New Gay Bible Prevents Homophobic Misinterpretation of Key Verses; Titled The Queen J

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

Abiding

Guest
#2
:eek:Dunty im afraid to look will you hold my hand
 

DuntyMolly

Junior Member
May 5, 2009
27
3
3
#3
Sure thing, only if you interpret it as a "loving"action. :cool:
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#4
The following statement includes everything good I can say about this new venture:
 
Sep 13, 2012
619
1
0
#5
this thread doesn't even need to exist,
 
D

dmdave17

Guest
#6
this thread doesn't even need to exist,
Amen! I'm just curious how they get around "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (Leviticus 18:22, KJV)

God bless us all.
 
I

Indubitably

Guest
#7
Enough wisdom has been applied in all the above threads. I doubt if it will hit the best seller list.
 

shrimp

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2011
1,188
39
48
#8
Well, if anything was changed or taken out, then they will be held accountable before God.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#10
Amen! I'm just curious how they get around "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (Leviticus 18:22, KJV)

God bless us all.
I cheated, I looked at the website. They add that you can't do it in the temple of Moloch, implying, I assume, that it's okay anywhere else.
 
T

truth81

Guest
#11
Wow like all the others chopping up G-ds word to suit their belief. I beleve we are told to love all ppl regardless of what they do as we have all sinned however the truth of the matter comes first and foremost.

So a sexual sin whether it be Adultery, Pornography. lust. homosexuality and the like are one and the same.
Bit shocked that someone could read the Bible than chop it up and be ok with it. Liars!
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#13
I cheated, I looked at the website. They add that you can't do it in the temple of Moloch, implying, I assume, that it's okay anywhere else.
oh wow.....serious?
oh....wow.
gulp.

 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#14

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#15
lol the kjv is the only one...oh you...
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#16


Just another counterfeit bible that Satan is using in an attempt to get rid of God's true, perfect, inerrant, and infallible word which is the King James Holy Bible.

Stick with the Old King James Bible. That old precious and blessed Book :)
English Standard Version (©2001)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.

Holman Christian Standard Bible (©2009)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.

International Standard Version (©2012)
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken later about another day.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

ERROR IN KJV
 

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,083
190
63
#17
English Standard Version (©2001)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.

Holman Christian Standard Bible (©2009)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.

International Standard Version (©2012)
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken later about another day.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

ERROR IN KJV
If the name Yahshua (spelling variable) from Hebrew was changed to Jesus via greek to english... it actually is then correct/acceptable by their standards to use the name Jesus here for Joshua in line with the change of the name etc....

I believe there is a "conspiracy" behind the removal of Yahvah God and Yahshua the Messiah's name being changed anyhow and this stands out maybe for a different reason...

interesting thank you for bringing this up even if it had a different outcome for me.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#18
If the name Yahshua (spelling variable) from Hebrew was changed to Jesus via greek to english... it actually is then correct/acceptable by their standards to use the name Jesus here for Joshua in line with the change of the name etc....

I believe there is a "conspiracy" behind the removal of Yahvah God and Yahshua the Messiah's name being changed anyhow and this stands out maybe for a different reason...

interesting thank you for bringing this up even if it had a different outcome for me.
hi loveme:)
the Gospel went out to all the nations of the world.
the NT is written in Koine Greek for a reason.
by ordination of God, Messiah's Name would be taught also in it's Greek variant, and clearly was.

John 19
The Crucifixion

So they took Jesus, 17and he went out, bearing his own cross, to the place called The Place of a Skull, which in Aramaic is called Golgotha. 18There they crucified him, and with him two others, one on either side, and Jesus between them. 19Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.” 20Many of the Jews read this inscription, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Aramaic, in Latin, and in Greek. 21So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but rather, ‘This man said, I am King of the Jews.’” 22Pilate answered, “What I have written I have written.”

and in every other nation the languages of the gentiles, they heard the Name of the Messiah (Acts 2)

Joshua in Spanish: José / Josué (no direct translation of names in Spanish):)
Jesus in Spanish: Jesús (we know they pronounce J with an H)
in Greek: Iēsous

English is a known human language:)

i don't think there is a conspiracy to change the Name of Messiah:)
if anything, it might be coming from the 'sacred name' groups.
love zone
 
Last edited:

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#19
English Standard Version (©2001)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.

Holman Christian Standard Bible (©2009)
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.

International Standard Version (©2012)
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken later about another day.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

ERROR IN KJV

No Zone. That is not an error in the KJV. There are absolutely No Errors in the KJV. It is God's perfect and inerrant word. You may want to take a look at this site. William Kinney does a fantastic job of showing why Jesus in Hebrews 4:8 is not an error. Below is the given link:

Heb 4:8 Jesus or Joshua? - Another King James Bible Believer