Remarriage Bibically

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#21
Her is where I have a problem as in my understanding. When things are talked about like tithing, or Sabbath I hear we are not under the law. Yet on this subject people go back to OT scripture to David to justify their stance. As for the woman at the well Jesus told her she has had 5 husbands and the one she was with now was not hers. Could it be that they were not married at all or that he was telling her that the husband she has now is not hers? Either way he was letting her know she was doing something unlawful in God's eyes.
Is David not part of the Bible and even a writer thereof? Some will look at the OT indeed and it is still useful for gleaning a little wisdom. So therefore, an OT example to consider alongside the NT example for this topic. Notice how the principle is even the same of mercy. As for the woman at the well, indeed she had 5 husbands, and had yet not a husband. I agree it seems that would mean her remarriages are not legitimate. However, even she herself had said she had no husband, though she had five as Jesus pointed out, but Jesus said she answered well. The main point is Jesus offer her a solution of mercy and indeed prove himself of great wisdom, even as water drawn from a well and good food set before the whole town.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#22
Technically I concede that you are correct; however I believe that the teaching that we are not under law but under grace is more important in some cases.

When Jesus spoke those words, He was addressing unsaved Pharisees who were perverting the Law and adding impossible demands. Besides which the Law was given to show people that they are unable to please God in their own efforts.

Rom 6:14-15
14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
KJV



1 Cor 6:12
12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
KJV

1 Cor 10:23
23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.
KJV


Some husbands are abusive in spite of the fact that they are told to love their wives in a self sacrificing way.

Some wives are abusive to both husband and children.

Sometimes when a person feels the need to choose between two kinds of disobedience; it is not our job to judge them.
Yeah, but look at Iwant's title and then his post. He's not talking about whether anyone is okay to marry again. He's talking about if it's okay to REmarry -- as in marry the same person again. It's really not okay to marry your old spouse again.

He's specific. He's not addressing all divorced people.

At least, that's what I'm seeing. Did I miss something? (I am so thankful I'm asking that of you, Marc, because you've seen enough evidence from me to know I do miss some things, and you know me enough to not take that as snarky. lol)
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#23
No we are no longer under the law as Jesus himself was telling them because they were asking something according to the law. This was not just told to the Pharisees but also in the sermon on the mount Matt 5:35 which was addresses to all that were there. So I ask you again how can what Jesus called unlawful become lawful because of grace?
Okay, I'm lost (officially.) I didn't get your last line. It might be because I'm not so into the whole "we are no longer under the law" thing as much as most get into that. (I do think Jesus fulfilled the law, so when we follow him and cling to him we are keeping the law just by keeping with Jesus. We're still not doing it perfectly, and doing it imperfectly is breaking it, so it can't save us, but because the law is God's will/personality/who he is in great detail by following him and letting him work his will into us, we are doing it, not simply dismissing it. So maybe that's why I don't get your last sentence.) Any chance you can clarify what you mean so I can understand better?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#24
What are we attempting to accommodate? Remarriage or divorce?

Question: If divorce required one to live alone and never remarry would that have an influence on the divorce rate? Would that cause folks to consider more carefully the matter of marriage in the first place?

Marriage in biblical times were not as they are today. Most were arranged and were seldom for love. This is a matter that calls for wisdom and compassion towards those who are effected by it.

I cannot argue against divorce if it involves abuse or infidelity. I am hard pressed to argue against remarriage by sincere committed Christians.

Surely sins before salvation continue to have consequences for the duration of ones life on this earth. Sins are forgiven but not all the consequences are rectified just because someone got saved. Only when we are glorified together with Christ will all the consequences of sin be completely and eternally rectified. All of creation groans together awaiting the consummation of the world.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
S

shotgunner

Guest
#25
Jesus totally addressed it in Matthew 19:1-12. Please let me know what you find there ok.
Yes, but you have to understand that Jesus was correcting a particular situation of the Pharisees who would marry or divorce as a matter of law, using the law as an excuse to commit adultery. Jesus is explaining that marriage is spiritual and not just a matter of law.

Even so all sin can be forgiven. I find it incredibly hypocritical that we place divorced people under the burden of sin that can never be forgiven. It seems that some churches will more readily accept an ex murderer or child molester than a divorced man.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#26
Yes, but you have to understand that Jesus was correcting a particular situation of the Pharisees who would marry or divorce as a matter of law, using the law as an excuse to commit adultery. Jesus is explaining that marriage is spiritual and not just a matter of law.

Even so all sin can be forgiven. I find it incredibly hypocritical that we place divorced people under the burden of sin that can never be forgiven. It seems that some churches will more readily accept an ex murderer or child molester than a divorced man.
Good point... and the issue is SURELY <imo> worth examining more closely... and when does a murderer become and EX murderer??? I don't think you meant it to be like the crime is a vocation... right? But marriage IS a vocation and how a person conducts themselves as a professing Christian in that arena IS important... dontchya think?
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
#27
No we are no longer under the law as Jesus himself was telling them because they were asking something according to the law. This was not just told to the Pharisees but also in the sermon on the mount Matt 5:35 which was addresses to all that were there. So I ask you again how can what Jesus called unlawful become lawful because of grace?

When unlawful abuse provokes unlawful divorce neither you nor I are in a position to judge the outcome.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#28
When unlawful abuse provokes unlawful divorce neither you nor I are in a position to judge the outcome.
Perhaps you could elaborate? We are instructed to judge ALL THINGS so how does abuse and divorce become removed issues?
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
#29
Yeah, but look at Iwant's title and then his post. He's not talking about whether anyone is okay to marry again. He's talking about if it's okay to REmarry -- as in marry the same person again. It's really not okay to marry your old spouse again.

He's specific. He's not addressing all divorced people.

At least, that's what I'm seeing. Did I miss something? (I am so thankful I'm asking that of you, Marc, because you've seen enough evidence from me to know I do miss some things, and you know me enough to not take that as snarky. lol)
Lynn,

It is my understanding that he is using remarry to mean enter a second marriage (with anyone).

I read through his OP again and I still have the same impression.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
#30
Perhaps you could elaborate? We are instructed to judge ALL THINGS so how does abuse and divorce become removed issues?
As I understand it, we are instructed to διακρίνω discern (evaluate) all things.
We are told
not to κρίνω judge (try at law, condemn or punish.

Matt 7:1-2
7 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
KJV


Both types of judgement get translated as judge but they are different words.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#31
As I understand it, we are instructed to διακρίνω discern (evaluate) all things.
We are told
not to κρίνω judge (try at law, condemn or punish.

Matt 7:1-2
7 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
KJV


Both types of judgement get translated as judge but they are different words.
I am aware of the words and their distinct meanings.... I do however WHOLLY disagree that trying at law, condemning or punishing is instructed as NOT permissible for Christians to participate in and or execute.
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#32
Thank You for your honesty regarding the woman at the well reference.... I agree it is worth looking at closer.
1) she was a SAMARIAN not a Jew
2) Jesus said she had had 5 husbands so apparently she was married 5 times
3) Jesus agreed with her that the man she was with WAS NOT HER HUSBAND... which does allude to her NOT being married to him... he didn't say..."go marry him" or "go leave him"... he said "go and sin no more" leaving the scenario OPEN in terms of how to use the passage for instruction in righteousness... and I think then it becomes necessary to judiciously use other scriptures to filter any given scenario about re-marriage "lawfulness".
Why is everyone saying that Jesus told the woman at the well with the previous five husbands to "Go and Sin no more" He never told the woman at the well this statement. Jesus told a woman and a man to "Go and sin no more". That woman was the woman caught in adultery and they were going to stone her for it, and the man was who was lame for 38 years waiting for the moving of the water to be healed. Jesus never said to the woman at the well to "Go and sin no more".
This is just for your information.

^i^ Responding to post # 20
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
#33
Why is everyone saying that Jesus told the woman at the well with the previous five husbands to "Go and Sin no more" He never told the woman at the well this statement. Jesus told a woman and a man to "Go and sin no more". That woman was the woman caught in adultery and they were going to stone her for it, and the man was who was lame for 38 years waiting for the moving of the water to be healed. Jesus never said to the woman at the well to "Go and sin no more".
This is just for your information.

^i^ Responding to post # 20
You are correct Dave... in point 3 I did combine Adulterous woman and Samarian woman in error... because I didn't check the scripture and went with leading comment. Thank you for noticing and POINTING IT OUT!
 
V

VioletReigns

Guest
#34
oops... sorry
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#35
What are we attempting to accommodate? Remarriage or divorce?

Question: If divorce required one to live alone and never remarry would that have an influence on the divorce rate? Would that cause folks to consider more carefully the matter of marriage in the first place?

Marriage in biblical times were not as they are today. Most were arranged and were seldom for love. This is a matter that calls for wisdom and compassion towards those who are effected by it.

I cannot argue against divorce if it involves abuse or infidelity. I am hard pressed to argue against remarriage by sincere committed Christians.

Surely sins before salvation continue to have consequences for the duration of ones life on this earth. Sins are forgiven but not all the consequences are rectified just because someone got saved. Only when we are glorified together with Christ will all the consequences of sin be completely and eternally rectified. All of creation groans together awaiting the consummation of the world.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
It is written that we are ONE with Him, So if Jesus lives in me then i am together (ONE) with Him. And it is because of Him in me, giving me His Strength and Power to overcome EVERY temptation, that all consequences of sin is completely rectified. Even as if HE told me to "Go and sin no more". There is no sin that a person does that they can't cease from, be prepared to answer for yourself on Judgement Day, why you did not cease from it. Is it not written to get rid of the sin that so easily besets us? Yes, that is instructed to all Christians. Jesus and i are ONE. Now if i knowingly and willingly choose to commit a sin, than i have altogether DENIED His Strength and Power to overcome that temptation. How will this generation escape His wrath that is going to come upon the whole Earth because of sin.

^i^ responding to post # 24
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#36
You are correct Dave... in point 3 I did combine Adulterous woman and Samarian woman in error... because I didn't check the scripture and went with leading comment. Thank you for noticing and POINTING IT OUT!
You are most welcome. And may the Lord Bless you, not because what you say here, or to me, but may He Bless you because you have a teachable Spirit, which is a rare thing among the last days generation. Continue to seek the Truth, and it shall find you.

^i^ responding to post # 33
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#37
Why is everyone saying that Jesus told the woman at the well with the previous five husbands to "Go and Sin no more" He never told the woman at the well this statement. Jesus told a woman and a man to "Go and sin no more". That woman was the woman caught in adultery and they were going to stone her for it, and the man was who was lame for 38 years waiting for the moving of the water to be healed. Jesus never said to the woman at the well to "Go and sin no more".
This is just for your information.

^i^ Responding to post # 20
You're right, my bad, I mentioned it first not BarlyGurl, post #12. Still though he did not condemn the woman or make her divorce or any of that in both stories woman at the well and saving the adultress from being stoned. It is a good story and lesson for the topic. We don't have to have the divorce or the remarriage stuff to learn from Jesus.
 

iwant2serve

Senior Member
Apr 12, 2009
513
28
28
#38
Okay, I'm lost (officially.) I didn't get your last line. It might be because I'm not so into the whole "we are no longer under the law" thing as much as most get into that. (I do think Jesus fulfilled the law, so when we follow him and cling to him we are keeping the law just by keeping with Jesus. We're still not doing it perfectly, and doing it imperfectly is breaking it, so it can't save us, but because the law is God's will/personality/who he is in great detail by following him and letting him work his will into us, we are doing it, not simply dismissing it. So maybe that's why I don't get your last sentence.) Any chance you can clarify what you mean so I can understand better?
What I mean in the last line is this. If God said something is wrong or we enter into a agreement that was unlawful as he said remarriage with no fornication is adultery. Does asking God to forgive the second union become ok to continue in it because of grace?
 

iwant2serve

Senior Member
Apr 12, 2009
513
28
28
#39
When unlawful abuse provokes unlawful divorce neither you nor I are in a position to judge the outcome.
No matter what or how we try to bet around it This is what Jesus said. We tend to want to make extra excuses for allowing it. Do you know that even in America you were not granted a divorce unless you had proof that your souse cheated or some kind of abuses was taking place? I want to stay biblical though so can we change the bible because we want something that will make us happy?
 

iwant2serve

Senior Member
Apr 12, 2009
513
28
28
#40
Let me ask this way. If two people get married and they are the same sex, then get saved can they now have a union honored by God?
If yes why
If no why?