The MOST CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENT MADE

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#21
Go study the word saves from the Greek and no offence, but a Catholic believes in the water (sprinkling) which is also contrary to the actual act of IMMERSION
Ah...so I'm being legalistic, but your legalistic definition of baptism isn't legalism? Funny...very funny
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#22
"...when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 3:20-21).

In other words, baptism saves you but not for the putting away the filth of the flesh (i.e. sin), but as an answer of a good conscience toward God. This is a "like figure" (i.e. parallel) of how Noah and his family (i.e. the eight souls within the Ark) were saved from the Global Flood. However, Noah already found grace in the eyes of the Lord before building the Ark. Noah already had grace and was saved before building the Ark; Just as Abraham believed God and he accounted to him as righteousness.

See, your works don't save you. God does not weigh your good deeds and your bad deeds. Nor does God save you by what you do, either. God saves you by His mercy and by the washing and regeneration of the Holy Ghost (Titus 3:5). THEN.....

After the transformation (Like a caterpillar turning into a butterfly), will works follow because it is God doing the work thru that person. They are transformed and are saved and they KNOW IT. There is no question of their salvation because the Spirit confirms they are saved.

Anyways, I hope this helps, my friend.
You do realize those that baptism saves you because of the action of God, not because of your action of obedience. Also, what action does God do? What does God give to man through this baptism? Shall we call it grace, because it is grace that saves us?

So...
a. Baptism Saves
b. Because of a bestowing of grace by God and not of the work of human hands

Who believes this?
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#23
Can anyone show biblical scripture where any of the twelve were immersed in water?
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,367
2,443
113
#24
Then explain Peter's comment that "baptism...now saves us."
Thomist,
I think you'll be able to understand contextual issues better just as soon as...
well...
just as soon as you stop being catholic.

: )
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#26
Yah it's really important to read the context in which baptism is put for each part of scripture. A key part of it as has been posted before on what 'save' means.

It is not always about deliverance from sins in being given eternal life. Sometimes it is just getting through a hard trial or being taken out of a destructive situation.

There is also salvaging your life to God after salvation which is also put in the bible- salvaging talents.

Then you also get the likes of in John- being 'born of water and the spirit'- this is water of the WOMB[/QUOTE]

Totally agree with this for sure....most who teach water for salvation misapply this verse as well unto baptism failing to see the obvious context.........!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#27
Ah...so I'm being legalistic, but your legalistic definition of baptism isn't legalism? Funny...very funny
No, my definition of baptism is based upon the GREEK WORD and what it means.....Not my fault false religions took the Greek word and TRANSLITERATED the word with ENGLISH letters.....

BAPTIZO=DIP or IMMERSE
RANTIZO=SPRINKLE<--------NEVER USED in connection with IMMERSION

JOHN THE DIPPER...not JOHN the sprinkling CATHOLIC!

LOOSE your pride and accept truth...it will set you free from your heretical religion...NO OFFENCE MEANT!
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#28
Don't forget the thief on the cross.

They will say that he must have been baptized by John in order to understand what was happening and to ask Jesus what He did. But if Baptized by John and many believe that you cannot sin after baptism, then why was he a thief and killed for it?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#29
They will say that he must have been baptized by John in order to understand what was happening and to ask Jesus what He did. But if Baptized by John and many believe that you cannot sin after baptism, then why was he a thief and killed for it?
I say that the bible states clearly that no murderer hath eternal life dwelling in him...the thief was being put to death for thievery and murder....he could not have been saved and or immersed before he met Jesus on the cross that day....they will also say that he is an example of salvation under the O.T. and I say...The law and the prophets were until John....John was dead and gone...Jesus had called forth his church...spoken of in the present tense twice at least and is an example of biblical salvation without immersion as IMMERSION has nothing to do with it......
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#30
You do realize those that baptism saves you because of the action of God, not because of your action of obedience. Also, what action does God do? What does God give to man through this baptism? Shall we call it grace, because it is grace that saves us?

So...
a. Baptism Saves
b. Because of a bestowing of grace by God and not of the work of human hands
Please slow down and re-read what I wrote. For if you were to read what I had written, you would see that Scripture is saying you are not saved in baptism in regards to the filth of the flesh; I.e. sin.

Who believes this?
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!
You say that like it is supposed to impress me. What about Jesus or the Holy Spirit? In other words, you are not giving true credit where credit is due. For no man can lay any other foundation but Christ. For Christ is the Rock.
 
Last edited:
K

Kerry

Guest
#31
I say that the bible states clearly that no murderer hath eternal life dwelling in him...the thief was being put to death for thievery and murder....he could not have been saved and or immersed before he met Jesus on the cross that day....they will also say that he is an example of salvation under the O.T. and I say...The law and the prophets were until John....John was dead and gone...Jesus had called forth his church...spoken of in the present tense twice at least and is an example of biblical salvation without immersion as IMMERSION has nothing to do with it......
Look at what the thief said, we deserve our punishment but this man has done nothing wrong, Lord (that the key) when you come in to your Kingdom( exemplified faith) remember me. Jesus said to the thief " today you will be with me in Paradise".

Jesus will accept you just as you are it is your faith that is key and not water. This thing is debunked and has been debunked for 100 years, But people will cling to their sacred cow no matter what.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
#32
You know...for those who teach a watered down salvation and the ones who trust into baptism as part of their salvation explain the following....

IF BAPTISM IS NECESSARY FOR SALVATION THEN WHY DID PAUL SAY....

I THANK GOD I BAPTIZED NONE OF YOU but Crispus and Gaius.....1st Corinthians 1:14

This man wrote almost HALF of the N.T. and IF BAPTISM WAS CRITICAL to SALVATION then this has got to be the most controversial statement in the bible and he must have been off of his rocker to pen that statement!

It is also the most anti-evangelistic statement in the scriptures if BAPTISM is NECESSARY....

GOD said...WHEN I SEE THE BLOOD I WILL PASS OVER YOU........

HE DID NOT SAY.....WHEN I SEE THE BLOOD, WATER AND WORKS I WILL PASS OVER YOU!

IF BAPTISM was necessary...PAUL WOULD HAVE BEEN IMMERSING EVERYBODY that he could get HIS HANDS ON as his hearts desire was to win everyone to the truth and eternal life!
anyone with half a brain would understand there was contention in the church and some were forming cliques ..Paul wanted no part of it...that is why he said it...
[SUP]11 [/SUP]For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

[SUP]14 [/SUP]I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

[SUP]16 [/SUP]And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
[SUP]17 [/SUP]For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

he is not speaking against baptism but against division... look at vs 13....three questions which all ties the believer to Christ....(1)... is Christ divided?...no...(2).... was Paul crucified for you?...no... (3)... were you baptised in the name of Paul?...no...If baptism was not as important as ....the unity in Christ and the crucifixion of Christ...do you think Paul would have asked ...were you baptised in the name of Paul?
 
P

phil112

Guest
#33
You know...for those who teach a watered down salvation and the ones who trust into baptism as part of their salvation explain the following....

IF BAPTISM IS NECESSARY FOR SALVATION THEN WHY DID PAUL SAY....

I THANK GOD I BAPTIZED NONE OF YOU but Crispus and Gaius.....1st Corinthians 1:14.....................................
Those that believe water baptism must be done to be saved simply don't understand scripture. Not only are they not ready for "strong meat", they're choking on milk. We are following an example set by Christ. Did Christ get baptized so HE would be saved? We do it for the same reason, so why did He do it?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#34
anyone with half a brain would understand there was contention in the church and some were forming cliques ..Paul wanted no part of it...that is why he said it...
[SUP]11 [/SUP]For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

[SUP]14 [/SUP]I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

[SUP]16 [/SUP]And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
[SUP]17 [/SUP]For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

he is not speaking against baptism but against division... look at vs 13....three questions which all ties the believer to Christ....(1)... is Christ divided?...no...(2).... was Paul crucified for you?...no... (3)... were you baptised in the name of Paul?...no...If baptism was not as important as ....the unity in Christ and the crucifixion of Christ...do you think Paul would have asked ...were you baptised in the name of Paul?
Love the personal attack on my intelligence....go read everything written in the post and then come mouth...and no matter as baptism has nothing to do with biblical salvation......! SO keep trusting your water instead of the blood and see where it takes you!
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
#35
I'm not going against what you believe about baptism and salvation by saying this but I think Pauls statement is being misunderstood here. I think what he is saying I'm glad I didn't baptise you because they would have said "I am of Paul" which Paul would of hated.

What do you think?
very good reasoning....he said it in vs 15
[SUP]14 [/SUP]I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#36
Those that believe water baptism must be done to be saved simply don't understand scripture. Not only are they not ready for "strong meat", they're choking on milk. We are following an example set by Christ. Did Christ get baptized so HE would be saved? We do it for the same reason, so why did He do it?
Amen and as an Identifier....Jesus was already the son of God by birth (Holy Spirit) and came to be identified as such by the outward testimony of who he was and is inwardly....It is our public profession of an inward conversion...it identifies us with God and disassociates us from the guilty world. Just like Peter compares it to the flood...the water did not save NOAH, but rather separated him from the world that perished....THE ARK covered within and without with PITCH (picture of the blood) is what saved Noah and his family....not the WATER.....!

Score one for Phil....when are u gonna get a real chain saw HAHHAHAH STIHL for me the whole way :)
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#37
The Father drew me to the Son by the work of the Holy Spirit. I responded by faith.

I was an alcoholic. Overnight I was delivered from alcohol.

I was into porn. Bam. It was gone.

My life changed radically. The peace that passes all understanding and the joy of The Lord was mine. My stress and anxiety was gone.

I knew I was lost but now I am saved. I just didn't know that my sins were not forgiven yet according to many.

I spent the next 9 months winning souls to Christ. I had no idea that I was deceiving them by telling them that their sins would be forgiven and new life would be theirs by trusting in Jesus.

I finally got baptized. It was a blessing. But I didn't feel any cleaner than I already felt.

Now my question is this. If I had died before I hit the water, would I have gone to hell? Well if I had, that last 9 months of my life was the most exciting and awesome time of my life. I was head over heals in love with Jesus and witnessing to a lost world, by the power of the Holy Spirit, His eternal truths, His gospel of forgiveness and salvation.

So I guess I was saved and preaching salvation by grace, His mercy, His forgiveness, but if the truth be told, I just wasn't forgiven yet. Sins not remitted. Hell to pay...as it were. Bummer!
 
Last edited:
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
#38
Love the personal attack on my intelligence....go read everything written in the post and then come mouth...and no matter as baptism has nothing to do with biblical salvation......! SO keep trusting your water instead of the blood and see where it takes you!
what intelligence???you attack the word of God I take offence...I read your post and it is way out of context....I explained why he said what he said...vs 15 explains why he said it.....but you choose vs 14 to start a thread against baptism....and call that intelligence....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#39
what intelligence???you attack the word of God I take offence...I read your post and it is way out of context....I explained why he said what he said...vs 15 explains why he said it.....but you choose vs 14 to start a thread against baptism....and call that intelligence....
Keep mouthing and trusting into your watered down blood and see where it gets you dude....The statement stands regardless of your rejection of truth....!
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#40
Ding Ding Ding this round is go to your corners and refresh and then com back out.