Wow!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

Consumed

Guest
#21
Hey doc, post up the link to "synagogue of Satan" great time line, that laid it all out
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#23
The Jesuits own the 'Skull & Bones' secret society. The Skull & Bones society is Freemason. Freemasonry overlaps and is controlled by the Illuminati. IN OTHER WORDS - THE BLACK POPE/JESUIT IS THE OWNER IN CHARGE OF THE ILLUMINATI, WHICH ALSO NOW OWNS THE GOVERNMENT!

The US Government is a puppet with the Jesuits (Vatican) pulling the strings! (New World Order)
Wow, while I knew you and I disagreed theologically, I didn't think you'd be into the conspiracy theory bit too. Come on, do you honestly believe that? Why do you swallow hook line and sinker every crazy story about the Jesuits or us Catholics, but when we point to the actual sources and documents of these groups you ignore them. Is it really Christian to bear false witness about what we believe?
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#25
Wow, while I knew you and I disagreed theologically, I didn't think you'd be into the conspiracy theory bit too. Come on, do you honestly believe that? Why do you swallow hook line and sinker every crazy story about the Jesuits or us Catholics, but when we point to the actual sources and documents of these groups you ignore them. Is it really Christian to bear false witness about what we believe?
Dcherck I respect you, catholic no prob, you love Jesus, good enough for me. Jesus said to discern the times we live in. Check the link out, have a read, you got nothing to fear or lose by doing so. You don't know til you check it yourself.

 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#26
Dcherck I respect you, catholic no prob, you love Jesus, good enough for me. Jesus said to discern the times we live in. Check the link out, have a read, you got nothing to fear or lose by doing so. You don't know til you check it yourself.

Considering the fact that the guy posting it somehow believes that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is credible, and that 9/11 is a massive government conspiracy in the face of all rational evidence, why should I bother?
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#27
Wow, while I knew you and I disagreed theologically, I didn't think you'd be into the conspiracy theory bit too. Come on, do you honestly believe that? Why do you swallow hook line and sinker every crazy story about the Jesuits or us Catholics, but when we point to the actual sources and documents of these groups you ignore them. Is it really Christian to bear false witness about what we believe?
Gonna start giving you +1's every time you say the buzzwords...

"I didn't think you'd be into the conspiracy theory bit too."

BuzZ bUzZ!!

+2

You cant intimidate Christians by foisting the buzzwords on us buddy. EVERYONE knows things aint right!

Everyone in the real world that is who arn't trapped in cults.

Does the RCC have a dogma yet on 9-11?

Has Pope wassisface officially said it was done by 12 arabs (of undetermined nationality) with rusty exacto knives? Amazingly how those tiny knives can cut through huge steel core columns.

LOLZ!

Admit it...yer just a coincidence theorist.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#28
Considering the fact that the guy posting it somehow believes that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is credible
Produce evidence of this accusation or retract.

One of the two.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#29
Considering the fact that the guy posting it somehow believes that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is credible, and that 9/11 is a massive government conspiracy in the face of all rational evidence, why should I bother?
Bro, that aside read it, it's quiet extensive and you can cross reference any part you don't agree with and make your own conclusions.

Hey can I ask you dscherk, you believe JFK was killed by that magic bullet when photogragic evidence shows half his face getting blown off from the side?? Just a question
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#31
Bro, that aside read it, it's quiet extensive and you can cross reference any part you don't agree with and make your own conclusions.

Hey can I ask you dscherk, you believe JFK was killed by that magic bullet when photogragic evidence shows half his face getting blown off from the side?? Just a question
To the second part, yes. look up hydrostatic shock.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#33
Very telling that you dont wanna post the actual quote:

Doc:

Whats the difference if their fake or real?

They are being followed to the letter.


You said I believe the protocols are credible.

I said I dont know if they are fake or real.

Are you gonna retract your statement?
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#34
Very telling that you dont wanna post the actual quote:

Doc:

Whats the difference if their fake or real?

They are being followed to the letter.


You said I believe the protocols are credible.

I said I dont know if they are fake or real.

Are you gonna retract your statement?
They are being followed to the letter.

Seems to me that you believe that they are credible in the sense that some group is using them to orchestrate power. So, no I will not retract my statement.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#35
I think we know who you are now.

You admit yourself the jesuit order was made to counter the reformation.

Your 'revised' and 'for public consumption' oath has nothing in it about the goals of the order.

Not believable. Sorry.

But keep trying really hard to cover for the murderous Jesuit order. It will help to get all the information out there. The more you attempt to cover them the more they, and you, will be exposed.
I din't say that their main purpose in their founding was to counter the Reformation, I said that became their main purpose. They were founded to teach the poor, they were and still are a teaching order. But they are also great missionaries and were sent to areas in the third world where Protestant missionaries also were, and thus they became proficient at combating Protestantism in those areas.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#36
They are being followed to the letter.

Seems to me that you believe that they are credible in the sense that some group is using them to orchestrate power. So, no I will not retract my statement.
Then you are being dishonest.

The word credible is never used in that sense.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#37
I din't say that their main purpose in their founding was to counter the Reformation, I said that became their main purpose. They were founded to teach the poor, they were and still are a teaching order. But they are also great missionaries and were sent to areas in the third world where Protestant missionaries also were, and thus they became proficient at combating Protestantism in those areas.
Oh ok you wanna do this?

We'll start with WIKI and see where we take this.

In fulfilling the mission of the Formula of the Institute of the Society, the first Jesuits concentrated on a few key activities. First, they founded schools throughout Europe. Jesuit teachers were rigorously trained in both classical studies and theology, and their schools reflected this. Second, they sent out missionaries across the globe to evangelize those peoples who had not yet heard the Gospel, founding missions in widely diverse regions, such as modern-day Paraguay, Japan, Ontario, and Ethiopia. Finally, they aimed to stop Protestantism from spreading and to preserve communion with Rome and the successor of Peter.

LINK: Society of Jesus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seems like the first Jeuits aimed to stop protestantism from spreading in order to fulfill the mission of the Formula of the Institute of the Society of Jesus.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#38
Awaiting lawyeristic spin.....5...4....3....2.......
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#39
The Council of Trent (1545-1563) was where the Roman Catholic Church codified their position against what they perceived as Protestant "heresies" and finally specified in writing positional statements for Catholic doctine on salvation, the sacraments, and the Biblical canon (Papal infallibility wasn't invoked as official church dogma until the First Vatican Council started in 1868 though it had been around for some time). Council of Trent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now the Jesuits (e.g. Society of Jesus) were approved by Pope Paul III in 1540 by the bull containing the Formula of the Institute. Yes the Society participated in the Counter-Reformation but only AFTER the Council of Trent had concluded and the Roman Catholic Church's position made known. They were not formed for that purpose, though they certainly did engage in it after the conclusion of the Council of Trent.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#40
The Council of Trent (1545-1563) was where the Roman Catholic Church codified their position against what they perceived as Protestant "heresies" and finally specified in writing positional statements for Catholic doctine on salvation, the sacraments, and the Biblical canon (Papal infallibility wasn't invoked as official church dogma until the First Vatican Council started in 1868 though it had been around for some time). Council of Trent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now the Jesuits (e.g. Society of Jesus) were approved by Pope Paul III in 1540 by the bull containing the Formula of the Institute. Yes the Society participated in the Counter-Reformation but only AFTER the Council of Trent had concluded and the Roman Catholic Church's position made known. They were not formed for that purpose, though they certainly did engage in it after the conclusion of the Council of Trent.
So what yer saying is.....because the Catholic church didnt MAKE KNOWN her position on Protestant heresies until after the Jesuits were approved...THAT means that the Jesuits were not formed for that purpose???

And you would like us to swallow that camel with what kind of beverage?