-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
how is it judging? could it not be the fact ? and what was the reason the last President allowed those with serious mental issues join? most transgender suffer from a form of PTSD, and other issue where they take heavy mind altering drugs . those who are not transgender and suffer from this are Disqualified from Military service did you know that ? don't hear them crying about it .
D
Really? "Reassignment" surgery is vastly expensive, and never covered under health insurance. Do you think it's an accident that suddenly lots of men AND women are signing up and then going for that surgery? Even the HRT is expensive and not covered if it's purely to put more testosterone in a woman's system or more estrogen to put in a man's system. There's a reason for that. It's dangerous, so is a lawsuit waiting to happen. It's just that the PC Police won't let anyone say that out loud.
Personally, I think it's permissible to judge harshly where life and death on a grand scale are at stake.
The move to allow transgenders in the military and provide them with surgery had nothing to do with growing the military or sharpening military efficiency and everything to do with social engineering. Not acceptable.
The move to allow transgenders in the military and provide them with surgery had nothing to do with growing the military or sharpening military efficiency and everything to do with social engineering. Not acceptable.
D
Actually, we do have homosexual rights now. What couldn't be passed through legislation was passed through court decisions. and just like Roe V. Wade it has become the law of the land. Homosexuals really do have the right to cohabited and be considered with all the rights and privileges of any other marriage -- common law or legal marriage. If cohabiting for X number of years, the spouse does make medical decisions as needed, does get the benefits, if the other spouse dies, and gets the joys of the legal system deciding who gets what when the relationship is over. And, yes, it is no longer court-martialable to be openly homosexual in the military. It's still court-maritialable to be having sex while on duty though. (That's been part of the regs since... I don't know when. lol)
It's the extra-rights being argued now. The "right" to get a cake and flowers from whomever they want, the right to be married in a church, the right to adopt kids, and the right to live in a state that doesn't count homosexual marriage yet, however the couple is already married in another state.
They won the big battles. Now they're after their icing with their cake.
3%ers won again.
It's the extra-rights being argued now. The "right" to get a cake and flowers from whomever they want, the right to be married in a church, the right to adopt kids, and the right to live in a state that doesn't count homosexual marriage yet, however the couple is already married in another state.
They won the big battles. Now they're after their icing with their cake.
3%ers won again.
no they do not they have marriage rights by the State not all States adhere to gay marriage . roe v wade if it were over turned would just go back to the States who would allow abortions. a sexual preference do not have right's. per the Bill of Right's. the argument you are making in context to cakes LOl FYI they won over turned by the Courts . Churches to have the right not to preform a marriage ceremony for gay couples .
I think gender fluidity is an interesting concept, less cringeworthy than other things. What does the bible have to say about it? It doesn't because its a newly formed concept. Surely people should be allowed to not be judged by the physical flesh they live in. I'm not a homophobe like it appears some uneducated people on this thread are, although it doesn't mean I agree with it. I think it is better to be accepting of people rather than to suppress them.
Suppression is an evil in itself. How can you bring people into the light if you suppress them, and unwittingly push them into dark places, and into the wrong hands, and the wrong crowd. There are gays and there are gays, just like there are straight people and straight people, both capable of wicked things.
However it is easy for a Christian to scapegoat that which the bible appears to 'allow them' to. Of course forget about Jesus talking about love, forget about that one. Even the majority of Muslims are peaceful, but those who are not, or those that come from deprived nations (not real Muslims), do the same thing, they take context out of their holy book and use it for their own agenda 'against the wicked'. Often when people do that, they themselves are wicked. And it is wicked because it is without love, to be against 'an enemy'. Just like people might talk here. Say something loving for a change.
Suppression is an evil in itself. How can you bring people into the light if you suppress them, and unwittingly push them into dark places, and into the wrong hands, and the wrong crowd. There are gays and there are gays, just like there are straight people and straight people, both capable of wicked things.
However it is easy for a Christian to scapegoat that which the bible appears to 'allow them' to. Of course forget about Jesus talking about love, forget about that one. Even the majority of Muslims are peaceful, but those who are not, or those that come from deprived nations (not real Muslims), do the same thing, they take context out of their holy book and use it for their own agenda 'against the wicked'. Often when people do that, they themselves are wicked. And it is wicked because it is without love, to be against 'an enemy'. Just like people might talk here. Say something loving for a change.
D
Problem being a Pennsylvanian. By the time the primaries come, the decision was already made for us. (I say PA should have our primary the first Tuesday in November, the year before the election.) Problem with being a Philadelphian is there is no decision to be made. Democrats and more-spending win every time.
D
When your "right" includes paying massive legal fees to enforce those rights, it's no longer a right. Many churches in my denom have stopped marrying people in the churches to avoid the legal cost of defending "the right" not to marry someone. They really do have equal rights -- by force, but they have it.
