R
Lol, well that shows why Trump will win the nomination at least if this mentality prevails. The conservatives will take anyone, yet they cannot coalesce in agreement on that one. Lol also it seems to me the most constitutionalist though would want to vote for Rand Paul who is consistently, even annoyingly, invoking the US Constitution and actually does have plans and records in voting of working towards the approach you ascribe to, albeit without the war. Also lil Rand Paul has been the most vocal opponent of Trump in the debates, each and every one of them. It is kinda humorous to me knowing you are very anti-Paulite.
As for my opinion on Paul, I actually like him, if he were to rise in the polls and my good servant Kasich were to drop out before my primary rolls around I could be persuaded to vote Rand Paul over Trump if both hold somewhat the same to how they've been performing. I've watched all the GOP debates and even the Democrat debates. Even Bernie Sanders the supposed hippy communist was talking about all these plans for more war. Rand Paul is really the only candidate that I believe wants to end these wars and end funding, training, and giving weapons to Islamic rebels. So he has that going for him. Though I don't like how he is so obedient to the Constitution, I view the US Constitution as a hindrance at the least and an outright problem at the worst. How the US Constitution is at the least of it useless and at the worst of it allows and even empowers Islam is a good example indeed.
As for my opinion on Paul, I actually like him, if he were to rise in the polls and my good servant Kasich were to drop out before my primary rolls around I could be persuaded to vote Rand Paul over Trump if both hold somewhat the same to how they've been performing. I've watched all the GOP debates and even the Democrat debates. Even Bernie Sanders the supposed hippy communist was talking about all these plans for more war. Rand Paul is really the only candidate that I believe wants to end these wars and end funding, training, and giving weapons to Islamic rebels. So he has that going for him. Though I don't like how he is so obedient to the Constitution, I view the US Constitution as a hindrance at the least and an outright problem at the worst. How the US Constitution is at the least of it useless and at the worst of it allows and even empowers Islam is a good example indeed.
even then paul has been caught numerous times trying to have it both ways...which is why he has lost many of his father's supporters even though he is still the biggest libertarian in the primary...
i don't view the constitution as a hindrance at all...including in the conflict with radical islam...for one things sharia would be unconstitutional...so the constitution would be our defense against any attempt to impose sharia...do away with the constitution and you do away with the strongest political defense the church has...
what is the hindrance is when our leaders -ignore- the constitution or interpret its beyond far beyond the intent of the founders...something trump and cruz and paul do just as well as the democrats...