The Visual Nature of Men

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

hoss2576

Senior Member
May 10, 2014
552
23
18
#81
As someone who has no horse in this race, can I suggest you three take this argument out of the thread? As was noted, the proper thing would be to privately discuss this in PMs with each other, not in such an open forum. As it stands, there is about as much tact as a brillo pad being displayed. The original thread topic is no longer even being discussed. The rest of us seem to just be watching in befuddlement which is about all we can do.
 
G

GaryA

Guest
#82
​So um...blindfolds and...muzzles?
"Yes --- a blindfold for the men --- and a muzzle for the ... :eek: :p ;) Wait -- nevermind - I don't want to feed the fire too much... :eek:"

:)

Yes - this was really only intended to be funny. I couldn't resist. Please don't take it to be anything else.

:D
 
M

MissCris

Guest
#83
"Yes --- a blindfold for the men --- and a muzzle for the ... :eek: :p ;) Wait -- nevermind - I don't want to feed the fire too much... :eek:"

:)

Yes - this was really only intended to be funny. I couldn't resist. Please don't take it to be anything else.

:D
While I'm thrilled you found it funny, that's definitely Not what I meant.
 

Fenner

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2013
7,507
111
0
#84
As someone who has no horse in this race, can I suggest you three take this argument out of the thread? As was noted, the proper thing would be to privately discuss this in PMs with each other, not in such an open forum. As it stands, there is about as much tact as a brillo pad being displayed. The original thread topic is no longer even being discussed. The rest of us seem to just be watching in befuddlement which is about all we can do.


I'm watching because I like drama. ;)
 
Feb 18, 2013
1,294
26
0
#85
I still want to have the last word, and I still think it should be "taco".
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,315
16,302
113
69
Tennessee
#86
"Think what you will. That is O.K. --- you will understand on Judgment Day..."

Stilly said that, when a man looks at a woman's body, a perception / reaction occurs within the 'physiological' realm of his existance that may cascade into the 'psychological' / 'mental' / 'emotional' realms... ??? REALLY??? I missed that post...



I am not for blaming the opposite sex for "attraction or lust issues"; however, I am for helping the opposite sex better understand some things from the [ other ] perspective.



Your point about physiology is in error. In almost the same breath ( so to speak ), you have denied yourself by stating that what I said was false ( that women affect men on a physiological level through visual stimulus ) and the paragraph below:
What it the world is wrong to be attracted to members of the opposite sex? Of course, women can affect men on a physiological level through visual stimulus. If this were not true there would not be very many relationships formed. I don't 'get' this thread at all.
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#92
I´ll be back whenever I read what sort of stimuli a blind man can see when he "sees" a woman.

I have not idea what a bull feels when he sees cows, particularly when he knows that what it´s seen is what they wanted to let being seen.

It´s like todays war in Gaza and Israel, each part shows what they want to be believed. They need one another, particularly those workers who go to Israel for money, but these hate Israel´s economy or progress.

I wish I really knew what a cow feels when these could wear like these:

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-29.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-6.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-17.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-30.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-34.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-36.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-37.jpg

http://www.dogguie.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/moda-japonesa-40.jpg

http://www.geekologie.com/2007/05/30/japanese-eye-lashes.jpg

http://mlm-s1-p.mlstatic.com/lote-d...-hakata-doll-13341-MLM3383066306_112012-O.jpg
 
Last edited:
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#93
It´s evident what HUMAN nature is visual. just google what is in fashion in Japan (rare skirts), where men and women are wearing soft and light clothing you won´t believe...

I will not give you hyperlinks (that´s where your EYES could be at risk, by nature).
 
J

jer2911

Guest
#94
A quick reply. I'm about to sleep.

@GaryA and seoulsearch - both of you have a point.

@GaryA - I appreciate what GaryA mentiioned in detailed of men predicament re:
physical thing. As for me, i'm to naive of how deeply men struggled. Thanks GaryA for explaining it fully well. Now, I understand. And I don't feel you putting blame on women. Or making excuses, justfication.

@seoulsearch - yes, you're right some of us know already how to take care of ourselves but unlike you, as i said, still naive to that... so slow to learn lol. My awareness iincreased when GaryA shared this thread. And you are also correct that we also struggle like men. I don't feel like you come across too strong bout men's temptation. You are merely emphasizing that with God, all are equal, as men and women pertaining to physical thing. Yeah, in all that we do... be considerate.

1 Corinthians 10:13
No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it.

We can only remind people. We cannot control their choices or response. We can only contol our own choices and our own response to that particular situation. They are more accountable to God and we, directly to Him accountable for our actions.


God bless everyone! Let's grow together in faith everyday. :)
 

gypsygirl

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2012
1,394
60
48
#95
stephen63, firewire, and garya:

i understand you have become (previously) frustrated and find yourself in disagreement with duchessaimee. but i find it very unacceptable for anyone (male or female) to congregate in a thread for the purpose of discussing your mutually unpleasant impressions of anyone. just. not. cool. while i may be newer to this community, i have to believe that others could easily do the same for any of us -- start swapping stories of unpleasant interaction while others join in and commiserate.

and that's just very counter-productive and frankly, poor form. we all have a responsibility to individually address our conflicts with people in a private manner, not store them up and regale the community with your tales of bitterness.

when this escalated from directly-speaking post to openly berating and trading impressions, it was too far. nothing good has come from this but to air dirty laundry and express what appear to be (petty) resentments. whether you are bashing directly through your words, or indirectly by joking and "liking" these statements, you are participating in unproductive, even destructive dialogue that hurts us as a community.

while i find disagreement and respectful, cordially-expressed conflict healthy and productive in its desire for edification, expression and enlightenment, this "ganging up" and public roast simply went too far.

also, i find it to be decidedly un-gentlemanly, and certainly not befitting for any children of God.

for everyone:

we are called to bear with one another, to show love and godly reproof. we are called to be a light, the salt, a worthy example to the world that we can live, respect, tolerate, and yes, disagree with one another in a manner that honors God and reflects Christs' love and mercy, not anger and resentment. some of the words spoken here seem to have more vitriol than any desire to elucidate.

i find it so amazing, and particularly relevant that of all the things that might have been chosen for us to be identified by the world, John challenges us that it is our love of one another as the means for which the world will recognize us:

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.
By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.
john 13:34,35

we all have relevant viewpoints and insight to share, if nothing more than our own perspective. we need to respect that, even when the views are shared without a lot of tact. maybe we need to lead with more compassion, and less accusation.

finally, if there is any doubt, we do have clear instruction regarding how to handle those who treat us in a manner we feel is wrong--even hateful. we should aspire for our attitude and the intent of our words should reflect that.

But I say to you who hear, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you. To one who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also, and from one who takes away your cloak do not withhold your tunic either. Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods do not demand them back. And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.
luke 6:27-36


and to be PERFECTLY clear, i'm not on "anyone's side" or choosing teams, because i think there's plenty of responsibility to pass around. had the genders been reversed in this, i can promise you, i would feel the exact same way.

and i have taken no offense to anyone's view on this issue--the valid points raised by all are worthy of respectful consideration. and thank you for listening. : )
 
F

FireWire

Guest
#98
stephen63, firewire, and garya:

i understand you have become (previously) frustrated and find yourself in disagreement with duchessaimee. but i find it very unacceptable for anyone (male or female) to congregate in a thread for the purpose of discussing your mutually unpleasant impressions of anyone. just. not. cool. while i may be newer to this community, i have to believe that others could easily do the same for any of us -- start swapping stories of unpleasant interaction while others join in and commiserate.

and that's just very counter-productive and frankly, poor form. we all have a responsibility to individually address our conflicts with people in a private manner, not store them up and regale the community with your tales of bitterness.

when this escalated from directly-speaking post to openly berating and trading impressions, it was too far. nothing good has come from this but to air dirty laundry and express what appear to be (petty) resentments. whether you are bashing directly through your words, or indirectly by joking and "liking" these statements, you are participating in unproductive, even destructive dialogue that hurts us as a community.

while i find disagreement and respectful, cordially-expressed conflict healthy and productive in its desire for edification, expression and enlightenment, this "ganging up" and public roast simply went too far.

also, i find it to be decidedly un-gentlemanly, and certainly not befitting for any children of God.

Then the fact is if duchessaimee had a problem with what was being said she should have argued on a biblical basis as to why she disagreed and not made personal attacks against them. If she couldn't do that then it should've been taken into a private conversation. Would she do this in church? Like tell the whole church I have a problem with this guy? No I don't think so.

To frame it her own words:

You don't get to attack somebody personally if you disagree with them biblically. She also said she doubted the motives of the thread in the first place. Should've talked to a mod about it.

To frame your own words:

I find it to be decidedly un-womanly, and certainly not befitting for a person that is redeemed by the blood of the Lamb.
 

Fenner

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2013
7,507
111
0
#99
Loveneverfails this last word Is for you. TACO TACO TACO TACO!!!!!
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,031
3,265
113
Since this thread has degraded to nothing but a couple of users talking about another and tacos (not so much the problem). It is now closed.

Taco-Bell-tacos-no-beef-meat.jpg

PS.....I got the last word in Loveneverfails :p:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.