In another thread Kenneth made this input regarding books that didn't make it to, or were left out of, the canon:
Elsewhere we have roman catholics/eoc and others who might want to suggest that the deuterocanonical books (OT Apocrypha) are to be in all bibles. We might also have people on the messianic/hr/sn bent who may be in favor of a different arrangement of the order of the biblical books. Some people at this board might even say that there is a continuing revelation. Etc.
All in all, this thread is about discussing biblical canon. Do we, peoples of the earth, have the full written records of God's Word translated into our languages or is anything missing? It's a heated topic yet the discussion will be decent and no attacks on anyone, regardless of their position, will be tolerated.
...there are many many more early church documents showing women in leadership roles. Even some that list a number of women as apostles, yet you would deny them just because they are not in the bible. Even though some of them were written around the same time or earlier then some of the books of the NT that we have in the bible.
That was part of that deception done at the Nicene council where they left books out, and changed scriptures to try and hide the fact of women apostles, teachers, preachers, and other leadership roles. Anybody who does an actual full in depth study will find this truth as it is not hidden.
That was part of that deception done at the Nicene council where they left books out, and changed scriptures to try and hide the fact of women apostles, teachers, preachers, and other leadership roles. Anybody who does an actual full in depth study will find this truth as it is not hidden.
All in all, this thread is about discussing biblical canon. Do we, peoples of the earth, have the full written records of God's Word translated into our languages or is anything missing? It's a heated topic yet the discussion will be decent and no attacks on anyone, regardless of their position, will be tolerated.