You know what most people don't understand is Rest. Also Righteousness that is apart from the Law.
People don't understand it and when it is brought up legalists call it a 'false doctrine'. Well to a legalist it is. But legalists are already under a false doctrine. So why would anyone listen to them? They want to be teachers but they don't understand the big picture. They are blind leaders of the blind.
The more a doctrine causes a legalist to yell 'licentiousness!' the closer to the Truth it probably is.
People don't understand it and when it is brought up legalists call it a 'false doctrine'. Well to a legalist it is. But legalists are already under a false doctrine. So why would anyone listen to them? They want to be teachers but they don't understand the big picture. They are blind leaders of the blind.
The more a doctrine causes a legalist to yell 'licentiousness!' the closer to the Truth it probably is.
If that's true you have absolutely nothing to worry about, for the readers would see that.
Both sides have to be viewed to make a proper decision, yes?
Somebody has to show the other side, because the majority doesn't want the readers know it does exist.