Wow!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
Posting a fake oath won't help your case. You have been directed to the proper oath, and you ignore it in favour of whatever confirms your beliefs. You have no regards for the truth, only what you think confirms you to be correct.
Posting a fake oath won't help your case either.

How about the Absolutist Papal Maxims of the Jesuits are they fake too?
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
"I have summoned to the bar of public opinion only a small number of Jesuits; there still remain THREE HUNDRED formidable members whom I have not unveiled, but whom I shall unveil at a future time. . . .They were powerful; for such was the will of kings. They assassinated princes, and disturbed empires . . . That the Jesuits were the disturbers of kingdoms, the oppressors of nations, the masters of the world, I freely admit.”

Marcel de la Roche Arnauld, 1827
French Roman Catholic Priest,
The Modern Jesuits

(Protestantism and Catholicity, Jaime Balmes, (Baltimore, Maryland: John Murphy & Co., 1851) pp. 268, 269.)
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
Adolfo Nicolas is the newest Darth Pope.



Not shifty lookin' at all eh?
Because judging a person based on their looks is surely a Christian view. *rolleyes*

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
„... the Jesuits were driven to co-operate with the other two international brotherhoods, the Freemasons and the Jews [Rothschild’s Illuminati], in the destruction of the Spanish Empire.”

Salvador de Madariaga, Spanish Statesman: „The Jesuits”, 1820


During the Order’s Suppression from 1773 to 1814 by Pope Clement XIV, General Ricci [Eighteenth Superior General of the Society of Jesus, 1758 - 1775] created the Order of the Illuminati with his soldier, Adam Weishaupt, uniting the House of Rothschild with the Society of Jesus.

G. B. Nicolini: „History of the Jesuits: Their Origin, Progress, Doctrines, and Designs”, (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1889) pp. 356, 357.

ROME AND JERUSALEM.
JUST LIKE ALWAYS.

JUST LIKE THE TEN TOES: ROME (iron) and CLAY (Herods)
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Wlodimir Ledochowski, S.J.


26th Jesuit Superior General 'Black Pope' - Feb. 11, 1915 - Dec. 13, 1942: 'one of the two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order' ... 'an almost merciless disciplinarian,and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals'...' Ledochowski can be called the last of the great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.'

~

check out this cat's credentials.
and activities.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
“The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is POWER. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man . . .
The General of the Jesuits insists on being master, sovereign, over the sovereign. Wherever the Jesuits are admitted they will be masters, cost what it may . . . Every act, every crime, however atrocious, is a meritorious work, if committed for the interest of the Society of the Jesuits, or by the order of the general.”


- Napoleon
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
“The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is POWER. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man . . .
The General of the Jesuits insists on being master, sovereign, over the sovereign. Wherever the Jesuits are admitted they will be masters, cost what it may . . . Every act, every crime, however atrocious, is a meritorious work, if committed for the interest of the Society of the Jesuits, or by the order of the general.”

- Napoleon
but they work for somebody else.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Doc can i just slip one more in while we're waitin'?

Jesuit Adam Weishaupt, 1748 – 1811
Founder of the Illuminati, 1776

Born at Ingolstadt, Germany, in the heart of Roman Catholic Bavaria from which originated the Order’s Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), Adam Weishaupt, a White German Gentile, was educated by the Jesuits; in 1775 he became a notorious professor of the Vatican’s murderous Canon Law, including the evil, Counter-Reformation Council of Trent. Since Pope Clement XIV’s Bull of Extinction was not enforced in Lutheran Germany, the Order flourished at its University of Ingolstadt, out of which Weishaupt established the Illuminati in 1776 and joined the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge in 1777. He united the magnificent financial empire of the Cabalistic, Masonic, Jewish House of Rothschild, the „Guardians of the Vatican’s Treasury,” with the opulence of the international and secret, anti-Jewish Race, primarily White Gentile Society of Jesus.

Nesta H. Webster: „Secret Societies and Subversive Movements”, (South Pasadena, California: Emissary Publications, 1988; originally published in 1924).

only problem with is ol' Adam was not a gentile.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
Insert Catholic apologies below....
Someone has to point out the truth to the people who may be watching yet not participating in this thread. Since you refuse to acknowledge it, might as well be one of us.

That said, why do you persist in posting blatant lies and forgeries and expect us to believe them? Is spreading false witness something you should do?
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
Someone has to point out the truth to the people who may be watching yet not participating in this thread. Since you refuse to acknowledge it, might as well be one of us.

That said, why do you persist in posting blatant lies and forgeries and expect us to believe them? Is spreading false witness something you should do?
Why do you persist in accusing me of posting lies and forgeries and expect us to believe you? Is spreading false witness something you should do?
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
Why do you persist in accusing me of posting lies and forgeries and expect us to believe you? Is spreading false witness something you should do?
Because you ARE posting known fakes and forgeries. And when confronted with actual sources and documents you dismiss them out of hand.

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Alberto Rivera is as big a charlatan as Pierre Plantard which is to say he's a really big charlatan. Dr. Walter Martin, John Ankerberg, and every other respected scholarly Christian Protestan apologist that met with him, both those that don't attack the Roman Catholic Church and those who do, and examined his claims came to the same conclusion: Alberto was a fraud.

His seven doctorates were bought cheap from mail order diploma mills, he was never a Catholic priest so it was no surprise that he couldn't speak a lick of Latin but he did swindle some people in Spain where he was known for forgery. Fooling Chick was the best con of his whole life. If that had failed, he might have resorted to starting a cult to preside over the suckers he deceived.

I'm still laughing at some of his historical assertions. This guy knew history as well as he knew Latin which is to say he didn't know much at all.

Don't waste your time running around after lying quacks when you could be putting it to good use. Time is more meaningful than that.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Credible scholarly sources don't sit well with him in my observations so he immediately dismisses them often with some ad hominem. It doesn't matter if it's a world-class Oxford professor or Billy Graham, apparently they are all on the side of evil in his opinion while the lying quack conspiracy charlatans are the "good" guys.

I wouldn't expend any peace of mind because of Strangelove. He appears to live in a somewhat delusional world that doesn't align well with the real one.

I will say this though. He's good as a comedic second or lacky when you want to share credible information because he willl always superficially attack and then dismiss whatever credible information you share in a sentence or two which allows you to keep expanding the discussion. So he's a catalycist for discussion (or pot stirrer lol) which, and you never know, might just be the real purpose behind the facade of Dr. Strangelove.


Because you ARE posting known fakes and forgeries. And when confronted with actual sources and documents you dismiss them out of hand.

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Credible scholarly sources don't sit well with him in my observations so he immediately dismisses them often with some ad hominem. It doesn't matter if it's a world-class Oxford professor or Billy Graham, apparently they are all on the side of evil in his opinion while the lying quack conspiracy charlatans are the "good" guys.

I wouldn't expend any peace of mind because of Strangelove. He appears to live in a somewhat delusional world that doesn't align well with the real one.

I will say this though. He's good as a comedic second or lacky when you want to share credible information because he willl always superficially attack and then dismiss whatever credible information you share in a sentence or two which allows you to keep expanding the discussion. So he's a catalycist for discussion (or pot stirrer lol) which, and you never know, might just be the real purpose behind the facade of Dr. Strangelove.
LOL!
hi AoK.

who did 9-11?
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
Credible scholarly sources don't sit well with him in my observations so he immediately dismisses them often with some ad hominem. It doesn't matter if it's a world-class Oxford professor or Billy Graham, apparently they are all on the side of evil in his opinion while the lying quack conspiracy charlatans are the "good" guys.

I wouldn't expend any peace of mind because of Strangelove. He appears to live in a somewhat delusional world that doesn't align well with the real one.

I will say this though. He's good as a comedic second or lacky when you want to share credible information because he willl always superficially attack and then dismiss whatever credible information you share in a sentence or two which allows you to keep expanding the discussion. So he's a catalycist for discussion (or pot stirrer lol) which, and you never know, might just be the real purpose behind the facade of Dr. Strangelove.
I'm well aware of his antics. But the problem is, there are vulnerable people out there who fall prey to such antics. Just like the OP. We need to help them realize that these stories are fantastic simply because they are fantasy. It's fine to criticize any institution, but you should use actual facts, not crazy conspiracy theories. That holds true for the US government, for the UK monarchy, and for the Catholic Church. I'm not naieve enough to think that the Catholic Church is immune to criticism, but why waste your time criticizing a fantasy version of the Church?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I'm well aware of his antics. But the problem is, there are vulnerable people out there who fall prey to such antics. Just like the OP. We need to help them realize that these stories are fantastic simply because they are fantasy. It's fine to criticize any institution, but you should use actual facts, not crazy conspiracy theories. That holds true for the US government, for the UK monarchy, and for the Catholic Church. I'm not naieve enough to think that the Catholic Church is immune to criticism, but why waste your time criticizing a fantasy version of the Church?
hi DS:D

who did 9-11?
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
LOL!
hi AoK.

who did 9-11?
I've already answered you. A bunch ticked off muslims who took advantage of our lax security system at the time. They smuggled on boxcutter knives and used them to intimidate the crews of the planes. And while we can easily look back in hindsight to say, "Boxcutter knives? Really?" one must not forget that prior to 9/11 there had not been instances of suicide hijackings. Most hijackings simply insisted that the planes go to some other location, and that political prisoners be released. No one expected them to steer the planes into major metropolitan areas and crash them into skyscrapers.

But it certainly wasn't the US government, the illuminati, or mossad.

I love you Zone, but you really are wrong on this one.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I've already answered you. A bunch ticked off muslims who took advantage of our lax security system at the time. They smuggled on boxcutter knives and used them to intimidate the crews of the planes. And while we can easily look back in hindsight to say, "Boxcutter knives? Really?" one must not forget that prior to 9/11 there had not been instances of suicide hijackings. Most hijackings simply insisted that the planes go to some other location, and that political prisoners be released. No one expected them to steer the planes into major metropolitan areas and crash them into skyscrapers.

But it certainly wasn't the US government, the illuminati, or mossad.

I love you Zone, but you really are wrong on this one.
okey dokey.
money shot on the pentagon though.
those arabs were pretty darn lucky.










YA RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!
ROTFLMHO!
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63