It's hilarious that you are trying to lump Bart Ehrman, James White and Daniel Wallace into the same group.
Bart Ehrman is an apostate Christian that denies the inspiration of Scripture. James White and Daniel Wallace are orthodox Christian scholars with doctorates.
By the way, what are your credentials? I find it hilarious as well that people with zero credentials make assertions of this magnitude. It reminds me of the pridefulness of the cult leader I followed when I was 22-32 years old, Herbert Armstrong. He, armed with his Strong's concordance, criticized a long history of scholars who had doctorates in the original languages and were in virtual consensus on some of the issues Armstrong criticized.
This is the YouTube world though
Is this the type of scholarship you bring forward? Lol. instead of dealing with the empirical data presented in our treatise, you require credentials. Lol. Are you saying we must all present doctorates of divinity to engage in this debate?
For though Bart is an unbeliever, he received his phd under Bruce Metzger, in the same field of of study as james and daniel. While bart, james and Daniel all reach different conclusions, they all use the same method of Textual Criticism as published in Bruce Metzger works.
So these three scholars all subscribe to the same method of Textual criticism of bruce metzger, yet their findings are different...and it is in this that that they are categorized together, for our central argument is against this very method of Textual examination that they upload as the standard, which departs from the historical method used by the renessiance scholars and the apostolic churches.
For irenaeus was no novice in the field of Textual examination as is well documented in his examination in his discussion of the variant reading 616 found in several copies of johns apocalypse. For his primary method in establishing 666 as the authentic reading is stating, "as this being the case 666 as having been found in the most approved and ancient texts of the apocalypse, and those men who saw john face to face bearing witness to it.
This a far cry from the textual examination of these three scholars, for they reject the historical greek church texts as corrupt.
And do not use church texts as their source.
So I would presume bart real degrees trumps that of your own credentials, so based on your criteria you should be silent as well.