10 Questions about OSAS

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,992
8,694
113
The same word SEAL is used in Mat 27:66 which is not the kind of seal that cannot be broken

Mat 27:66
And they went and made the grave secure, and along with the guard they set a seal on the stone.


God put his signet or private mark or claim upon us . . .but when we consider the whole counsel of God where He warns that those who fall away will be lost if they don't confess and forsake their sins and get back in right standing with the Lord...

It's obvious from scripture that when the Lord made man in His Own Image that man does in fact have free will and God does not violate that free will... since He's the One Who gave free will to man!

Of course the OSAS peoples don't accept the whole counsel of God because man y things the Lord says in His Word proves it's entirely possible for one to get born again and then fall away from the Lord and not go to Heaven.

Having chosen to NOT accept all that Lord says... sadly the OSAS peoples lack understanding and revelation in these matters
Lol!

You are going to equate a seal a man puts on something, with a seal the Lord puts on a person or the scroll that no man could break?

Pretty arrogant to think you can break a seal the Lord puts on someone. Dontcha think?

And BTW, who BROKE the seal on the tomb?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,264
26,315
113

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,992
8,694
113
Sop you're going to be repenting then???
Ya sure you’re not a Pharisee?

They excelled at pointing out other people sin too.
Of course their fatal error was they couldn’t see the massive sin in themselves.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,600
13,017
113
There's no need to go back to some of my posts. The question is whether the Westminster Confession clearly states the eternal security of the believer (but not necessarily using that exact term). So here it is:

CHAPTER XVIII. OF THE ASSURANCE OF GRACE AND SALVATION
I. Although hypocrites and other unregenerate men may vainly deceive themselves with false hopes and carnal presumptions of being in the favour of God, and estate of salvation, (Job 8:13-14; Mic 3:11; Deu 29:19; Jhn 8:41); (which hope of theirs shall perish, Mat 7:22-23): yet such as truly believe in the Lord Jesus, and love Him in sincerity, endeavouring to walk in all good conscience before Him, may, in this life, be certainly assured that they are in the state of grace, (1Jo 2:3; 1Jo 3:14, 18-19, 21, 24; 1Jo 5:13); and may rejoice in the hope of the glory of God, which hope shall never make them ashamed, (Rom 5:2, 5).

II. This certainty is not a bare conjectural and probable persuasion grounded upon a fallible hope, (Hbr 6:11, 19); but an infallible assurance of faith founded upon the divine truth of the promises of salvation, (Hbr 6:17-18); the inward evidence of those graces unto which these promises are made, (2Pe 1:4-5, 10-11; 1Jo 2:3; 1Jo 3:14; 2Co 1:12); the testimony of the Spirit of adoption witnessing with our spirits that we are the children of God, (Rom 8:15-16); which Spirit is the earnest of our inheritance, whereby we are sealed to the day of redemption, (Eph 1:13-14; Eph 4:30; 2Co 1:21-22).

Obviously Cameron did not read this before posting. I trust he will now retract what he said.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,264
26,315
113
There's no need to go back to some of my posts.
It is a site function for a reason. If you don't care to use it, that is certainly your prerogative. I find it handy, and in going back just now did come across another instance where once again you chose to falsely accuse me. Funny how when you believe you have been falsely accused of something you call it evil, but seem to have absolutely no sense of compunction when it comes to falsely accusing others.
 
Sep 28, 2023
948
176
43
the Westminster Confession
This also claims God doesn't want all men to be saved... which is not true and unbiblical.

Titus 2:11,12
For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;


Jude 1:4
For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
 

Edify

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2021
1,362
542
113
You find it difficult to love your neighbor...noted.
Exactly! The "almost correct" protagonist doing an awful job of being right, that nobody wants to listen to him.
In In most protagonist/antagonist discussions, this id the format. All the antagonists are nice, polite, & sound right as a result.
But.... should you believe them? Many will without batting an eye. This is exactly what I told Maxwell yesterday.
 

NightTwister

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2023
1,378
463
83
64
Colorado, USA
The calvinists claim that some of the "elect" are not really saved and believe none of the "elect" can know if they are saved or not unless they go to Heaven.

Lots of parallelizes between calvinism and islam and catholicism as they all believe one cannot know for sure if they are saved or not during this life.
Once again, you misrepresent the beliefs of a large number of Christians.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
Exactly! The "almost correct" protagonist doing an awful job of being right, that nobody wants to listen to him.
In In most protagonist/antagonist discussions, this id the format. All the antagonists are nice, polite, & sound right as a result.
But.... should you believe them? Many will without batting an eye. This is exactly what I told Maxwell yesterday.
That's not actually what I meant. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming to be speaking for God on a particular subject, and not doing so in the manner God prescribes.
 

Edify

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2021
1,362
542
113
These people THOUGHT they were saved. They did all sorts of Churchy stuff. But they FELL AWAY. Why? Because NONE of them were ever saved to begin with! The "falling away" happens exactly with people like John describes here..
The epistles are never to the sinner no matter how good he looks!
Sinners can't rebel from God because they're sinners.
I don't care how many wasn't saved to begin with... because the epistles are teachings & warnings to christians, not sinners!
Your statement doesn't hold water at all.
 

Edify

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2021
1,362
542
113
Imagine all of yesterday's post with commentaries & only one was touched or commented on.
When I get home today I will start again. I've only got started... and they all agree.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,992
8,694
113
The epistles are never to the sinner no matter how good he looks!
Sinners can't rebel from God because they're sinners.
I don't care how many wasn't saved to begin with... because the epistles are teachings & warnings to christians, not sinners!
Your statement doesn't hold water at all.
It’s not MY statement. It’s the beloved of Christ Apostle John’s statement.

I suppose the Gospel as presented in 1 Corinthians 15 and other Epistles aren’t for sinners either.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,600
13,017
113
This also claims God doesn't want all men to be saved... which is not true and unbiblical.
No need to go off on a tangent. What was pertinent was for Cameron to understand that they hold to eternal security.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
No need to go off on a tangent. What was pertinent was for Cameron to understand that they hold to eternal security.
I was very careful in how I worded it. And the Westminster Confession is an excellent treatise of the reformed understanding of the faith,but it is not Calvinism.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,025
1,730
113
I was very careful in how I worded it. And the Westminster Confession is an excellent treatise of the reformed understanding of the faith,but it is not Calvinism.
If I may ask, since I don't really know, is it the view of free will that separates the WC from Calvinism?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
If I may ask, since I don't really know, is it the view of free will that separates the WC from Calvinism?
There is little difference between the two. My point was that Calvinism can only come from the teachings of Calvin. He was one of many reformers, but he is the favorite target of those who differ with the understanding of the reformed faith. But those who subscribe to the reformed understanding of the faith are a diverse lot. Just as all Baptists and Lutherans, and all denominations are comprised of individuals who hold a variety of beliefs, the reformed arm of the church is disparate as well. And most people who criticize Calvin aren't that familiar with his reasoning. They have merely heard what others have said and parrot it.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,025
1,730
113
There is little difference between the two. My point was that Calvinism can only come from the teachings of Calvin. He was one of many reformers, but he is the favorite target of those who differ with the understanding of the reformed faith. But those who subscribe to the reformed understanding of the faith are a diverse lot. Just as all Baptists and Lutherans, and all denominations are comprised of individuals who hold a variety of beliefs, the reformed arm of the church is disparate as well. And most people who criticize Calvin aren't that familiar with his reasoning. They have merely heard what others have said and parrot it.
I think I might be Calmenian, or an Arvinist mebbe? :unsure: