Can someone educate me on this Hebrew Roots movement?
I suppose you could say I'm part of the HRM, but I hesitate to use that term for many of the reasons already stated. There can be too much weirdness in parts of it. And has been stated already, there is so much variation on what is taught that you can't really lump the doctrine together in the same way you can a specific denomination.
That being said, personally......
It seems like Hebrew Roots says that a fruit of salvation is keeping the Torah or the Old Covenant. Logically this implies that if you are not keeping the Torah, including the Sabbath and festivals, you are unsaved.
Torah obedience is NOT the source of salvation, nor has it ever been. Salvation was offered and granted through Passover (a type and shadow of Jesus' sacrifice) and Israel's acceptance of it. Torah-obedience is what set Israel apart from the nations, and set-apart as holy unto God. The great thing about Torah is that it affects EVERY part of your life; there isn't a part of your life that isn't touched by God and His commandments (even how you go to the bathroom).
Now, while I definitely believe salvation isn't based on Torah, obedience to it should a be a fruit of that salvation. Just as our lives should change and be obedient to the Holy Spirit and the NT, so should our lives be changed by being obedient to the Torah (as well as the Holy Spirit and the NT).
I also recognize that all Christians are at different points of spiritual maturity, and that it isn't beneficial to demand or suggest that everyone be living their life in the exact same way. This includes the things we are obedient to, including Torah and the NT. When God places a particular service or act of obedience on your heart and spirit to do, you are responsible for being obedient to it. But unless the Spirit moves you to do it, I shouldn't expect that you have to do it. At the same time, it's callous of us to automatically dismiss obedience to the Torah as unacceptable for Christians to do.
Biblelogic01 does your group teach that those Christians who never observe Torah are unsaved or spiritually inferior?
Again, no salvation through Torah. But your question about spiritual inferiority can be a troublesome idea. Again, while I recognize that people are at different points of spiritual maturity, Jesus DOES say this:
"Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." -Matthew 5:19
I'll leave that to others to work through.
Also, do they hold the position of the Trinity in terms of orthodox Christian beliefs? It seems as if I see some indication that some Hebrew Roots people deny the Trinity or redefine it in some way different than orthodox Christianity has held.
The doctrine of the Trinity is also varied in it's understanding. When the idea of the Trinity starts saying that there are 3 distinct and separate manifestations of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, I have a problem with it. There is only 1 God, and when we see any of those "personalities" in Scripture, it is the exact same God. The same God who gave the Torah is the same Jesus that was sacrificed and is the same Holy Spirit that indwells us today. And all 3 have existed at the same time. Which means Jesus gave the Torah and the Holy Spirit was just as much of a source of it.
I understand that a lot end up accepting a Unitarian Monotheism and denying the deity of Christ. Others end up denying the writings of Paul as well.
Perhaps there are some sects of the HRM that deny the deity of Jesus. But, Jesus IS God. End of story.
And perhaps there are some sects of the HRM that deny Paul's writings. Personally, Paul's writings are inspired by God and given to Him from God. My only contention is not with Paul himself, but how we interpret what he says. Jesus IS God; Paul isn't. Which means the Torah and Jesus' words need to be the original source of life and truth. Paul offers a commentary on those words which are completely true, but we need to understand the original source, and THEN study Paul's relationship to it. Not vice versa.
As a point of interest, I've started hearing the following idea within Christianity and even on this forum: "
Jesus' words were not intended for the Gentiles, but only Jews. Paul's writings are for the Gentiles and should be the ones we follow."
There you go. Just one man's understanding of the HRM.