Before I touch on the Sabbath, as a sign of justification by faith, I first need to draw some parallels to circumcision. Once I do that I will attempt to link the Sabbath, not to the law (i.e., 4th commandment), but rather to the gospel.
What does the NT say about the Judaizers and their demands for circumcision?
First let's go to Acts 15:1,5
Verse 1: "Some men (the Judaizers) came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved!"
Verse 5: Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees (i.e., the Judaizers) stood up and said, "The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses."
How did Peter respond?
verse 10 Why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of the disciples a yoke (yoke of bondage) that neither we nor our fathers have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are...."
So Peter rejected circumcision as a condition for salvation.
What about Paul?
Turn to Gal 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage. 2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. 3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. 4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
So Paul rejected circumcision too as a means of salvation! In fact he stated such a believer, who attempted to by justified by law, would fall from grace. That's means he, through legalism, would end up lost and hell bound.
Now turn to Romans 4:11
And he (Abraham) received the sign of circumcision, a seal (or sign) of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised....
If Abraham, who was righteous by faith, received circumcision wouldn't that put him in the camp of the Judaizers?
What does the NT say about the Judaizers and their demands for circumcision?
First let's go to Acts 15:1,5
Verse 1: "Some men (the Judaizers) came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved!"
Verse 5: Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees (i.e., the Judaizers) stood up and said, "The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses."
How did Peter respond?
verse 10 Why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of the disciples a yoke (yoke of bondage) that neither we nor our fathers have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are...."
So Peter rejected circumcision as a condition for salvation.
What about Paul?
Turn to Gal 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage. 2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. 3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. 4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
So Paul rejected circumcision too as a means of salvation! In fact he stated such a believer, who attempted to by justified by law, would fall from grace. That's means he, through legalism, would end up lost and hell bound.
Now turn to Romans 4:11
And he (Abraham) received the sign of circumcision, a seal (or sign) of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised....
If Abraham, who was righteous by faith, received circumcision wouldn't that put him in the camp of the Judaizers?
Last edited: