7 years

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#41
So we see how MAY BE FULFILLED to some means IS NOW fulfilled, its good to demonstrate these things.
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#42
He cant tell that Jesus is fulfilling Isiah word concerning his proclamation not the actual proclamation.

Ears to hear are rare
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#43
So we see how MAY BE FULFILLED to some means IS NOW fulfilled, its good to demonstrate these things.
That "may be fulfilled" passage doesn't allow an assumption that it was already fulfilled in the past by our Lord Jesus like you insinuated in your posts.

So in your view, was it fulfilled already, or not?
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#44
He cant tell that Jesus is fulfilling Isiah word concerning his proclamation not the actual proclamation.

Ears to hear are rare
Even you yourself admitted that our Lord Jesus didn't say... that was fulfilled in their ears like He did with the Luke 4 passage from Isaiah. Now you're reversing what you said?
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#45
Isaiah 61:2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD,

Which Jesus quotes here in
Luke 4:19

Then he closed the book (of Isaiah) in Luke 4:20 because that day this was fulfilled

As we know that last verse is split...

The second half of
Isaiah 61:2 is to proclaim.... the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;

Which part of vengeance is proclaimed here

Luk 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

Jesus only had to proclaim those two times (the acceptable year in Luke 4:20 and day of vengeance as he declared them in Luke 21:22) Jesus fulfilled proclaiming them as Isaiah said he would, the proclamation itself in Luke 21 was not fulfilled, you dont even need the Spirit of God to see that.


 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#46
Even you yourself admitted that our Lord Jesus didn't say... that was fulfilled in their ears like He did with the Luke 4 passage from Isaiah. Now you're reversing what you said?
Quote my words exactly for people (thank you)
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#47
That "may be fulfilled" passage doesn't allow an assumption that it was already fulfilled in the past by our Lord Jesus like you insinuated in your posts.

So in your view, was it fulfilled already, or not?
You cannot hear a single word,

Answer this for yourself.

Jesus Christ, Isaiah said he would declare the acceptable year of the Lord (where did he do that in the gospel)?

Isaiah said he would declare the day of vengeance of our God, where again did Jesus do that?

Give us the scriptures where "acceptable year" and days "of vengeance are that Isaiah prophesied of.

You dont believe Jesus fulfilled speaking of them I take it
 
G

GaryA

Guest
#48
I have been reading some of the post and decided to join and ask a question.
In studying the end times, I see 1290 days, 1260 days, 1335 days, and 42 weeks.
Most seem to believe the tribulation period will be seven years, three and a half years of peace followed by three and a half years of tribulation.
Most seem to believe the three and a half years of peace is the result of the Anti-Christ will make a peace tready with Israel and will break that tready after three and a half years and attack Israel.
I would like to know what Scripture you base this belief on?
Many people base the belief on a misinterpretation of a single verse of scripture --- Daniel 9:27. :(

:)
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#49
Isaiah 61:2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD,

Which Jesus quotes here in
Luke 4:19

Then he closed the book (of Isaiah) in Luke 4:20 because that day this was fulfilled

As we know that last verse is split...

The second half of
Isaiah 61:2 is to proclaim.... the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;

Which part of vengeance is proclaimed here

Luk 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

Jesus only had to proclaim those two times (the acceptable year in Luke 4:20 and day of vengeance as he declared them in Luke 21:22) Jesus fulfilled proclaiming them as Isaiah said he would, the proclamation itself in Luke 21 was not fulfilled, you dont even need the Spirit of God to see that.


What got this started had nothing to do with that idea of His 'proclaiming' those Isaiah verses. It had everything to do with you saying they BOTH were fulfilled by Jesus, which is a different statement altogether.

So has that "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 (or Isaiah 61:2 if you prefer), fulfilled already?
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#50
What got this started had nothing to do with that idea of His 'proclaiming' those Isaiah verses. It had everything to do with you saying they BOTH were fulfilled by Jesus, which is a different statement altogether.

So has that "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 (or Isaiah 61:2 if you prefer), fulfilled already?
I keep saying Jesus fulfills the "proclaiming" part of it, It is Jesus who said the first one in Luke 4 was fulfilled in their ears, and it is Jesus also who said of those days (the days of vengeance) mentioned in Luke 21 were the days that all things written MAY BE FULFILLED and you keep coming after me over they are NOT fulfilled when even Jesus isnt saying in the text itself (you quote at me) that they are.

You do this all the time?

You are embarrassing yourself, its like calling me a liar that Jesus fulfilled Isaiahs proclamations and then calling me a liar again over Jesus own words I quoted as if I didnt notice what was written concerning their specific fulfilments (and in Like 4 right there) and in Luke 21 it cannot be more obvious those things were not fulfilled, a first grader can see that.

Is there some kind of point to this?
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#51
Quote my words exactly for people (thank you)
No problem: here:

Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things*** which are written may be fulfilled***.

At least it shows where both of the proclamations were fulfilled in Jesus.
Don't you notice you said "both of the proclamations were fulfilled in Jesus" in that?

The first Isaiah 61 proclaiming was not just about Him saying that at His first coming. It was about Him saying that first part was then "fulfilled".

Luke 4:21
21 And He began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
KJV
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#53
I keep saying Jesus fulfills the "proclaiming" part of it, It is Jesus who said the first one in Luke 4 was fulfilled in their ears, and it is Jesus also who said of those days (the days of vengeance) mentioned in Luke 21 were the days that all things written MAY BE FULFILLED and you keep coming after me over they are NOT fulfilled when even Jesus isnt saying in the text itself (you quote at me) that they are.

You do this all the time?

You are embarrassing yourself, its like calling me a liar that Jesus fulfilled Isaiahs proclamations and then calling me a liar again over Jesus own words I quoted as if I didnt notice what was written concerning their specific fulfilments (and in Like 4 right there) and in Luke 21 it cannot be more obvious those things were not fulfilled, a first grader can see that.

Is there some kind of point to this?
It's a simple matter, either you believe the "days of vengeance" is already fulfilled, or you don't. You can't just make that about His proclaiming it, because what He said in Luke 4 about the first part was then fulfilled at His first coming, but the second part in Luke 21:22 wasn't, and still has yet to be fulfilled. This difference is very simple, so I don't know why you would want to avoid my question if you believe that Luke 21:22 event was actually fulfilled then or not.
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#54
No problem: here:



Don't you notice you said "both of the proclamations were fulfilled in Jesus" in that?

The first Isaiah 61 proclaiming was not just about Him saying that at His first coming. It was about Him saying that first part was then "fulfilled".

Luke 4:21
21 And He began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
KJV
Yes, lets look at the second time I showed this one and see the whole thing which my first post (under prove all's post) was to

JESUS BEING WHERE FOR WHICH ONE OF THOSE and I qualified it see the first line you conveniently leave out



Only someone looking for argument would do what you are doing

But I love this part of it too sometimes because the longer it goes the more visible it becomes
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#55
Yes he does, and shamefully so. :eek:
Don't tell me you don't understand what she's doing.

For those who don't yet know what this is about, I'm dealing with those on men's doctrines of Preterism here, which many of them actually believe those "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 have already... been fulfilled by our Lord Jesus, back in His Apostle's days. But their idea of that already being past would mean the "day of the Lord" event of God pouring out His cup of wrath upon the wicked was already past history. That's what this little debate is actually about.
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#56
I have bad eyes, but sometimes when you make things even bigger and highlight the obvious only

He did both
, these are just split as to where he did so.

Jesus stops in Luke, but as we know Isaiah continues...

Isaiah 61:2
To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God;to comfort all that mourn;

That is where Jesus closes" the book" of Isaiah cutting that saying short in
Luke 4:21 that "this saying was fulfilled in their ears" but he continues the other proclamation of Isaiah 61:2 by picking it up in Luke 21:22 here

Luke 21:22For these be the days of vengeance, that all things*** which are written may be fulfilled***.

At least
it shows where both of the proclamation were fulfilled in Jesus.
 
G

GaryA

Guest
#57
..., which many of them actually believe those "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 have already... been fulfilled by our Lord Jesus, back in His Apostle's days. But their idea of that already being past would mean the "day of the Lord" event of God pouring out His cup of wrath upon the wicked was already past history.
I do not believe that --- I believe that the Second Coming of Christ is 'future'.

:)
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#58
Yes he does, and shamefully so. :eek:
You are more familar with things I guess, thanks.

I gotta start filling up ignore, three pages trying to state I am confirming Isaiahs words in Jesus and now I am being held to answer for Jesus and Jesus own words of when such would be fulfilled (as he does in each) its amazing.
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
#59
Don't tell me you don't understand what she's doing.

For those who don't yet know what this is about, I'm dealing with those on men's doctrines of Preterism here, which many of them actually believe those "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 have already... been fulfilled by our Lord Jesus, back in His Apostle's days. But their idea of that already being past would mean the "day of the Lord" event of God pouring out His cup of wrath upon the wicked was already past history. That's what this little debate is actually about.
I understand what she is showing, she is showing where Jesus proclaimed it, Jesus spoke it. Do you comprehend that? She is not saying all end time prophecy is fulfilled as your trying misrepresent in her statement. So get over it, drop it, move on.
 
Feb 11, 2016
2,501
40
0
#60
Don't tell me you don't understand what she's doing.

For those who don't yet know what this is about, I'm dealing with those on men's doctrines of Preterism here, which many of them actually believe those "days of vengeance" of Luke 21:22 have already... been fulfilled by our Lord Jesus, back in His Apostle's days. But their idea of that already being past would mean the "day of the Lord" event of God pouring out His cup of wrath upon the wicked was already past history. That's what this little debate is actually about.
Your not dealing with anything because I am not a preterist, I mostly stay out of these conversations because I am not convinced yet of quite a few things, so there you go once again telling folks what its all about instead of telling them that its about you being wrong