Adam's fall and its consequences

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
Again no answer. I command dogs to build a castle = useless command. I gotta build it for them.
Ok so that question cannot be answered logically i can see cause calvinism doesnt deal with reality.

Now just answer this one and i'll leave you alone, PLEASE, straight answer:


I am calvinist joe, i go to preach in a town square, I tell people God commands every man everywhere to repent, the odds are most folks arent elect out there. So, does them hearing the Gospel message serve a purpose? A purpose such as further hardening them or damning them? Thats all I wanna know and ill let ya be.

Well, for starters I wouldn't make the assumption you are making. I see all men and women the same. Preach the gospel to them all. Who responds is not my doing! And I think to say that does the them hearing the gospel message serve a purpose. Thats just silly, Of course it serves a purpose for how would any man/woman be saved without hearing.

When the great throne judgement comes no man will have an excuse...doesn't the scripture tell us that Romans 1 (maybe you think they will?). God will be seen as Just.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,400
16,342
113
69
Tennessee
Again no answer. I command dogs to build a castle = useless command. I gotta build it for them.
You said you responded to the call by faith but no you didnt, God just gave you the will and new heart to respond, so God believed for you in reality. You had no choice, He made you willing (insert verse)
Ok so that question cannot be answered logically i can see cause calvinism doesnt deal with reality.

Now just answer this one and i'll leave you alone, PLEASE, straight answer:


I am calvinist joe, i go to preach in a town square, I tell people God commands every man everywhere to repent, the odds are most folks arent elect out there. So, does them hearing the Gospel message serve a purpose? A purpose such as further hardening them or damning them? Thats all I wanna know and ill let ya be.
The Word of God is never returned void. It always serves a purpose.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Well, for starters I wouldn't make the assumption you are making. I see all men and women the same. Preach the gospel to them all. Who responds is not my doing! And I think to say that does the them hearing the gospel message serve a purpose. Thats just silly, Of course it serves a purpose for how would any man/woman be saved without hearing.

When the great throne judgement comes no man will have an excuse...doesn't the scripture tell us that Romans 1 (maybe you think they will?). God will be seen as Just.
No one will have an excuse in my view.
In yours everyone will, they can say "Wasnt me, God made me do it" "I was predestinated for this"

This is so against everything scripture says and what the saints before augustine believed it aint even funny.

Can I just get an answer please so I can stop refreshing this page. All i wanna know is this:

WHEN THE GOSPEL IS PREACHED TO UNELECT PEOPLE, DOES IT FURTHER HARDEN OR DAMN THEM ACCORDING TO REFORMED THEOLOGY, YES OR NO?
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,787
1,736
113
Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned—[Romans 5:12]

Notice, it says because all sinned. Now, who are the 'all' here in focus? Those he acted as a representative for. Now, who was he a representative for? All of humanity, all his posterity. When he sinned and fell, it plunged everyone of us into sin and death. His sin was imputed to us, and God now sees us as if we were the ones who sinned. That's why babies die in the womb.
Yes,everyone that came through that seed of Adam sinned because Adam sinned and that means ALL,but GOD Is just and where there Is no law(where the person doesn't know they are doing wrong)sin Is not Imputed.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
No one will have an excuse in my view.
In yours everyone will, they can say "Wasnt me, God made me do it" "I was predestinated for this"

This is so against everything scripture says and what the saints before augustine believed it aint even funny.

Can I just get an answer please so I can stop refreshing this page. All i wanna know is this:

WHEN THE GOSPEL IS PREACHED TO UNELECT PEOPLE, DOES IT FURTHER HARDEN OR DAMN THEM ACCORDING TO REFORMED THEOLOGY, YES OR NO?


Hi Issacher92,

Not all, I find it amusing sometimes that those who rail against reformed theology are the ones who haven't got a clue what it s.

I think I've answered a few of your questions. But I will answer the above.. Don't you think that man hardens His own heart, after all its in his nature, but we also know that God can harden hearts aswell.

Of course you may have the same view as the Pelagians which is not a Christian view?
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Hi Issacher92,

Not all, I find it amusing sometimes that those who rail against reformed theology are the ones who haven't got a clue what it s.

I think I've answered a few of your questions. But I will answer the above.. Don't you think that man hardens His own heart, after all its in his nature, but we also know that God can harden hearts aswell.

Of course you may have the same view as the Pelagians which is not a Christian view?
So is the answer to my question YES OR NO. You said man hardens and God hardens, but I asked does the preaching of Gospel do that when the unelect hear it, if its the purpose? I got no clue what the pelagians believed. But if you mean free will then yes. Just like all Jews always, I believe in free will.
YES OR NO?

YES OR NO?

WHEN THE GOSPEL IS PREACHED TO UNELECT PEOPLE, DOES IT FURTHER HARDEN OR DAMN THEM ACCORDING TO REFORMED THEOLOGY, YES OR NO?
 
Last edited:

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
Its yes and no :)

I think that is quite a few answers I have given you, maybe you would be polite enough to answer the below as it gets to the thread title.

Why do you think the Pelagian view of a neutral man is unscriptural or do you?
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Its yes and no :)

I think that is quite a few answers I have given you, maybe you would be polite enough to answer the below as it gets to the thread title.

Why do you think the Pelagian view of a neutral man is unscriptural or do you?
Yes and no..... you havent answered the question which makes me suspect even more that there is some hidden sinister calvinist doctrine in the closet. Looks like I gotta google ya boi calvin and go through his quotes.

I dont know the pelagian view of neutral man. But i know the jewish view, and thats what i hold. Ive said it before in this thread clearly: Read genesis 3, no mention of impaired ability to obey or sin nature is mentioned, merely physical death and other curses listed which ive quoted on this thread.

If our ability to obey was impaired, God would not ask us to obey Him. Simple.

And because i can answer a question straight and not say "yes and no" i will make it real plain what i believe in one sentence:

Man is born neutral, becomes a sinner when the first sin is commited, you cannot be a liar before you lie.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
Yes and no..... you havent answered the question which makes me suspect even more that there is some hidden sinister calvinist doctrine in the closet. Looks like I gotta google ya boi calvin and go through his quotes.

I dont know the pelagian view of neutral man. But i know the jewish view, and thats what i hold. Ive said it before in this thread clearly: Read genesis 3, no mention of impaired ability to obey or sin nature is mentioned, merely physical death and other curses listed which ive quoted on this thread.

If our ability to obey was impaired, God would not ask us to obey Him. Simple.

And because i can answer a question straight and not say "yes and no" i will make it real plain what i believe in one sentence:

Man is born neutral, becomes a sinner when the first sin is commited, you cannot be a liar before you lie.

Hi Issachar,

Ok thats basically along the lines of Pelagian. It was condemned as heresy.

Its in your nature to lie. thats why we sin! Mans nature after the fall was continually evil.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,787
1,736
113
Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned—[Romans 5:12]

Notice, it says because all sinned. Now, who are the 'all'?
Yes,ALL sinned because all men came through the seed of Adam but GOD Is just and sin Is not Imputed where there Is no law meaning(a person has to know they are doing wrong before sin Is Imputed)babies don't know when they are doing wrong until the commandment comes where sin revives,this Is when the person becomes accountable to GOD.
 

Bladerunner

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2016
3,076
59
48
Are you saying babies are not born tabula rasa? I do not believe they are.


Well, the bible does say to know to do good and not do it, to them it is sin.



David wrote "Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me."[Psalm 51:5] Then he wrote "Even from birth the wicked go astray; from the womb they are wayward, spreading lies.[SUP] [/SUP]Their venom is like the venom of a snake, like that of a cobra that has stopped its ears,[SUP] [/SUP]that will not heed the tune of the charmer, however skillful the enchanter may be."[Psalm 58:3-5] So, we are born sinners and when we grew enough to put it into action, we sinned. An infant will take things they know are not theirs, and that is stealing. They will tell you a big honking falsity to keep from getting their 'bum bum' heated, and that is lying. When they get mad, they will slap, scratch, scream, bite, because they did not get their way. Babies are not the 'sweet little angels' ppl make them out to be. My wife and I do not have kids, but I've been around enough nieces and nephews to know, see and feel their hatred when things do not go their way.




Well, they do know from their parents what is right and what is wrong. They know that if they get caught, to try to lie or deflect the blame to someone else to keep from getting into trouble.

Then how can you explain it was my sins that put Jesus on that Cross. Was It Your Sins as well???You have to decide.

Man is born with an inherited sin. While Babies are innocent as you say and like little Children they will go to heaven if they die. Their fleshly bodies still inherit the sin that was brought on by Adam's Fall...Notice I said Adam's Fall.....

Rem, It is a love story where Eve was deceived by Satan when Adam was not around.....Probably at work? lol

(NOTE: Adam must have told Eve not to eat of the Fruit for we know God did not tell Eve not to eat of the fruit of that tree.

Anyway, when he came home, she told him what she had done. Adam knew what was going to happen to Eve but He could not stand living without her (called Love) so He sinned against God by eating of the Fruit.


Because of this, Innocence has/had to die for our sins, yet there are many out there that will not accept that. So SAD

 
Last edited:
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Hi Issachar,

Ok thats basically along the lines of Pelagian. It was condemned as heresy.

Its in your nature to lie. thats why we sin! Mans nature after the fall was continually evil.
Adam sinned without the sin nature, so how does that work? Sounds like we got the same choice to make as Adam, to sin or not to sin. We lie because we decide to, it benefits us in some way usually. Im not saying humans arent tempted or have evil inclinations, its a choice, but you guys are saying even infants are evil BEFORE they lie. Thats wicked. Pure evil. No one is guilty of anything until one commits something, no one is a liar until one lies. Even if that lie is guaranteed to come.

Was condenmned as heresy by who? the chief heretics themselves? According to the catholics you are also a heretic, so that "was condemned" thing goes no where. For such a core doctrine the bible sure is silent on original sin.

I responded your question you didnt respond to mine, but luckily John Calvin exposed this wicked teaching I knew something was fishy when you were dodging my question:

In this way God avenges contempt of His grace: He hardens the hearts of the reprobate so that they never desire to repent.” (Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries, A Harmony of the Gospels: Matthew, Mark and Luke, Vol. II, p.47)

Just as I expected. I double checked to make sure by reprobate he doesnt mean what the bible means which is folks who sin until their conscience gets seared. But this guy means those who didnt win the grace lottery in heaven.

By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death (Institutes of the Christian Religion 3.21.5).

Pagan gnostic manichean garbage. Case closed. Cant wait for this cult to die out. Lucky for me these guys are cold-hearted robots with no spirituality so their evangelism produces no fruit, they preach repentance and cancel it out right away by preaching inability and you're gonna mess up, some have turned to liberal rock music and fancy lights to attract more people like John Piper. Usually they have a form of godliness and deny the power thereof. Which is why that mason macarthur who some here pretend to be is a cessationist. (Doesnt believe the bible which states gifts operate until Jesus [the perfect] returns).
God grants repentance, yet I hear calvinist preachers on stage claim they are sinners and sin everyday in thoughts and deeds, i could understand this if repentance was upto us. But they blame their failures on God. They say God grants repentance well looks like He failed, or maybe He gave like a half-way repentance? This preacher was john piper btw. I aint joking he said it.

So to recap: Calvinism is contradictory to itself and to the scriptures not to mention logic (and church fathers before Augustine). Its just gnostic manichean garbage repackaged by heretics during the reformation who believed infants went to hell without commiting a single sin and not to mention the HORRIBLE quotes from Luther, i cant even quote all the things that man said here. Look it up. I know ya wont, that guy is ya boy.






I'll see yall in the next thread, nothing to be done here.
 
Sep 14, 2017
900
23
0
So is the answer to my question YES OR NO. You said man hardens and God hardens, but I asked does the preaching of Gospel do that when the unelect hear it, if its the purpose? I got no clue what the pelagians believed. But if you mean free will then yes. Just like all Jews always, I believe in free will.
YES OR NO?

YES OR NO?

WHEN THE GOSPEL IS PREACHED TO UNELECT PEOPLE, DOES IT FURTHER HARDEN OR DAMN THEM ACCORDING TO REFORMED THEOLOGY, YES OR NO?
Its yes and no :)

I think that is quite a few answers I have given you, maybe you would be polite enough to answer the below as it gets to the thread title.

Why do you think the Pelagian view of a neutral man is unscriptural or do you?
It's always been my experience that when people give a neutral useless answer it means they've come to their end and refuse to admit that it's so.
It seems to be a common thing lately in the BDF.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,637
13,041
113
It's Hyperbolic.

Now you are dismissing the very words of God to sinners as hyperbolic. What next? Cut out the passages which disprove your theology?

However, I would not agree at all with Pelagianism, which we see on here from time to time..that is, there is no 'sin nature' etc etc, Man is inherently good and so on. Thats not a Christian belief.
I don't believe I have seen any deny that man has a sin nature inherited from Adam. If so, that is clearly unscriptural. All human beings are sinners and guilty before God. There is none righteous, no not one.
Concerning 'free will', what exactly do you mean by that? .
As you can see from the passage quoted sinners do have free will. And when the Gospel is preached, it is the power of God unto salvation. Therefore the Holy Spirit convicts and convinces sinners when they hear the Gospel. But then THEY MOST OBEY THE GOSPEL, which means that they must respond to the Gospel and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. God does not compel any sinner to believe, but every sinner must freely repent and receive Christ as Lord and Savior. That is embedded in Scripture. Kindly note these Scriptures and meditate upon them:

Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Acts 2:37,38)

And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. (Acts 16:30,31).

Do you see God compelling them to be saved? Or do you see sinners responding to the Gospel of their own free will? WHAT SHALL WE DO?... WHAT MUST WE DO? That is underlying evidence that sinners have free will, and will respond to the Gospel without coercion. This presumes (on the basis of Scripture) that Gos wants all men to be saved and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
 
Last edited:

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Isachar92:

You are asking complex questions and requiring simple answers like "yes or no" and if you do not get it (because reality is more complex) you get angry and aggressive with your pictures,colors etc.

---

First, this is not a fight, so there do not need to be attacks and emotions involved. You are still attacking Luther, Calvin, Augustin etc. Are we attacking persons too? No.

Second, realize that the reality of the Universe of space-time and the reality of timeless God are both very complex things and "yes or no" answers do not have to fit in.

Third, can you also answer some questions? For example, what does this verse mean:

"For I am God, and here is none other beside me, telling beforehand the latter events before they come to pass, and they are accomplished together: and I said, all my counsel shall stand, and I will do all things that I have planned."

Is 46:9
 
Oct 21, 2017
30
0
0
What do you mean by *God*?

nvm...I read your bio...spiritual status unsure? Good day sir and good bye.
Ooo... how Christo-centric of you, SovereignGrace. Do forgive me for not passing your 'litmus test'. It never fails to surprise me how Christians can have such a callousness when talking to those who may have an alternate point of view. Even if those with whom they disagree share common ground in other areas.

No matter. In all things be well, and thanks for the limited conversation.
 
Oct 21, 2017
30
0
0
I think you are both talking about something slightly different.
Yes, that seems possible but since I didn't pass muster for SG to continue our conversation, we may never know.

It seems to me that you mean that their knowledge is tabula rasa. They have not learned yet what is wrong or good.
Yes. That is accurate. My position is infants and those with mental disabilities do not have moral culpability concerning knowing "right from wrong." Indeed, the whole concept is based upon culturally imposed standards.

For instance, the Bible is clear in advocating slavery; the ownership of a human being. Yet, who among us would dare state it as precedent for either 'indentured servitude' or outright slavery?

While SovereingGrace seems to be talking about their state as human beings, inclining to evil from the beginning, no matter if they realize that or not.
Is there a "right or wrong" answer to the question? Do infants inherit the sin(s) of their parents or not via Original Sin? Unfortunately, the Bible comes down on both sides of the issue without a clearly defined answer. Therefore, our discussion is nothing but a rehashing of ideas dating back at least to the time of Augustine vs. Pelagius, or Arminius vs. Calvin.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51

Now you are dismissing the very words of God to sinners as hyperbolic. What next? Cut out the passages which disprove your theology?


I don't believe I have seen any deny that man has a sin nature inherited from Adam. If so, that is clearly unscriptural. All human beings are sinners and guilty before God. There is none righteous, no not one.

Hi Nehemiah.

To answer your first statement, the answer is no! Re- read my post please.

And your second point, I agree with that we have a sin nature, and here is most definitely one who denies it, read Issachars posts.


I haven't got time at the moment to comment on the rest of your post, but if I can scrape some later I will.

Have a good day :)
 
Oct 21, 2017
30
0
0
God has very little regard for human life? Srsly? He sent His Son to die for a multitude of hell bound sinners. The Christ died for many who were His enemies.
Nice, thanks for the continuing discussion. Indeed. God has little regard for human life according to every Biblical account from the flood of Noah; to the prescribed sacrifice of Isaac; to the genocides of Canaan; to the advocacy of slavery, to the idea of vicarious human sacrifice in the life/death of Jesus.

And given the popular Christian response: "Anyone who does not believe in Jesus is condemned to hell" - It doesn't speak well of God's regard for the vast majority of humanity. Especially everyone who was born prior to the life/death/resurrection of Jesus, and those who, through no fault of their own, never had an opportunity to "hear the gospel."
 
Oct 16, 2017
90
2
0
Nice, thanks for the continuing discussion. Indeed. God has little regard for human life according to every Biblical account from the flood of Noah; to the prescribed sacrifice of Isaac; to the genocides of Canaan; to the advocacy of slavery, to the idea of vicarious human sacrifice in the life/death of Jesus.

And given the popular Christian response: "Anyone who does not believe in Jesus is condemned to hell" - It doesn't speak well of God's regard for the vast majority of humanity. Especially everyone who was born prior to the life/death/resurrection of Jesus, and those who, through no fault of their own, never had an opportunity to "hear the gospel."
Do you think that everyone who was born before Jesus is in hell?
Sorry. Just got here and that's the impression I get.