Are the Scriptures plain to all Christians that read them?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest

Dear eternallygratefull: That is not logical and not true. 2 plus 2 equals for is not found in Scripture. Is it adding to Scripture to believe that?


What does 2 plus 2 have anything to do with God Scott? This is a foolish statement. and does not prove your point.

It is true. Whatever is true comes from God. Whatever is false agrees with falsehood, and no falsehood is of God. It is false to say the Bible teaches "by the Bible alone". It does not. The Bible teaches the Bible and (in) the traditions of God. Of course you don't want to believe what 2 Thess. 2:15 and 2 Thess. 3:6. There are apostolic traditions that were spoken in words by the apostles.
Who said I don't believe it? Are you putting words in my mouth again? I just do not interpret them the way you do. You have your interpretation. I have mine, they are apposed. and this is where we have our differences.

And which are preserved in the Orthodox Church.
Thats your opinion. Based on speculation. Not based on fact. You can't prove this to be true.

Matthew 28:19 says baptize. Christ doesn't explain how to baptize in this verse. To know that, we must refer to the teaching and practice of the apostles of Christ. The Church teaches trine immersion. But the Bible doesn't say that. Nor does the Bible say it shouldn't be trine immersion.
Again I have no clue what your trying to prove. We do know what baptize means by the word he used. it means to immerse ceremonially. And scripture does show this. John the baptist did it, The apostles did it. so why do you say we can not know what it is by scripture? You can't and you are in error saying it can not be.

as for triune baptism. what about when Paul baptized only in the ame of the lord. did he error? and why would it matter. baptism done by men does not save anyone. Only baptism done by God. mans baptism in obedience to Christs command is no more salvaic than OT sacrifice of animals or circumcisions, they are teaching tools. to show what God did and does. thats all.

Sola Scriptura is totally untrue. Scripture proves that (2 Thess. 2:15, 3:6).
God bless you. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington


again, your opinion. not based on fact

No. I am not following men. I follow the traditions of God. Private interpretation of the Bible by "scripture alone" is a tradition of men.

No. you follow men who tell you they have the only true tradition. You do not follow God. or you would believe as Paul did. You don't. so you can't be from God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The Orthodox do not teach any heresies. We teach that priests can marry, but only before ordination.
Where does scripture say that a priest should not marry after ordination? Why should a priest be forbidden to be given a help meet to help him do his job? As God intended. Paul refused to have a wife because he travelled alot and it would not be fair to her or him. so whats your excuse to reject thre most important institution God gave man just because someone becomes a priest?

We teach that all foods are good, but we abstain from foods on certain days because the Lord Himself told us to fast, "when you fast" (Matthew 6:16).
I have no problem with fasting. Many heresies were brought into the church These were just a few examples.


You don't understand,St Paul was talking about the teachings of the first Christian heretics - the GNOSTICS. He wasn't talking about regular (Orthodox) Christians.
I understand completely. As I said. these were just a few examples. many cults use the same false teachings of others.


Protestants do follow the teachings of Luther. The most commons teachings of his that you follow is "Sola Fide" and "Sola Scriptura". Now Sola Fide is a heresy because Christ told us that works are necessary, and St Paul told us to "Work our your salvation with fear and trembling" (Pill 2:12).
Thats a lie. And again false witness against others.

1. Can you show where Christ said works were necessary for salvation? What work did the thief on the cross do to be saved? If he did none, why does he get out of working and the rest of us have to work? How much work is required? Is it the same for everyone? If it is not. what is the guidline of how much works. and how could anyone know they have eternal life if they must work? John said we can KNOW WE HAVE (present tense) Eternal life. Did John lie?

As for working out salvation. He was telling them to work out the results of their already obtained salvation. he was not telling them to work to earn salvation. A common mistranslation of this verse by legalistic christian wannabees who want to work out their own salvation and reject Gods salvation.

Luther had nothing to do with my belief in the baove. I got it by studying it myself. Unlike some. I do not take mens words as gospel truth. I study what they say. I have never studied luther. No need to.

He said elsewhere in that epistle about this, "Brothers, I do not count myself to have laid hold; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forward to those things which are ahead," Phil 3:13
Salvation is a thing Paul stated he had. Paul spoke of THINGS (plural) here. Why do you think he is talking about salvation. And not the eternal rewards God promised to those who do his works?

Rewards and a gift (salvation) are two different things. We work for a reward. We receive a gift. God calls salvation a gift. not a reward. In fact Paul makes it clear. if we try to work for it we incur debt. Why do you want to place yourself back under the debt of sin, when you sin was paid for on the cross? It makes no sense.


[/quote]Sola Scriptura is a heresy because nowhere in the whole Bible do we read that we need the Bible alone for salvation.[/quote]

And no where in the bible does it say we need things outside of scripture to be saved.

Paul made it clear. We have enough knowledge from scripture to be saved. why would we want to add to scripture things needed to be saved when Paul said it was all in there? Why would God give us a book to tell us his plan of salvation, then leave things out which are required for salvation. Sorry bro. But this I can not buy.

I would never write an instruction manual and leave important parts out. why would God? You think lowly of God my friend thinking he would do such a thing. and that is sad!
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest


What does 2 plus 2 have anything to do with God Scott? This is a foolish statement. and does not prove your point.

Who said I don't believe it? Are you putting words in my mouth again? I just do not interpret them the way you do. You have your interpretation. I have mine, they are apposed. and this is where we have our differences.

Thats your opinion. Based on speculation. Not based on fact. You can't prove this to be true.

Again I have no clue what your trying to prove. We do know what baptize means by the word he used. it means to immerse ceremonially. And scripture does show this. John the baptist did it, The apostles did it. so why do you say we can not know what it is by scripture? You can't and you are in error saying it can not be.

as for triune baptism. what about when Paul baptized only in the ame of the lord. did he error? and why would it matter. baptism done by men does not save anyone. Only baptism done by God. mans baptism in obedience to Christs command is no more salvaic than OT sacrifice of animals or circumcisions, they are teaching tools. to show what God did and does. thats all.



again, your opinion. not based on fact



No. you follow men who tell you they have the only true tradition. You do not follow God. or you would believe as Paul did. You don't. so you can't be from God.
Can you prove your tradition is the tradition of God?

 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Can you prove your tradition is the tradition of God?

My tradition and doctrines lines up with scripture. thats the only proof I need. Nor do I need to prove it. My eternity is not based on tradition. it is based on the word of God and his promises.

But you do not hold scripture to any authority. so you can't see it.

You do not hold scripture as your authority because your tradition falls on its face unless extra-biblical sources are used. Just like in Christ time. The jewsih faith fell on its face if scripture was its only guidline. Thats why Jesus used scripture alone to refute them. and purposely broke their extrabibical laws.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
My tradition and doctrines lines up with scripture. thats the only proof I need. Nor do I need to prove it. My eternity is not based on tradition. it is based on the word of God and his promises.

But you do not hold scripture to any authority. so you can't see it.

You do not hold scripture as your authority because your tradition falls on its face unless extra-biblical sources are used. Just like in Christ time. The jewsih faith fell on its face if scripture was its only guidline. Thats why Jesus used scripture alone to refute them. and purposely broke their extrabibical laws.
You believe private reading of the Bible can be trusted. You do not hold scripture as your authority; you hold your interpretation as your authority. You assume without proof that you can't misunderstand Scripture.
I do hold Scripture as the authority for Christians, when it is interpreted by Christians in the Church, as it is not the Scripture alone, but, according to Scripture, it is the Church that is "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). You do not believe that there is any Church that is the pillar and ground of the truth. You believe the Church is yourself, in your own private interpretation of the Bible. You see no need to agree with anyone other than yourself.
You don't need to listen to any man (Acts 8:30-31), because you wrongly believe your tradition and doctrines line up with Scripture. If you believe the Protestant doctrine that there are only 2 sacraments, salvation is by faith alone without any works, the Bible alone is the only authority for whatever private interpretation whatsoever you want to get out of the Bible according to your own personal feelings and emotions and self-made doctrines, and that anyone who is not a Protestant is automatically a Roman Catholic, I can only say your views are illogical. If I am exaggerating your views, I apologize. But Protestants generally accuse Eastern Orthodox Christians of being Roman Catholics because they see so much similarity between Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy. Actually, the popes used to be Orthodox Christians, but they fell into heresy. Every Protestant, or almost every Protestant, is a Roman Catholic, as all Protestants believe in rationalism and intelligent faith. Whatever seems logical and rational to them as a private opinion must be the truth.
I am not infallible. The Bible says only the Church is infallible (1 Tim. 3:15). You do not believe what 2 Thessalonians 2:15, 3:6 say, so you falsely believe in the false doctrine of Bible alone.
 
Aug 18, 2011
392
0
0
You believe private reading of the Bible can be trusted. You do not hold scripture as your authority; you hold your interpretation as your authority. You assume without proof that you can't misunderstand Scripture.
I do hold Scripture as the authority for Christians, when it is interpreted by Christians in the Church, as it is not the Scripture alone, but, according to Scripture, it is the Church that is "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). You do not believe that there is any Church that is the pillar and ground of the truth. You believe the Church is yourself, in your own private interpretation of the Bible. You see no need to agree with anyone other than yourself.
You don't need to listen to any man (Acts 8:30-31), because you wrongly believe your tradition and doctrines line up with Scripture. If you believe the Protestant doctrine that there are only 2 sacraments, salvation is by faith alone without any works, the Bible alone is the only authority for whatever private interpretation whatsoever you want to get out of the Bible according to your own personal feelings and emotions and self-made doctrines, and that anyone who is not a Protestant is automatically a Roman Catholic, I can only say your views are illogical. If I am exaggerating your views, I apologize. But Protestants generally accuse Eastern Orthodox Christians of being Roman Catholics because they see so much similarity between Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy. Actually, the popes used to be Orthodox Christians, but they fell into heresy. Every Protestant, or almost every Protestant, is a Roman Catholic, as all Protestants believe in rationalism and intelligent faith. Whatever seems logical and rational to them as a private opinion must be the truth.
I am not infallible. The Bible says only the Church is infallible (1 Tim. 3:15). You do not believe what 2 Thessalonians 2:15, 3:6 say, so you falsely believe in the false doctrine of Bible alone.

I agree Scott. How can the non-Orthodox Christians understand what their bible means without being "tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;" (Ephesians 4:14)?. Because everybody's a critic, and everybody is going to have their own interpretation of the Bible. There are always contentions in Protestant Christianity because of this. They have not yet reached the "unity of the Faith" (Ephesians 4:13), so they cannot help but the tossed by the doctrines of other people. When you have a Calvinist saying "I believe in predestination" and you have a Seventh Day Adventist saying, "I believe that Saturday is the day of worship" and you have a Johovah's Witness saying, "There is not Holy Trinity, only Jehovah is Lord", then we are swimming in the ocean of confusion. This is why it is critical to be a part of "Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth." (1 Timothy 3:15). Which Church is the Eastern Orthodox Church because it adheres to the holy 7 Ecumenical Councils; not the councils of just "men", but holy bishops who were guided by the Holy Spirit of Truth. For the Bible cannot be interpreted just by any and everybody, that is how we get heresies in the first place; because people place so much trust in their own minds and heart that they think, "This is what God told me the Bible means", then they can very easily be deluded or deceived by Satan who transforms into an angel of light. The earliest Christians taught us that there is nothing worse than for a person to trust in his own understanding because this is the way of self deception and pride. But being obedient to the Holy Church of Christ, you cure your self deceiving pride and you learn the how to walk in a path that hundreds of millions of Christians have walked before; by the lives and sayings of the Saints and the life of the Church. Protestants are not a part of the Church of Christ because they walk as individualistically as possible, having their own selves as the infallible leader and interpreted of Holy Scripture - this i spiritually dangerous, as Satan himself uses it to keep you enslaved to your own ego.
Join the Church of Christ and you kill pride by being obedient to Her and Her precepts.
 
Last edited:
S

Scotth1960

Guest
I agree Scott. How can the non-Orthodox Christians understand what their bible means without being "tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;" (Ephesians 4:14)?. Because everybody's a critic, and everybody is going to have their own interpretation of the Bible. There are always contentions in Protestant Christianity because of this. They have not yet reached the "unity of the Faith" (Ephesians 4:13), so they cannot help but the tossed by the doctrines of other people. When you have a Calvinist saying "I believe in predestination" and you have a Seventh Day Adventist saying, "I believe that Saturday is the day of worship" and you have a Johovah's Witness saying, "There is not Holy Trinity, only Jehovah is Lord", then we are swimming in the ocean of confusion. This is why it is critical to be a part of "Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth." (1 Timothy 3:15). Which Church is the Eastern Orthodox Church because it adheres to the holy 7 Ecumenical Councils; not the councils of just "men", but holy bishops who were guided by the Holy Spirit of Truth. For the Bible cannot be interpreted just by any and everybody, that is how we get heresies in the first place; because people place so much trust in their own minds and heart that they think, "This is what God told me the Bible means", then they can very easily be deluded or deceived by Satan who transforms into an angel of light. The earliest Christians taught us that there is nothing worse than for a person to trust in his own understanding because this is the way of self deception and pride. But being obedient to the Holy Church of Christ, you cure your self deceiving pride and you learn the how to walk in a path that hundreds of millions of Christians have walked before; by the lives and sayings of the Saints and the life of the Church. Protestants are not a part of the Church of Christ because they walk as individualistically as possible, having their own selves as the infallible leader and interpreted of Holy Scripture - this i spiritually dangerous, as Satan himself uses it to keep you enslaved to your own ego.
Join the Church of Christ and you kill pride by being obedient to Her and Her precepts.
Peter E. Gillquist's book, "Becoming Orthodox", convinced me of the truth of Orthodoxy, and the right meaning of John 15:26. This showed me in simple terms why Orthodoxy has the correct Triadology (doctrine of the Holy Trinity). I read the translations of the work of Blessed Saint Photios (Photius) about the mystagogy of the Holy Spirit. Not only is Photios work biblical and theologically Orthodox: it makes sense to simple logic and obedience to proper rules of proper reasoning. I am reading a book now that I find really explains Photios's work in simple terms
It should be read by Christians. Haugh, Richard. (1975). Photius and the Carolingians: The Trinitarian Controversy. Belmont, MA: Nordland Publishing Company.

 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You believe private reading of the Bible can be trusted.
No I don't scott. I believe there is but one interpretation of the Bible. Not many. And I believe only those who have open eyes and trust God to show them this truth minus any preconceived, or prideful ideas will find this interpretation. This "private interpretation" Crap comes from only two churches. both who procede from Rome, and it is an excuse they use to keep you from searching the word. Because they know if you search the word, you will find truth, and find they do not have it. It is a ploy from satan to keep people from studying Gods word. and you have bitten into it hook line and sinker.

You do not hold scripture as your authority; you hold your interpretation as your authority.
This makes no sense Scott. where do you get this crap? That's like saying that the Uniform Code of Military Justice is onl;y applicable to MY interpretation. And is not my authority. It was my authority when I was in the military;l If I misinterpreted it, I suffered the consequences of that misinterpretation and my actions because of that misinterpretation. It is no different with scripture. It is my authority. If I misinterpret. I suffer the consequences. But it is still my authority!.
You assume without proof that you can't misunderstand Scripture.
I don't assume anything. I have found that I have misinterpreted it before. And have corrected my misinterpretations by study. Thats why we study Gods word with open hearts. Never assume anything. You assume your church gets it right. But if you actually studied, you would find they have not. Your looking for external proof. When scripture is more than adequate to prove itself. God did not give us a faulty word! We do not need external proofs to prove it is from God. and know what it says is true. God gave us more than enough in his word to prove out interpretation to be correct.


I do hold Scripture as the authority for Christians

No you don't. you hold to your church as trhe authority. Your fooling yourself if you think otherwise.


, when it is interpreted by Christians in the Church, as it is not the Scripture alone, but, according to Scripture, it is the Church that is "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). You do not believe that there is any Church that is the pillar and ground of the truth. You believe the Church is yourself, in your own private interpretation of the Bible. You see no need to agree with anyone other than yourself.
No. I believe the Church is the body of Christ. And anyone baptized into the body by the HS of God belongs to that church. It is not a religious organization. It is a group of people all united by one thing. CHRIST! and the word (WHICH IS CHRIST) is our authority. I agree with many thousands of people. If I was alone, I would worry. But I am not. Again you make nonsensical arguments.

Face it Scott. You follow men. You say their doctrines hold up to the word. But your wrong. And even if you thought they might be wrong, you would not even investigate it, because your brainwashed by the roman heirarchy to believ only they can properly interpret the word. well they are wrong. and your headed to an eternity of darkness if you do not study for yourself and find truth. Otherwise you will fall with all the religious pharisees. and those who have come in their place.
 
Aug 18, 2011
392
0
0
No I don't scott. I believe there is but one interpretation of the Bible. Not many. And I believe only those who have open eyes and trust God to show them this truth minus any preconceived, or prideful ideas will find this interpretation. This "private interpretation" Crap comes from only two churches. both who procede from Rome, and it is an excuse they use to keep you from searching the word. Because they know if you search the word, you will find truth, and find they do not have it. It is a ploy from satan to keep people from studying Gods word. and you have bitten into it hook line and sinker.



This makes no sense Scott. where do you get this crap? That's like saying that the Uniform Code of Military Justice is onl;y applicable to MY interpretation. And is not my authority. It was my authority when I was in the military;l If I misinterpreted it, I suffered the consequences of that misinterpretation and my actions because of that misinterpretation. It is no different with scripture. It is my authority. If I misinterpret. I suffer the consequences. But it is still my authority!.


I don't assume anything. I have found that I have misinterpreted it before. And have corrected my misinterpretations by study. Thats why we study Gods word with open hearts. Never assume anything. You assume your church gets it right. But if you actually studied, you would find they have not. Your looking for external proof. When scripture is more than adequate to prove itself. God did not give us a faulty word! We do not need external proofs to prove it is from God. and know what it says is true. God gave us more than enough in his word to prove out interpretation to be correct.




No you don't. you hold to your church as trhe authority. Your fooling yourself if you think otherwise.




No. I believe the Church is the body of Christ. And anyone baptized into the body by the HS of God belongs to that church. It is not a religious organization. It is a group of people all united by one thing. CHRIST! and the word (WHICH IS CHRIST) is our authority. I agree with many thousands of people. If I was alone, I would worry. But I am not. Again you make nonsensical arguments.

Face it Scott. You follow men. You say their doctrines hold up to the word. But your wrong. And even if you thought they might be wrong, you would not even investigate it, because your brainwashed by the roman heirarchy to believ only they can properly interpret the word. well they are wrong. and your headed to an eternity of darkness if you do not study for yourself and find truth. Otherwise you will fall with all the religious pharisees. and those who have come in their place.
One, he is not Roman Catholic but Eastern Orthodox, Rome fell away from the true Church in 1054. My mian observation here is that whenever you say to Scott "you follow men", you are being hypocritical because you yourself are a man and yet you interpret the Scripture for yourself and follow yourself. Haven't you read the Proverb (28:26) " He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool"? What makes you better than the Bishops, Priests and Holy One's of the Apostolic Church? Are God's appointed teachers not good enough for you? I see, you think you know better than they.


1Timothy 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.

 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
One, he is not Roman Catholic but Eastern Orthodox, Rome fell away from the true Church in 1054.
1. You are still a part of the roman church. You still teach the same works based gospel. Rome did not fall away from truth, they never head it. All you have is wetted down version of the roman Church.

My mian observation here is that whenever you say to Scott "you follow men", you are being hypocritical because you yourself are a man and yet you interpret the Scripture for yourself and follow yourself.
Why is this a problem. When I stand in front of God am I going to be judged based on what man or men I listened to? Or will my eternity be based on what I studied and what I believed? This is not even the same, Why do you deny your following men? Your basing your eternity on what men tell you. I am basing my eternity on what God shows me in his word.

Haven't you read the Proverb (28:26) " He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool"? What makes you better than the Bishops, Priests and Holy One's of the Apostolic Church? Are God's appointed teachers not good enough for you? I see, you think you know better than they.
This is the problem. You ASSUME they are from Gods church. Yet scripture does not support this Assumption. I am not trusting my heart. I am trusting Gods word. Gods word tells me I am saved based on my faith in the work of Christ on the cross. Gods word tells me if I try to earn salvation I am working for a reward. And my reward will be justly served as eternal punishment. Because the penalty of sin is death, thus my reward for sin is death. Nothing else can remove my sin. I can take the eucharist every day from now until I die. I can be baptised in water. I can attend church whenever the doors are opened. Confess my sins to any priest or bishop or do whatever "work" a Church tells me to do. I will still be deserving of my just reward. Spiritual death. Because ONLY DEATH CAN TAKE AWAY SIN! Any church that teaches otherwise is NOT a Church of God!


1Timothy 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
This speaks highly of the man who formed the roman Church, of which you are a part of.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
No I don't scott. I believe there is but one interpretation of the Bible. Not many. And I believe only those who have open eyes and trust God to show them this truth minus any preconceived, or prideful ideas will find this interpretation. This "private interpretation" Crap comes from only two churches. both who procede from Rome, and it is an excuse they use to keep you from searching the word. Because they know if you search the word, you will find truth, and find they do not have it. It is a ploy from satan to keep people from studying Gods word. and you have bitten into it hook line and sinker.



This makes no sense Scott. where do you get this crap? That's like saying that the Uniform Code of Military Justice is onl;y applicable to MY interpretation. And is not my authority. It was my authority when I was in the military;l If I misinterpreted it, I suffered the consequences of that misinterpretation and my actions because of that misinterpretation. It is no different with scripture. It is my authority. If I misinterpret. I suffer the consequences. But it is still my authority!.


I don't assume anything. I have found that I have misinterpreted it before. And have corrected my misinterpretations by study. Thats why we study Gods word with open hearts. Never assume anything. You assume your church gets it right. But if you actually studied, you would find they have not. Your looking for external proof. When scripture is more than adequate to prove itself. God did not give us a faulty word! We do not need external proofs to prove it is from God. and know what it says is true. God gave us more than enough in his word to prove out interpretation to be correct.




No you don't. you hold to your church as trhe authority. Your fooling yourself if you think otherwise.


Dear eternallygratefull:
I do hold Scripture as the authority. Who wrote the Scripture? The Church. Who knows what its own writings mean? The original members of the Church: the 12 apostles, St. Paul, the Seventy, and their successors, the bishops of the Church. The priests and the deacons too. And the Christian laity.
You're fooling yourself if you think your tradition comes from the Scripture. If you read it in a Protestant way, it comes from Luther. I already proved to you that Luther invented "faith alone" on his own personal authority. He didn't get it from Saint Paul. He added the word "alone" to the Bible. You assume the Orthodox Church does not get it right. But if you actually studied, you would find that they do. John 15:26 is a clear example of where the Church gets her doctrine of the Trinity, of the procession of the Spirit in the Trinity, correct (orthodox).
God bless you.


No. I believe the Church is the body of Christ.
Dear eternallygratefull: I believe the Church is the body of Christ.
I do not believe 38,000 different, contradictory Protestant sects, are the Church.
In Erie Scott R. Harrington

And anyone baptized into the body by the HS of God belongs to that church. It is not a religious organization. It is a group of people all united by one thing. CHRIST! and the word (WHICH IS CHRIST) is our authority.
I agree with many thousands of people. If I was alone, I would worry. But I am not. Again you make nonsensical arguments.

Face it Scott. You follow men.

Face it, eternallygratefull. You do not tell the truth.
Well, you are wrong.
It is slander to call my belief "roman heirarchy", and learn to spell please, it's Roman hierarchy. I am not a member of the RCC. Eastern Orthodoxy is not Roman Catholicism! You are mistaken if you think that it is!
Scott Harrington Erie PA

You say their doctrines hold up to the word. But your wrong. And even if you thought they might be wrong, you would not even investigate it, because your brainwashed by the roman heirarchy to believ only they can properly interpret the word. well they are wrong. and your headed to an eternity of darkness if you do not study for yourself and find truth. Otherwise you will fall with all the religious pharisees. and those who have come in their place.
[
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
1. You are still a part of the roman church. You still teach the same works based gospel. Rome did not fall away from truth, they never head it. All you have is wetted down version of the roman Church.



Why is this a problem. When I stand in front of God am I going to be judged based on what man or men I listened to? Or will my eternity be based on what I studied and what I believed? This is not even the same, Why do you deny your following men? Your basing your eternity on what men tell you. I am basing my eternity on what God shows me in his word.



This is the problem. You ASSUME they are from Gods church. Yet scripture does not support this Assumption. I am not trusting my heart. I am trusting Gods word. Gods word tells me I am saved based on my faith in the work of Christ on the cross. Gods word tells me if I try to earn salvation I am working for a reward. And my reward will be justly served as eternal punishment. Because the penalty of sin is death, thus my reward for sin is death. Nothing else can remove my sin. I can take the eucharist every day from now until I die. I can be baptised in water. I can attend church whenever the doors are opened. Confess my sins to any priest or bishop or do whatever "work" a Church tells me to do. I will still be deserving of my just reward. Spiritual death. Because ONLY DEATH CAN TAKE AWAY SIN! Any church that teaches otherwise is NOT a Church of God!

Dear eternallygratefull: Only CHRIST'S death and resurrection can take away sin. Our death does not take away sin; our death is taken away by Christ's death and resurrection. I have faith in the work of Christ on the cross. Do you assume I don't believe that? Why do you say "only death can take away sin"? Which verse of Scripture says that?
In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington


This speaks highly of the man who formed the roman Church, of which you are a part of.[

Dear eternallygratefull: I am not a part of the Roman catholic church. And you don't know the Roman empire in its Christian form was preserved in Orthodoxy in the East, not in the papist West. I am not from the papist West. I was a Protestant, not a papist, before I heard about Russian Orthodoxy.
In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
No I don't scott. I believe there is but one interpretation of the Bible. Not many. And I believe only those who have open eyes and trust God to show them this truth minus any preconceived, or prideful ideas will find this interpretation. This "private interpretation" Crap comes from only two churches. both who procede from Rome, and it is an excuse they use to keep you from searching the word. Because they know if you search the word, you will find truth, and find they do not have it. It is a ploy from satan to keep people from studying Gods word. and you have bitten into it hook line and sinker.



This makes no sense Scott. where do you get this crap? That's like saying that the Uniform Code of Military Justice is onl;y applicable to MY interpretation. And is not my authority. It was my authority when I was in the military;l If I misinterpreted it, I suffered the consequences of that misinterpretation and my actions because of that misinterpretation. It is no different with scripture. It is my authority. If I misinterpret. I suffer the consequences. But it is still my authority!.


I don't assume anything. I have found that I have misinterpreted it before. And have corrected my misinterpretations by study. Thats why we study Gods word with open hearts. Never assume anything. You assume your church gets it right. But if you actually studied, you would find they have not. Your looking for external proof. When scripture is more than adequate to prove itself. God did not give us a faulty word! We do not need external proofs to prove it is from God. and know what it says is true. God gave us more than enough in his word to prove out interpretation to be correct.




No you don't. you hold to your church as trhe authority. Your fooling yourself if you think otherwise.




No. I believe the Church is the body of Christ. And anyone baptized into the body by the HS of God belongs to that church. It is not a religious organization. It is a group of people all united by one thing. CHRIST! and the word (WHICH IS CHRIST) is our authority. I agree with many thousands of people. If I was alone, I would worry. But I am not. Again you make nonsensical arguments.

Face it Scott. You follow men. You say their doctrines hold up to the word. But your wrong. And even if you thought they might be wrong, you would not even investigate it, because your brainwashed by the roman heirarchy to believ only they can properly interpret the word. well they are wrong. and your headed to an eternity of darkness if you do not study for yourself and find truth.

Dear eternallygratefull: You assume I do not study for myself to find truth. I have studied John 15:26. It is the verse that the Orthodox Church teaches. The Protestants most of them ignore or do not teach this verse. This verse is from Christ God, Who is light. God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all. There is an eternity of darkness about the procession of the Holy Spirit for those who do not study John 15:26. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington

Otherwise you will fall with all the religious pharisees. and those who have come in their place.


It is wrong to bring up the pharisees out of context, to call any belief you don't agree with a belief of the religious pharisees. That is slander. Isn't Luther acting like his own authority over "faith alone" which is not taught in Romans 3:28?

 
Aug 18, 2011
392
0
0
1. You are still a part of the roman church. You still teach the same works based gospel. Rome did not fall away from truth, they never head it. All you have is wetted down version of the roman Church.
No, we are not the same Church as the Roman Catholic Church. We are the original Church , the Catholic Church was made in 1054 AD because of a schism and apostasy. What makes you think that the Gospel isn't based on works? Jesus Christ taught a Gospel of works, and so did the Apostles, "But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons." Collosians 3:25 "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad." 2Co_5:10 "And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works." Rev_20:13 "And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labours; and their works do follow them."Rev_14:13 perfect?
Jas_2:24 "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only."
Eph_2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

The Lord Jesus Christ Himself said this,

Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.





Why is this a problem. When I stand in front of God am I going to be judged based on what man or men I listened to? Or will my eternity be based on what I studied and what I believed? This is not even the same, Why do you deny your following men? Your basing your eternity on what men tell you. I am basing my eternity on what God shows me in his word.
Well the Bible was written by men, do you agree? It did not just fall from Heaven. If the Bible was written by men, then you do, in fact, follow men. So then why should you degrade the status of men? It was through men that divine revelation came, and it was through a man (Jesus Christ) that we were saved. So you are being a hypocrite because you also follow a men, the Holy Bible was all written by men. You must not degrade the status of any Saint of the Apostolic Church because it was through them that the Holy Spirit spoke to us, just like they Holy Spirit spoke to Paul or the Prophets.

This is the problem. You ASSUME they are from Gods church. Yet scripture does not support this Assumption. I am not trusting my heart. I am trusting Gods word. Gods word tells me I am saved based on my faith in the work of Christ on the cross. Gods word tells me if I try to earn salvation I am working for a reward. And my reward will be justly served as eternal punishment. Because the penalty of sin is death, thus my reward for sin is death. Nothing else can remove my sin. I can take the eucharist every day from now until I die. I can be baptised in water. I can attend church whenever the doors are opened. Confess my sins to any priest or bishop or do whatever "work" a Church tells me to do. I will still be deserving of my just reward. Spiritual death. Because ONLY DEATH CAN TAKE AWAY SIN! Any church that teaches otherwise is NOT a Church of God!

Jesus Christ Himself said, "I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it". "And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

Ephesians 4

It is through Apostolic Succession that the Church of Christ lives on. Read this here : Apostolic succession - OrthodoxWiki


Sin is taken away through the means of body and soul. That is why Paul says, " Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God." 2Co_7:1
Protestantism's rejection of asceticism and the Sacraments is what keeps them from being cleansed in the body. Because it is in the body that sin resides and we must kill sin in the body. The only way to kill sin in the body is if we receive the Sacraments of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion.

Rom_7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest


Dear eternallygratefull: You assume I do not study for myself to find truth. I have studied John 15:26. It is the verse that the Orthodox Church teaches. The Protestants most of them ignore or do not teach this verse. This verse is from Christ God, Who is light. God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all. There is an eternity of darkness about the procession of the Holy Spirit for those who do not study John 15:26. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington


What does John 15: 26 have to do with our discussion? John 15: 26 says that the helper will help the people who walked with Christ. And testify of Christ. that has nothing to do with salvation. Studying one verse does not make you a Bible Scholar.

It is wrong to bring up the pharisees out of context, to call any belief you don't agree with a belief of the religious pharisees. That is slander.


The pharisees had a basic message.

1. We can trace our routs back to the fathers. No one else can.
2. We can trace our traditions back to the fathers. No one else can
3. God has given us alone the power to interpret scripture. No one else has that ability.
4. Our way is the right way. Other ways do not have the complete message.
5. Taught a works based Gospel based on deeds, and not on faith.

Sounds just like the Roman church, whether it be Catholic or Orthodox. So forgive me, It is not slander, it is based on facts.


Isn't Luther acting like his own authority over "faith alone" which is not taught in Romans 3:28?
27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law.


1. Justification is by Faith. I can't find any other thing Paul is trying to say we are justified by other than faith. If we are justified by anything other than faith. why did Paul leave it out?

2. Faith minus deeds of the law. Paul speaking to people who were infiltrated by jews trying to add works of the law to faith in order to receive justification. He tells them plainly., you are saved by faith, not works.


No to mention. all one has to do is look at ocntext to easily see this.

Rom 3:20 - 24..Therfore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified. For by the law is knowledge of sin. but now the rightiousness of God apart from the law is revealed being witnessed by the law and the prophets even the rightiousness of God through faith in Christ to all on on all who believe for their is no difference. for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. being justified freely by the grace of God through the redemption in Christ Jesus. ( rom being justified ( greek dikaiosumenoi - "having been acquitted"or Made perfect) freely by the grace of God through the redemption in Christ. Jesus.

What does Paul say? Justification is free. If it is free. what work can be added to EARN justification? Paul only makes one thing which grants justification. faith. So did Luther change the meaning by screwing up and adding the word "alone" No he did not. It is what Paul said. Luther messed up, and many have suffered because of his errors. But it does not make some of what he said true!

Was paul the first to say this?


Acts 13:39 - And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

Here belief (faith) grants justification. Nothing else is added to belief or faith. and should not be added.

How about what Paul said later,, which supports this view?

Romans 4 : What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,

1. One can not say works of the law here. There was no Law in Abrahams time.
2. One can not say religious works, or laws Given by God. There were none at this time.
3. One can say what Paul makes clear. ANY WORK OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. which would include ANY GOOD DEED, Whether religious in type or not.
4. Abraham was justified by one thing and one thing only. Faith. Paul makes it clear. If we try to work or earn justification. we will not get it. Because justification is a gift not a reward. If we try to earn it by obeying a set of religious guidelines or works. We are trying to recieve a reward. Thus will NEVER be justified. One who is never justified, is still guilty and will die in his sin. And spend eternity separated from God.


I could Go on and On Scott. But I should not have to. You are more than capable of seeing truth for yourself. Paul taught justification by Faith alone. Not of works, whether these works be of the law. Any Good deed, or religious wors (sacraments) as taught by the roman church or any other church. If you try to earn justification. you will fail. Because only one thing can help you get to heaven on your own accord by your on works. That thing is the law. And only Christ fuflilled this law. As paul said in rom 3. ALL Have sin and fallen short of the mark set by God. thus all will suffer eternal damnation unless they recieve the gift given by God through his son. Try to work for it. You will fail.

The penalty of sin is death. Not being baptised. Not taking the eucharist. Not confessing to a priest. or any other sacrament or work people try to add to the gospel of Christ. Since the penalty of sin is death. We have two choices. Recieved Christ's gift based on his death, and offered by Grace (unmerited favor) or suffer our own death as a result of sin. as a reward. (merited judgment)








 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
No I don't scott. I believe there is but one interpretation of the Bible. Not many. And I believe only those who have open eyes and trust God to show them this truth minus any preconceived, or prideful ideas will find this interpretation. This "private interpretation" Crap comes from only two churches. both who procede from Rome, and it is an excuse they use to keep you from searching the word. Because they know if you search the word, you will find truth, and find they do not have it.
Dear eternallygratefull: What keeps you from searching the Word? Is it the Eastern Orthodox Church? Not at all. The Orthodox Church says in Her Creed: (I believe) .."in the Holy Spirit, the Lord true and life giving, Who proceedeth from the Father [see John 15:26]..."
The Church quotes our Saviour and LORD Jesus Christ, Who says, that the Spirit "proceedeth from the Father". Christ says, "But when the Comforter is come, Whom I shall send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, Who proceedeth from the Father, He shall give testimony of Me." John 15:26. What does the Protestant Reformation (Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Wesley), say. They say "who proceedeth from the Father" and the Son; and thus they add words to the Holy Scripture. They get this error from Rome: from Roman Catholicism. If you follow Scripture, instead of Protestant tradition, you will avoid this error of "and the Son" (Filioque in Latin language). Who says the Orthodox Church does not have the truth? This verse, John 15:26, proves that the Eastern Christians DO have the truth, because they all say the Spirit proceeds from the Father alone. So, you are simply not telling the truth about the Orthodox, and this shows Orthodoxy's Gospel does not come from Rome, but from Jesus Christ in John 15:26. And thus Orthodoxy bears witness to Jesus Christ (John 15:27).
God bless you and save you for always in Christ our SAVIOUR. AMEN. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington PS Christ is the First and the Last, and besides Him there is no Saviour.
We are saved by His mercy alone (Titus 3:5).


It is a ploy from satan to keep people from studying Gods word. and you have bitten into it hook line and sinker.




This makes no sense Scott. where do you get this crap? That's like saying that the Uniform Code of Military Justice is onl;y applicable to MY interpretation. And is not my authority. It was my authority when I was in the military;l If I misinterpreted it, I suffered the consequences of that misinterpretation and my actions because of that misinterpretation. It is no different with scripture. It is my authority. If I misinterpret. I suffer the consequences. But it is still my authority!.


I don't assume anything. I have found that I have misinterpreted it before. And have corrected my misinterpretations by study. Thats why we study Gods word with open hearts. Never assume anything. You assume your church gets it right. But if you actually studied, you would find they have not. Your looking for external proof. When scripture is more than adequate to prove itself. God did not give us a faulty word! We do not need external proofs to prove it is from God. and know what it says is true. God gave us more than enough in his word to prove out interpretation to be correct.




No you don't. you hold to your church as trhe authority. Your fooling yourself if you think otherwise.




No. I believe the Church is the body of Christ. And anyone baptized into the body by the HS of God belongs to that church. It is not a religious organization. It is a group of people all united by one thing. CHRIST! and the word (WHICH IS CHRIST) is our authority. I agree with many thousands of people. If I was alone, I would worry. But I am not. Again you make nonsensical arguments.

Face it Scott. You follow men.

eternallygratefull:
I follow the Man, the God-man, Jesus Christ, Who says, "But when the Comforter is come, Whom I shall send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, Who proceedeth from the Father, He shall bring testimony to Me." John 15:26 Scott Harrington Erie PA


You say their doctrines hold up to the word. But your wrong. And even if you thought they might be wrong, you would not even investigate it, because your brainwashed by the roman heirarchy to believ only they can properly interpret the word. well they are wrong. and your headed to an eternity of darkness if you do not study for yourself and find truth. Otherwise you will fall with all the religious pharisees. and those who have come in their place.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
My tradition and doctrines lines up with scripture. thats the only proof I need. Nor do I need to prove it. My eternity is not based on tradition. it is based on the word of God and his promises.

But you do not hold scripture to any authority. so you can't see it.

You do not hold scripture as your authority because your tradition falls on its face unless extra-biblical sources are used.
Dear eternallygratefull: Totally false. The Bible says, "But when the Comforter comes, Whom I shall send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, Who proceedeth from the Father, He shall bear witness to Me." John 15:26. Biblical Faith. The Orthodox Christian Faith. No extra-biblical sources to prove this doctrine of the single procession of the Spirit from the Father alone.
Protestantism? Catholicism? Western Christianity in most of its expressions? They say "and the Son". Where do they get the idea?
From Augustine of Hippo: De Trinitate. From the third council of Toledo Spain, 589 AD. From Charlemagne, who got his ideas from Alcuin of York, who followed Augustinian theology, and the tradition of the third council of Toledo, Spain. God bless you.
If you say "salvation by faith alone", it is an error to ignore Luther, for Luther, not the Bible alone, is the source of this error. Thus, your main doctrine as a Protestant is predicated solely on the individualistic authority of Martin Luther, not upon the Bible faith, the "faith once delivered to the saints" (Jude 3). God bless you in the Saviour of all who believe in Him, Jesus Christ. Amen. In Erie PA October 2011 AD Scott R. Harrington


J
ust like in Christ time. The jewsih faith fell on its face if scripture was its only guidline. Thats why Jesus used scripture alone to refute them. and purposely broke their extrabibical laws.
Dear friend:
Scripture alone refutes Protestantism: "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith alone". James 2:24 In Erie PA Scott Harrington

 

duewell

Senior Member
Mar 5, 2011
350
9
18
imagine achieving all the enlightenment Christianity offers, only to have people disagree with you.

here is my example of this.

imagine your drinking coffee and someone is reading out of a book about coffee. they start reading to you out of the book and you can tell they never drank coffee. you want to share your coffee, but it is not your coffee to pour. so you try to tell them how to go and get a cup of coffee for themselves. the instructions for doing so are in the book they are reading. you try to explain it to them but they tell you that you are wrong. you look at them and take another sip of coffee, patiently trying to find another way to explain it to them from the book. coffee has to be planted and grown before it can be served. the book tells you how to do it. i hope that they will one day drink some coffee and laugh at the memories.

so you ask, are the scriptures plain to all Christians that read them? no, they are not. but those who study and read them will be prepared for when understanding is given to them. they will be able to follow with faith.

Duewell
the coffee is delicious
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
What does John 15: 26 have to do with our discussion? John 15: 26 says that the helper will help the people who walked with Christ. And testify of Christ. that has nothing to do with salvation. Studying one verse does not make you a Bible Scholar.

[/b][/color]

The pharisees had a basic message.

1. We can trace our routs back to the fathers. No one else can.
2. We can trace our traditions back to the fathers. No one else can
3. God has given us alone the power to interpret scripture. No one else has that ability.
4. Our way is the right way. Other ways do not have the complete message.
5. Taught a works based Gospel based on deeds, and not on faith.

Sounds just like the Roman church, whether it be Catholic or Orthodox. So forgive me, It is not slander, it is based on facts.




27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law.


1. Justification is by Faith. I can't find any other thing Paul is trying to say we are justified by other than faith. If we are justified by anything other than faith. why did Paul leave it out?

2. Faith minus deeds of the law. Paul speaking to people who were infiltrated by jews trying to add works of the law to faith in order to receive justification. He tells them plainly., you are saved by faith, not works.


No to mention. all one has to do is look at ocntext to easily see this.

Rom 3:20 - 24..Therfore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified. For by the law is knowledge of sin. but now the rightiousness of God apart from the law is revealed being witnessed by the law and the prophets even the rightiousness of God through faith in Christ to all on on all who believe for their is no difference. for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. being justified freely by the grace of God through the redemption in Christ Jesus. ( rom being justified ( greek dikaiosumenoi - "having been acquitted"or Made perfect) freely by the grace of God through the redemption in Christ. Jesus.

What does Paul say? Justification is free. If it is free. what work can be added to EARN justification? Paul only makes one thing which grants justification. faith. So did Luther change the meaning by screwing up and adding the word "alone" No he did not. It is what Paul said. Luther messed up, and many have suffered because of his errors. But it does not make some of what he said true!

Was paul the first to say this?


Acts 13:39 - And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

Here belief (faith) grants justification. Nothing else is added to belief or faith. and should not be added.

How about what Paul said later,, which supports this view?

Romans 4 : What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,

1. One can not say works of the law here. There was no Law in Abrahams time.
2. One can not say religious works, or laws Given by God. There were none at this time.
3. One can say what Paul makes clear. ANY WORK OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. which would include ANY GOOD DEED, Whether religious in type or not.
4. Abraham was justified by one thing and one thing only. Faith. Paul makes it clear. If we try to work or earn justification. we will not get it. Because justification is a gift not a reward. If we try to earn it by obeying a set of religious guidelines or works. We are trying to recieve a reward. Thus will NEVER be justified. One who is never justified, is still guilty and will die in his sin. And spend eternity separated from God.


I could Go on and On Scott. But I should not have to. You are more than capable of seeing truth for yourself. Paul taught justification by Faith alone. Not of works, whether these works be of the law. Any Good deed, or religious wors (sacraments) as taught by the roman church or any other church. If you try to earn justification. you will fail. Because only one thing can help you get to heaven on your own accord by your on works. That thing is the law. And only Christ fuflilled this law. As paul said in rom 3. ALL Have sin and fallen short of the mark set by God. thus all will suffer eternal damnation unless they recieve the gift given by God through his son. Try to work for it. You will fail.

The penalty of sin is death. Not being baptised. Not taking the eucharist. Not confessing to a priest. or any other sacrament or work people try to add to the gospel of Christ. Since the penalty of sin is death. We have two choices. Recieved Christ's gift based on his death, and offered by Grace (unmerited favor) or suffer our own death as a result of sin. as a reward. (merited judgment)








Dear eternally-gratefull: In: "Re: Are the Scriptures plain to all Christians that read them, your thread #115, you write: "What does John 15:26 have to do with our discussion? John 15:26 says that the helper will help the people who walked with Christ."
Actually, John 15:26 does not say that. Here is what John 15:26 does say, "But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me." John 15:26 KJV. You are right when you say the Spirit will testify of Christ. But the verse does not say the helper will help the people who walked with Christ. If you can't get your Scripture quotes correct, you shouldn't quote the verse only from memory. You must be thinking of perhaps 14:26 of John, perhaps, or at least drawing an inference from this. But you're not actually referring to all the words of either Jn. 14:26 or 15:26.
This speaks to your lack of credibility when you refer to Scriptures. If you get this wrong, what else do you get wrong? If you say "faith alone", you contradict another verse in the Bible, James 2:24. And the Bible can't contradict itself. But Protestantism doesn't care. All it cares is the testimony of Martin Luther, and Luther can offer no proof or justification from Scripture. He says faith alone is so because he, Martin Luther says it is so. "It is so. And I will have it so. And my will is reason enough. It is so because I, Dr. Martin Luther, say it is so."
The whole basis of faith alone is subjectivism, not the Holy Word of God, the Holy Bible.
The Bible, then, in Luther's hands, can mean anything that Luther personally wants the Bible to mean, not what our Lord Jesus Christ intends for the Bible.
In Erie PA October 13, 2011 AD Scott Robert Harrington, B.A.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
Its not placing a man before us and God to believe that gifted teachers are needed to "shepherd the flock of God". Its commanded by the Holy Spirit for us to follow the teachers an pastors who are set over us.


1Peter 5:1 The elders who are among you I exhort, as a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed;
2 shepherd the flock of God among you, overseeing not by compulsion, but rather willingly, not in fondness for dishonest gain, but rather eagerly;
3 nor as being masters over the flock under you, but rather being examples to the flock.



St Paul says in another passage regarding this "overseeing", "1Thessalonians 5:12 And we request of you, brothers, to recognize those who labor among you, and are over you in the Lord and instruct you,
13 and to regard them beyond all measure in love, because of their work. Be at peace among yourselve
s.



Not all have the gift of teaching. This simply means that not all have the ability to interpret Scriptures properly by the Holy Spirit.


1Corinthains 12:28 And those whom God has appointed in the church are: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, kinds of tongues.
29 All are not apostles, are they? All are not prophets, are they? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles?




For if what you are saying is true, then why are there over 28,000 Protestant denominations today? Is division a work of the Holy Spirit - certainly not. This is a work of error, of the spirit of error. And those who appoint themselves as teachers and infallible interpreters, just because they believe that they have the "Holy Spirit" to help them interpret it, these are self deceived and conceited. 2 Corinthians 10:18 "For not he who commends himself is approved, but he whom the Lord commends."


Dear NiceneChristian: This is kind of off-topic, but here is a book by an Eastern-Orthodox Christian that I recommend for all. For readers, especially for Eastern Orthodox readers who will read and believe it.

Dale, David. (2002). Upon This Rock: Doctrine, Dogma, and Orthodox Church Authority. Salisbury, MA: Regina Orthodox Press. Regina Orthodox Press, PO Box 5288, Salisbury, MA 01952 Regina Orthodox Press Online Store

"The Dogmatic Additions made by the Roman Church to the Apostolic Faith"
"There are four primary additions to the Apostolic Faith that have been made by the Roman Catholic Church: the addition of the Filioque clause to the Creed, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, the doctrine of papal infallibility, and the doctrine of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin." (page 286, Dale).
Of these, all Orthodox Christians reject; but some Orthodox Christians accept, as a theologoumenon, the assumption of the Virgin. It has not been defined by another Ecumenical Council, and generally many Orthodox Christians believe the Theotokos was assumed bodily into heaven. But it is an opinion on which one may accept or not accept, as a theologoumenon. It shouldn't be demanded by Romanist papist decree as it was. Nor rejected merely because a pope decreed it.
God save us all in Christ Jesus.
In Erie PA USA Scott R. Harrington