Attention Site owner/Admins: I need a moderator on the Cessationism Thread Please!
- Thread starter beastslayer1970
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
In this case that is what happened. You did not actually change any of the original poster's words (KJB excepted).
But you have directly changed a poster's words before to make it seem they said something they did not say. I know for a fact that you have done it to me, and I've seen you do it to others.
When you quote someone, it is meant to be a quote to remind people what you are responding to, not an opportunity for you to change what they said.
But you have directly changed a poster's words before to make it seem they said something they did not say. I know for a fact that you have done it to me, and I've seen you do it to others.
When you quote someone, it is meant to be a quote to remind people what you are responding to, not an opportunity for you to change what they said.
Not sure why people can't let this go. Preacher4Truth did nothing that is against forum rules, and many members do this. Cutting out the lengthy part of the posts, or to reply to one part of a post.
I do agree that KJV is right, as it is a translation, and a version of the Bible. Even Biblegateway lists it as KJV. But in the end, not a huge difference. And since there are people on that thread who are cessationists, using the KJV, it looks like you can defend the topic from either side, using the KJV. Except of course, it falls on deaf ears with me, since I cannot get through a passage in KJV, without running into so many words I would need to look up to understand, and that is not worth my time, when there are so many modern versions that are so readable, and of course, the Greek and Hebrew texts.
As far as snipping, well, he made it clear what he was doing. He did not represent what the person said, because he said what he did, and the original post was right there to read.
Much ado about nothing! Oh wait! Me quoting Shakespeare? And what does "ado" really mean?" LOL
I do agree that KJV is right, as it is a translation, and a version of the Bible. Even Biblegateway lists it as KJV. But in the end, not a huge difference. And since there are people on that thread who are cessationists, using the KJV, it looks like you can defend the topic from either side, using the KJV. Except of course, it falls on deaf ears with me, since I cannot get through a passage in KJV, without running into so many words I would need to look up to understand, and that is not worth my time, when there are so many modern versions that are so readable, and of course, the Greek and Hebrew texts.
As far as snipping, well, he made it clear what he was doing. He did not represent what the person said, because he said what he did, and the original post was right there to read.
Much ado about nothing! Oh wait! Me quoting Shakespeare? And what does "ado" really mean?" LOL
Don't pay attention to defilers, just ignore them. The spirit of anger intends for one thing, to put it in others. I pray such people can be free from it, so they don't inadvertently affect others. And in complete ignorance of it, turn comments back on the people who wrote them, often with a public distortion of it to gather jokes and support, while never seeing their own doings from deep down which they know not that they do.
We are free from sin when we don't engage with it, however, it is more challenging to see when someone is sinning in their intention and words. When we engage with them we are being drawn in. If anyone afflicted might return to the light I will gladly see them in a new light, but some people choose not to. If that isn't sin, then what else do these people grant themselves in self-justification?
We are free from sin when we don't engage with it, however, it is more challenging to see when someone is sinning in their intention and words. When we engage with them we are being drawn in. If anyone afflicted might return to the light I will gladly see them in a new light, but some people choose not to. If that isn't sin, then what else do these people grant themselves in self-justification?
Sorry, let me add, "making a joke with it!" Humourless people! Really! If you can't take a joke about yourself, time to go back to God, and let him help you grow to a point where you get the joke, and can laugh at it too! Especially when he was only joking about words, not cutting the person down.
Where did all the senses of humour go, anyway?
U
Humor or not, this should not be allowed 
...That surely is violation to the posters personal space...If it has been noted before, then surely a sticky note should be posted in the rules about it, how awful that this has happened...xox...
...That surely is violation to the posters personal space...If it has been noted before, then surely a sticky note should be posted in the rules about it, how awful that this has happened...xox...
Really no need to create a thread about it being done maliciously. Just report the post in question.
Threads like this are pure drama and have nothing constructive or of value. That's why report buttons exist. So people don't have to make drama threads.
When I use "reply with quote" I often edit the quote for brevity.
I don't replace any words with different words, but I often just cut things down for brevity.
This shouldn't be a problem unless the edit is intentionally done to change the meaning.
If we're going to get into a debate, we should expect people to nitpick our words.
What generally happens is people quote us CORRECTLY, but then when they go on to editorialize, they MISINTERPRET what we MEANT.
That isn't a rule violation, that's just poor debating...
and irritating.
: )
Last edited:
Elvis was all shook up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzQ8GDBA8Is
- Status