In context Paul said that along with covet to prophesy.
Tongues for the immature and prophesy for those who are matured in the faith.
Still can't explain the differences between tongues in Acts and tongues in Corinthians. Acts the tongues are in the ear of the hearer and in Corinthians tongues are in the mouth of the speaker. Acts did not require an interpreter yet in Corinthians an interpreter is required.
Care to hazard a guess what makes them different?
For the cause of Christ
Roger
No he did not and he did not use the context of mature and immature. it was explained, you can't explain how 1cor 13:8 is the creation of a modern translation of the bible. And you have not shown where the gifts are not for today. Yet you assert a false context to 1cor 14:1
"Tongues for the immature and prophesy for those who are matured in the faith."
1cor 14:1-5 does not support your claim . you are in error sir.
“Pursue love, and desire spiritual
gifts, but especially that you may prophesy.
2. “For he who speaks in a tongue
does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands
him; however,
in the spirit he speaks mysteries. Speaking to God is immature. You should be ashamed.
3 But
he who prophesies speaks edification and exhortation and comfort to men. 4 He who
speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
It is wrong to edify yourself huh?
5. I wish you all spoke with tongues(sounds like Paul is teaching how immature this gift is ),
but even more that you prophesied; [
a]for he who
prophesies is greater than he who speaks with tongues,
unless indeed he interprets, that the church may receive edification.
Unless there is an interpretation which produces the same results as Prophesying tongues & Interpret = edification.
Where is the immaturity again?