Baptism, the simple version.

[Wansvic]

That's the point to the poster it was sent to. By works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is a NT command. It has nothing to do with the OT law.

 

[Cameron143]

Water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is a NT command. It has nothing to do with the OT law.

You are predicating salvation on the action of men. That isn't grace...it's works.

 

[Wansvic]

What I shared makes perfect sense. You are just having a difficult time understanding anything beyond your biased, church indoctrination.

In regards to John's baptism, in Mark 1:4, was this baptism of repentance for "in order to obtain" the forgiveness of sins or was it for "in regards to/on the basis of" the forgiveness of sins received upon repentance? *Be careful. John's baptism took place BEFORE Pentecost. Also, in Matthew 3:11, we read - I baptize you with water "for" repentance.. *Was this baptism for "in order to obtain" repentance? OR was this baptism for "in regards to/on the basis of" repentance? Getting water baptized in order to obtain repentance makes no sense at all. Repentance precedes water baptism. This was also BEFORE Pentecost.

Baptized into Christ does not mean water baptized into the body of Christ. That is accomplished through Spirit baptism. (1 Corinthians 12:13) Now in what "sense" would a believer be "water baptized into Christ?" In the same "sense" that the Israelites were "baptized into Moses.." (1 Corinthians 10:2) The Israelites were not literally water baptized into the body of Moses here and there is little dispute that being "baptized into Moses" signified the open allegiance and public identification of the Israelites with Moses as their leader. Moses was formally recognized as the leader of the covenant people. Water baptism signifies our allegiance and public identification with Christ as our Savior, so it's only in that sense.

So you are saying that EVERYONE who was baptized by John had to be re-baptized later or else they would not be saved? In regards to Acts 19:1-7, in verse 2, Paul asked these disciples of John if they had received the Holy Spirit when they believed and their answer in verses 2-3 reveals that they had not yet believed in Christ unto salvation. They had not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit and they received the baptism of John, but did not realize that Jesus Christ was the One to whom John's baptism pointed. Paul gave them instructions about Jesus and after they believed Paul's presentation of the gospel and came to saving belief in Christ, they were then baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Paul laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit which is the exception, not the rule. We also see the laying on of hands in Acts 8:16-17. Again, exception, not the rule.

According to your logic, everyone who died prior to the death of Christ and could not be baptized into Christ will perish. Your gospel just does not hold water. It is full of holes.

That is your biased interpretation, but it's false. The only logical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18). *Perfect Harmony*

In regards to Acts 2:47, they were added to the Lord upon repentance/faith prior to receiving water baptism, just as we see in (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:7-9).

Acts 4:4 - However, many of those who heard the word believed; and the number of the men came to be about five thousand. *What happened to baptism?

Acts 5:14 - And believers were increasingly added to the Lord, multitudes of both men and women. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.

We must properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching our conclusion on doctrine, and not distort and pervert passages of scripture in an effort to "patch together" your so called gospel plan.

This sounds similar to the Campbellite 4 step plan of salvation, although they typically reverse the order of #2 and #3 in your list. Repentance actually precedes saving belief/faith in Christ. (Acts 20:21) Confessing with our mouth that Jesus is Lord and believing in our heart that God raised Him from the dead are not two separate steps to salvation, but are chronologically together. (Romans 10:8-10) Water baptism "follows" saving belief/faith in Christ. (Acts 10:43-48)

Your false gospel is the result of bad semantics and flawed hermeneutics. Let me know when you are ready to change your mind and believe the gospel. (Romans 1:16)

The idea that every scripture must specifically reference water baptism is incorrect. Once the components of the gospel message are established by 2-3 witnesses, as is the case with water baptism, there is no need to continually reference it. If that were so, then one could conclude that neither repentance, nor being filled with the Holy Spirit plays a part in acquiring the NT rebirth.

John the Baptist was sent to introduce the concept of the NT water baptism while the OT law was still in effect. It was an introduction to what was later modified and applied directly to the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. According to both Peter and Paul, obedience to the NT water baptism brought about the reality of an individual's sin being remitted in association with Jesus' sacrifice. (Acts 2:38, Rom. 6:3-6)

The NT command to repent AND be baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of one's sin was given to those who had already believed that Jesus was the Son of God. Consider that Jesus said unless one repents they will surely perish. (Luke 13:3, 5) So were the individual's who first heard the gospel message saved prior to their willingness to repent, and be baptized? Or, as scripture reflects, saved after both believing and being obedience to the command? (Mark 16:15-16, Acts 22:16...)

The act of repentance involves turning to God acknowledging one's sin after acceptance that Jesus was the Son of God. And, trusting that being buried with Jesus in the likeness of His death brings about what God says it does, the destruction of one's sins in accordance with Jesus' sacrifice. (Rom. 6:3-6)

 

[Wansvic]

You are predicating salvation on the action of men. That isn't grace...it's works.

So you deny that water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for remission of sin is a New Testament command?

God's grace is seen in His willingness to design a plan of salvation for sinful man, who in no way deserved it. And that plan included the need for those who believe in Jesus to be buried with Him by baptism wherein their sin is destroyed; as provided for by His shed blood on Calvary. The mixing of blood and water for purification is an ongoing theme seen in foreshadows throughout scripture.

 

[Wansvic]

@mphsmom

FYI:
"And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." Mark 16:15-16

 

[Cameron143]

So you deny that water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for remission of sin is a New Testament command?

God's grace is seen in His willingness to design a plan of salvation for sinful man, who in no way deserved it. And that plan included the need for those who believe in Jesus to be buried with Him by baptism wherein their sin is destroyed; as provided for by His shed blood on Calvary. The mixing of blood and water for purification is an ongoing theme seen in foreshadows throughout scripture.

I don't deny the command at all. We are just at variance as to what is happening in following it. Just as there were fruits meet for John's baptism, there are also fruits that attend NT baptism. Faith and obedience are the response of a converted heart. You would expect to find them wherever you find a genuine work of God.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Baptism, the simple version

grab em
dunk em
hold em
lift em
release em

 

[Cameron143]

Baptism, the simple version

grab em
dunk em
hold em
lift em
release em

Sounds like border policy.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Sounds like border policy.

 

[DJT_47]

It's obvious to me that you are very satisfied with what you already believe and don't want to be confused with the facts. Sadly, I can see that you are thoroughly indoctrinated and unteachable. I just hope and pray that something I shared with you will at least plant a seed that one day will be watered and lead you to faith in Jesus Christ for salvation. Water baptism cannot save you, but Jesus can only IF you place your faith in Him alone for salvation. (Acts 10:43; 16:31; Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9)

Yes, you are correct. I'm unteachable. I can't be taught BS and untruth. Goodbye.

 

[mailmandan]

Yes, you are correct. I'm unteachable. I can't be taught BS and untruth. Goodbye.

I'll be praying for you. 🙏

 

[mailmandan]

The idea that every scripture must specifically reference water baptism is incorrect. Once the components of the gospel message are established by 2-3 witnesses, as is the case with water baptism, there is no need to continually reference it. If that were so, then one could conclude that neither repentance, nor being filled with the Holy Spirit plays a part in acquiring the NT rebirth.

John the Baptist was sent to introduce the concept of the NT water baptism while the OT law was still in effect. It was an introduction to what was later modified and applied directly to the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. According to both Peter and Paul, obedience to the NT water baptism brought about the reality of an individual's sin being remitted in association with Jesus' sacrifice. (Acts 2:38, Rom. 6:3-6)

The NT command to repent AND be baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of one's sin was given to those who had already believed that Jesus was the Son of God. Consider that Jesus said unless one repents they will surely perish. (Luke 13:3, 5) So were the individual's who first heard the gospel message saved prior to their willingness to repent, and be baptized? Or, as scripture reflects, saved after both believing and being obedience to the command? (Mark 16:15-16, Acts 22:16...)

The act of repentance involves turning to God acknowledging one's sin after acceptance that Jesus was the Son of God. And, trusting that being buried with Jesus in the likeness of His death brings about what God says it does, the destruction of one's sins in accordance with Jesus' sacrifice. (Rom. 6:3-6)

Your arguments have already been refuted numerous times, but unfortunately, you just don't have eyes to see or ears to hear. (2 Corinthians 4:3,4)

https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/what-must-i-do-to-be-saved.209857/page-15

https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/what-must-i-do-to-be-saved.209857/page-16

https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/what-must-i-do-to-be-saved.209857/page-17

 

[mailmandan]

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...the-sorcerer-saved.209192/page-6#post-4999941

 

[Wansvic]

You stated in your previous post:

I find it interesting that people refuse to accept what is so obvious in the detailed conversion accounts of the Acts of the Apostles. The God-designed rebirth clearly parallels the elements He put in place regarding one's natural birth. (Rom. 1:20) Birth requires coming out of the waters of the womb. And drawing in life sustaining air (a picture of receiving the Holy Spirit into the body) in order to become a viable human being.

What I find interesting, is so many people refuse to accept the obvious from what is taught in John 3:3-10. In order that one may "SEE" and "ENTER" the Kingdom of God, (John 3:3 & 5), one must be "born anew". Jesus Christ was the Kingdom of God on earth. Therefore, in order to see and enter into Him, one must be "born anew". Because, what is flesh is flesh and what is spirit is spirit.

John 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

If one is not "born of the Spirit, then that one has a "natural mind" (born of the flesh is flesh), and the natural mind does not discern the things that are spiritual in nature. (1 Cor. 2:14). Without this discernment, one cannot properly understand the Gospel and the need for it's message.

John 3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born anew.

The persons that are born of the flesh, had no decision or part in their conception. They had no choice as to whom their mother and father would be. They could not say, "I do not want to be born". or "I want to be born." Their life, if you will, was completely decided outside of their decision or will.

John 3:8 The wind bloweth where it will, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but knowest not whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that has been born of the Spirit.

In this same way, John 3:8, teaches the Sovereign Work of the Spirit. He moves as He wills and comes to those that He wills. We have no more say so in being born from above, than we had in our physical birth. This is the proper understanding of the parallel of the "two" births. First, physical - second, spiritual.

This fact is further backed-up, by the writers choice of word in the Greek. The Greek word translated in verse 8, as" "has been born", is the word: γεγεννημενος. It is a Perfect. Passive. Participle of: γεννάω. The perfect tense emphasizes the verbs past action and it's continuing results but the part we should pay close attention to, is the passive voice. This means the recipient is not active in it's taking effect. The recipient receives this new birth in the same manner as one received their physical birth. They were acted upon but had no say in it's action. If it were in the "active voice", then we would say that they birthed themselves.

Enochanti wrote:
The existence of God answers the atheists who says there is no God and the lordship and sovereignty of God answers the word of faith adherent who in their core teachings deny the sovereignty of God by claiming God needs man’s permission before he can operate in this world. But that is not the God of the Bible for the God of the Bible is Lord over all.

In the receiving of the Holy Spirit, in the Book of Acts, as I stated earlier, was the blessing promised by Jesus and why the disciples were told to tarry until Pentecost. At Pentecost, the fledgling church was empowered with the various gifts needed for it's early earthly ministry. In Acts 1:5, this is called the "Baptism of the Holy Spirit" and is not referred to as the "New Birth".

We must remember, the NT Scriptures did not yet exist. The preaching of the Gospel, needed to be authenticated with signs and wonders because it was proclaimed by word of mouth without any written prooftext, except when the OT passages were referenced. Jesus Christ's ministry was also authenticated in a similar manner. So too, Moses' ministry before Pharaoh.

Those that the Holy Spirit fell upon, were already in a "born anew" position and were partakers of the Faith. The Sovereignty of God's Grace, is shown throughout the Book of Acts: (KJV)

Acts 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Acts 2:47 Praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
Acts 16:14 And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul.

Lydia - was a business woman of purple dye and may have been a Jewish woman or at least a proselyte because the Scripture says she worshipped or was a devout woman before God. This proves she knew of the God of Israel but like Israel, was worshipping out of an incorrect knowledge. At this time, she knew not Jesus Christ whom Paul had come to proclaim. Scripture says that the Lord opened her heart (the New Birth), and subsequent to this event, she gave head to what Paul proclaimed.

But this takes us away from the discussion of Baptism and it's purpose and enters into the Sovereign work of God in Salvation.

I did not respond to specifics of this post as what you stated so obviously goes against the word. But since you brought it up, here goes:

The idea that God creates people destined to an eternity of hell fire is ludicrous. Paul made it clear that the gospel is hid from people whose minds are blinded by the god of this world, not our Heavenly Father.

"But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them." 2 Cor 4:3-4

And as stated in John 1:11-13, those who received/believed in Jesus were given power TO BECOME the sons of God. This indicates they were not immediately sons of God upon believing. They were granted the right to become sons through repentance, baptism, and being indwelt with the Holy Spirit. And this, by God's design as witnessed from scripture. (Mark 16:15-16)

As to John 3, being born again enables one to both SEE and ENTER into the kingdom.
Being able to SEE the significance of what is first believed and acted upon occurs after taking a step of faith in obedience to the commands first presented on the Day of Pentecost.

Many still refuse to accept they must be baptized in water in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. Accepting rather that their sins are not actually dealt with at that time. And secondly, they submit to being baptized in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost; a practice instituted years after the apostolic era. One inconsistent with the witness of the apostles in the biblical record. Jesus was the one crucified for all mankind. And it is baptism in His name that is necessary in order to be buried with Him into His death wherein one's sin is destroyed according to the Apostle Paul. (Rom. 6:3-6)

Lastly, the Holy Ghost is not given twice as some suggest. The Holy Ghost was the GIFT that was initially sent to dwell in people on the Day of Pentecost. The experience had nothing to do with the bestowal of spiritual gifts. The evidence of the indwelling of the Holy Ghost resulted in their speaking in an unknown tongue, a separate experience from the spiritual gift of tongues that requires interpretation. (1 Cor. 12)

"Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear." Acts 2:33


God provided evidence of the arrival of the Holy Ghost through speaking in tongues as revealed in the conversion records of each group of humanity:

And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. (Acts 2:4)

The lack of tongues can be contributed to how the Samaritans knew they had not received the Holy Ghost. (Acts 8:12-16, 17)

Have you received the Holy Ghost since you believed? Paul asked. (Acts 19:1-6)

Peter knew the Gentiles had received the Holy Ghost the evidence was speaking in tongues. (Acts 10:43-48)

 

[DB]

1st Cor.15 vs 1-5 is our Gospel. If one believes in the Lord Jesus Christ and believing that He was the Son of God, died for us, and rose to be with the Father in Heaven is what is required. Anything else is a works which doesn't save anyone. Water doesn't have the power of forgiveness. Only the shed blood of Christ can forgive sins. Without the shedding of blood there can be no forgiveness of sin.

 

[hornetguy]

1st Cor.15 vs 1-5 is our Gospel. If one believes in the Lord Jesus Christ and believing that He was the Son of God, died for us, and rose to be with the Father in Heaven is what is required. Anything else is a works which doesn't save anyone. Water doesn't have the power of forgiveness. Only the shed blood of Christ can forgive sins. Without the shedding of blood there can be no forgiveness of sin.

Ok.... only if you want to rip out a bunch of scripture, just to prove your belief system.....

 

[DJT_47]

I'll be praying for you. 🙏

Pray for yourself. God has blessed me beyond measure.

 

[mailmandan]

1st Cor.15 vs 1-5 is our Gospel. If one believes in the Lord Jesus Christ and believing that He was the Son of God, died for us, and rose to be with the Father in Heaven is what is required. Anything else is a works which doesn't save anyone. Water doesn't have the power of forgiveness. Only the shed blood of Christ can forgive sins. Without the shedding of blood there can be no forgiveness of sin.

The gospel is the "good news" of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) and is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that BELIEVES.. (Romans 1:16) To "believe" the gospel is to trust in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation.

 

[mailmandan]

Pray for yourself. God has blessed me beyond measure.

I pray that you will come to repent (change your mind) and believe the gospel by trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-SUFFICIENT means of your salvation.

 

[JBTN]

We, each, receive the gift of the Spirit individually per Acts 2:38. That is not the baptism of the spirit such as in Acts 2 on the day of Pentecost.

That and Acts 10 are 2 unique events that happened twice per the scriptures in this unique fashion and doesn't happen today.

The Holy Spirit fell unilaterally on individuals as a sign and validation of those events which in both cases, the church was initiated.

Any other time the spirit fell miraculously in the form of a gift was as the result of the laying on of the apostle's hands.

Happened twice in biblical times, and doesn't happen today.

Better?

I don’t understand how that can be. Acts 2:14-21 says this:

“But Peter, standing with the eleven, lifted up his voice and addressed them: “Men of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give ear to my words. For these people are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is only the third hour of the day. But this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel: “‘And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams; even on my male servants and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy. And I will show wonders in the heavens above and signs on the earth below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke; the sun shall be turned to darkness and the moon to blood, before the day of the Lord comes, the great and magnificent day. And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.’”
‭‭Acts‬ ‭2‬:‭14‬-‭21‬ ‭ESV‬‬
https://bible.com/bible/59/act.2.14-21.ESV

If Acts 2 is correct the receiving of the Holy Spirit was meant for more than just the Apostles and the house of Cornelius.

“The apostles and the elders were gathered together to consider this matter. And after there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. And God, who knows the heart, bore witness to them, by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us, and he made no distinction between us and them, having cleansed their hearts by faith.”
‭‭Acts‬ ‭15‬:‭6‬-‭9‬ ‭ESV‬‬
https://bible.com/bible/59/act.15.6-9.ESV

Doesn’t this passage show that the elders present here received the Holy Spirit in the same manner as the Apostles and the house of Cornelius? No distinction. There are similar statements in Acts 10 and 11.