.
Hi Locutus,
Of course it is past and tied in with the 66-70 AD war.
The problem I have with you AB-One is you changing definitions of words (such as last days and turn it into last centuries, or "about to be" as something that is "about to be" for 1900 years) and you ignoring commonalities in scripture.
There is a future resurrection, you say that it is past, with no future resurrection, Yes?
These all speak of the same event:
Isa 2:19 And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.
Yes, 70 ad
Luke 23:30 Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.
Yes, 70 ad
Rev 6:15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
Rev 6:16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
Yes, 70 ad
So when Jesus uses motifs from Isaiah in Luke and John in revelation uses the very same motifs then we should accept that the event is in the time frame that Jesus said they would occur.
I do, up to the point of the 6/7th seal.
Same with the exact same motifs in the following:
Dan 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
This shows the first resurrection of Jesus and the rest of the OT saints, fulfilled by 70 ad (33 ad).
Act 24:15 (Young's Literal) having hope toward God, which they themselves also wait for, that there is about to be a rising again of the dead, both of righteous and unrighteous;
Give me an exact date of when this resurrection at the dest of Jeru occurred.
John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
John 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
The resurrection, "at His coming", which is yet to happen.
These speak of the same events,
but you are able to re-explain them away to mean something foreign to the context and plain meaning.
This is about exactly how many resurrections there are.
1 Cor 15:23-28.
1. Jesus' resurrection, the first fruits.
2. Those who are Christ's at His coming, the 2nd resurrection.
3. Death is destroyed (also seen in Rev 20:14-15).
4. The kingdom is delivered up to the Father.
5. Jesus submits to the Father to be all in all.
There are only 2 resurrections shown.
Where does a resurrection at the dest of Jeru fit into this passage?
Isn't that 3 ?
Or, are there no more resurrections to take place?
========================================================
Revelation was written after the dest of Jeru.
On to Rev 16:
Rev 16:6 For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
Rome certainly qualifies, having killed Israelites for over a hundred years by then.
When they invaded Israel, in the rebellion of the Maccabees, the infants of Bethlehem, John the Baptist, Jesus, the Apostles, and countless others, Rome killed them all, their blood was on Rome's hands (Herod,Pilate).
Rome would continue to attack Israel for the next 1900 years.
The avenging of the saints in the Rev 16:6 has certain time and people in mind:
The fall of Rome? (8th head lives until perdition, spiritual destruction)
Mat 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee...
Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
Jerusalem, yes, but it's not connected to this passage of Rev chs 15-16.
So what continues on from Rev 16:6 is the fulfilling of the vengeance on 1st century Jerusalem for killing the saints and prophets,
The 5 th vial is poured out on the "seat of the beast", the seat of the Roman beast (4th, iron legs) is the city of Rome.
--
The 6th vial dries up the Euphrates River.
Literal?, didn't happen, not an obstacle for the Roman armies.
They go to the valley of Armageddon for the great battle, not 70 ad Jerusalem.
--
Why don't you explain to me how the 7th vial is ONLY the dest of Jeru?
While you want Rome to be the one that is guilty of killing the prophets scripture totally refutes your pet theory.
Israel is guilty of the blood of Jesus also and foremost,
But Rome (Pilate) did sentence Jesus to death, even if it was to the consent and urging of the Priests.
Rome nailed Jesus to the cross.
Rome kept the people from helping Jesus.
I would say that Rome shared in the blame.
---
Remember, that nothing could be written against Rome under penalty of death,
That is why it is symbolized.
If it was Jerusalem (in Rev), they would say Jerusalem, who would care?
The Romans would have loved the prophecy against Jerusalem.
Luke 18:7 And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them?
Luke 18:8 I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?
Lk 18:1, And He spake a parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint;"
This is mainly about prayer, how to pray, and God hearing our prayers.
About the last sentence, it's exact time is indeterminate, as far as I can tell.
It would depend on the evaluation of the term "when the Son of Man cometh".
At Jerusalem in 70 ad? or at the 2nd resurrection, yet to come?
1900 years and counting I can tell you right now does not fit the definition of speedily.
Since the context is about prayer, I would think that "speedily" would refer to how God answers prayers.
Rev 16:12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.
Completely dried up?
In around 67AD Vespasian and Titus his son brought the soldiers from four Roman Legions to Judea from the region of the river Euphrates through Syria to attack Judea.
Josephus in his book the Jewish Wars writes of Titus:
"...were two thousand men, chosen out of the armies at Alexandria. There followed him also three thousand drawn from those that guarded the river Euphrates"
The troops that Titus took with were drawn largely from the the region of the Euphrates.
Tacitus writes that Antiochus of Commagene (a king) whose dominions were located on the Euphrates sent a contingent to the war. Sohemus (another king) whose territories were in the same region sent a force to work with Titus.
The Romans had lots of foreign armies in their ranks.
The above fulfills John's imagery in Rev 16:12 remarkably well,
Yes it does, to a point.
As far as the general context of this passage,
It says that after the wrath of God is filled up Rev 15:2, and the 7 plagues are fulfilled 15:8,
That men will be able to enter the temple of God 15:8,
Does that mean after Jerusalem is destroyed (not before v 8) that men can enter the temple of God?
tie that in with what Jesus said and John in Rev 6:15-16 and we're cooking with gas.
I'll tie it in with the 6th trumpet, but not the 6th seal.