Born Again Speaking in Tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
what is not mandated and you cannot prove biblically that being baptized in water has to be done in Jesus name ONLY.
Instead of arguing why not just do a search of every form of the word baptism and see if scriptures line up with your understanding. And keep in mind that all concepts in the word must be established by 2-3 witnesses.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
then why do you add baptism as a part of salvation and state if you are not baptized you are not saved?

Jesus death on the cross is sufficient

your teaching on baptism is adding to the 'it is finished'


being filled with the Holy Spirit is separate from being baptized yet you appear to conflate the 2

to quote you: 'we an all read what you posted'
The gospel includes the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. Paul states that one must obey the gospel. (Rom 10:16)
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
The gospel includes the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. Paul states that one must obey the gospel. (Rom 10:16)
includes?

so what else are you including?

LOL! you are not as swift as you fancy yourself to be

leaving out your fanciful belief on baptismal regeneration is you being duplistic

who do you think you are fooling here? every thread you are in you divert it to baptismal regeneration

I call that an obsession
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
includes?

so what else are you including?

LOL! you are not as swift as you fancy yourself to be

leaving out your fanciful belief on baptismal regeneration is you being duplistic

who do you think you are fooling here? every thread you are in you divert it to baptismal regeneration

I call that an obsession
Gospel includes not only Jesus death but His was burial and resurrection.
Paul states that one must obey the gospel. (Rom 10:16)
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
Gospel includes not only Jesus death but His was burial and resurrection.
Paul states that one must obey the gospel. (Rom 10:16)

The word gospel literally means “good news” and occurs 93 times in the Bible, exclusively in the New Testament. In Greek, it is the word euaggelion, from which we get our English words evangelist, evangel, and evangelical. The gospel is, broadly speaking, the whole of Scripture; more narrowly, the gospel is the good news concerning Christ and the way of salvation.

 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
every thread you are in you divert it to baptismal regeneration

I call that an obsession
I respond to questions that get brought up about water baptism. I will continue to do so regardless of opposing viewpoints. If that bothers you please place me on ignore.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
The word gospel literally means “good news” and occurs 93 times in the Bible, exclusively in the New Testament. In Greek, it is the word euaggelion, from which we get our English words evangelist, evangel, and evangelical. The gospel is, broadly speaking, the whole of Scripture; more narrowly, the gospel is the good news concerning Christ and the way of salvation.
Sure is.
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
I respond to questions that get brought up about water baptism. I will continue to do so regardless of opposing viewpoints. If that bothers you please place me on ignore.
well of course you do!

but that is not what happened in this thread and not others I have seen you in either

waggles post 70 is referenced by you in post 73 and includes your belief that baptism is part of salvation

and then in post 199 you dig right into what CS1 said to the op and start about baptism on a post that was NOT even directed to you so there goes your explanation of how you only respond to questions . CS was asking the op about oneness

what bothers me is the cute little way you twist things and deny what you actually do

in post 210 CS tells you that he was not even asking about baptism

I ask you why you are making things all about baptism again in post 221

continue reading. you successfully divert the entire thread to your own devices once again

you started it and you continue it. page 25 now :sleep:

only you do not really believe that

to quote you again 'everyone can read what you write'
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
I respond to questions that get brought up about water baptism. I will continue to do so regardless of opposing viewpoints. If that bothers you please place me on ignore.

as far as ignoring you goes, that would be easy for you

why should anyone ignore your deviation from biblical truth?

again, what bothers me is the way you twist things and your goody two shoes act
 

FollowHisSteps

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2019
3,674
1,201
113
what is not mandated and you cannot prove biblically that being baptized in water has to be done in Jesus name ONLY.
This idea is new to me. If someone is baptised, they are baptised into God, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit,
because the communion is with God, who is represented by all three. To divide this is to divide the meaning of
communion in our hearts, new birth, walking in righteousness, love ruling everything we do, truth, integrity,
holiness.

I suspect humans suffer from secret knowledge that I know, but you do not, which makes me special and my
group, and we are ok, but you guys are lost, if only you could be with us, feeling. Everything evil is with that
other group over there, but we are safe, loving, and definately got it right.

I wonder if the choice of coat hook is actually random, but the emotional boost one gets by belonging is the
same which proves they have definately got it right. Speak to the flat earthers, and you get it all in one.
I used to go to an open brethren church, and it is easy to absorb this feeling of having it, and doing the special
meetings that convey this sense of belonging.

Other than identifying the problem, members of these groups can take 5 or 10 years to come out of it, and
start to get some balance, so powerful is the effect. But if you begin to see Jesus's love and transcending every
aspect of life, such compromises and stubborness drops away. I only believe this is freedom, because I see my
problems and those of all the groups I belong to, so hopefully I have no delusions of exclusivity and walk in
the light of my weakness and need to follow Jesus in all things. God bless you.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
well he is actually a she

at least her profile suggests that

oh my differences with her theology started way back when she presented OT circumcision as NT water baptism

butchering the Bible one doctrine at a time

see, the thing is this person will say they believe in the gifts and waggles will say the same but then they ADD to what is in scripture and I have a huge problem with that

they perfectly illustrate a valid reason why so many turn away from those who profess to have spiritual gifts

they illustrate the skeptic's guide to the gifts over and over and over again
I see Blue and I assume male, so it does not surprise me that I got that wrong..This new format I guess I have not gotten used to. Lol

Yes. They give your group a bad name And worse yet. Teach a false gospel of dependence on the work of men and not the work of God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Instead of arguing why not just do a search of every form of the word baptism and see if scriptures line up with your understanding. And keep in mind that all concepts in the word must be established by 2-3 witnesses.
Both sides have way more that two or three witnesses.

So using this as a determining factor is flawed.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
So stop being wrong.
In your dreams
You are joking.
To have rivers of living water flowing out from a believer requires a believer to pray in tongues.
Praying in the Holy Spirit (tongues) is living water.
You need to get off your high horse and stop your nonsense

What I quoted came from John 4. Where Jesus told a woman and in effect all of us, that if we ask him, he will give us rivers of living water, flowing to eternal life. No mention of tongues or anything else.


Jesus also told her the rivers of livibg water WAS the HOLY SPIRIT

But you also want to equate the work of God and the work of man as equal. So it is easy to understand why basic concepts of scripture are hard for you to understand.




So you also need to study.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,564
13,547
113
58
Gospel includes not only Jesus death but His was burial and resurrection. Paul states that one must obey the gospel. (Rom 10:16)
We “obey the gospel” by “choosing to believe the gospel.” (Romans 1:16)

Romans 10:16 - But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our report?”
 

Waggles

Senior Member
Sep 21, 2017
3,338
1,262
113
South
adelaiderevival.com
When the world is on fire and people are dying due to Wormwood then we all shall see the power and purpose
of praying in tongues …

they shall pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Mark 16:18
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
When the world is on fire and people are dying due to Wormwood then we all shall see the power and purpose
of praying in tongues …

they shall pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Mark 16:18
You might see it but I will be with Jesus in heaven when that happens. Good luck.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Water baptism is a NT mandate. Whereas circumcision was an OT mandate. There is a big difference.

Paul's reprimand was always about Christians being draw away by people trying to add OT responsibilities to NT ones.
And OT circumcision NEVER saved or had a thing to do with anyones salvation. Just like NT baptism has NOThing to do with anyones salvation.

They both are symbols and teaching tools.
 

Waggles

Senior Member
Sep 21, 2017
3,338
1,262
113
South
adelaiderevival.com
You might see it but I will be with Jesus in heaven when that happens. Good luck.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Ha ha ha ha always wit the jokes.
This is exactly why Jesus has brought about Pentecostal revival in these very last days.
When the whole world suffers the worldwide tribulation and catastrophes that are about to come upon us all, then it will be
as in the days of Moses and the children of Israel when they suffered not in Goshen while those in Egypt suffered all the plagues.
There will be a sifting of the wheat from the chaff.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,564
13,547
113
58
And OT circumcision NEVER saved or had a thing to do with anyones salvation. Just like NT baptism has NOThing to do with anyones salvation.

They both are symbols and teaching tools.
Amen! What do we read about Abraham in regards to circumcision? Romans 4:11 - And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also. Why would baptism be any different?

In Colossians 2:12, the context shows that baptism is presented as the New Testament counterpart of circumcision in the Old Testament. They are presented in a careful parallel to each other. The one who is "in Christ" is circumcised with a circumcision made "without hands" and the parallel usage of circumcision and baptism demonstrates that we understand the "baptism" to be made "without hands" also.

*Romans 2:28-29 shows clearly that it is not physical circumcision "made with hands" but *spiritual circumcision* which makes one truly a Jew and one of Abraham's children.

Since baptism is the New Testament counterpart to circumcision in the Old Testament, we may therefore understand Romans 2:28-29 to have the same meaning in relation to baptism that it has in relation to circumcision: For he is *not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh;* but he is a Jew who is one *inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit,* and not in the letter, whose praise is not from men but from God.

Physical circumcision was not the means of obtaining salvation in the Old Testament, for Abraham was saved when he BELIEVED before he was circumcised (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:2-3; 9-10). The same applies to physical water baptism in the New Testament (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31).
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,256
1,110
113
Amen! What do we read about Abraham in regards to circumcision? Romans 4:11 - And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also. Why would baptism be any different?

In Colossians 2:12, the context shows that baptism is presented as the New Testament counterpart of circumcision in the Old Testament. They are presented in a careful parallel to each other. The one who is "in Christ" is circumcised with a circumcision made "without hands" and the parallel usage of circumcision and baptism demonstrates that we understand the "baptism" to be made "without hands" also.

*Romans 2:28-29 shows clearly that it is not physical circumcision "made with hands" but *spiritual circumcision* which makes one truly a Jew and one of Abraham's children.

Since baptism is the New Testament counterpart to circumcision in the Old Testament, we may therefore understand Romans 2:28-29 to have the same meaning in relation to baptism that it has in relation to circumcision: For he is *not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh;* but he is a Jew who is one *inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit,* and not in the letter, whose praise is not from men but from God.

Physical circumcision was not the means of obtaining salvation in the Old Testament, for Abraham was saved when he BELIEVED before he was circumcised (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:2-3; 9-10). The same applies to physical water baptism in the New Testament (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31).
Notice God's warning that the one who was not circumcised was guilty of breaking covenant with God. One can apply the same standard concerning circumcision to the NT parallel of water baptism. Those who have not been water baptized would be seen as severing their covenant with God.

"And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant." Gen 17:1