Bread used for Communion

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#41
Yes, Spirit and truth, not merely material and literal. This is the way sacraments work in Christianity. They represent and symbolize things. There is often a material component, but it symbolizes something deeper. We must not miss that.
Spirit and truth is real a greater reality than mere materialism. symbolism is not real.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,003
6,531
113
62
#44
He did. To His disciples. His other followers left when He said it.
They actually ate His literal flesh and drank His literal blood while He was on earth? If so, why use bread and wine at the last supper?

And what is the benefit of eating actual flesh and drinking actual blood?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,003
6,531
113
62
#50
Is that question a yes/no or a matter of degree? I surrender all. That is a must.
Maybe you do and maybe you don't. If I see a picture of you without a yoke around your neck and without a cross draped across your back I'll have my suspicions.
 

Sipsey

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2018
1,476
690
113
#51
Spirit and truth is real a greater reality than mere materialism. symbolism is not real.
A symbol is representative of a reality, a teaching tool.

In addition, I thought there was a rule against consuming blood.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,705
113
#52
Maybe you do and maybe you don't. If I see a picture of you without a yoke around your neck and without a cross draped across your back I'll have my suspicions.
I see what you are doing there. You are visualizing a literal yoke and cross. (y)
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,003
6,531
113
62
#53
I see what you are doing there. You are visualizing a literal yoke and cross. (y)
Of course it's symbolic. I don't want to offend, but sometimes what people take literally surprises me.
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#56
They actually ate His literal flesh and drank His literal blood while He was on earth? If so, why use bread and wine at the last supper?

And what is the benefit of eating actual flesh and drinking actual blood?
You call Jesus a liar, i will not.
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#58
Does using leavened bread being for communion constitute 'syncretism'?

No.
It does if one who rejects that and only accepts unleaven bread pretends its ok and has communion with them.
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#59
I see what you are doing there. You are visualizing a literal yoke and cross. (y)
Except Jesus when He said that did not give them a yoke or a cross.
Before he gave them bread and wine He said, you must eat His body and drink His blood. Them when He gave them bread and wine He said this is My body and blood.
If he had given them a yoke or and a cross even a small one for the pockets then there would be similarity.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,705
113
#60
If he had given them a yoke or and a cross even a small one for the pockets then there would be similarity.
That is the point. He did not pull one of His fingers off and hand it to them. IT WAS BREAD. HE SAID IT WAS FOR REMEMBRANCE.