Can the Trinity be Biblically proven?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,098
959
113
#41
Hi Bluto,Let me attempt to answer some of Quasar92 post No.8 usingPsalms 119:130 The entrance of thy words giveth light; it giveth understanding unto the simple.Quasar92 said: No, I am not now or ever was a JW. The Bible teaches that Jesus was the FIRSTBORN over all creation in Col.1:15, confirming Pr.8:22-36. My response: Well FIRSTBORN in Col. 1:15, doesn’t fit FIRSTCREATION nor it was a confirmation of Proverbs 8:22-36. Not even the word “firstborn” was used in Proverbs pertaining to the wisdom of God. The word “possessed” has nothing to do with “firstborn” or “first creation”. It simply means God holds such wisdom even before the creation of the earth. Wisdom in the Proverbs actually is a “personification” in order for people to understand it (vv. 1-5). There’s a need to understand this wisdom because this speaks of the excellent and right things (vv. 6-9). It cannot be compared to any precious gems or all things that maybe desired of (vv.10-11). It is an excellent thing that people to learn of this wisdom because it properly “belongs” “owned” or “possessed” by God. The LORD says “Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom…” v. 14a. Noticeable is the meaning of “possessed” as “belonging to” or “mine”. Now we need to define the word “Fristborn” for consideration:1) Firstborn – As used in Colossians means “pre-eminence or superiority” over God’s creation. This is specifically used in Col.1:18. It is not a first-born.
It is not a first born in the sense first created...
 

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,103
531
113
#42
I will tell you this for the last time, Bluto: READ POST #8 and it will answer your questions. FYI, the pre-incarnate Jesus, IS NOT Almighty God, never was and never will be! Jesus is/was the FIRSTBORN over all creation, in Col.1:15, described in Pr.8:22-36.


Quasar92.
No quasar, you have been deceived. I have read your post #8 and your post is the basis for my questions? You outright deny the deity of Jesus Christ (and I am NOT talking about the Trinity), I'm talking about the identity of who is Jesus Christ. You just said, "Jesus IS NOT Almighty God,"

You then said this: " Jesus is/was the FIRSTBORN over all creation, in Col.1:15, described in Pr.8:22-36." Your don't even understand what "firstborn" means because your using the word (which in Greek is "prfototokos") and it has two primary meanings which depends on how the word is used in its context. You have chosen that it means to be created which is what the "Arians" believe. This is why one poster accused you of being a JW. Unitarians also believe Jesus Christ was a created being. And both groups deny the deity of Jesus Christ just as you do.

Like I said, if Jesus Christ was created first of everything that was created, and if He is created Himself, HE CANNOT BE GOD. You are in extreme error by quoting Colossians 1:15 and Proverbs 8:22-36 to prove Jesus is created. In fact, I'm surprised you did not quote Revelation 3:14 to support your heretical position. The Jw's sure quote the verse. "And to the angel of the church oin Laodicea write: "The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION OF GOD, say this."

See there quasar, Jesus Christ is the beginning of the creation of God. NOT! That word "beginning" in the Greek is "arche." We get our English word "architect" from that word and it means, the planner, the creator or the orgin of something. In other words, Jesus Christ is the creator just like Colossians 1:16 states as well as John 1:3. "For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authortities-all things have been created BY HIM and for Him."

Now, regarding the "firstborn" issue. It is true that "firstborn" can reer to either the birth in a family or to special status conferred upon someone or something, WHICH CONNOTES PREEMINENCE OR HAVING FIRST PLACE AMONG OTHERS. At Colossians 1:15 the Apostle Paul is explaining that Jesus has first place in everything. This is based upon what vs16 states that "For by Him all things were created."

As well, Jesus is referred to as the "firstborn of the dead." Here is Colossians 1:18, "He/Jesus Christ is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the first-born from the dead; SO THAT HE HIMSELF MIGHT COME TO HAVE FIRST PLACE IN EVERYTHING." Even though there were others who were rasied from the dead before Jesus Christ, like Lazarus the point of the verse is that Jesus Christ holds first place among all who have or will be rasied from the dead in a permanent way by His resurrection.

And just as God refers to David as his "firstborn" king at Psalm 89:27, "the highest of the kings of the earth," even though King David was not the first king. Or how about at Genesis 22:12 where Abraham offers his "only son" despite the fact that Isaac was not Abraham's only son. Isaac had "preeminence" among the other sons of Abraham. In short, your argument is founded on a total misunderstanding of the scriptures and what words mean in their proper context. This is something you have not considered and is obviously clear to some of us here. Lastly, I plan on showing you the proof/evidence that Jesus Christ did indeed preexist in the Old Testament before His incarnation. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 
Aug 19, 2016
721
3
0
#43
God, who is the Holy Spirit, according to Jn.4:24 and 2 Cor.3:7-18, is also the Father of Jesus, according to Mt.1:20 and Lk.1:35. One person, not two. They are two very separate entities, as every epistle in the Bible extends greetings to both. To say nothing of Jesus committing His Spirit to the Father in Lk.23:46, and the Father raising Jesus from the dead in Rom.10:9. In addition, Jesus told His disciples in Jn.14:10, His Father lived in Him doing His work, obviously, the Holy Spirit, who also lives in all of us who are born again Christians. Do you see what the Scriptures do to the doctrine of the Trinity?


Quasar92


The meaning of FIRSTBORN in Col.1:15:


A person's child, the first to be born; the eldest.


Your assessment of FIRSTBORN is rationalizing. For example, Jesus said the following:

In Jn.1:1-2: "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [SUP]2 [/SUP]He was with God in the beginning." [Jesus did not become the Son of God/God the Son until God, the Holy Spirit produced Him by the virgin Mary in Mt.1:20 and in Lk.1:32, 35. Or it would contradict a number of OT statements by YHWH, that He was the one and only God, as recorded in Isa.44:6 and in 45:5:The doctrine of the Trinity is refuted by the Scriptures th

"I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me,"



In Deut.32:39:
"See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand."

Nor was wisdom brought forth, given birth or appointed, because YHWH was forever eternal together with His wisdom. Nor does wisdom have emotions, nor was it a craftsman at God's side, as seen in Heb.1:1-2:

1On many past occasions and in many different ways, God spoke to our fathers through the prophets. 2But in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the universe.…

in Jn.17:5:[SUP]"[/SUP]And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began." Confirming Pr.8:22-36 and Col.1:15.

In Gen.1:26: "Then God said, 'Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.'"


Beginning in Proverbs 8, pertaining to the attributes of God's Wisdom, I refer specifically to verses 22 through 36, that clearly identify the pre-incarnate spirit of Jesus Christ as the WHO, of the Wisdom of God. [From the NIV].


"The Lord brought me forth as the first of His works, before His deed of old; I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning,

before the world began. When there were no oceans, I was given birth, [Vs 22-24]
when there were no springs abounding with water; before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth, before He made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world. [Vs 24-26]

I was there when He set the heavens in place, when He marked out the horizon on the face of the deep, when He established the clouds above and fixed securly the fountains of the deep, [Vs 27-28]

when He gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep His command, and when He marked out the foundations of the earth. Then I was the craftsman at His side. I was filled with delight day after day, [Vs 29-30]

rejoicing always in His presence, rejoicing in His whole world and delighting in mankind. Now then my sons, listen to me; blessed are those who keep my ways. Listen to my instruction and be wise; do not ignore it. [Vs 30-33]

Blessed is the man who listens to me, watching daily at my doors, waiting at my doorway. For whoever finds me finds life and
receives favor from the Lord. But whoever fails to find me harms himself; all who hate me love death." [Vs 34-36]

That Jesus is the Personification of Wisdom [Power and Knowledge] of God is made abundantly clear in 1 Cor.1:24 and Col.2:2-3

Endorsed by:

1. Frank L. Gaebelein, A.M., Litt.D., Headmaster Emiritus, The Stoney Brook School; 2. William Culbertson, D.D., L.L.D., President, Moody Bible Institute; 3. Charles L. Feinberg, ThD., PhD., Dean, Talbot Theological Seminary; 4. Allan A. Mac Rae, A.M., PhD., President, Biblical School of Theology; 5. Clarence E. Mason, Jr., Th.M., D.D., Dean, Philadelphia College of Bible; 6. Alva J. Mc Clain, Th.M., D.D., President Emeritus, Grace Theological Seminary; 7. Wilbur M. Smith, D.D., Editor, Peloubet's Select Notes; 8. John F. Walvoord, A.M., Th.D., President, Dallas Theological Seminary; 9. C.I. Scofield, D.D., Editor, Scofield Bible; 10. Editorial Committee Chairman, J. E. Schuyler English, Litt.D.


The doctrine of the Trinity is refuted by the Bible itself, as documented in my post #8
.


Quasar92
 
Aug 19, 2016
721
3
0
#44
No quasar, you have been deceived. I have read your post #8 and your post is the basis for my questions? You outright deny the deity of Jesus Christ (and I am NOT talking about the Trinity), I'm talking about the identity of who is Jesus Christ. You just said, "Jesus IS NOT Almighty God,"

You then said this: " Jesus is/was the FIRSTBORN over all creation, in Col.1:15, described in Pr.8:22-36." Your don't even understand what "firstborn" means because your using the word (which in Greek is "prfototokos") and it has two primary meanings which depends on how the word is used in its context. You have chosen that it means to be created which is what the "Arians" believe. This is why one poster accused you of being a JW. Unitarians also believe Jesus Christ was a created being. And both groups deny the deity of Jesus Christ just as you do.

Like I said, if Jesus Christ was created first of everything that was created, and if He is created Himself, HE CANNOT BE GOD. You are in extreme error by quoting Colossians 1:15 and Proverbs 8:22-36 to prove Jesus is created. In fact, I'm surprised you did not quote Revelation 3:14 to support your heretical position. The Jw's sure quote the verse. "And to the angel of the church oin Laodicea write: "The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION OF GOD, say this."

See there quasar, Jesus Christ is the beginning of the creation of God. NOT! That word "beginning" in the Greek is "arche." We get our English word "architect" from that word and it means, the planner, the creator or the orgin of something. In other words, Jesus Christ is the creator just like Colossians 1:16 states as well as John 1:3. "For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authortities-all things have been created BY HIM and for Him."

Now, regarding the "firstborn" issue. It is true that "firstborn" can reer to either the birth in a family or to special status conferred upon someone or something, WHICH CONNOTES PREEMINENCE OR HAVING FIRST PLACE AMONG OTHERS. At Colossians 1:15 the Apostle Paul is explaining that Jesus has first place in everything. This is based upon what vs16 states that "For by Him all things were created."

As well, Jesus is referred to as the "firstborn of the dead." Here is Colossians 1:18, "He/Jesus Christ is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the first-born from the dead; SO THAT HE HIMSELF MIGHT COME TO HAVE FIRST PLACE IN EVERYTHING." Even though there were others who were rasied from the dead before Jesus Christ, like Lazarus the point of the verse is that Jesus Christ holds first place among all who have or will be rasied from the dead in a permanent way by His resurrection.

And just as God refers to David as his "firstborn" king at Psalm 89:27, "the highest of the kings of the earth," even though King David was not the first king. Or how about at Genesis 22:12 where Abraham offers his "only son" despite the fact that Isaac was not Abraham's only son. Isaac had "preeminence" among the other sons of Abraham. In short, your argument is founded on a total misunderstanding of the scriptures and what words mean in their proper context. This is something you have not considered and is obviously clear to some of us here. Lastly, I plan on showing you the proof/evidence that Jesus Christ did indeed preexist in the Old Testament before His incarnation. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto


Which is the epitome of rationalizing and of opinion in which the Scriptures already posted on this thread refute you.


Quasar92
 

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,103
531
113
#45
Which is the epitome of rationalizing and of opinion in which the Scriptures already posted on this thread refute you.


Quasar92
Is that the best you've got quasar, avoidance! Your like the guy who whistles in the dark hoping the dark will go away. Well from me nothing is going away, in fact it's going to get even darker because I am going to confront you on every turn including your error that God the Father is the person of the Holy Spirit. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 
R

RBA238

Guest
#46
Indeed, there are no three persons in the Godhead! There are two! The Holy Spirit, who is the Father, His title, and the Son of God, Jesus Christ. See my post #8 for the Biblical description of God and of Jesus.


Quasar92
Incorrect....The "Father" is identifying The One Eternal Spirit. That Eternal One Spirit created himself a Human Body, The Son, Jesus Christ.
Two reasons: (1) So Men could see The Lord talking to them, view some of his miracles, teaching them, and then pay for our sins at Calvary.

Why did The Almighty One Lord, One God lower himself to be beaten, mocked, laughed at, spit upon and Shed Blood for us lowly mortals?
Because he created everyone ever born, and Loved his creation, mankind, enough to give us a Free Gift of eternal salvation by following simple rules and commands.

He was the Only Human Born into a fleshly body, who could qualify to pay our sin penalty

Read Hebrews Chapter 9 for what, how, and Why. God is a Spirit ( John 4 verse 24) And That eternal one spirit..created HIMSELF in Human form using Mary to fulfill this role..

The "Father" and The "Son" are ONE AND THE SAME GOD..."Father" is the Spirit, "Son" ID's the Humanity side of The Father, not a "Person"

This"Trinity" doctrine actually began in Pagan Culture and beleif...Babylon...Egypt..Rome..etc.

When Moses brought the children the Hebrew children out of Egypt, they had been fully indoctrinated in Pagan Customs and Rituals.
Many of these people would not give up their pagan beleifs, and the rest is recorded history.
The Catholic Church started Pagan Beleifs all over again after they broke away from the Original Holy Apistolic Church started in Jerusalem. Satan made certain people would stay blinded and not serve God in The Truth.

In Conclusion; Here is something else to consider...If You read in Genesis 18...You Read where THE LORD and two of his Angels paid a visit to Abraham and Sarah. They were heading to Destroy Sodom and Gommorah...Please read where The Lord, and his Angels Sat, and ATE FOOD while having fellowship with Abraham while Sarah, his wife prepared the food...

Was The Eternal One God was "Person # 1 showing himself as person # 2? Of course not!
What we see in this Chapter is a THEOPONY..
(An instant Manifestation) The Only difference between a "Theopony" , and a Jesus? Jesus had Real blood flowing his veins, to meet the eventual blood sacrifice ( Hebrews Chapter 9).

In Conclusion; There is no. PERSON #1, AND #2, OR #3.
 
Aug 19, 2016
721
3
0
#47
Is that the best you've got quasar, avoidance! Your like the guy who whistles in the dark hoping the dark will go away. Well from me nothing is going away, in fact it's going to get even darker because I am going to confront you on every turn including your error that God the Father is the person of the Holy Spirit. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto


Have you suddenly gone blind, bluto? There are five or six of my posts preceding this one you obviously ignore, that refute your views. I don't chew my cabbage twice.


Quasar92
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#48
John 5 verse 43: Jesus Said: "I am Come in MY FATHERS' NAME; AND YOU BELEIVE ME NOT ( THE Spirit and The Son have the same exact same name, because Jesus Told us in John 10 verse 30; "I , and MY FATHER (THE FATHER) ARE ONE...NOT ONE OF TWO PERSONS.
Deut 18:19
19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.


The verses in Matt 10:40 and John 13:20 a couple of good references also.
 
R

RBA238

Guest
#49
Amen, All Glory unto God
 

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,103
531
113
#50
Good job fred, your absolutely right but quasar here does not get it and he thinks that firstborn "ALWAYS" means the first one born or first one created. Keep up the good work. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,103
531
113
#51
Look quasar, I'm not arguing that firstborn does not mean the first to be born the eldest. I'm trying to tell you that it also has another meaning which is "preeminence." How the word firstborn is used in the Greek/protokos depends on the context. Luke 2:7, "And she gave birth to her firstborn son;" This is literal birth.
Romans 8:29, "For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become confromed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren: In the case the word means "preeminent.
Luke 2:23, "Every firstborn male that opens the womd shall be called Holy to the Lord. This is literal birth of the word.

Colossians 1:15, "He is the image of the invisible God the firstborn of all created. This means preeminent. I could go on and on with other examples but the point is that "firstborn" DOES NOT ALWAYS pertain to be birth or created as you believe. Which now brings me to Proverbs 8. Let me say first of all I AM NOT SAYING JESUS CHRIST IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF WISDOM. I'm saying that Proverbs 8 is NOT teaching that Jesus Christ is a crated being.

The Logos is not a creature as the Arians teach or the Son of God is a creature or the Son is the beginning of Gods creation. As I said before wisdom is intrinsic to God which means wisdom has always been with God. There was never a time when God was "wisdomless." Gods wisdom is "EXPRESSED" in creation and all of Gods works. If you don't believe me on this then check me out by using a lexicon of some of these words. And btw, I agree with all the scholars you mentioned and am very familar with their work. I do find it ironic that you quote them to support Jesus being created even though all of them are "Trnitarians?" Why don't you believe them on that subject quasar? :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#52
Good job fred, your absolutely right but quasar here does not get it and he thinks that firstborn "ALWAYS" means the first one born or first one created. Keep up the good work. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
The Son was never created, yet was given life in himself separate of the Eternal God.

For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; John 5:26

Thus, an eternal God can create within and that which is formed is eternal.

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: a body of eternal Light.

Thus the lamb that was slain from the foundation of the world.

Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen. 1 Tim 6:16
 
Last edited:

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,103
531
113
#53
The Son was never created, yet was given life in himself separate of the Eternal God.

For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; John 5:26

Thus, an eternal God can create within and that which is formed is eternal.

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: a body of eternal Light.

Thus the lamb that was slain from the foundation of the world.

Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen. 1 Tim 6:16
Yes z, the Son was never created. Secondly, if you look at John 1:4 it says, "In Him was life, and the life was the light of men." In other words, Jesus had life in himself BEFORE His incarnation. This power was given back to him AFTER His resurrection, after he had accomplished His mission as a man.

Now, for a pious Jew to ascribe all power in heaven and earth to ANYONE is for him to acknowledge the absolute deity of that person. Please read Philippians 2:6-8 for more insight. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,098
959
113
#54
Good job fred, your absolutely right but quasar here does not get it and he thinks that firstborn "ALWAYS" means the first one born or first one created. Keep up the good work. :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
May God be magnified! God bless!
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,098
959
113
#55
Look quasar, I'm not arguing that firstborn does not mean the first to be born the eldest. I'm trying to tell you that it also has another meaning which is "preeminence." How the word firstborn is used in the Greek/protokos depends on the context. Luke 2:7, "And she gave birth to her firstborn son;" This is literal birth.
Romans 8:29, "For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become confromed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren: In the case the word means "preeminent.
Luke 2:23, "Every firstborn male that opens the womd shall be called Holy to the Lord. This is literal birth of the word.

Colossians 1:15, "He is the image of the invisible God the firstborn of all created. This means preeminent. I could go on and on with other examples but the point is that "firstborn" DOES NOT ALWAYS pertain to be birth or created as you believe. Which now brings me to Proverbs 8. Let me say first of all I AM NOT SAYING JESUS CHRIST IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF WISDOM. I'm saying that Proverbs 8 is NOT teaching that Jesus Christ is a crated being.

The Logos is not a creature as the Arians teach or the Son of God is a creature or the Son is the beginning of Gods creation. As I said before wisdom is intrinsic to God which means wisdom has always been with God. There was never a time when God was "wisdomless." Gods wisdom is "EXPRESSED" in creation and all of Gods works. If you don't believe me on this then check me out by using a lexicon of some of these words. And btw, I agree with all the scholars you mentioned and am very familar with their work. I do find it ironic that you quote them to support Jesus being created even though all of them are "Trnitarians?" Why don't you believe them on that subject quasar? :eek:

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
I received a free of charge of “The New Scofield Reference Bible” by Swiss Seamen Missionaries in France, during my early teens and I am familiar with the names given since they Editors of it and they are Trinitarians…

God bless
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#56
the first chapter of John. These verses predate the first verse in Genesis.
At that prehistoric time of the first verse of John 1, the Word was not (yet) the Son of God.

He divested himself of His glory as a spirit divinity to be begotten as a human person.
He was made God’s Son, through being begotten or sired by God and born of the virgin Mary.

John 1:1-4: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him [the Word]; and without him was not any thing
made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.”

Before the angels were created, before the universe or man were created,
God [and] the Word existed. Two Personages are revealed.

God and the Word. They were not yet at this point Father and Son.
There is no mention of the Holy Spirit!

The Word in John 1 is translated from the Greek word Logos and means “Spokesman.”

“And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory,
the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”verse 14:

“The Word, then, is a Personage who was made flesh—begotten by God,
who through this later begettal became His Father.

The Word was made the Son of God when He was begotten by God of
the virgin Mary and later resurrected as the firstborn Son of God.

when the Word was made flesh, He was “begotten of the Father.”
The Word became the Son

Prior to becoming the Son, He was the Word. By Him, “all things were made”
Ephesians 3:9 says, “…?God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.”

So it is revealed that God is the Creator, but He created all things through
the Word, or Spokesman, the one who became Jesus Christ.

Now move forward in time sequence to Genesis 1:1:
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”

The Hebrew word translated ‘God’ is Elohim—a noun or name,
plural in form, but normally singular in grammatical usage.

It is the same sort of word as family, church, group—one family consisting of two
or more members—one church composed of many members—one group of several persons.

It is referring to precisely the same Persons, making up or composing the one God,
as we found in John 1:1—the Word and God—and each of those two Persons is God”

“And God [Elohim] said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness?…” (Genesis 1:26).
God said, “Let us”... after our likeness?…”—more than one.

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God”—more than one.
God, who created all things by Jesus Christ”—more than one!

One of the two, the Word, became flesh. The other one,
God the Father, did not become flesh.


After Adam rebelled against God, Elohim said in Genesis 3:22:
“And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us..

Here, God not only says “us,” He says “one of us”! One of the “us”
was God the Father and the other one of the “us” was the Word.

If there was just one deity, why would one deity say to Himself, “ONE of us”?

-

In the New Testament, The word “son” is used 422 times alone.
In at least half of those instances, the word is referring to Jesus Christ
—the Son of God the Father.

The word “father” is used 352 times in the New Testament and,
in over 250 cases, it refers to God the Father. Father and Son—family!

“The names ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ do indicate a family relationship.”
God Is a Family and we are invited to join.

The Word was made flesh (John 1:14). In the flesh, Jesus was also God.
He was God converted to flesh (1?Timothy 3:16). Hebrews 2:14 says,
“Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood,
he [Christ] also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death
he might destroy [annul] him that had the power of death, that is, the devil.”

His life was worth more than all other human beings combined.

When Jesus died, He was in the grave three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40)
the second person of the Godhead—Emmanuel—God with us—God made human flesh
—was dead!”

that Christ had given up His immortal life inherent in divine glory
and been converted into human mortality for the purpose of death.

the same God who made the Word flesh also raised Jesus Christ from the dead!
Acts 13:30 says, “But God raised him from the dead.”

-
Genesis 1:26: “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness?.…”
In verse 21 we see that God created the birds after their kind.
In verse 25 it says God made the beasts of the Earth after their kind, the cattle
after their kind and every thing that creeps upon the Earth after its kind.
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#57
[FONT=&quot]1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was[a] on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]3 Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. So the evening and the morning were the first day.

Here we have God the father.....creator

God the son.....the spoken word.

The holy spirit.....hovering.

Then the Lord said let us make man in our image.


[/FONT]
 
R

RBA238

Guest
#58
the first chapter of John. These verses predate the first verse in Genesis.
At that prehistoric time of the first verse of John 1, the Word was not (yet) the Son of God.

He divested himself of His glory as a spirit divinity to be begotten as a human person.
He was made God’s Son, through being begotten or sired by God and born of the virgin Mary.

John 1:1-4: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him [the Word]; and without him was not any thing
made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.”

Before the angels were created, before the universe or man were created,
God [and] the Word existed. Two Personages are revealed.

God and the Word. They were not yet at this point Father and Son.
There is no mention of the Holy Spirit!

The Word in John 1 is translated from the Greek word Logos and means “Spokesman.”

“And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory,
the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”verse 14:

“The Word, then, is a Personage who was made flesh—begotten by God,
who through this later begettal became His Father.

The Word was made the Son of God when He was begotten by God of
the virgin Mary and later resurrected as the firstborn Son of God.

when the Word was made flesh, He was “begotten of the Father.”
The Word became the Son

Prior to becoming the Son, He was the Word. By Him, “all things were made”
Ephesians 3:9 says, “…?God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.”

So it is revealed that God is the Creator, but He created all things through
the Word, or Spokesman, the one who became Jesus Christ.

Now move forward in time sequence to Genesis 1:1:
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”

The Hebrew word translated ‘God’ is Elohim—a noun or name,
plural in form, but normally singular in grammatical usage.

It is the same sort of word as family, church, group—one family consisting of two
or more members—one church composed of many members—one group of several persons.

It is referring to precisely the same Persons, making up or composing the one God,
as we found in John 1:1—the Word and God—and each of those two Persons is God”

“And God [Elohim] said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness?…” (Genesis 1:26).
God said, “Let us”... after our likeness?…”—more than one.

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God”—more than one.
God, who created all things by Jesus Christ”—more than one!

One of the two, the Word, became flesh. The other one,
God the Father, did not become flesh.


After Adam rebelled against God, Elohim said in Genesis 3:22:
“And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us..

Here, God not only says “us,” He says “one of us”! One of the “us”
was God the Father and the other one of the “us” was the Word.

If there was just one deity, why would one deity say to Himself, “ONE of us”?

-

In the New Testament, The word “son” is used 422 times alone.
In at least half of those instances, the word is referring to Jesus Christ
—the Son of God the Father.

The word “father” is used 352 times in the New Testament and,
in over 250 cases, it refers to God the Father. Father and Son—family!

“The names ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ do indicate a family relationship.”
God Is a Family and we are invited to join.

The Word was made flesh (John 1:14). In the flesh, Jesus was also God.
He was God converted to flesh (1?Timothy 3:16). Hebrews 2:14 says,
“Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood,
he [Christ] also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death
he might destroy [annul] him that had the power of death, that is, the devil.”

His life was worth more than all other human beings combined.

When Jesus died, He was in the grave three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40)
the second person of the Godhead—Emmanuel—God with us—God made human flesh
—was dead!”

that Christ had given up His immortal life inherent in divine glory
and been converted into human mortality for the purpose of death.

the same God who made the Word flesh also raised Jesus Christ from the dead!
Acts 13:30 says, “But God raised him from the dead.”

-
Genesis 1:26: “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness?.…”
In verse 21 we see that God created the birds after their kind.
In verse 25 it says God made the beasts of the Earth after their kind, the cattle
after their kind and every thing that creeps upon the Earth after its kind.
When we hear the word "FATHER" it means the Eternal Spirit of God. The Bible clearly states that there is only ONE SPIRIT..So The FATHER And The HOLY GHOST/SPIRIT are ONE AND THE SAME SPIRIT..not :"Two Persons" The "SON" is the visable manifestation of the Unseen Eternal Spirit of God...Same ONE GOD, in both Spirit and Flesh. God is called "The Lord" also..What is the Lord's Name?
When Saul (Apostle Paul) was struck blind by a bright light from heaven; he asked: "Who art thou LORD"? And THE LORD said; I AM JESUS WHOM THOU PERSECUTEST".

Now, let me address Genesis 1 Verse 26: God stated: "Let US make man in our image" It would appear that God was speaking to Jesus . Since Jesus was not created back then, then God was counselling with himself in his thoughts. There is a verse in our Bibles that says " He (God) Spoke of those things that were, ALL THOUGH THEY WERE NOT"[...QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
#59
The OP asks if the Trinity can be proven by the Bible. The answer to that question, is NO, IT DOES NOT. Neither the Bible, Jesus, nor His disciples ever taught the Trinity.


Surprising admissions that the Trinity is not taught from the Bible!


Shocking Admissions by Joel Hemphill

http://www.ucg.org/booklet/god-trinity/trinity-biblical/


It may surprise you to learn the doctrine of the Trinity was never taught by Jesus, His disciples or can it be taught from the Bible.


Notice these admissions from a number of reputable sources and authors who, while themselves affirming the Trinity, acknowledge that the word "Trinity" and the doctrine is not found in the Bible.
The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia acknowledges that "'trinity' is a second-century term found nowhere in the Bible, and the Scriptures present no finished trinitarian statement" (1988, Vol. 4, "Trinity," p. 914). It further states that "church fathers crystallized the doctrine in succeeding centuries"—long after the apostles had passed from the scene.


The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary tells us, "The formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the NT [New Testament]" (Paul Achtemeier, editor, 1996, "Trinity").


The Harper Collins Encyclopedia of Catholicism states: "Today, however, scholars generally agree that there is no doctrine of the Trinity as such in either the OT [Old Testament] or the NT [New Testament] . . . It would go far beyond the intention and thought-forms of the OT to suppose that a late-fourth-century or thirteenth-century Christian doctrine can be found there . . . Likewise, the NT does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity" (Richard McBrien, general editor, 1995, "God," pp. 564-565).
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, in its article on the Trinity, explains: "Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament . . . The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies . . . It was not until the 4th century that the distinctness of the three and their unity were brought together in a single orthodox doctrine of one essence and three persons" (1985 edition, Micropaedia, Vol. 11, p. 928).


The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology points out that "primitive Christianity did not have an explicit doctrine of the Trinity such as was subsequently elaborated in the creeds of the early church" (Colin Brown, editor, Vol. 2, 1976, "God," p. 84).



Historian and science fiction writer H.G. Wells, in his noted work The Outline of History, points out, "There is no evidence that the apostles of Jesus ever heard of the trinity—at any rate from him" (1920, Vol. 2, p. 499).


Martin Luther, the German priest who initiated the Protestant Reformation, conceded, "It is indeed true that the name 'Trinity' is nowhere to be found in the Holy Scriptures, but has been conceived and invented by man" (reproduced in The Sermons of Martin Luther, John Lenker, editor, Vol. 3, 1988, p. 406).


The Oxford Companion to the Bible states: "Because the Trinity is such an important part of later Christian doctrine, it is striking that the term does not appear in the New Testament. Likewise, the developed concept of three coequal partners in the Godhead found in later creedal formulations cannot be clearly detected within the confines of the canon [i.e., actual Scripture]" (Bruce Metzger and Michael Coogan, editors, 1993, "Trinity," p. 782).


Professor Charles Ryrie, in his respected work Basic Theology, writes: "Many doctrines are accepted by evangelicals as being clearly taught in the Scripture for which there are no proof texts. The doctrine of the Trinity furnishes the best example of this. It is fair to say that the Bible does not clearly teach the doctrine of the Trinity . . . In fact, there is not even one proof text, if by proof text we mean a verse or passage that 'clearly' states that there is one God who exists in three persons" (1999, p. 89).
Ryrie goes on to state: "The above illustrations prove the fallacy of concluding that if something is not proof texted in the Bible we cannot clearly teach the results . . . If that were so, I could never teach the doctrine of the Trinity" (p. 90).


Millard Erickson, research professor of theology at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, writes that the Trinity "is not clearly or explicitly taught anywhere in Scripture, yet it is widely regarded as a central doctrine, indispensable to the Christian faith. In this regard, it goes contrary to what is virtually an axiom of biblical doctrine, namely, that there is a direct correlation between the scriptural clarity of a doctrine and its cruciality to the faith and life of the church.


"In view of the difficulty of the subject and the great amount of effort expended to maintain this doctrine, we may well ask ourselves what might justify all this trouble" (God in Three Persons: A Contemporary Interpretation of the Trinity, 1995,p. 12).


Professor Erickson further states that the Trinity teaching "is not present in biblical thought, but arose when biblical thought was pressed into this foreign mold [of Greek concepts]. Thus, the doctrine of the Trinity goes beyond and even distorts what the Bible says about God" (p. 20).



Professor Erickson later points out: "It is claimed that the doctrine of the Trinity is a very important, crucial, and even basic doctrine. If that is indeed the case, should it not be somewhere more clearly, directly, and explicitly stated in the Bible? If this is the doctrine that especially constitutes Christianity's uniqueness . . . how can it be only implied in the biblical revelation? . . . For here is a seemingly crucial matter where the Scriptures do not speak loudly and clearly.


"Little direct response can be made to this charge. It is unlikely that any text of Scripture can be shown to teach the doctrine of the Trinity in a clear, direct, and unmistakable fashion" (pp. 108-109). Later in this booklet we will consider various scriptures often used to support the Trinity doctrine.


Shirley Guthrie, Jr., professor of theology at Columbia Theological Seminary, writes: "The Bible does not teach the doctrine of the Trinity. Neither the word 'trinity' itself nor such language as 'one-in-three,' 'three-in-one,' one 'essence' (or 'substance'), and three 'persons,' is biblical language. The language of the doctrine is the language of the ancient church taken from classical Greek philosophy" (Christian Doctrine, 1994, pp. 76-77)."


Historic origins of the doctrine of the Trinity: Is the Trinity Biblical

Is the Trinity Biblical


The Biblical description of God, Yahweh, and of Jesus, Y'Shua, is recorded in post #8 above.





Quasar92
The triunity of God is clearly taught in the Scriptures by the risen Jesus Christ.

He speaks of people being 'baptised in the (ONE) Name (YHWH) of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit'. The placing of Son between Father and Spirit is conclusive. God has many titles but only one Name.

we may argue the background, we cannot argue with the facts.
 
R

RBA238

Guest
#60
The triunity of God is clearly taught in the Scriptures by the risen Jesus Christ.

He speaks of people being 'baptised in the (ONE) Name (YHWH) of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit'. The placing of Son between Father and Spirit is conclusive. God has many titles but only one Name.

we may argue the background, we cannot argue with the facts.
Disagree...The Trinity is like a "Mirage" in a hot desert...You think you see a Pool of Water, and when you get to where you see it..it is not really there....The Truth is this: "The Titles" Father, Son, and Holy Ghost" are 3 offices or administrations of Almighty God
His name is Jesus Christ, AKA, "The Lord", "I AM" "YESHUA" etc, etc, etc....Jesus stated: "All power in heaven and earth is given unto me"
If you see this as The Son telling us HE HAS ALL THE POWER, Tells us if there really 3 persons in the Godhead, 2 of them have no power, sonce Jesus said he had all the power.