L
When God command gopher wood to build the ark, could Noah use gopher wood and oak yet still do what God said? No. Noah would have CHANGED what God said by ADDING to what God said just like ADDING to an order is CHANGING the order.
That's not a good analogy. A better analogy would be Moses putting a little pitch somewhere that wasn't clearly on the outside of the boat.
Better yet would be if God had told him that He liked something, but didn't command it specifically, and Moses did it.
Substituting oak for gopher wood isn't following instructions. If Noah hung put up a plant or two for decorations inside, that's not disobedience. If he had a reason to think plants in the ark pleased God based on what God said, and put plants in the ark though it wasn't specifically commanded in this case that would be a better analogy.
And those who use musical instruments to praise God have Psalms to read that tell us that it is good to praise God with musical instruments.
You are creating a law where one is not stated. You have a law that if the New Testament does not specifically authorize something for church meetings (with 'something' being some specific set of things you object to, but not the other things) then it is forbidden. The Bible teaches no such thing. It does teach 'let all things be done unto edifying.'
You are applying rules from the tabernacle to the church without Biblical authorization.
Let's discuss that if the issue is disobeying God (e.g. disobeying the commandments in I Corinthians 14.) You have now presented any scripture that shows that using musical instruments in church is disobedience to God.
Prove your interpretation from scripture.
Psalms says it is good to praise the Lord to the sound of the lyre and the harp.
Jesus said "...it is lawful to do good, even on the Sabbath day." Wouldn't that apply even to the first day of the week?
'Failed' because you dismiss it out of hand. The point is, you have no justification for using the Nadab and Abihu argument for church and not other areas of your life, or for certain practices in church you oppose, but not for others.
I'm not the one assuming something is forbidden unless it is specifically authorized. When it comes to the tabernacle, Moses was shown a certain pattern, and that pattern had to be followed. The priests had a certain fire they were to use and they were to keep it burning. Nadab and Abihu deviated from the pattern.
Those who use musical instruments have inspired scripture to back them up. The Bible says singing praises to God to the lyre and harp is good, and Jesus says it is lawful to do good.
This is your idea, but the Bible does not teach this. I Corinthians 1:7 says, "So that ye come behind in no spiritual gift, waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ."
I can't comment on your experience, because I wasn't there, except to say that you err by basing your doctrine on experience instead of scripture. If someone doesn't meet up to your expectations of what spiritual gifts should look like, that doesn't mean that there are not people exercising Biblical spiritual gifts. If you want to talk about experiences, I've seen obvious supernatural spiritual gifts before.
No, I am not. I am saying taking RCC liturgy as the basis for a church service, and designing a church services by asking which components of it are Biblical, and which are not, is not the way to have church. Instead, we need to completely return to the New Testament, and ask what it actually teaches. I Corinthians 14 is the longest chapter we have on what to do in church. Like Hebrews 10:24-25, the idea is to 'exhort one another.' Protestantism and your movement also, have a tradition of the clergy type up front speaking and performing rituals, rather than the body functioning in their gifts to edify one another in the meeting.
But while that is important, we are not talking about truly prostrating to the Father, but rather what we do in our church meetings. There is no command to prostrate ('worship') in our church gatherings in the New Testament.
Better yet would be if God had told him that He liked something, but didn't command it specifically, and Moses did it.
Substituting oak for gopher wood isn't following instructions. If Noah hung put up a plant or two for decorations inside, that's not disobedience. If he had a reason to think plants in the ark pleased God based on what God said, and put plants in the ark though it wasn't specifically commanded in this case that would be a better analogy.
Rom 14 was being twisted essentially into saying that what anyone's conscience says for them to do is alright. So what ever you conscience ASSUMES would be right. Yet in that context Paul is dealing with matters of opinions NOT matter of law/doctrine.
You are creating a law where one is not stated. You have a law that if the New Testament does not specifically authorize something for church meetings (with 'something' being some specific set of things you object to, but not the other things) then it is forbidden. The Bible teaches no such thing. It does teach 'let all things be done unto edifying.'
I have not drawn on Nadab and Abihu. Yet even though the OT was permanently taken away by Christ, Col 2:14; Heb 10:9 we can still learn from their examples "Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come." 1 Cor 10:11. People who disobey God today will be punished as those who disobeyed back then.
Not doing as God say is sin/disobedience/unrighteousness. Sure I can choose to disobey God but it will come with a price I do not want to have to pay in being eternally lost.
Col 3:17 "And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him."
"In the name of the Lord Jesus" means by His authority.
"In the name of the Lord Jesus" means by His authority.
WHere do men get their authority to think they can worship God anyway they so choose?
Jesus said "...it is lawful to do good, even on the Sabbath day." Wouldn't that apply even to the first day of the week?
The "electricity" and "internet" is a failed argument already used mulitple times in this thread.
In Mt 28:19,20 Jesus commanded his disciples to go into all the world and teach. Since in this context Jesus did not authorize a specific mode of transportation/communication, then how were the disciple to go and teach?
Please answer this question, then we can talk about matter of authority and expediency.
Please answer this question, then we can talk about matter of authority and expediency.
Those who use musical instruments have inspired scripture to back them up. The Bible says singing praises to God to the lyre and harp is good, and Jesus says it is lawful to do good.
The miraculous has ceased. No one today can speak in tongues as the apostles did in Acts 2.
I have personally witnessed their inablity to do the things they claim.
YOu post "...modify it into a church service based on whether elements of it could be backed up with scripture"
You are implying worship activity does NOT have to backed up with scripture?
You are implying worship activity does NOT have to backed up with scripture?
Jn 4:23,24 the true worshipper worships "in truth" God's word is truth, Jn 17:17, so true worship is according to scripture. God did not leave how worship is to be conducted up to the opinions of men.