How can you be justified if you cannot find sin in using instrument under the Law????
There are many probelms in going back to the OT law to find justification for a practice. The entire Galatain epistle is about Paul condemning the Galtians for leaving Chrit's NT and returning to that OT law thinking they could be jsutified by keeping circumcision. FOr leeaving the NT and returning to the OT Paul told themthey had leftthe gospelunto a false gospel, they had quit obeying the truth, they were trying to make Christ's death in vain, theyhad fallen from grace. This would also be true of me for leaving Chris't's NT to return to the OT to justify using IM.
Paul also told them in Gal 5:3 "I testify again to every man that receiveth circumcision, that he
is a debtor to do the whole law"
THe point being there is no cherry-picking out of a law what you like and disregarding the rest of the law you do not like. So if you return to the OT for justification to use IM,then you have an obligation to contend for the WHOLE law.
watcher2013 said:
Have you not heard of the great multitudes, the elders... and those who were slain for the word of God?
harp = melodic, sweet sounding, and you got it from where?
by the way...there is also a trumpet sound....what does this mean again?
Again, if you are ready to literlize harps in Rev 14:1,2 then are you ready to literalize only 144,000 being in heaven?
Furthermore, even if the harps were literal, physical harps that does not authorize the use of them here on earth within the church. Mt 22:30 there is no marriage or giving in marriage in heaven. Does this sanction that no marriage should take place in the church today here on earth? No. So harps in heaven would not sanction their use here on earth in the church.
watcher2013 said:
and there is no question about it...
I did not rejected your arguments..in fact I did said its up to you to add peanut and juices and it is not a sin.
Huh??? To be clear, you are actually saying peanuts and o.j. can be used for the Lord's Supper and that would be acceptable with God?
watcher2013 said:
are you sure noah did not used any oak?
Did God instructed noah to use hammer?
So you are arguing Noah could have built the ark out of oak and still done as God said?
God did not specify the tool hammer, but using a hammer did not add to or change God's instructions in how the ark was to be built but a hammer would be an aid in carrying out that command to build an ark.
Question: In the great commisson, Mt 28:19,20, Jesus commanded His disciples to "go". Yet in this context, nowhere did Jesus authorize a certain mode of transportation/communication. So what mode of transportation/communication could the disciples use since none was specifically authorized?