Did Jesus Die on The Cross for The Just/Elect/Saved Whose Names Are Written in The Book of Life OR

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
2,509
303
83
It looks like they missed where I questioned you about equating being made alive with being raped. I wonder if you know what role you played in being predestined, and do you consider that a violation of your will also? Comparable to being raped? Being made alive being called a rape of your will... No, I may never get used to that. I very much doubt that God is happy with you or anybody else saying it is comparable.
The Calvinist view of predestination an irresistible grace is comparable to date rape. The biblical view of these is not.
 
Jul 3, 2015
57,020
26,743
113
I can only speak for myself.
I was not raised as a Christian. However, as the years went on I was slowly began to see the world around me and come to the understanding that God had to be the creator. But, my struggle continued because I was unable to see and understand that I could be forgiven. But a simple sermon on a certain Sunday convinced me otherwise. I heard the message that day and understood that even a sinner such as I could be forgiven!
It wasn't the end of my journey but it was the beginning!
Was I raped? Not hardly! I am forever thankful.... I do not consider this rape, but consider it to be a blessing that I never deserved!
Thank you, BillyBob, my attitude is one of gratitude also, and I have said a number of times I am
grateful God was gracious enough toward me to allow me to survive the stupidity of my youth.


And you were dead in your trespasses and sins, 2in which you used to walk when you conformed
to the ways of this world and of the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the
sons of disobedience. 3 All of us also lived among them at one time, fulfilling the cravings of our flesh
and indulging its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature children of wrath.


4 But because of His great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, 5 made us alive with Christ even when
we were dead
in our trespasses. It is by grace you have been saved! 6 And God raised us up with Christ
and seated us with Him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, 7 in order that in the coming ages He
might display the surpassing riches of His grace, demonstrated by His kindness to us in Christ Jesus.


8 For it is by grace you have been saved through faith, and this not from yourselves; it is the gift
of God, 9not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ
Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance as our way of life. Ephesians 2:1-10


:)
 
Apr 18, 2024
712
103
43
I would say that fools reject what they understand. (Rom. 1) Men understood the deity and power of God but rejected the knowledge,
I didn't state that one very well. I guess I should learn to use the emojis more so it would have looked like this:

Sure:rolleyes:. No one rejects what they understand:rolleyes:. Simplistic ideology not accepted.

Open Text. Prove your case with Scripture if you are able. It's pretty easy to find some to discuss.
Double rolling eyes for emphasis.
 
Jan 24, 2024
3,811
621
113
But there is no such animal as an autonomous free will. Not even God Almighty has such a fanciful animal! The will of man is powerless to change his essence; just as God is powerless to change his! Both scripture (Jer 13:23) and the Law of Identity support my premise.

Also, the will is moved by our desires. The will does not operate in a vacuum, apart from all the other faculties which are corrupt by sin. Your theory contradicts Paul's assertion that there is NO GOOD thing in man's flesh (sin nature, cp Rom 7:18). But your theory clearly implies that's man's will is good enough to "override the sin nature..."

Don't you know that man is in bondage to sin? What do you think the Exodus narrative is teaching? Since the ancient Hebrews were in bondage, then what makes you think the antitypes aren't in bondage as well? :rolleyes:
You seriously have no problem taking a verse completely out of context, do you?

The verses in Jeremiah 13 before 23 also shows that if God sets something in stone how can man change it.

That verse literally has no connection whatsoever to free will in accepting God.

Paul shows us in Acts 17 God made a way for man to seek God. If man should use his free will he can seek God [whether he does or not] (he still has the ability to do so). And you deny that ability when Paul shows that God gave man that ability. So once again you are making things up and spreading false truths as truths.
 
Jan 24, 2024
3,811
621
113
Just curious. Lazarus dead in the tomb. Did he hear and then was alive, or was he given life and then heard?
He was not full of the Holy Spirit because Jesus had not DBR and ascended to Heaven. So he heard with natural ears. But you reject that God can speak to the natural man dead or alive. That's specifically where your doctrine fails at.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,467
513
113
There's not one [single] scripture that says people have the Holy Spirit before they HEAR, NOT ONE!
Not one? Really?
What do you think this verse is saying?

[1Co 2:12 KJV]
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

There are others but for the sake of simplicity, for now, I'll just post this one.

There's almost 10 TEN verses that say you hear, then the Holy Spirit works.
Which verses explicitly state that we can hear spiritually before and without having the Holy Spirit? I'd be interested in reading them.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
He clearly says He is doing so because they cannot know the mysteries of the kingdom, while others have been given the ability to know.

Please, post the text of the scripture that clearly says, "They cannot know the mysteries of the kingdom, while others have been given the ability to know."

You asked earlier -
Cameron143 said:
Didn't Jesus speak in parables so some would not understand?

If Jesus spoke in parables so they would not understand His teaching, what was His purpose in preaching plainly before He started to use parables? Surely it was so that they could understand, and they rejected what they had understood Him to be saying, because it had not fit with their own opinions on spiritual things.
Matthew 13:11.
 
Apr 18, 2024
712
103
43
Not one? Really?
What do you think this verse is saying?

[1Co 2:12 KJV]
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

New day. Old errors.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
Good question, albeit loaded.

I wonder, what would Cameron say...

Argument from silence.

So, to contrast what you may say:

Maybe that's why it's called sleep. Asleep > hear the Voice > awaken.

Maybe the same with death: dead > hear the voice > life.

And, is anybody truly dead as far as God knows and sees reality:

NKJ Luke 16:22-23 "So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 "And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.​

NKJ Matthew 17:1-3 Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James, and John his brother, led them up on a high mountain by themselves; 2 and He was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and His clothes became as white as the light. 3 And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him.​

NKJ 1 Sam 28:15 Now Samuel said to Saul, "Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?" And Saul answered, "I am deeply distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God has departed from me and does not answer me anymore, neither by prophets nor by dreams. Therefore I have called you, that you may reveal to me what I should do."​
NKJ 1 Thess 4:16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.​
Do we truly think we understand death? Even in physical death it seems the dead can see and hear and even show up here and there according to the Text. So, why not in spiritual death which at least has us walking around in this realm with faculties?
Dead isn't hard to understand. You don't go to the cemetery to witness. You understand it.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear. Obviously there are those who have ears that do not hear. Since nearly all possess hearing physically, there is a spiritual hearing being spoken of. Clearly not everyone has it.

God created all things in such a way as to point back to Him. This is so He could be known. He doesn't want people to perish. You He has quickened and you should be able to hear and understand. Dead in Christ is much different than dead in trespasses and sins..see Luke 16.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
At
At the beginning of Jesus ministry, it was given in plain speech in the Sermon on the Mount and elsewhere, but many understood it and refused to accept it. After that Jesus spoke in parables, so that those rejectors would not understand.

It was in this second case that Jesus said, "it is being given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom... but to them it is not being given."
There is no reason to assume this was always the case in Jesus' ministry.
It never says that He did so for that reason. And Jesus is making a distinction...he that hath ears versus he that hath not...13:9.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
Repentance is not something one does after believing. Repentance is what one does in response to hearing (akuO) God speak. It is turning away from what one has been trusting in and turning toward Jesus Christ and God to listen/pay attention (akuO) to Him, so that one can believe what one hears. Jesus and John said, "Repent and believe" not "Believe and repent."
Faith is the result of hearing. Obedience is the result of faith.
Acts 2:37....they heard, were pricked in the heart, and said...
Acts 2:38...repent and be baptized...
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,417
1,837
113
It was a horrible analogy, and should have been dropped. But when someone begins to defend a position, they will often stick with stuff to the end.
I understand that people believe they have the freedom of choice, but equating the sovereign actions of God with rape is more than a little over the top.
This is a mischaracterization of the description of the view that is suggestive of what a particular doctrine asserts, and not scripture.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
He was not full of the Holy Spirit because Jesus had not DBR and ascended to Heaven. So he heard with natural ears. But you reject that God can speak to the natural man dead or alive. That's specifically where your doctrine fails at.
Not at all. He quickens the dead. Dead people don't hear. Living people do. The same is true spiritually.
 
Apr 18, 2024
712
103
43
Dead isn't hard to understand. You don't go to the cemetery to witness. You understand it.
Then try to see reality through God's eyes by properly interpreting His Word. The corpse without the breath is not the entire reality even though some seem determined to make it so.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear. Obviously there are those who have ears that do not hear. Since nearly all possess hearing physically, there is a spiritual hearing being spoken of. Clearly not everyone has it.
Which conversely says some do.

God created all things in such a way as to point back to Him. This is so He could be known. He doesn't want people to perish. You He has quickened and you should be able to hear and understand. Dead in Christ is much different than dead in trespasses and sins..see Luke 16.
Quoted some from Luke 16.

See Matthew 13:11 in context.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
16,071
5,649
113
62
This is a mischaracterization of the description of the view that is suggestive of what a particular doctrine asserts, and not scripture.
I didn't introduce the term rape or kidnap. These are both terms that were used to characterize what some who hold a particular view of salvation must be claiming. The mischaracterization was done by those who employed the terms. It was their mischaracterization of what they thought others believe. It was incendiary and inappropriate and inaccurate.
You can defend those individuals and those terms if you like, but you would only be guilty of the same.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,417
1,837
113
I didn't introduce the term rape or kidnap. These are both terms that were used to characterize what some who hold a particular view of salvation must be claiming. The mischaracterization was done by those who employed the terms. It was their mischaracterization of what they thought others believe. It was incendiary and inappropriate and inaccurate.
You can defend those individuals and those terms if you like, but you would only be guilty of the same.
So, kill me. I think it a reasonable characterization of an erroneous interpretation.
Jesus called Judas "friend" and without a cynical bone in His body. Why? He knew that Judas was no friend of Him. However, the Lord is friendly in allowing others the privilege of their own opinions, even if they are erroneous and would lead them to hell. But He wasn't backward about making them aware of it.
 
Apr 18, 2024
712
103
43
It was incendiary and inappropriate and inaccurate.
You can defend those individuals and those terms if you like, but you would only be guilty of the same.

Some see what they consider to be repetitively posited false doctrine as incendiary and inappropriate and inaccurate. Honestly, I'd rather be cussed at than repetitively fed unbiblical error that the feeders will not and cannot prove in detailed exposition from Scripture.