Do you believe in Moral Absolutes or Eternal Moral Laws of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#22
So if you had a vision you believe might be from God that told you to mow down a bunch of children with a machine gun or to do something you believed to be wrong or sinful, you would just do it?

See, I believe I can know God is good. His righteous and good ways are not a mystery to me. I am not in a Mystery religion. I am in a relationship with Jesus Christ and He can teach me His good ways. I can know them. For the Spirit guides me into all truth. God is not the author of confusion. He is not going to tell me to do good and then turn around and tell me to do something bad.

For Abraham did not believe he was going to just permanently murder his son. Hebrews 11:19 tells us Abraham believed God was going to resurrect Isaac. If Abraham did not believe God was going to resurrect Isaac, and that God was asking him to permanently take the life of his son, then I would believe this to be wrong because God does not ask us to break His own eternal moral Laws. God is good and His standard for righteousness is always good and knowable.

Just because you think it is wrong doesn't make it wrong. God actually did tell people to kill entire villages, women and children included. Those who didn't listen were punished. You are deciding on your own that Jesus should not have given those people more wine because they had had enough. I think you are overstepping your boundaries.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#23
Then you should in no way use your own worldly judgements to contradict what the bible wrote. At the party where Jesus turned the water into wine, the man said "most people use the good wine first and then when everyone is well drunk they bring out the bad wine, but you have saved the good wine for last" I have personal experience in that. There is nothing in that scripture to support your view and whether or not you judge Jesus as righteous for His actions doesn't give you the right to "rewrite" what the scripture says. Jesus said that John baptist came neither eating nor drinking. Did John not drink water? it was referring to alcohol. Jesus said He came eating and drinking and they called Him a wine bibber. Now I don't think it's really worthy to argue. Jesus did whatever it was that Jesus saw fit to do. It changes nothing in my life or in yours so why are you so adamant as to rewrite that which is written, do you not fear that you are maiming the Word?
I believe Jesus made freshly squeezed juice straight from the grapes themselves because God creates life and not death. For the Bible mentions both wine being fully fermented and wine that has not fully fermented (Which can be called unfermented wine although wine is technically always fermenting unless the process of fermentation has been stopped. Note: It can be called "unfermented" because it did not fully ferment yet whereby it produces an intoxicating alcoholic type substance.). I believe this to be a moral issue because the alcoholic who reads John chapter 2 could get the "green light" that it is okay to drink intoxicating beverages for everyone because everyone did so at a Wedding party. But I do not believe Jesus would leave thousands of struggling alcoholics who read the Bible to then drink themselves to death because of wrong belief on Jesus' miracle in John 2. I also believe it is immoral because it breaks every OT warning about intoxicating beverages. Strong drink is raging.. Wine is not for kings. It can bite you like a serpent. Daniel refused the king's wine and meat so as not to be defiled, etc.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#24
I believe Jesus made freshly squeezed juice straight from the grapes themselves because God creates life and not death. For the Bible mentions both wine being completely fermented and wine that has not fully fermented (Which can be called unfermented wine although wine is technically always fermenting unless the process of fermentation has been stopped). I believe this to be a moral issue because the alcoholic who reads John chapter 2 could get the "green light" that it is okay to drink intoxicating beverages for everyone because everyone did so at a Wedding party. But I do not believe Jesus would leave thousands of struggling alcoholics who read the Bible to then drink themselves to death because of wrong belief on Jesus' miracle in John 2. I also believe it is immoral because it breaks every OT warning about intoxicating beverages. Strong drink is raging.. Wine is not for kings. It can bite you like a serpent. Daniel refused the king's wine and meat so as not to be defiled, etc.
I know your reasoning and I also know drunks at a party. No drunk or buzzed man is going to hail the new non alcoholic juice. Alcoholics want more alcohol. You can simply read the story and see what it's saying.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#25
take it even further. His mother said "they have NO MORE wine" He was replenishing a depleted supply.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#26
Just because you think it is wrong doesn't make it wrong. God actually did tell people to kill entire villages, women and children included. Those who didn't listen were punished. You are deciding on your own that Jesus should not have given those people more wine because they had had enough. I think you are overstepping your boundaries.
No, not at all. I believe you are ignoring tons of Scripture on alcoholic beverages in the OT, if you believe Jesus made an intoxicating beverage and not freshly squeezed juice (wine) from the grape. So I believe you are overstepping your boundaries.

Also, God telling people to kill their enemies who were bent on destroying them both physically and spiritually as a nation is not the same thing as one selfishly taking a life because you hate that person or lust in desiring to kill them for your own dark and evil purposes. One is obeying God and the other is making yourself into your own God (Which is wrong).
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#27
take it even further. His mother said "they have NO MORE wine" He was replenishing a depleted supply.
You see and hear the word "wine" and have been indoctrinated by your society and your church to believe that this is what the word "wine" means. Look up at Dictionary.com at the third definition. Google unfermented wine in Google's image search section. Such a statement does not make the word "wine" into an intoxicating beverage. Oh, and yes. They said "well drunk." Doesn't mean they were drunk. Jesus did not contribute to drunkenness. If He did it would contradict other Scripture where Paul says drunkenness (along with a list of other sins) will not cause you to inherit the Kingdom of God. Drunkenness is a sin; And Jesus contributing to drunkenness would have been wrong.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#28
No, not at all. I believe you are ignoring tons of Scripture on alcoholic beverages in the OT, if you believe Jesus made an intoxicating beverage and not freshly squeezed juice (wine) from the grape. So I believe you are overstepping your boundaries.

Also, God telling people to kill their enemies who were bent on destroying them both physically and spiritually as a nation is not the same thing as one selfishly taking a life because you hate that person or lust in desiring to kill them for your own dark and evil purposes. One is obeying God and the other is making yourself into your own God (Which is wrong).
My point Jason is when God tells you to do something you do it. Even if He says to kill your own son. You are reasoning everything out so it will fit nicely into your own understandings and in so doing you are denying that which is written. You have 0 evidence that Jesus made non alcoholic wine. In fact every other reference suggests that Jesus did drink fermented wine and He made it. You are deciding it doesn't fit with scripture. That is your problem, and a scary one. I have a simple faith brother. I don't like to add a bunch to it. It is a fear of mine that I can be mislead by following "people's opinions" I follow what is written. People who wish to live a life in the flesh they will find countless ways to do so. They can twist anything to fit their own desires. My issue with this particular subject is that a drunk will remain a drunk no matter what Jesus turned that water into, the real threat here is that you are adding to the Word.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#29
No, not at all. I believe you are ignoring tons of Scripture on alcoholic beverages in the OT, if you believe Jesus made an intoxicating beverage and not freshly squeezed juice (wine) from the grape. So I believe you are overstepping your boundaries.

Also, God telling people to kill their enemies who were bent on destroying them both physically and spiritually as a nation is not the same thing as one selfishly taking a life because you hate that person or lust in desiring to kill them for your own dark and evil purposes. One is obeying God and the other is making yourself into your own God (Which is wrong).
For the Israelites went to war so as to protect their familes and nation that they loved. But taking a life because you feel like it is dark, twisted, and selfish that is not based on love but hate.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#30
You see and hear the word "wine" and have been indoctrinated by your society and your church to believe that this is what the word "wine" means. Look up at Dictionary.com at the third definition. Google unfermented wine in Google's image search section. Such a statement does not make the word "wine" into an intoxicating beverage. Oh, and yes. They said "well drunk." Doesn't mean they were drunk. Jesus did not contribute to drunkenness. If He did it would contradict other Scripture where Paul says drunkenness (along with a list of other sins) will not cause you to inherit the Kingdom of God. Drunkenness is a sin; And Jesus contributing to drunkenness would have been wrong.
Jason, people drank fermented wine from the very beginning. They were at a wedding. They were drinking fermented wine. You are adding to all of this with your own judgements. Why did Jesus say they called Him a wine bibber? is that an insult for juice? "that guy drinks too much juice!"
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#31
For the Israelites went to war so as to protect their familes and nation that they loved. But taking a life because you feel like it is dark, twisted, and selfish that is not based on love but hate.
Who said anything about killing for hate? was that in the Godly vision question you asked? "kill those people with hate"?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#32
My point Jason is when God tells you to do something you do it. Even if He says to kill your own son. You are reasoning everything out so it will fit nicely into your own understandings and in so doing you are denying that which is written. You have 0 evidence that Jesus made non alcoholic wine. In fact every other reference suggests that Jesus did drink fermented wine and He made it. You are deciding it doesn't fit with scripture. That is your problem, and a scary one. I have a simple faith brother. I don't like to add a bunch to it. It is a fear of mine that I can be mislead by following "people's opinions" I follow what is written. People who wish to live a life in the flesh they will find countless ways to do so. They can twist anything to fit their own desires. My issue with this particular subject is that a drunk will remain a drunk no matter what Jesus turned that water into, the real threat here is that you are adding to the Word.
To have no standard of morality in one's faith is to have the type of faith that is no different than a terrorist's faith or the faith of a sociopathic religious nut.

In other words, if God told you to kill a bunch of children, or act like the terrorists at 9/11 then you would do it?

I don't believe God wants us to destroy our enemies under this current dispensation. It is only when Jesus returns in the sky riding upon a horse (With his saints following) whereby the saint (which came from Heaven) will then execute justice upon the remaining nations who have refused to repent.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#33
besides, turning water into juice is much less impressive. Fermentation takes time. I can make koolaid in 60 seconds. lol
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#34
To have no standard of morality in one's faith is to have the type of faith that is no different than a terrorist's faith or the faith of a sociopathic religious nut.

In other words, if God told you to kill a bunch of children, or act like the terrorists at 9/11 then you would do it?

I don't believe God wants us to destroy our enemies under this current this current dispensation. It is only when Jesus returns in the sky riding upon a horse (With his saints following) whereby the saint (which came from Heaven) will then execute justice upon the remaining nations who have refused to repent.
That is the difference Jason. God wouldn't tell me to do that. We know the voice of our Shepherd. At the same time we have to trust Him to know more than we do. God demands that we trust Him above our own desires and understandings. God holds many mysteries. If He say's "lift that dagger and stab your son" you lift that dagger. That's what Abraham did. Trust God and then He stopped Abraham. You see, God will test our faith.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#35
besides, turning water into juice is much less impressive. Fermentation takes time. I can make koolaid in 60 seconds. lol
Jesus miracle was to magnify his glory (John 2:11). It was to show He was God. God created life and not death. Fermentation is a process of death. And the Scriptures say that death will one day be destroyed.

Endorsing a beverage that causes addition, hurt, pain, and destoys familes every several minutes is not how I see how God would get the glory in this case. For alcohol's destruction or bad fruit is impartial.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#36
Here is a question to ponder. Why did God select Jesus' lineage to go through the Bathsheba who David took to wife through adultery and even committed murder to her husband Uriah? Why did God love Bathsheba and Davids son so much? does that fit in your righteous understanding?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#37
That is the difference Jason. God wouldn't tell me to do that. We know the voice of our Shepherd. At the same time we have to trust Him to know more than we do. God demands that we trust Him above our own desires and understandings. God holds many mysteries. If He say's "lift that dagger and stab your son" you lift that dagger. That's what Abraham did. Trust God and then He stopped Abraham. You see, God will test our faith.
As I said before. God was not asking Abraham to murder his son permanently. Read Hebrews 11:19. Abraham believed God was going to resurect Isaac. Therein lies the difference.

In other words, on one hand you are saying God would not ask you to kill children and then on the other hand you are saying that he can ask you to kill chlldren by taking the life of your own son permanently? See you believe in a contradiction. No moral absolute in this case. You either believe God always acts good or you don't.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#38
Jesus miracle was to magnify his glory (John 2:11). It was to show He was God. God created life and not death. Fermentation is a process of death. And the Scriptures say that death will one day be destroyed.

Endorsing a beverage that causes addition, hurt, pain, and destoys familes every several minutes is not how I see how God would get the glory in this case. For alcohol's destruction or bad fruit is impartial.
red wine promotes a healthy heart (in moderation) and the entire old testament you have God's chosen drinking and getting drunk, taking multiple wives, harlots and concubines. They remained His chosen through most of that. How are you able to decide what God should and should not do? did and did not do?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#39
Here is a question to ponder. Why did God select Jesus' lineage to go through the Bathsheba who David took to wife through adultery and even committed murder to her husband Uriah? Why did God love Bathsheba and Davids son so much? does that fit in your righteous understanding?
God does not condone open rebellion or people who refuse to repent. Jesus lineage is from people who had chosen to repent of their sins. It wasn't the fact that they sinned. Everyone has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. It's when you turn from your sin and ask to forgive you of your sin is when you are accepted of God. No repentance. No salvation.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#40
As I said before. God was not asking Abraham to murder his son permanently. Read Hebrews 11:19. Abraham believed God was going to resurect Isaac. Therein lies the difference.
So now it matters what Abraham believed? now it's morally sound? well the 9-11 attackers thought they were doing God a service. A woman who murdered her kids thought she was sending them to heaven. I don't think that's sound reasoning at all. Bottom line He said "sacrifice your son"