Does YOUR FAITH heal you?Name it claim it! YAY!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#41
By your response,Im assuming you didnt read the scriptures provided in the post? God is all things all the time. God does not heal all. that is a LIE
God is able and willing to heal all. Jesus never said no,He healed all that came to Him.
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#42
God is able and willing to heal all. Jesus never said no,He healed all that came to Him.
Yes,but at that time Jesus was trying to show Israel that He is the Messiah,and from God,by the miracles He did,which He said,if you do not believe the words that I am telling you,then believe Me for the works that I do,that I am from God,but of course Jesus wanted to heal them because He loves them.

Also it was not spiritual yet,where the body does not matter,but the spiritual matters,for Paul asked God to remove a thorn in the flesh from him three times,in which God did not do it,but said,My grace is sufficient for you,so Paul said,very well then,I will glory in my infirmities,for when I am weak,then I am strong,for the power of Christ rests upon me.

So it appears as if some people not being healed is a better spiritual position for them,to keep them humble,to depend on God,to learn that God's grace is enough,not the soundness of the body.

But although God might not heal someone physically,I tend to believe that God will always heal the mind,or not let anything happen to the mind,for God has given us power,love,and a sound mind,it does not say He has given us a sound body.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,591
879
113
61
#43
God is able and willing to heal all. Jesus never said no,He healed all that came to Him.
Kaylagirl, that correct for the time when our Lord walked on earth! But show me the proof that he is doing it through the whole churchhistoriy till today! It is not because he could not do it, but it is not his goal for us. For him it is much more important to save us for eternety then to heal our physical body. We all have to die on any sickness, accident ore something else.
And also all the people which he healed died finally, most at any diseases. And Lazarus finaly also died. The goal of the Lords healings and miracles we find in John 20,29-31:
Jesus said unto him, Thomas, because you have seen me, you have believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed. 30 And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: 31 But these are written, that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you might have life through his name.





 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#44
I let others be the judge of that. In regards to Joseph Prince, the Lord orchestrated events in such a way that I got one of his books to learn about God's grace. The Lord used his book to allow me to grow in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ. I even had a dream where the Lord told me that He was going to be teaching me about His grace (as Jesus and I stood before two mirrors and the reflection in both were Jesus). This meaning, imputed righteousness, justification, and so on.

You say you see it one way and I another, but God has but one mouth. If there is a contradiction between what we are sharing, then shouldn't we like the Bereans search the scriptures? I said in another thread or post to you that all these people disagreeing simply disagree in method, but actually desire the same goal. That is something to keep in mind. :)

Cool dream!

-JGIG
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#45
Maybe Ezekiel should have changed his method too, for he didn't have any success stories, either.
Ezekiel 3:5-9 (NASB)
[SUP]5 [/SUP]"For you are not being sent to a people of unintelligible speech or difficult language, but to the house of Israel, [SUP]6 [/SUP]nor to many peoples of unintelligible speech or difficult language, whose words you cannot understand. But I have sent you to them who should listen to you; [SUP]7 [/SUP]yet the house of Israel will not be willing to listen to you, since they are not willing to listen to Me. Surely the whole house of Israel is stubborn and obstinate. [SUP]8 [/SUP]"Behold, I have made your face as hard as their faces and your forehead as hard as their foreheads. [SUP]9 [/SUP]"Like emery harder than flint I have made your forehead. Do not be afraid of them or be dismayed before them, though they are a rebellious house."

Maybe the street preachers are also preaching to a rebellious house too?
Um, Ezekiel wasn't preaching the Good News of Christ because the Work of Christ had not yet been done.

Now, after the Work of Christ, it is the Good News that we are to preach!

-JGIG
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#46
That is the excuse used by "evangelists" who do not reveal the goodness of God that leads to repentance. Instead of being introspective they blame the harvest, instead of deciding that the field is white for harvest they are burning the crops with a message of condemnation instead of reconciliation.

People encourage them in posts, "Oh good for you, preaching to those sinners. You gave them a good stern word! You tell 'em!", when in actuality they have failed these people. There was no love, the truth can be shared in such a way that hardens people's heart, not because the message is offensive but because the messenger is offensive.

Of course we ought to love these street preachers just as we encourage them to love others. In this way they see how gentleness and respect go a long way in receiving truth, or correction. I just find too often when people accuse the harvest of being rebellious it is often because they themselves have showed no results. They blame the harvest instead of their methods. Maybe the issue isn't the harvest but the laborers.

As I shared earlier, perception is a key to reception. If people do not perceive the love in what you share, in that of coming into an embrace and reconciliation with the Father, they do not get a glimpse of God's goodness. They usually get condemnation, hate, and a "repent or else" ultimatum instead of a message of reconciliation.
It's been my experience that street preachers "called" to their ministry usually have a sterner message because their job is to warn the sinner of pending judgement. This was the way of John the Baptist, Jonah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, & others. If I were a street preacher, I wouldn't listen to a stranger's advice, either. They hear so much already they probably just filtered it out.

I would praise most of them who are trying because there's no way they can live off their ministry..... it's volunteer work. It's hard enough to get a "paid" pastor to get out there every once in a while.

An old indian proverb says "I will not judge my brother till I've walked a mile in his moccasins". Perhaps you should try it first.
:rolleyes:
 
L

ladylynn

Guest
#47
Blasphemy is the prosperity WOF movement that expects the Holy Spirit to do something fabulous at their whim! Scripture was presented. I dont take advice from the likes of you and your cronies that support false teaching and false teachers. There will be a special place in hell for those who have perverted Gods words!

Good grief Polly! This is a scathing post. Mean to the core with words that whip the reader. It was just like reading swear words to my eyes and heart.:eek:
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#48
1)Um, Ezekiel wasn't preaching the Good News of Christ because the Work of Christ had not yet been done.

2) Now, after the Work of Christ, it is the Good News that we are to preach!

-JGIG
1. Ummm..... I just gave an example of biblical street preaching. I never said he was preaching the Gospel.
2. Ummm..... yes it is, just not the way it's done by many today.

Luke 24:44-49 (KJV)
[SUP]44 [/SUP]And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. [SUP]45 [/SUP]Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, [SUP]46 [/SUP]And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: [SUP]47 [/SUP]And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. [SUP]48 [/SUP]And ye are witnesses of these things. [SUP]49 [/SUP]And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.
 

Demi777

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2014
6,877
1,949
113
Germany
#49
Its not the faith that heals you..its the one you have the faith IN that does..just putting that out there
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,727
833
113
44
#50
I am not accusing them of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit or the unpardonable sin. I am saying that one ought to be cautious of attributing evil, sickness and disease to God because it can be using the Lord's name in vain. Better to be silent on the matter than to attach God's name to curses (of the law).

No Christian wishes to use God's name in vain, right? If God did not send the sickness or permit it, and a person attributes it to Him, that is using His name in vain. Correct? So it seems silence on this matter might be the better decision even though there is no condemnation in Jesus Christ. I just think as a child of God we wouldn't want to give off a false perception of our Heavenly Father.
Fair enough, but what about when I say that the Lord permitted me to go through a horrible motorcycle wreak that took all function from my dominate arm? I mean He is God right, He could have made the SUV turn to nerf right? or at least held my brachial plexus in my spine so I could still use my arm. So because He didn't do that He, in a sense, permitted it to happen. Yet He used this to break me down, I mean as low as one can get to really think about what's important in this world, then He took this disgusting person who's own mother walked out on him before age 1, ex-drug dealer, convict, violent fighter and proud of it, adulterous, and a whole LONG list of other stuff, and all that is way before we look at my thought life, and made him a new man. God used the hardest trial of my life to bring me to truth, and I will Praise Gods name until the day He takes me for this hardship I had to endure. Now we do agree that God did not "cause" my wreak, and I do not believe the Holy Spirit will develop cancer in someone either, so if that is what you meant then we are in agreement, but it sounds to me like you're suggesting that after we are saved and except Christ that we get some kind of free pass from the hardship of this world and I do not agree at all with that. I also praise God for my accident and the loss of this arm. Is that blaspheming the Holy Spirit in you view?
 
L

ladylynn

Guest
#51
That is the excuse used by "evangelists" who do not reveal the goodness of God that leads to repentance. Instead of being introspective they blame the harvest, instead of deciding that the field is white for harvest they are burning the crops with a message of condemnation instead of reconciliation.

People encourage them in posts, "Oh good for you, preaching to those sinners. You gave them a good stern word! You tell 'em!", when in actuality they have failed these people. There was no love, the truth can be shared in such a way that hardens people's heart, not because the message is offensive but because the messenger is offensive.

Of course we ought to love these street preachers just as we encourage them to love others. In this way they see how gentleness and respect go a long way in receiving truth, or correction. I just find too often when people accuse the harvest of being rebellious it is often because they themselves have showed no results. They blame the harvest instead of their methods. Maybe the issue isn't the harvest but the laborers.

As I shared earlier, perception is a key to reception. If people do not perceive the love in what you share, in that of coming into an embrace and reconciliation with the Father, they do not get a glimpse of God's goodness. They usually get condemnation, hate, and a "repent or else" ultimatum instead of a message of reconciliation.


If I was not a believer and a snarling mean hag came at me telling me I'm going to hell if I don't repent from my sins like she did., I'd look at her and think if that is what happens to a person when they get saved I don't want it!! What has it done for her??



 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#52
Good grief Polly! This is a scathing post. Mean to the core with words that whip the reader. It was just like reading swear words to my eyes and heart.:eek:
Scathing? What about this one?
Matthew 23:13-33 (KJV)
[SUP]13 [/SUP]But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. [SUP]14 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. [SUP]15 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! [SUP]17 [/SUP]Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? [SUP]18 [/SUP]And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. [SUP]19 [/SUP]Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? [SUP]20 [/SUP]Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. [SUP]21 [/SUP]And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. [SUP]22 [/SUP]And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon. [SUP]23 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. [SUP]25 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. [SUP]26 [/SUP]Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. [SUP]27 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. [SUP]28 [/SUP]Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. [SUP]29 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, [SUP]30 [/SUP]And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. [SUP]31 [/SUP]Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. [SUP]32 [/SUP]Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. [SUP]33 [/SUP]Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

Now that's scathing, wouldn't you say?
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#53
Scathing? What about this one?
Matthew 23:13-33 (KJV)
[SUP]13 [/SUP]But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. [SUP]14 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. [SUP]15 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! [SUP]17 [/SUP]Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? [SUP]18 [/SUP]And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. [SUP]19 [/SUP]Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? [SUP]20 [/SUP]Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. [SUP]21 [/SUP]And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. [SUP]22 [/SUP]And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon. [SUP]23 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. [SUP]25 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. [SUP]26 [/SUP]Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. [SUP]27 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. [SUP]28 [/SUP]Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. [SUP]29 [/SUP]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, [SUP]30 [/SUP]And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. [SUP]31 [/SUP]Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. [SUP]32 [/SUP]Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. [SUP]33 [/SUP]Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

Now that's scathing, wouldn't you say?
That is talking to the self-righteous Pharisees/scribes who are hypocrites. How about showing one where the Lord is talking to His disciples like that and telling them that they are snakes and vipers? There is a vast difference between the two.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#54
That is talking to the self-righteous Pharisees/scribes who are hypocrites. How about showing one where the Lord is talking to His disciples like that and telling them that they are snakes and vipers? There is a vast difference between the two.
Why do I want to do that? I know who I'm posting to.

Yes, there IS a vast difference between the two.:)
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#55
Why do I want to do that? I know who I'm posting to.

Yes, there IS a vast difference between the two.:)
Exactly! Which is why ladylynn talked about in her post describing another's post towards believers in Christ that was scathing and in fact was not something that Christ would have done - just as you have now pointed out that He has never done to His beloved children.

 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#56
Exactly! Which is why ladylynn talked about in her post describing another's post towards believers in Christ that was scathing and in fact was not something that Christ would have done - just as you have now pointed out that He has never done to His beloved children.

No, Jesus didn't. Neither did Pollyanna.:)
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#57


If I was not a believer and a snarling mean hag came at me telling me I'm going to hell if I don't repent from my sins like she did., I'd look at her and think if that is what happens to a person when they get saved I don't want it!! What has it done for her??


snarling mean hag....forsooth, you have too much of the Shakespeare in you

that stuff does belong in a cauldron though


 
P

popeye

Guest
#58
As far as I can tell, the unpardonable sin is ascribing to works of Satan to the HS,and visa versa.

The amount of healing verses is massive.

The pro sickness/faith is demonic position has what,2 or three obscure verses?

Jesus said to raise the dead.

Is dead raising another fluke of heaven?
 
P

popeye

Guest
#59
Seems to me at some point hyper cessationists will have to draw a line between humans misapplying Gods word,and poo pooing the verses themselves.

That is spiritual suicide
 
P

popeye

Guest
#60
You can go into some Third world country,and see the handiwork of the devil so clearly. You can see the evidence of where he has been.

We can stop it. We can reverse it. It is heaven sent to a desperate people. God comes,things get better,not worse.

Some do more than others.

The ones doing more,don't study and major on how to stop the power of God and demonize Gods warriors