Einstein Was Wrong !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

marinerscatch

Active member
Nov 23, 2018
114
31
28
#2
Actually, relativity does connect everything as proposed by Einstein. And we of course, have the simpler answer to it than E=m(2). In scientific thought process, from the original neutron of energy to the Bang, to planet forming around the sun (Sol), to the laws of physics and eventual evolution down to our present day, everything is connected and defined as energy.

Technically, without the assumption of energy, the Bang, gravity forming each galaxy, to life on earth...all things relate. This is absolutely true. How so? Look at God's creation. We do not have the exact specifics how God brought the earth into existence, since Genesis 1:2 has the Spirit of God hovering over an earth covered in water. So before the days of creation ever began, the earth seemingly was already here. But from the moment the days of creation began, we see from animals, grass, plants, trees, even humans are made and connected to the soil of the earth. So by the earth's soil alone, we and all living things are relative to it.

So I propose that Einstein was never wrong, he only was wrong because he connected relativity through how science defines life, not how God defined it. But if we took Einstein's formula and applied to how God used the earth's soil to create living beings, it would be absolutely 100% correct.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#3
Actually, relativity does connect everything as proposed by Einstein. And we of course, have the simpler answer to it than E=m(2). In scientific thought process, from the original neutron of energy to the Bang, to planet forming around the sun (Sol), to the laws of physics and eventual evolution down to our present day, everything is connected and defined as energy.

Technically, without the assumption of energy, the Bang, gravity forming each galaxy, to life on earth...all things relate. This is absolutely true. How so? Look at God's creation. We do not have the exact specifics how God brought the earth into existence, since Genesis 1:2 has the Spirit of God hovering over an earth covered in water. So before the days of creation ever began, the earth seemingly was already here. But from the moment the days of creation began, we see from animals, grass, plants, trees, even humans are made and connected to the soil of the earth. So by the earth's soil alone, we and all living things are relative to it.

So I propose that Einstein was never wrong, he only was wrong because he connected relativity through how science defines life, not how God defined it. But if we took Einstein's formula and applied to how God used the earth's soil to create living beings, it would be absolutely 100% correct.
Lol. Einsteins field equations are pure fantady and fake math. I will post later. All....ALL of the standard cosmological theoryies are now obsolete. ALL. I will post links later.

The scientists I assure you are presently lying their fool heads off, as the latest sattelite and telescope date wreck the prevailing theories.....completely. And fully support the Sripture.
 

marinerscatch

Active member
Nov 23, 2018
114
31
28
#4
Lol. Einsteins field equations are pure fantady and fake math. I will post later. All....ALL of the standard cosmological theoryies are now obsolete. ALL. I will post links later.

The scientists I assure you are presently lying their fool heads off, as the latest sattelite and telescope date wreck the prevailing theories.....completely. And fully support the Sripture.


You are talking about the satellite that will be up in the next 10 years, or the satellite that proved there was nothing in space (completely void and empty) when the supposed Bang took place? This new evidence has flipped science head over hills because it means they have to toss out the neutron of energy that grew and then annihilated into the space we see now. Either way, they always have to change theories with each new discovery because it makes past theories obsolete.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
28,914
9,112
113
#5
Lol. Einsteins field equations are pure fantady and fake math. I will post later. All....ALL of the standard cosmological theoryies are now obsolete. ALL. I will post links later.

The scientists I assure you are presently lying their fool heads off, as the latest sattelite and telescope date wreck the prevailing theories.....completely. And fully support the Sripture.
if you say so lol.
i read the link in OP it was nonsense. the argument amounted to '
inconclusive results exist therefore we assume the premise'
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#6
if you say so lol.
i read the link in OP it was nonsense. the argument amounted to '
inconclusive results exist therefore we assume the premise'
"inconclusive results"
Stay tuned lol. BTW, inconclusive experiments are used to falsify theories all the time.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
12,849
5,763
113
#7
Einstein Was Wrong !
Not likely.

"Einstein's theory of general relativity predicted that the space-time around Earth would be not only warped but also twisted by the planet's rotation. Gravity Probe B showed this to be correct.

Credit: NASA "
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#8
Not likely.

"Einstein's theory of general relativity predicted that the space-time around Earth would be not only warped but also twisted by the planet's rotation. Gravity Probe B showed this to be correct.

Credit: NASA "
Oh brother. Where do I start. Einsteins field equations are bogus. Gravity is an inconsequential force, electromagnetic forces are the driving forces. All stellar formation and function theories are incorrect.
Stars are NOT running on nuclear fusion. Very little is. There are NO black holes.....they do not exist. The redshift data per the SDSS indicates all the theories are wrong. The Planck sattelite and WMAP sattelite data indicated the BB did not happen. The LTA clearly indicates that the minor axis of all galaxies are aligned with the plasma filaments. This is going to take a while ....but....the high priestly class of scientists are unquestionably preaching the false gospel of BB and billions of years. Total bunk.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
28,914
9,112
113
#9
Oh brother. Where do I start. Einsteins field equations are bogus. Gravity is an inconsequential force, electromagnetic forces are the driving forces. All stellar formation and function theories are incorrect.
Stars are NOT running on nuclear fusion. Very little is. There are NO black holes.....they do not exist. The redshift data per the SDSS indicates all the theories are wrong. The Planck sattelite and WMAP sattelite data indicated the BB did not happen. The LTA clearly indicates that the minor axis of all galaxies are aligned with the plasma filaments. This is going to take a while ....but....the high priestly class of scientists are unquestionably preaching the false gospel of BB and billions of years. Total bunk.
i decided to perform an experiment to test your theory. the sock i pulled out of the drawer turned out to be blue, which doesn't necessarily support what you are saying.

therefore we conclude that you are wrong.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#10
i decided to perform an experiment to test your theory. the sock i pulled out of the drawer turned out to be blue, which doesn't necessarily support what you are saying.

therefore we conclude that you are wrong.
If you have something to offer pls do so. Irreverent analogies I cannot use and do not need.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#11
i decided to perform an experiment to test your theory. the sock i pulled out of the drawer turned out to be blue, which doesn't necessarily support what you are saying.

therefore we conclude that you are wrong.
BTW...if you still believe that stars are nuclear furnaces, you are decades behind on your research. Pls try and keep up.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#13
you said inconclusive results are useful as proof?
Lol. When an experiment fails to detect the phenomenon we can assert that the theory is suspect.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
28,914
9,112
113
#15
what if a person doesn't detect Christ?

toss it out?

that your scientific method? or do you need more information?

this is a section for Bible discussion. i haven't detected your thread having anything to do with scripture yet. what do you suggest i do on this basis, write you off as proven troll, or keep listening, deferring judgement? at what point do i decide i know everything there is to know about you?

do i need to do an exhaustive search or can i snap to a judgement of you based on a couple inconclusive posts?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#16
i fail to detect Einstein being wrong.

so.
Rest assured Einstein is 100% wrong, 100% of the time. Sure the math works kind of, but the theories being propped up are laughable. Preposterous really. And then they attempt to shoehorn in the idea that the speed of gravity is limited to the speed of light, and then conjure up more fake math to support it! Utterly absurd, and easily refuted. As are the ridiculous fake math of the field equations.

The universe is run on electromagnetism in sum. And gravity is very likely an electromagnetic phenomenon as well.

You had better throw out those old textbooks, they are good for kindling that's about it.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
28,914
9,112
113
#17
gravity is very likely an electromagnetic phenomenon
why does a ferromagnetic substance experience the same gravity as a non-magnetic substance?

why do objects in freefall accelerate towards the center of the earth's mass instead of towards one of its magnetic poles?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
5,437
2,702
113
#18
what if a person doesn't detect Christ?

toss it out?

that your scientific method? or do you need more information?

this is a section for Bible discussion. i haven't detected your thread having anything to do with scripture yet. what do you suggest i do on this basis, write you off as proven troll, or keep listening, deferring judgement? at what point do i decide i know everything there is to know about you?

do i need to do an exhaustive search or can i snap to a judgement of you based on a couple inconclusive posts?
what if a person doesn't detect Christ?

A person who doesn't "detect Christ" is without a doubt ….unsaved. Christ reveals Himself to whom He wills.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
28,914
9,112
113
#20
what if a person doesn't detect Christ?

A person who doesn't "detect Christ" is without a doubt ….unsaved. Christ reveals Himself to whom He wills.
thank you for mentioning Jesus :)