Einstein Was Wrong !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,001
8,368
113
cv5,

You have posted a lot of videos. Maybe you can summarize some of the main points so that readers who do not have a lot of time to watch videos can become interested in your theories.

One video said the math behind the theory of black holes required dividing by zero. Another was about Einstein's theory assuming what? No mass or something along those lines. I saw part of it, but i forget.

I'd have to take certain math courses to follow some of this. I can't see how that would be a path for uber-effective evangelism for me. I think more people can follow the stuff Ravi Zecharias says.
Its going to take a while to pick it up, but you will get a handle on it trust me.

This will blow your socks off......3 minutes of your time.
Question: what are "Electric Transmission lines"?
Answer: see what the originators of EM theory have to say about it!

 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,833
13,558
113
Please post your DM/EM gravity links here I will appreciate it thanks.
I will do the same.
Thanks for your valuable input.
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,001
8,368
113
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
Well Sir, there is no "gravity" per se according the one theory. Another theory...gravity is the polarization of the ZPE field (Barry Setterfield). Your problem? You are constantly reverting back to your old dusty textbooks, and the question itself is unanswerable in the form that you pose. There is no relation necessary at all between the two domains. Mathematics would not help either, as they are antiquated in the form as commonly used, or simply nonsensical in terms of describing the phenomenon. Totally useless.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,001
8,368
113
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
If you want to "buy a book"....start with this author. And throw out the other ones. Do you want me to dictate the contents for you as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_D._Jefimenko#Generalized_Theory_of_Gravitation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism