Not hat you have to agree with it.
I am unconvinced. it's as simple as that really.
It doesn't have to be witnessed or proven in the "laboratory".
Yes but it helps to establish facts that way or else it is open to abuse. I could say anything about anything but does that make it the truth?
What assumptions? You're using the word "theories" in the wrong manner, and hypothesis doesn't fit at all.
Here we go once again, a theory is not necessarily a fact, just because someone claims that human beings evolved from a sub-species does not make it fact, just because living things share common components does not mean that it shows our ancestory or direct descendant and to make a claim that's how we came into existence.
If you want to berate well held theories with LOADS of evidence, you can do that and call it "assumptions". But that is the understatement of the year. It's proven itself time and time again.
There you go again with the so called evidence, if you and others want to believe in evolution then that is your choice, I am not convinced, I shall leave you to your evolution, nothing more can be said, the end
If you don't like the evidnece now, that's a different story.
I am unconvinced by the story of evolution, to me it is not factual evidence, I shall stick with what I observe today. It takes intelligent purposeful design mechanisms to bring into existence a complex machine created by man and yet natural phenomena is vastly superior by design than anything that man has designed. The core principle of human engineering is DESIGN, I know design when I see it. You can not bring into existence a complex machine with highly sophisticated components or parts using the priciples of evolution which is based upon natural selection, mutations and chance events and time. You can continue to discuss this topic with others if you choose to do so, I have done all of this a thousand times before. Time is running out, farewell.
