Galatian Conundrums

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
What are you talking about???
That lie you belive that peter preached a different gospel than paul.
You are a heretic.
Big time heretic.
That hyper pauline mess is heresy big time
Just because you disagree with another perspective does not mean its a lie. The world does not revolve around your beliefs.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Then how is the gospel recognized?

Did you mean a Jew must be born again? He told Nicodemus was he a Jew?

Have you been born again? If not believe in the Lord's death burial and resurrection, and you will be saved"
Nic was definitely a Jew.

For Jews during the 4 gospels and early Acts, they must believe Jesus is the Son of God and their promised Messiah (John 3:16 and John 20:31, Acts 2:36)
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Guojing said:Yes, so it made perfect sense for Peter to preach the resurrection of Christ to his Jewish listeners in Acts, but its not to preach in the same way as Paul, that it is the sign that all their sins are justified.
What kind of a group do you belong to?

Peter preached another kind or manner of signs ? How many sins are forgiven with it? Not enough to be justified??

Rather, its to tell the Jews that, since there was a resurrection, Jesus can still be their King even when they murdered him. But the key to that happening is that they must all repent, and be water baptized (Acts 2:38)
As always God must do the first works that do work in us to both will and do His good pleasure (imputed righteousness. Repentance is a work of God that he works in us to both will and do his good pleasure

Water baptism is an old testament ceremonial law (shadow of Jesus to come) used when a new priest entered the ministry. It was changed when Jesus from the tribe of Judah starting baptizing . No longer after a Levi alone now after any nation men and woman priest.A kingdom of priest as ambassadors sent from a foreign land not here. But where the believer have their citizenship and birth records. The heavenly Jerusalem not seen

But to Peter, even after Jesus resurrection, salvation for the Jews was still based on obeying the Law and getting circumcised.
Getting circumcised is an old testament ceremonial law as a shadow. It was fulfilled in Christ our bloody husband . It was used to represent the first born the Son of God.

It is clearly seen in the parable/ figure below.. Used a gentile woman to prevent God from kiling Moses for not honoring God's first Son the Son of God.

And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn.And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him.Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. So he let him go: then she said, A bloody husband thou art, because of the circumcision.Exodus 4:23-26

All of the old testament ceremonial laws where used as a way of preaching the gospel that did looked ahead to the suffering of Christ beforehand and the glory that did come. The graves were opened.

The old testement born again Jew (inward ) and not in respect to the flesh(outward Jew). They received the end of the work of faith that worked in them from the beginning just as us today

Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls. Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, (our bloody husband) and the glory that should follow.1 Peter 1:11 9-11
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Nic was definitely a Jew.

For Jews during the 4 gospels and early Acts, they must believe Jesus is the Son of God and their promised Messiah (John 3:16 and John 20:31, Acts 2:36)
The 4 gospels and early Acts. Not after or before? What did they believe before and after and why the pause for the 4 gospels and early Acts?

The work on the cross fell short of the glory of God?

What gospel did Abraham believe? One with a unknown remnant of grace . . . . you finish it in your own flesh in purgatory for a unknown amount of time?
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Paul spoke from his view. He did not KNOW james and the others personally. He spoke of hearsay only. thus, They seemed or appeared.

And rev was written decades after paul spoke those words. Paul realized long before this they they WERE pillars.. Because by then HE KNEW THEM
Well the next thing Paul says in Gal 2 is the he id know them:

Galatian 2

7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.


Who knows what is going on in this passage?
and says Peter is to the Gentiles, but Peter says different:

Acts 15:6-7, “So the apostles and the elders met to consider this statement. After a lengthy debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God chose me to be the one among you through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the gospel and believe."

1Timothy 2:7, "For this reason I was appointed to be an announcer, an apostle, and a faithful and true teacher of the gentiles. I am telling you the truth. I am not lying."
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Paul spoke from his view. He did not KNOW james and the others personally. He spoke of hearsay only. thus, They seemed or appeared.

And rev was written decades after paul spoke those words. Paul realized long before this they they WERE pillars.. Because by then HE KNEW THEM
ALso where does it say that he realized they were pillars?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Well the next thing Paul says in Gal 2 is the he id know them:



and says Peter is to the Gentiles, but Peter says different:

Acts 15:6-7, “So the apostles and the elders met to consider this statement. After a lengthy debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God chose me to be the one among you through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the gospel and believe."

1Timothy 2:7, "For this reason I was appointed to be an announcer, an apostle, and a faithful and true teacher of the gentiles. I am telling you the truth. I am not lying."
Acts 10 gives you your answer concerning peter, Remember peter’s vision and his words to the gentile family

then look at Gods words in act 9, where God said paul will be his chosen vessel

So they are both right, and do not contradict
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Did paul not realize it later?
I asked where does this happen? Paul questioned tham implying they are not pillars of the faith in Gal 2, seems like an important thing to me since their names are on the foundation of the kingdom and they are Jesus chosen disciples to carry His message.

I am asking where does he then realize and say they are indeed pillars of the faith, can you show me where?
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Acts 10 gives you your answer concerning peter, Remember peter’s vision and his words to the gentile family

then look at Gods words in act 9, where God said paul will be his chosen vessel

So they are both right, and do not contradict
Why then does Paul say Peter i not to Gentiles, but to Jews? WHen Peter says he is to Gentiles?

Galatians 2:7-9, " 7 On the contrary, when they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel to the circumcised 8 (for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles), 9 and when James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given to me, they gave the right hand of fellowship to Barnabas and me, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.

Acts 15:6-7, “So the apostles and the elders met to consider this statement. After a lengthy debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God chose me to be the one among you through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the gospel and believe."
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I asked where does this happen? Paul questioned tham implying they are not pillars of the faith in Gal 2, seems like an important thing to me since their names are on the foundation of the kingdom and they are Jesus chosen disciples to carry His message.

I am asking where does he then realize and say they are indeed pillars of the faith, can you show me where?
Show where he implied they were not
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Why then does Paul say Peter i not to Gentiles, but to Jews? WHen Peter says he is to Gentiles?

Galatians 2:7-9, " 7 On the contrary, when they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel to the circumcised 8 (for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles), 9 and when James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given to me, they gave the right hand of fellowship to Barnabas and me, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.

Acts 15:6-7, “So the apostles and the elders met to consider this statement. After a lengthy debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God chose me to be the one among you through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the gospel and believe."
Peter was referencing an event which happened (acts10)

Again, remember the dream peter had,
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Show where he implied they were not
Galatian 2
"7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles 9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision."


The thread asked about his:

Galatian 2

7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.


Who knows what is going on in this passage?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Galatian 2
"7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles 9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision."


The thread asked about his:
That does not imply they are not, That says he is not sure.

Huge difference bro..
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Yet Paul goes on to say "Peter stood condemmed" (2:11)

Galatians 1:6-24, " 6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. 10 For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ. 11 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel. 12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For you have heard of my former life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. 14 And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers. 15 But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, 16 was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone; 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, and returned again to Damascus. 18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas and remained with him fifteen days. 19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James the Lord's brother. 20 (In what I am writing to you, before God, I do not lie!) 21 Then I went into the regions of Syria and Cilicia. 22 And I was still unknown in person to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. 23 They only were hearing it said, “He who used to persecute us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.” 24 And they glorified God because of me.

Galatians 2:1-11, " 1 Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. 2 I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain. 3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek. 4 Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in—who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery— 5 to them we did not yield in submission even for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you. 6 And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me. 7 On the contrary, when they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel to the circumcised 8 (for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles), 9 and when James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given to me, they gave the right hand of fellowship to Barnabas and me, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised. 10 Only, they asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do. 11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned."
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Also in Acts 15 the holy spirit guided them to say gentiles should not eat meat sacrificed to idols, Paul says it is ok:

1 Corinthians 8:1-13, "Now concerning food offered to idols: we know that “all of us possess knowledge.” This “knowledge” puffs up, but love builds up. If anyone imagines that he knows something, he does not yet know as he ought to know. But if anyone loves God, he is known by God. Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that “an idol has no real existence,” and that “there is no God but one.” For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”— yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist. However, not all possess this knowledge. But some, through former association with idols, eat food as really offered to an idol, and their conscience, being weak (Acts 15 says “abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols”), is defiled. Food will not commend us to God. We are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do. But take care that this right of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak. For if anyone sees you who have knowledge eating in an idol’s temple, will he not be encouraged, if his conscience is weak, to eat food offered to idols? And so by your knowledge this weak person is destroyed, the brother for whom Christ died. Thus, sinning against your brothers and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I will never eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble."

James, Peter and John were there and James made this statement/letter

Acts 21: 25 But as for the Gentiles who have believed, we have sent a letter with our judgment that they should abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what has been strangled, and from sexual immorality.”

Galatian 2:9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars,
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
That does not imply they are not, That says he is not sure.

Huge difference bro..
Also it plainly states. " who seemed to be pillars"

It does not say "who I am uncertian of"

Seemed to be means,, to appear to be but not actually.

So here is the definition;

G1380 dokeo to suppose, consider, imagine

Galatian 2
"7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles 9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision."
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
Romans 14:9, "For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living."

Luke 20:38, "Now he is not God of the dead, but of the living, for all live to him.”
 

FollowtheShepherd

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
794
312
63
John 14:23-26, " 23 Jesus answered him, “If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. 24 Whoever does not love me does not keep my words. And the word that you hear is not mine but the Father's who sent me. 25 “These things I have spoken to you while I am still with you. 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
RickStudies said:

Galatian 2

7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.


Who knows what is going on in this passage?
I would offer. Its the same gospel whether in respect to or not a heathen Jew (not born again) hears it by the faith of Christ working in them , or a gentile heathen . (not born again) hears it as the Holy Spirit give them ears to make it possible to believe.

Sent them to different locations. Its does not mean either one of them could not be used to bring the gospel to either group when in a mixed situation. It has to do with the gospel not flesh and blood. Not after any man

But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ .Galatians 1:11-12