God gave the law about Circumcision.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
#81
You are free to live in bondage
If God freed Israel out of bondage in Egypt in order to put them under bondage to His law, then it would be for bondage that God sets us free, however, Galatians 5:1 says that it is for freedom that God sets us free, and God’s law is of freedom (Psalms 119:45). In Psalms 119:142, God’s law is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is the transgression of God’s law that puts us into bondage while the truth sets us free. If you want to live in bondage, then that is your choice.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,079
644
113
#82
If God freed Israel out of bondage in Egypt in order to put them under bondage to His law, then it would be for bondage that God sets us free, however, Galatians 5:1 says that it is for freedom that God sets us free, and God’s law is of freedom (Psalms 119:45). In Psalms 119:142, God’s law is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is the transgression of God’s law that puts us into bondage while the truth sets us free. If you want to live in bondage, then that is your choice.
Nay, but you are in bondage to the law
 

NightTwister

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2023
2,151
814
113
65
Colorado, USA
#83
Circumcision was the outward sign of the covenant then as baptism is the outward sign today. The real circumcision and baptism is of the heart, and is performed by the Holy Spirit.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,066
266
83
#84
GENESIS 17:10-13

10 This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.

11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.

12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.

13 He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
Unlike many people on this forum, I believe that as Christians we're grafted into spiritual Israel (not Judaism.) And since the Torah and the covenants were given to Israel before it became known as a "Jewish" nation and the people were known as "Jews" as we refer to them today, the Torah and covenants are still applicable (physically and/or spiritually) for all believers today. They take on a different meaning now in light of Jesus' sacrifice and our salvation, but they still hold validity today.

I don't believe Jesus did away with the Law.
Matthew 5:17-20 “Do not presume that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. 18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished! 19 Therefore, whoever nullifies one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 “For I say to you that unless your righteousness far surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven."

So the question is what is the purpose of circumcision? The covenant is everlasting, which means eternal. Circumcision, as it was originally instructed by God, was meant to be a sign of the Abrahamic covenant between God and Abraham. It had nothing to do with salvation or right-standing before God as some people believe, and as the Pharisees tried to make it in Jesus' day. Today, it is still a sign of God's covenant with us; that He is our God and we are His people. I see it as very similar to the act of baptism. Is baptism required? No. Is it an act of faith as a sign of your relationship with God? Yes. And are you blessed by doing it? Yes.

I recognize I'm in the minority with some of these beliefs, but those are my thoughts.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,802
7,111
113
62
#85
Unlike many people on this forum, I believe that as Christians we're grafted into spiritual Israel (not Judaism.) And since the Torah and the covenants were given to Israel before it became known as a "Jewish" nation and the people were known as "Jews" as we refer to them today, the Torah and covenants are still applicable (physically and/or spiritually) for all believers today. They take on a different meaning now in light of Jesus' sacrifice and our salvation, but they still hold validity today.

I don't believe Jesus did away with the Law.
Matthew 5:17-20 “Do not presume that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. 18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished! 19 Therefore, whoever nullifies one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 “For I say to you that unless your righteousness far surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven."

So the question is what is the purpose of circumcision? The covenant is everlasting, which means eternal. Circumcision, as it was originally instructed by God, was meant to be a sign of the Abrahamic covenant between God and Abraham. It had nothing to do with salvation or right-standing before God as some people believe, and as the Pharisees tried to make it in Jesus' day. Today, it is still a sign of God's covenant with us; that He is our God and we are His people. I see it as very similar to the act of baptism. Is baptism required? No. Is it an act of faith as a sign of your relationship with God? Yes. And are you blessed by doing it? Yes.

I recognize I'm in the minority with some of these beliefs, but those are my thoughts.
People struggle with this passage because they don't believe heaven and earth have passed away. Suppose they have. Would this change your perspective?
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,079
644
113
#86
The covenant is everlasting, which means eternal. Circumcision, as it was originally instructed by God, was meant to be a sign of the Abrahamic covenant between God and Abraham. It had nothing to do with salvation or right-standing before God as some people believe, and as the Pharisees tried to make it in Jesus' day.
How can something that was near to disappearing nearly 2000 years ago be eternal?

In that he says, a new [covenant], he has made the first old. Now that which is worn out and grown old [is] near to disappear. Hebrews 8:13
To the second point, any male that wasn't circumcised was cut off from Israel and thereby cutoff from the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,621
630
113
#87
There is nothing from outside a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man. Mark 7:15
Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. Titus 1:15
You are making a reasonable explanation for harmonizing all three Scriptures, whereas CRFTD is the one who is ignoring two out of the three.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,079
644
113
#88
You are making a reasonable explanation for harmonizing all three Scriptures, whereas CRFTD is the one who is ignoring two out of the three.
I have no idea what this means when you quote me when responding to someone else
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,621
630
113
#89
Paul used an example of Gentiles shows that they have a circumcised heart by keeping God’s law, which was putting to shame those who were physically circumcised, but who were not keeping God’s law, so he was not speaking about perfect obedience. God never commanded circumcision for the purpose of earning our justification, so the Bible can speak against becoming circumcised for an incorrect reason without speaking against becoming circumcised for the reasons for which God commanded it.
Heavens no! Paul said the Gentiles are spiritually circumcised because they have faith in God as Abraham did well before the law of Moses was given.

God commanded physical circumcision for Jews as part of the sacrificial laws that He intended to keep their culture separate until it provided Messiah for the salvation of all humanity potentially, after which such laws became optional.
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
#90
Nay, but you are in bondage to the law
The view that we have of the law matches the view that we have of the Lawgiver for giving it. For example, a wise God is a giver of wise laws and a righteous God is not a giver of unrighteousness laws. The Psalms express an extremely positive view of obeying God’s law, such as the David repeatedly saying that he loved it and delighted in obeying it, so if we consider the Psalms to be Scripture and to therefore express a correct view of obeying it, then we will also delight in obeying it, which is incompatible with viewing it as being bondage. For example, in Psalms 1:1-2, blessed are those who delight in the Law of the Lord and who meditate on it day and night, so we can’t believe in the truth of these words as Scripture while not allowing them to shape our view of obeying God’s law. Moreover, the authors of the NT considered the Psalms to be Scripture, so they should not be interpreted as expressing a view of God’s law that is incompatible with the view that the Psalms are Scripture, especially because Paul also said that he delighted in obeying it (Romans 7:12). If you have such a poor view of God’s law that you consider it to be bondage, then you also have an equally poor view of God for giving it.
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,621
630
113
#91
Paul drew a distinction between eating meat that had been previously offered to idols and participating in the ceremony by eating meat that from the altar:

1 Corinthians 10:14-22
“Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. I speak as to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say. The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread. Consider the people of Israel: are not those who eat the sacrifices participants in the altar? What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. Shall we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he?”
Yes, that point is agreeable. Are you going to harmonize the three verses using it?
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
#93
Heavens no! Paul said the Gentiles are spiritually circumcised because they have faith in God as Abraham did well before the law of Moses was given.
Romans 2:26
“So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?”
‭‭
That verse notably does notably does not state that a Gentile who has faith will be regarded as circumcision, but one who keeps the law, though the Bible often conflated the two, such as in Revelation 14:12, those who kept faith in Jesus are the same as those who kept God’s commandments. It is contradictory for someone to think that we should have faith in God, but not in His instructions.

God’s way is the way to know Him by being in His likeness through being a doer of His character traits, such as in Genesis 18:19, God knew Abraham that he would teach his children and those of his household to walk in His way by being a doer of righteousness and justice that the Lord might bring to him all that He promised. In Genesis 26:4-5, God will multiply Abraham’s children as the stars in the heavens, to his children He will give all of these lands, and through his children all of the nations of the earth will be blessed because he heard God’s voice and guarded His charge, commandments, statues, and laws. In Deuteronomy 30:16, if the children of Abraham will love God with all of their hearts by walking in God’s way in obedience to His commandments, statues, and laws, then they will live and multiply and God will bless them in the land that they go to possess. So the promise was made to Abraham and brought about because he walked in God’s way in obedience to His law, he taught his children and those of his household to do that, and because they did that. Moreover, in Exodus 33:13, Moses wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to walk in His way that he and Israel might know Him. So both Abraham and Moses taught how to know God by walking in His way in obedience to His law.

God commanded physical circumcision for Jews as part of the sacrificial laws that He intended to keep their culture separate until it provided Messiah for the salvation of all humanity potentially, after which such laws became optional.
In 1 Peter 1:16, we are told to be holy for God is holy, which is a quote from Leviticus where God was giving instructions for how to do that. In 1 Peter 2:9-10, Gentiles are included as part of God’s chosen people, a holy nation, a royal priesthood, and a treasure of God’s own possession, which are terms used to describe Israel (Deuteronomy 7:6), so Gentiles also have the delight of getting to obey the instructions that God had given for how to fulfill those roles and holiness is not just for Jews. It would be contradictory for a Gentile to want to live as part of a holy nation while not wanting to follow God’s instructions for how to do that. The only way that we should cease to follow God’s instructions for how be holy as He is holy would be if God were to cease to be holy, and the same goes for God’s other instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits.

Jesus saves is from our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of God’s law, so Jesus graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it. If someone doesn’t want to be a doer of God’s law, they they also do not want God’s gift of salvation.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,079
644
113
#94
The view that we have of the law matches the view that we have of the Lawgiver for giving it. For example, a wise God is a giver of wise laws and a righteous God is not a giver of unrighteousness laws. The Psalms express an extremely positive view of obeying God’s law, such as the David repeatedly saying that he loved it and delighted in obeying it, so if we consider the Psalms to be Scripture and to therefore express a correct view of obeying it, then we will also delight in obeying it, which is incompatible with viewing it as being bondage. For example, in Psalms 1:1-2, blessed are those who delight in the Law of the Lord and who meditate on it day and night, so we can’t believe in the truth of these words as Scripture while not allowing them to shape our view of obeying God’s law. Moreover, the authors of the NT considered the Psalms to be Scripture, so they should not be interpreted as expressing a view of God’s law that is incompatible with the view that the Psalms are Scripture, especially because Paul also said that he delighted in obeying it (Romans 7:12). If you have such a poor view of God’s law that you consider it to be bondage, then you also have an equally poor view of God for giving it.
I esteem Christ's law above and greater than Moses' law

I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee [Moses], and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require [it] of him. Deuteronomy 18:18-19
 

ocean

Active member
Oct 15, 2024
184
75
28
#95
By using own intellect to understand Galatians 5:1-6 it seems like our Lord Jesus who taught Paul (Galatians 1:11-12) contradicted God The Father Commandment in Gen 17:10-12.
What was the purpose for God to send His Son to die in our place if the law can attain righteousness for us? You might be aware that scripture teaches that if you break just one part of the law, you have broken ALL of it. If you were not aware, you are now. Look up that scripture, it does exist, and think of what it states.

Jesus fulfilled all of the law; no animal sacrifice ever actually attained forgiveness.

You state you have been saved from birth. That is not found in Scripture. I see you do not attend church, but I am curious as to what belief you actually hold?
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,677
1,050
113
#96
Because according to him the law given by God The Father to the Prophets in the Old Testament were fulfilled by our Lord.
Where does it say that God the Father gave the law to the prophets in the Old Testament?
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,066
266
83
#97
People struggle with this passage because they don't believe heaven and earth have passed away. Suppose they have. Would this change your perspective?
I'm not too interested in hypotheticals. However, esus also said "until everything has been fulfilled." I don't believe either of those criteria have occured yet.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,677
1,050
113
#98
Yeap its the usual argument of should we follow the law or not (basically, do whatever you want with no consequences)

Jesus never stated the old law is no longer required, far from it - Matt 5:17 - Do not think that I have come to abolish the law .........

1) Do you accept that Revelations clearly states that some of the law is still valid as this is the last book after Paul and others?

2) Matthew 23:23 - Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

3) coming back to Acts - Acts 21:20-26 The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them. (clearly following some laws)
Clearly following the laws of the state in Israel.

Any Jew in Israel in the first century could be excommunicated or executed for transgression
of the law. The law of Moses was federal law in Israel.

No other country in the world was under the federal law of Moses in the first century.

Certainly not the Romans.
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
#99
How can something that was near to disappearing nearly 2000 years ago be eternal?

In that he says, a new [covenant], he has made the first old. Now that which is worn out and grown old [is] near to disappear. Hebrews 8:13
To the second point, any male that wasn't circumcised was cut off from Israel and thereby cutoff from the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
A newer covenant doesn’t nullify the promises of covenants that have already been ratified (Galatians 3:16-19), so God’s covenants are cumulative. One thing can only make another thing obsolete insofar as it has cumulative functionality. For example, a computer makes a typewriter obsolete, but doesn’t make a catapult obsolete. The Mosaic Covenant is eternal (Exodus 31:14-17, Leviticus 24:8), so the only way that the New Covenant can be make it obsolete is if it is cumulative with it. So the New Covenant still involves following the Mosaic Law (Hebrews 8:10) plus it is based on better promised and has a superior mediator. The problem that God found with the Mosaic Covenant was not with His law, but with the people for not continuing in their covenant (Hebrews 8:7-9), so the solution to the problem was not for God to do away with His law, but to do away with what was hindering us from obeying it. This is why the New Covenant involves God taking away our hearts of stone, giving us hearts of flesh, and sending His Spirit to lead us in obedience to His law, God sending His Son to free us from sin so that we might be free to meet the righteous requirements of His law (Romans 8:3-4), and God putting His law in our minds and writing it on our hearts (Jeremiah 31:33). God did not establish the New Covenant so that we can be free to have the same disobedience to His law that caused the New Covenant to be needed in the first place.
 

ocean

Active member
Oct 15, 2024
184
75
28
I quote the bible - Jesus says we are not allowed to eat food sacrificed to idols or commit sexual immorality - he also says Law is a weightier matter - do you not agree with this?
You ignore scripture that has been presented which clearly and fully denies your teaching and that of the op at your own peril. Who is your teacher?

Perhaps in your country food is sacrificed to idols, but you should understand the culture of this forum in which you have chosen to participate. All sins can be forgiven, save one. I would consider that one perhaps, I mean considering how you seem to think the Bible is so badly misconstrued by most.