Harry Potter bad?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
Rick, the literally millions of people who are devout Christians AND read Harry Potter disagree with you. You why no old people are agreeing with my side? Because everyone over 30 is too old to have enjoyed the books as children. It's like the older generation during Star Wars. It doesn't make it evil, it just makes it too "childish" for that generation.
Millions? Really?
I guess I must be wrong then......if 'literally millions' are reading it.
Millions can't be wrong, as we all know the road to heaven is wide.
(And the road to hell is very narrow)
.....But then again, millions of church goers are addicted to porn, so , on second thought,
I don't think I'll gauge my moral compass by the direction that "millions" are going.
- Not any millions, not any time soon.
 
Last edited:

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
O.K. you brought it up.
Justin Martyr.
His use of the word.
Please with references.
Justin Martyr's First Apology Chapter 5 entwines the Logos with the concept of reason. His Second Apology Chapter eight does the same, it quite eloquently refers to the logos as the seeds of reason. His Dialogue with Trypho also mentions it, though only in passing.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
So Blain, you are saying that it is harmless. - - - Just a story.
Well, if I wrote a trilogy about fornication and sexual sins, would you judge me then?
I would not like that you wrote it but i would need to know the motive for doing so, But it's not in the nature of Jesus to judge others so i would hope i would not. I don't know for sure if hp is evil or not i just don't believe it is, but i also know arguing about it here isn't going to do anything. It doesn't effect me because i don't let it, my main focus is god not hp. It's like saying to a good pastor hey you like to eat and drink more than you should, so you must not be a good christian. You like to sin so you must not be a christiain. We all sin, and we wouldn't do it if we didn't like it. But we as christians put our faith in god and do not let sin be the focus of our lives.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0

(No.....wait, you said they were two distinctly different things)
... Yeah... Minerva is the name of the goddess, her owl is her owl, and not itself named Minerva.


(I have a difficult time understanding what you are trying to say because it changes)
No, the whole times I've said that there is a goddess named Minerva, whom Prof McGonagal is named after and said goddess has an owl, for whom the prof is not named.
(Nope, you said they had nothing to do with each other)
No. I didn't say that at all. I said they where not the same being...

(The teacher doesn't have anything to do with imparting wisdom?)
Are you railing against teaching now?

Back to the point, being named after Minerva doesn't make the thing evil, many people are directly or indirectly named after gods and goddesses of myths..


(You are useless to debate with because at first you objected to her being of a different sex, and now you object because she is : "not that evil")
- I can't debate with non sequiturs
No logic, no logos, no nothing.

At this point its hard not to ask you to learn to read... I said that being named after a pagan god or godess does not make one evil. As in my previous post I pointed out that the server at my local Greek restaurant is named Aphrodite, being named that does not make her evil.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
Unless you are saying the previous Deputy Headmistress was a male, and replaced by a woman.



Dumbledore was the previous deputy headmaster. I stated this earlier. Like a normal school or other organization the second in command often replaces the first. The deputy headmaster before Dumbledore was also male...


That opens up an even bigger can of worms.
The male seceeded in the hierarchy of the family by the female

Deputy headmaster\headmistress can be either gender, like in most modern schools. The school also has female headmasters (headmistresses) from time to time as well (including McGonagal herself). It does not fit the occult archetype you posted.

You're trying to force a conspiracy in in ways that would make Dan Brown Proud.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
Ah, so that's where you put quality literature.
Sadly the extreme end of Protestants are inclined to burn books. At least Catholics tend to archive them, that has preserved many valuable works...
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Since Hollywood movies entertains the flesh, how do we know it is not trying somehow to influence us? Which one of you who is for this prayed before they watched and ask God to show you whether or not it's good or evil? How is it that it is wrong to go to a meeting of witches, but we can watch witchcraft all day long and it's all right? Either way, it's entertainment to some. If it is sin in a live performance, then it's sin on a DVD or on the TV. How is it that everything they act out IS sin, yet millions believe there's no harm in it? James 1:8 [SUP]8 [/SUP]A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
GPS,
I can't keep up with your outright deceptiveness.
You know what you said.
Your infidelity is not worth addressing anymore.
Carry on.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
As far as 'logos' goes, of course that word was cemented into the greek language well before it's use
in the N.T.
But we are not to frame the Word of God in our reasoning minds - (the old definition).
We are to accept it.
The old definition? Scripture doesn't re-define the word, it uses it as ones reasoning mind many times. Even in John 1:1 it isn't as much a re-definition as it is a redirection of philosophies that already existed to apply to Christ.
God's Word is forever settled in heaven, it is not to be equivocated, dampered, philosophized, or maligned by the cogent-(or mad), minds of mankind. It is SETTLED. "Heaven and earth will pass away, but My Word will not pass away".
What we are to do is to "study to show ourselves approved, a workman needing not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth."
No his word won't pass away. But depending on how you mean settled it may be inaccurate. His Word is quite alive and flowing and not a still pool.

So to say I lack logic and therefore don't know Logos (the Word, - which is what you meant); is a very serious charge.
Such liberties to answer for!
Yes, I meant that you don't know the Word. But it's amusing that you who throw such damnation and worse around on a regular basis would balk at being charged with the same.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
Okay i feel I need to explain what is going on here. First off, everyone here is standing firm in their beliefs. No one is going to budge, its like trying to get a stubborn donkey to follow you. Second, there are two kinds of posts here. One is simply to change someones minds, others here i feel just like to argue. Which is the whole reason this thread was made, have none of you noticed the only popular threads are ones that ppl argue in? This is no longer a debate ppls its a war, So knowing no one is going to change their minds why are we really posting on here? Is it not clear the devil loves dividing us? I notice ppl make threads that would be a popular debate subject but never respond to it at all, it just becomes a war zone. And everyone is getting worked up because ppl do not agree with them, All i am asking is for everyone to open their eyes here, I am going to go read my bible or something instead of wasting my time arguing about this. I invite others to do the same, or you could keep playing into this trap its up to you. Have a nice day everyone:]
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Probably none of us who live near a gang would go and sit on the grandstands watching two gangs fight it out, knowing we might get hurt. But we think it's okay to watch it on TV, believing we won't get our hands dirty. But what about our hearts?
Just because it's physically safe doesn't mean it spiritually safe.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
Rick, the literally millions of people who are devout Christians AND read Harry Potter disagree with you. You why no old people are agreeing with my side? Because everyone over 30 is too old to have enjoyed the books as children. It's like the older generation during Star Wars. It doesn't make it evil, it just makes it too "childish" for that generation.
Star wars has ACTUAL new age references all over it, yet Rick's older generation of Christians by and large has no problem with it. Rick may object to star wars, but he alone is not the point.


Good post reawakening.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
GPS,
I can't keep up with your outright deceptiveness.
You know what you said.
Your infidelity is not worth addressing anymore.
Carry on.
Wilful ignorance is entirely your game isn't it Rick. I've often reproved you with scripture and you come back with nothing but your own hard heart. Pius tones and contempt are not arguments Rick, though they are all you stand on.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
The old definition? Scripture doesn't re-define the word, it uses it as ones reasoning mind many times. Even in John 1:1 it isn't as much a re-definition as it is a redirection of philosophies that already existed to apply to Christ.


No his word won't pass away. But depending on how you mean settled it may be inaccurate. His Word is quite alive and flowing and not a still pool.



Yes, I meant that you don't know the Word. But it's amusing that you who throw such damnation and worse around on a regular basis would balk at being charged with the same.
O.K. accuser.
I will answer you.
 
P

Powemm

Guest
Honestly ... if handnt become familiar with a lot of things i shouldn't have done .. I
Might not have come to know God as well as I do now.. Because of it, I have come to respect Hod
More for it .. As well as have a "working" knowledge of how deeply things not of God can affect me.. Took a lot of tough lessons to come to this .. Wouldnt trade it for anything..so can I say no don't watch it ? Well like it or not we aren't in control of any of what others do.. Or What God is allowing for His greater
Purpose.. I don't think (no , i know) I would not have near the zeal for the things of God if I hadn't have had comparative contrasts to measure Him to ... I got real dirty in the pit... when god washed me off .. the difference was like going to the carwash with a little bit of dust on ya, compared to what a truck looks going in after all day four wheeling in mud".
It's because of such things..
also, now that i "know" who covers me... It's now like watching. A double movie.. you see all sorts if things in the spiritual realm when watching such things .. Pretty cool actually
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
Okay i feel I need to explain what is going on here. First off, everyone here is standing firm in their beliefs. No one is going to budge, its like trying to get a stubborn donkey to follow you.
One still may try.
Second, there are two kinds of posts here. One is simply to change someones minds, others here i feel just like to argue.
Argumentation is part of persuasion. I suppose you mean that some posts are only combative without much argumentation though.
Which is the whole reason this thread was made, have none of you noticed the only popular threads are ones that ppl argue in?
The trinity, over 100 paged and going :)
This is no longer a debate ppls its a war,
This is in fact right. We're fundamentally talking about radically different approaches to scripture and the world. It never was just about a random popular work of fiction
So knowing no one is going to change their minds why are we really posting on here?
Honestly, I started posting here to back Tintin's stand. I don't mind a little duelling though.
Is it not clear the devil loves dividing us?
He does, but its us who should be dividing us. The church needs a revival, and " A revival of religion presupposes a declension."

"A revival is nothing else than a new beginning of obedience to God." As such we need to find out what God actually wants of us. I would say what the anti-potter crowd is doing is adding to Gods law and expectations and creating a pointless millstone, and as such is not approaching true obedience. They of course would say the freedom is not true obedience.

And so we should be divided. The right side must win to have a revival.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
O.K. accuser.
I will answer you.
I've been calling you an accuser since many treads ago. I at least had the decency to bring scripture in when I first called you reprobate :)
 
P

Powemm

Guest
One more thing , when we watch such things its an opportunity to take what we've seen to God or bring God into it with us, let Him interact in on the action with us.. It's all about the relationship isn't it ? Yeah I think I'll invite the God I know to watch a movie with me .. The God I know is pretty cool like that .. gives me
An opportunity not to leave Him out but bring Himin for continual conversation with Him..

My God rocks like that