How come women do not cover their heads in Church anymore?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

jinx

Guest
thats smart information. thanks :)
 
S

savedNblessed

Guest
The method you used in India to cover your head is the correct method. People too often become too arrogant and do not understand authority or its purpose and want to make all authority equal. But authority was placed there by God, not man. As you have given the scripture also so practice. For in doing this you will receive the blessing of the authority that comes with it.
Also note the following though:
1 Corinthians 11:15 KJV[15] But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

So if a lady should have long hair, then her hair is her covering. If she does not have long hair then she needs to wear a covering as symbol of the authority over her. And she will be blessed with humbleness accordingly. So if a lady does have short hair then as the custom must be, she must have a covering. In like wise it is not good for a man to have long hair.
Aren't you contradicting yourself in your post?
 
T

Therapon

Guest
My comment was not intended as a Touché, brother, it was to emphasize an important doctrinal point. We are now almost 2000 years from when the New Testament was written, and like the Jews of old with their Talmud, have established our own body of traditions by our commentators. But to know God, we have to believe what God's inspired word declares, whether it agrees with our doctrines or not. If we don't, we will have traded a true knowledge of God for what man says God says. let me give you a few examples that have been voiced on this forum . . .

Bible: "For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered." 1 Cor 11:6

Forum: "Oh, a woman's hair is her covering or that was from the 1st century Corinthians."

Bible: "God hath given them
(the Jews) the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear." Rom 11:8


Forum: "Oh, God didn't blind the Jews, they blinded themselves."

Bible: "As concerning the gospel, they (the Jews during the Christian era) are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election (God’s selection or divine choice), they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.” Rom 11:28-29


Forum:
“Oh, those verses can’t be believed as written, the Jews of the Christian era cannot be saved unless they accept Jesus as their Messiah.”


Therapon quoting Scripture: ”
Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.”

Those are just a couple of verses that come readily to mind, I could add a dozen more. But I state unequivocally, it is impossible to come to a knowledge of some truths if we can only see Scriptures through our traditions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Loosen up Therapon. Enjoy the small things in life... like the funky green turtle. Oops... someone at the door bye.
 
T

Therapon

Guest
Loosen up Therapon. Enjoy the small things in life... like the funky green turtle. Oops... someone at the door bye.
Forty years ago I was living on my ocean-going sailboat, cruising around southern waters including the Bahamas. I was also a knee-walking, commode-hugging drunk, married, but with a sweet young dolly on the side. One day, someone came aboard my yacht, yanked my bottle out of my hand, threw it over the side and said, "Ellis, the Lord wants you to teach His word and you can't teach it as an adulterous drunk."

I went down into my stateroom and started to pray, "Lord, you know I've been trying to stop drinking for five years, but I am bound by alcohol and lust. Please help me, I give it all to you." I'd been drunk for months, but the next morning I was cold sober, no DTs, no nothing, but I was no longer an adulterer or alcoholic.

I started attending church again and what did I find? Lukewarm Christians playing polemic somersaults with the Word (just like I see here on the forum) and dabbling in the same sins that had gotten me into so much trouble. I tried to Talk to the brethren about it, but nobody cared. Instead, they'd say something like, "Loosen up, Ellis, enjoy the small things in life; in a few months you'll be just like us."

But the Lord had taken out my heart of stone and replaced it with a heart of flesh, so somehow, that never happened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
So you're saying that we're all drunk adulterers who don't care about God's Word? You must have lost your mind. I've been a celibate sober Bible reading born again Christian with a heart of flesh for the past 27 years.

I like the little green turtle because it makes me laugh not because I'm a drunk whoremonger hypocrite. What's the matter with you anyways?

That was completely uncalled for Therapon. Belay it, scuttle it, do something with it but get it out of here. It's not true and it doesn't belong.

Forty years ago I was living on my ocean-going sailboat, cruising around southern waters including the Bahamas. I was also a knee-walking, commode-hugging drunk, married, but with a sweet young dolly on the side. One day, someone came aboard my yacht, yanked my bottle out of my hand, threw it over the side and said, "Ellis, the Lord wants you to teach His word and you can't teach it as an adulterous drunk."

I went down into my stateroom and started to pray, "Lord, you know I've been trying to stop drinking for five years, but I am bound by alcohol and lust. Please help me, I give it all to you." I'd been drunk for months, but the next morning I was cold sober, no DTs, no nothing, but I was no longer an adulterer or alcoholic.

I started attending church again and what did I find? Lukewarm Christians playing polemic somersaults with the Word (just like I see here on the forum) and dabbling in the same sins that had gotten me into so much trouble. I tried to Talk to the brethren about it, but nobody cared. Instead, they'd say something like, "Loosen up, Ellis, enjoy the small things in life; in a few months you'll be just like us."

But the Lord had taken out my heart of stone and replaced it with a heart of flesh, so somehow, that never happened.
 
Aug 25, 2012
119
1
0
Forty years ago I was living on my ocean-going sailboat, cruising around southern waters including the Bahamas. I was also a knee-walking, commode-hugging drunk, married, but with a sweet young dolly on the side. One day, someone came aboard my yacht, yanked my bottle out of my hand, threw it over the side and said, "Ellis, the Lord wants you to teach His word and you can't teach it as an adulterous drunk."

I went down into my stateroom and started to pray, "Lord, you know I've been trying to stop drinking for five years, but I am bound by alcohol and lust. Please help me, I give it all to you." I'd been drunk for months, but the next morning I was cold sober, no DTs, no nothing, but I was no longer an adulterer or alcoholic.

I started attending church again and what did I find? Lukewarm Christians playing polemic somersaults with the Word (just like I see here on the forum) and dabbling in the same sins that had gotten me into so much trouble. I tried to Talk to the brethren about it, but nobody cared. Instead, they'd say something like, "Loosen up, Ellis, enjoy the small things in life; in a few months you'll be just like us."

But the Lord had taken out my heart of stone and replaced it with a heart of flesh, so somehow, that never happened.
thats a really neat story, as a fellow mariner I know how it goes, what happens at sea stays at sea lol, but not anymore when you are a born again christian.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I started attending church again and what did I find? Lukewarm Christians playing polemic somersaults with the Word (just like I see here on the forum)
hi ellis. since you're going off about all that above...

your 70th week is a long overview of all the other weeks, and more, that goes as far back as the second decree to rebuild the temple.

your 70th week ends in 1948 when Israel became a nation.

your last 7 is some unique 7 that is only posited by one guy who no one can find. no one else believes his interpretation.

anyways, the 7 (for the final week) times 360 (for days in a Jewish year) equals 2520 years which you converted into 2484 solar years is the exact number of years between Darius' decree in 536BC and 1948. :)

amazingly, in the middle of this time frame, you have the abomination of desolation which is the erecting of the Dome of the Rock in 688 AD.

However, doing the math, the middle should be 706BC.

So, what did you do?

you made a new start date for the 70th week and moved it back to the destruction of the first temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 583BC.

is that right?
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Myself, I'm an honorably discharged Naval veteran. I steamed all over in my youth. I wouldn't pat him on the back for calling everyone here lukewarm sinners that don't know the Word and have hearts of stone. You can. I'm not going to. That was completely out of line.

Therapon, you have a bitter old man side to you.







thats a really neat story, as a fellow mariner I know how it goes, what happens at sea stays at sea lol, but not anymore when you are a born again christian.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
I am not reading 13 pages so I am just gonna ask...

I have long hair. Do I still need a covering or no?
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
yes... if your feel any compulsion or conviction. Since you are asking... I am inclined to suggest you start shopping. :)
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
yes... if your feel any compulsion or conviction. Since you are asking... I am inclined to suggest you start shopping. :)
Nah, I think I will pass. I was just bored. Thought Id ask. :D
 
S

savedNblessed

Guest
I am not reading 13 pages so I am just gonna ask...

I have long hair. Do I still need a covering or no?
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. - 1 Corinthians 11: 5-6
Re-posting the Bible verse. This is what the scripture says. Covering our heads with a veil or a scarf is sign of submission, to Christ if we are unmarried and to our husband if we are married. It's obeying God. So YES! you do need to cover your head in church.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. - 1 Corinthians 11: 5-6
Re-posting the Bible verse. This is what the scripture says. Covering our heads with a veil or a scarf is sign of submission, to Christ if we are unmarried and to our husband if we are married. It's obeying God. So YES! you do need to cover your head in church.
I actually disagree considering verse 2 is referring to customs or traditions. He goes back to referring it to customs many many times. If it is a custom to wear a veil where a woman prays then yes. If not then no.
If I walked in my church with a veil on my head I would be a distraction.
 
S

savedNblessed

Guest
I actually disagree considering verse 2 is referring to customs or traditions. He goes back to referring it to customs many many times. If it is a custom to wear a veil where a woman prays then yes. If not then no.
If I walked in my church with a veil on my head I would be a distraction.
Yea that's the problem ”it has been categorized as a cultural tradition or a distraction”. But in truth, it's a God's command.
 

PS

Senior Member
Jan 11, 2013
5,399
695
113
I actually disagree considering verse 2 is referring to customs or traditions. He goes back to referring it to customs many many times. If it is a custom to wear a veil where a woman prays then yes. If not then no.
If I walked in my church with a veil on my head I would be a distraction.
Whether hair is shaved or bejeweled a head covering makes everyone equal in the sight of God and for that reason, if I were a woman I would follow the advice of Paul and wear a simple head covering.


(In previous posts I was trying to explain what the debate was about in the Corinthian church, that was all. :) )
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,622
282
83
I actually disagree considering verse 2 is referring to customs or traditions. He goes back to referring it to customs many many times. If it is a custom to wear a veil where a woman prays then yes. If not then no.
If I walked in my church with a veil on my head I would be a distraction.
What about if the women in the corinthian church did wear head coverings? Would that change your views?
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
The covering was their husbands. All of God's Word is wholly spiritual.
If they weren't married, their covering was the Holy Spirit.

B.T.W. - Who's the church? ......The bride of Christ. So Jesus is all of our coverings.
God's words are Spirit and they are truth, the flesh profits nothing.
Please see the spiritual truth in the apostle's writings.
 
T

Therapon

Guest
hi ellis. since you're going off about all that above...

your 70th week is a long overview of all the other weeks, and more, that goes as far back as the second decree to rebuild the temple.

your 70th week ends in 1948 when Israel became a nation.

your last 7 is some unique 7 that is only posited by one guy who no one can find. no one else believes his interpretation.

anyways, the 7 (for the final week) times 360 (for days in a Jewish year) equals 2520 years which you converted into 2484 solar years is the exact number of years between Darius' decree in 536BC and 1948. :)

amazingly, in the middle of this time frame, you have the abomination of desolation which is the erecting of the Dome of the Rock in 688 AD.

However, doing the math, the middle should be 706BC.

So, what did you do?

you made a new start date for the 70th week and moved it back to the destruction of the first temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 583BC. is that right?
That is not correct. It is true that Jer 41:5 and 52 :20 places the abolution of sacrifices in the 23rd year of Nebuchadnezzar, 583 B.C, three years after the Temple was destroyed, but the 70th week does not begin with the abolition of sacrifices, it starts in 536 B.C, in the first year of Darius, who gave the first decree of the Medo-Persians allowing the Jews to return to the holy land.

The 70th week ends in 1948 A.D. when the Jews were back in their homeland for the final time. You are correct, the middle of the 70th "week" is exactly 706 A.D., but when God uses such an imprecise word as a "week" as the descriptor of 2520 Hebrew years (2484 solar years), 688 A.D, is still in the "middle of the week."