F
Which paper was the most profound to me would be one about passionflowers and and butterflies and the development of mimicry. The paper about soft tissue in the T. rex was really cool. The evolution of fruit of the pawpaw trees related to the consumption of the mega fauna like the giant American ground sloth was really neat. The papers on the genetic influence of Homo neanderthalensis on early H. sapiens in Eastern Europe vs albinism resulting in the modern “ European” was very neat. But my favorite is definitely papers by Estefania Fernandez.
And those have convinced you are living on an old earth being mutated by other species over a billion years? Being roughly visible half a billion year ago ? That there is any man on earth smart enough to combine all this data and get to a point “aha we came from fish 450 million years ago”? Do you really?
Would it not be more logical to say there was simply more bio diversity on earth which got whiped out by a global disaster leaving few behind? While they have not evolved over millions of years but we are getting back up at our feet since few thousand years ago?
And whatever the case may be, we simpy will never know.
But it’s hard to ignore all what’s been left behind by our very own ancestors on earth. I just don’t see why the global flood would be a myth (when different continents share similair stories) while bones in the ground could add up to millions of pdf’’s online being taken serious.
The Bible speaks of interbreeding with humans, that explains those different humanoid bones in the ground to me. Even Jacob and Esau share total different physical aspects.
- 1
- Show all