While scientism can make up whatever rules it wants, the same is not true with legitimate science. Every discipline of science is based upon principles which are fixed and unalterable by which the universe is governed and regulated. Principles are not made up by man but are formed by the precepts found in nature which establish their validity and demonstrate their immutability. While zoological taxonomy is derived from the principle revealed in the scriptures that identifies and separates the different kinds of living creatures, the question is whether it holds true to the precepts upon which it is founded upon.
While the tiger genome sequence shows 95.6% similarity to the domestic cat while human and gorilla have 94.8% similarity the instructions regarding the validity of a precept is that it isn't judged according to appearance but according to righteous judgment.
Thus, that data is interesting and useful, it is not relevant in determining the Order. Since the the the tiger and cat both contain 38 chromosomes it would be reasonable to include both under one Order however since primates have 48 chromosomes and the human has 46 chromosomes then this would be in order,
In addition, the second precept for determining the Order is cell fusion. If the species within an Order is incapable of procreating with those within it one has to question the likelihood of their being any lineage between members of that Order. Cell fusion should be possible within the taxological Order even if chance of cell fusion occurring naturally is problematic.
Extensive efforts to produce cell fusion between a human gamete and a primate gamete were attempted by scientist, dating as far back as the 1920's, yet one US scientist is claimed to have achieved cell fusion and produced a viable genome. There are a number of reported cases but not any reported evidence to support the claims.
https://www.sciencealert.com/scient...imp-hybrid-100-years-ago-gallup-yerkes-oliver
https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=rFgDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6991,3347287&hl=en
While it obvious based upon those two precepts that man shouldn't be in the same Order as primates, yet if scientists lack the ability to use complex tools like the principle then that makes one consider what genus is behind the pulpits. I bet you thought I was going to say primates didn't you? Nah, helpmates.
Maybe this analogy might help, while the chocolates in the box might not be the same, the size and number of slots in the box remains the same. That is why it is called a box of chocolates with 46ps.
While the tiger genome sequence shows 95.6% similarity to the domestic cat while human and gorilla have 94.8% similarity the instructions regarding the validity of a precept is that it isn't judged according to appearance but according to righteous judgment.
Thus, that data is interesting and useful, it is not relevant in determining the Order. Since the the the tiger and cat both contain 38 chromosomes it would be reasonable to include both under one Order however since primates have 48 chromosomes and the human has 46 chromosomes then this would be in order,
In addition, the second precept for determining the Order is cell fusion. If the species within an Order is incapable of procreating with those within it one has to question the likelihood of their being any lineage between members of that Order. Cell fusion should be possible within the taxological Order even if chance of cell fusion occurring naturally is problematic.
Extensive efforts to produce cell fusion between a human gamete and a primate gamete were attempted by scientist, dating as far back as the 1920's, yet one US scientist is claimed to have achieved cell fusion and produced a viable genome. There are a number of reported cases but not any reported evidence to support the claims.
https://www.sciencealert.com/scient...imp-hybrid-100-years-ago-gallup-yerkes-oliver
https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=rFgDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6991,3347287&hl=en
While it obvious based upon those two precepts that man shouldn't be in the same Order as primates, yet if scientists lack the ability to use complex tools like the principle then that makes one consider what genus is behind the pulpits. I bet you thought I was going to say primates didn't you? Nah, helpmates.
Maybe this analogy might help, while the chocolates in the box might not be the same, the size and number of slots in the box remains the same. That is why it is called a box of chocolates with 46ps.
Neanderthals were humans , Homo neanderthalensis.
We’re they humans or were they highly intelligent apes that used tools, language, and created art? If they were humans why do they have different chromosomes than us, the H. Sapiens?