How old was Jesus when?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
B

BeyondET

Guest
#41
Funny, even the KJV says he was not preaching at age 12....yet by all means go on reaching all you care to...


[SUP]46 [/SUP]And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.

[SUP]47 [/SUP]And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.

That is not preaching bub, now stop being spiritual...
yes indeed, the KJV has issues too, I think your over reacting.

Say what say stop being spiritual? can you clarify this statement?
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#42
Tradition holds he was 30 when he began his ministry, 33 when he died.

The numbers should probably be taken with a few grains of salt, as they say - three being a particularly powerful number in Jewish folklore and religion, and of course numerology in general.

A number of studies have been done to try and ascertain a more accurate age based on various things (Pontius Pilate's years in Jerusalem, Jesus's birth year based on historical records of Herod's reign, etc., etc.) - I don't think anything came of the studies other than that he was somewhere between 30 and 45-ish, something like that.
yea I've read stuff like that, these scholars etc. don't even think about a simple statement like John 8:57

It's all a huge elaborate discussion and examples leading to a pile of nothing but redirect.

Of coarse John 8:57 couldn't be so simple, not in their eyes.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#43
I would be amazed if someone said, huh wow look how simple that was, he was approaching 50, But no doubt I'm in it all by myself, somethings never change. lol
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
#44
I know the bible doesn't say exactly how old Jesus was when He was crucified, but I do believe this can be known at least in the ball park range of age,

Any thoughts on this?
I have never heard any estimate beyond saying He was in His mid-thirties.

However, what is important about this?
Do you think it impacts on important doctrine?
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#45
Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus ruled the Roman Empire from 27 BC to 14 AD.

Luke 2:1-5
1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
2(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.

Yet August did not always hold the title Divi filius during his reign, so A.D. might signify the period when Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus had was given the title as the Son of God. Yet they say that Cyrenius wasn't governor of Syria until 6 A.D.

So if Jesus was taken by the chief priests beyond Jordan to be baptised in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar Divi Augusti filius Augustus according to Luke 1.

Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene,
Luke 1:1

Thus if Augustus ruled until 14. A.D. and Tiberius had been ruling for 15 years then it would have been in 29 A.D. that the chief priests took him beyond Jordan to be baptized of John.

22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.
23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Luke 3:22-23

However, it would seem more likely that in the first year of Augustus reign over the Roman Empire that he would decreed that the world would be taxed which would have meant that the in the 15 year of Tiberius rule then Jesus would have been 46 years old at the time of his baptism. And thus if 3 1/2 years till his public crucifixion that could explain why in John 8:57 "then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?"
 
Last edited:

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
#46
Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus ruled the Roman Empire from 27 BC to 14 AD.

Luke 2:1-5
1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
2(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.

Yet August did not always hold the title Divi filius during his reign, so A.D. might signify the period when Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus had was given the title as the Son of God. Yet they say that Cyrenius wasn't governor of Syria until 6 A.D.

So if Jesus was taken by the chief priests beyond Jordan to be baptised in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar Divi Augusti filius Augustus according to Luke 1.

Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene,
Luke 1:1

Thus if Augustus ruled until 14. A.D. and Tiberius had been ruling for 15 years then it would have been in 29 A.D. that the chief priests took him beyond Jordan to be baptized of John.

22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.
23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Luke 3:22-23

However, it would seem more likely that in the first year of Augustus reign over the Roman Empire that he would decreed that the world would be taxed which would have meant that the in the 15 year of Tiberius rule then Jesus would have been 46 years old at the time of his baptism. And thus if 3 1/2 years till his public crucifixion that could explain why in John 8:57 "then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?"
This is an interesting take.
Do you have any references for this for further study?
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#47
I have never heard any estimate beyond saying He was in His mid-thirties.

However, what is important about this?
Do you think it impacts on important doctrine?
Well that's a classic statement what is important about this aka deeper understanding, that's for each person to decide, some folks fear reaching understandings that are not written, some have no problem with reaching for it, then others are content on what they have learned thus far from scriptures. I guess things of the bible are determine by the willingness of the individual rather it's important or not.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#48
Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus ruled the Roman Empire from 27 BC to 14 AD.

Luke 2:1-5
1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
2(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.

Yet August did not always hold the title Divi filius during his reign, so A.D. might signify the period when Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus had was given the title as the Son of God. Yet they say that Cyrenius wasn't governor of Syria until 6 A.D.

So if Jesus was taken by the chief priests beyond Jordan to be baptised in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar Divi Augusti filius Augustus according to Luke 1.

Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene,
Luke 1:1

Thus if Augustus ruled until 14. A.D. and Tiberius had been ruling for 15 years then it would have been in 29 A.D. that the chief priests took him beyond Jordan to be baptized of John.

22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.
23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Luke 3:22-23

However, it would seem more likely that in the first year of Augustus reign over the Roman Empire that he would decreed that the world would be taxed which would have meant that the in the 15 year of Tiberius rule then Jesus would have been 46 years old at the time of his baptism. And thus if 3 1/2 years till his public crucifixion that could explain why in John 8:57 "then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?"
Excellent write up, Thank You for the info, I enjoyed reading about that, makes logical sense, when I had read that verse "Thou art not yet fifty years old", I didn't get a notion that was symbolic or just a general statement but of something that anybody would say to someone reaching a mile stone per say,
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#49
33 yrs 4 months
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
#50
For what it's worth, here's an interesting article on the significance of '50' or '50 years old' with respect to Jesus' age and the comment made in John 8:57. Particularly the second paragraph above the Notes at the bottom - based on when Pilate departed from Judea (winter of AD 36/37) and giving a birth year for about 6 BC (based on Herod's rule - the sort of maximum time spans), yields a maximum age of 43.

https://hermeneutics.stackexchange....7-and-the-age-of-jesus-before-his-crucifixion
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#51
For what it's worth, here's an interesting article on the significance of '50' or '50 years old' with respect to Jesus' age and the comment made in John 8:57. Particularly the second paragraph above the Notes at the bottom - based on when Pilate departed from Judea (winter of AD 36/37) and giving a birth year for about 6 BC (based on Herod's rule - the sort of maximum time spans), yields a maximum age of 43.

https://hermeneutics.stackexchange....7-and-the-age-of-jesus-before-his-crucifixion
That's a good explaination, but I find a error in the authors write up, he doesn't realize Jesus was never part of the Pharisees temple service or nabernacle. Jesus came to do His Father's business. so the Pharisees wouldn't be symbolizing in John 8:57 with someone who wasn't apart of their doctrine of service. To many times I've seen folks think Jesus did what the Pharisees did as far a law goes, these dudes had their own laws of service.
 

DustyRhodes

Senior Member
Dec 30, 2016
2,117
599
113
#52
Whatever it was, it was far too soon...we need Him much longer, imo. :D
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
#53
@BeyondET -

Thanks for the further clarification. Hadn't considered that.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#54
@BeyondET -

Thanks for the further clarification. Hadn't considered that.
Thank you for the info you supplied it was a interesting read.

some things in mind stand out as Jesus not taking part in those rituals of service, one clear one is at the tender age of 12 years old Jesus was teaching already in the synagogue. surely this isn't of typical fashion of the service in place already and there's other verses that mentions Jesus not being of those ways.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#56
You were not considered an adult until age 30 and I believe that his ministry lasted 1185 days of the 70th week of Daniel....Daniel 12 states there are 1335 days left to deal with Israel....that leaves 1185 days let of the 70th week.....IMV!
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#57
You were not considered an adult until age 30 and I believe that his ministry lasted 1185 days of the 70th week of Daniel....Daniel 12 states there are 1335 days left to deal with Israel....that leaves 1185 days let of the 70th week.....IMV!
He's eternal remember, he wasn't a newborn spirit but the Spirit that was with God in the beginning.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#58
You were not considered an adult until age 30 and I believe that his ministry lasted 1185 days of the 70th week of Daniel....Daniel 12 states there are 1335 days left to deal with Israel....that leaves 1185 days let of the 70th week.....IMV!
I've never really studied the 70th week stuff, in that are there 7 days = week, doing the math seems that this is a symbolic statement concidering the following below.

True 1185 days = 3.5 years but as well 1185 days = 169.2 weeks at least in the notion of 7 days a week is used.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#59
I've never really studied the 70th week stuff, in that are there 7 days = week, doing the math seems that this is a symbolic statement concidering the following below.

True 1185 days = 3.5 years but as well 1185 days = 169.2 weeks at least in the notion of 7 days a week is used.
Jewish calendar.....12 months 30 day lunar cycles....= 360 days

Tribulation, Reign of the Beast and Two witnesses prophesy <---1260 days or 3.5 years or 42 months......

7 years X 360 = 2520 days

2520 days - 1335 days = 1185 days

Look Daniel 12.....exactly 1335 days left......leaves 1185<--the ministry of Jesus in my view to the lost sheep of the house of Israel....they rejected as a nation so they endure the last 1335

again this is my view...

30 days of peace
1260 of tribulation
45 of wrath

1335 left ^^^<--30 plus 1260 plus 45 = 1335
 
Last edited:
B

BeyondET

Guest
#60
Jewish calendar.....12 months 30 day lunar cycles....= 360 days

Tribulation, Reign of the Beast and Two witnesses prophesy <---1260 days or 3.5 years or 42 months......

7 years X 360 = 2520 days

2520 days - 1335 days = 1185 days

Look Daniel 12.....exactly 1335 days left......leaves 1185<--the ministry of Jesus in my view to the lost sheep of the house of Israel....they rejected as a nation so they endure the last 1335

again this is my view...

30 days of peace
1260 of tribulation
45 of wrath

1335 left ^^^<--30 plus 1260 plus 45 = 1335
huh is this up to now today?

the calendar in Hebrew according to Jewish counting today is Thu, 6 July 2017 = 12th of Tamuz, 5777.

I've learned that in 70 AD Jerusalem was destroyed and the Pharisees reign was over.