Says the open who employs Ad Hominem as a discussion tactic. Lowering yourself down to this childish behavior means you have nothing valid to discuss here and have chosen to personally attack instead which is cowardly.
I just state the truth
You are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. You claim what happen in AD 70 has nothign to do with the olivet discourse. YOUR WRONG.
The whole conversation was a continuing one. You deny that.
The disciples asked. WHEN WILL THESE THINGS ME
what things?
THE THINGS THEY WERE DISCUSSING ON THE WAY THERE
where were that walking in way?
UP Mount OLIVET
The only reason you deny it is because it would prove you wrong.
And I say this because of all the conversations you and I have had not just this one. They all end the same way.