I quoted what you said. You said two incompatible things, from my perspective. You said...
1) You accept the scientific community which has a large group believing in the 6 day Creation, and
2) You reject any notion of a majority at all, since biblical truth does not require a majority.
I accept some elements in these statements. But on their face they are incompatible. If you don't accept the need for a "majority vote," then you don't need to be in association with a Creationist consensus. And though I accept that there are many creationists in the scientific community, I do not think that the largest group of creationists are "literalists" with respect to their notion of the "6 days.*
So yes, in my view you must reject the majority of scientists, Christian and non-Christian, in believing in a literal 6 days Creation. But now you're changing the equation--you're now saying that you only have to accept a small part of the scientific community who believes in a literal 6 day Creation. Either that, or you still don't understand?
1) You accept the scientific community which has a large group believing in the 6 day Creation, and
2) You reject any notion of a majority at all, since biblical truth does not require a majority.
I accept some elements in these statements. But on their face they are incompatible. If you don't accept the need for a "majority vote," then you don't need to be in association with a Creationist consensus. And though I accept that there are many creationists in the scientific community, I do not think that the largest group of creationists are "literalists" with respect to their notion of the "6 days.*
So yes, in my view you must reject the majority of scientists, Christian and non-Christian, in believing in a literal 6 days Creation. But now you're changing the equation--you're now saying that you only have to accept a small part of the scientific community who believes in a literal 6 day Creation. Either that, or you still don't understand?
And what does it mean "to utterly reject" some group such as "the scientific community"?