Is Calvinism the truth?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Could you actually point out where I "sound like the critics of Jesus"?

You continue to be confused. I have criticised YOUR doctrine, not biblical doctrine.

I DARE you to find even 1 quote from me that criticizes biblical doctrine. But of course you won't bother. Because you know I haven't done it.

Still no specifics, eh? Of course not. You don't have any.

What I believe comes directly from Scripture. What you claim I have refuted with Scripture.

You don't believe that Christ died for everyone, IN SPITE of the fact that numerous verses SAY He did. That's just one example.

The numerous verses that you have, I have debunked as false interpretations.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
What a foolish statement. In the first part, you ACTUALLY ADMIT that there are verses "that allows the unregenerate people to be able to understand and resp[ond to the things of the Spirit". And I ABSOLUTELY accept your verdict, because there ARE such verses that DO allow all people, including the unregenerate to UNDERSTAND AND RESPOND to the Scriptures.
I believe you are mistaken. Please point out the post where I admitted that the unregenerate person is able to understand spiritual things, and respond to them.
What did you do; delete it?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
What a foolish statement. In the first part, you ACTUALLY ADMIT that there are verses "that allows the unregenerate people to be able to understand and resp[ond to the things of the Spirit". And I ABSOLUTELY accept your verdict, because there ARE such verses that DO allow all people, including the unregenerate to UNDERSTAND AND RESPOND to the Scriptures.
Sentence stated wrong on my part.
Well, there you go.

That should have stated: That YOU THINK allows the unregenerate people to understand, and respond to the things of the Spirit. I think that you were well aware of my mistake in my statement.
I assure you I wasn't aware of anything you should have included. I took your sentence as it was written.

Regardless of your thoughts about 1 Cor 2:14, there ARE unbelievers who DO understand the gospel message as stated in the Bible, and yet don't believe it.

Everyone is free to their own opinions. But I've seen unbelievers explain the gospel.

That said, what you claim isn't the gospel message.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Could you actually point out where I "sound like the critics of Jesus"?

You continue to be confused. I have criticised YOUR doctrine, not biblical doctrine.

I DARE you to find even 1 quote from me that criticizes biblical doctrine. But of course you won't bother. Because you know I haven't done it.

Still no specifics, eh? Of course not. You don't have any.
The numerous verses that you have, I have debunked as false interpretations.
Still being vague, I see. As to your claim of debunking, that is just an opinion.

Your "interpretations" aren't even close to evangelicalism.
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,127
2,589
113
London
christianchat.com
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, it is clear that you don't have stomach for Greek grammar, even though it was the language that gave us the NT. Your bad.

If "faith is one of the 3 eternals" what does that mean and prove it from Scripture.

Huh? "yes....but"???? Really. iow, OK you proved a fact BUT BUT BUT. As if your BUT trumps anything or refutes anything.

If Tyndale supports your NON Greek grammar faulty understanding of Eph 2:8, and you choose to stay with his FAULTY claims, you have no excuse. You can do your own research on biblehub.com and see for yourself.

Oh, sorry, don't bother. I shouldn't bother you with FACTS since your mind is already made up.

How sad.
Tut tut
The doctrine is perfectly clear
By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of yourselves lest any man should boast

You don't want it to say that so you run to find a dictionary
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, it is clear that you don't have stomach for Greek grammar, even though it was the language that gave us the NT. Your bad.
You are free to ignore Greek grammar all you want, but the truth remains. The gift in Eph 2:8 is our salvation. The genders match.

The doctrine is perfectly clear
As I have proven from the Greek grammar.

By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of yourselves lest any man should boast

You don't want it to say that so you run to find a dictionary
Oh, I see. You don't trust dictionaries eh?

This isn't about what I want the Bible to say. It is ONLY about what the Bible SAYS, which you DON'T want it to say.

Get your facts straight.

Reformed doctrines cannot be found in the Bible. Fact.

You can't prove that unregenerate man can't believe the gospel.
You can't prove that election is to salvation.
You can't prove that Christ ONLY died for believers.
You can't prove that God's grace is irresistible.
You can't prove that true believers WILL ALWAYS persevere.

But, good luck trying to prove any of these doctrines.
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,127
2,589
113
London
christianchat.com
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, it is clear that you don't have stomach for Greek grammar, even though it was the language that gave us the NT. Your bad.

You are free to ignore Greek grammar all you want, but the truth remains. The gift in Eph 2:8 is our salvation. The genders match.


As I have proven from the Greek grammar.


Oh, I see. You don't trust dictionaries eh?

This isn't about what I want the Bible to say. It is ONLY about what the Bible SAYS, which you DON'T want it to say.

Get your facts straight.

Reformed doctrines cannot be found in the Bible. Fact.

You can't prove that unregenerate man can't believe the gospel.
You can't prove that election is to salvation.
You can't prove that Christ ONLY died for believers.
You can't prove that God's grace is irresistible.
You can't prove that true believers WILL ALWAYS persevere.

But, good luck trying to prove any of these doctrines.
Peace be unto you

even the devils can believe but they can never have saving faith
I believe election is unto the body of Christ, the church, it does not exclude any from being saved
Christ died for sinners, He imparts life to whom He will
People can fall from grace, falling from grace is not tantamount to losing salvation for the saved one
God is irresistible in the day of His power
eternal means eternal, eternal life means eternal life.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
OK, it is clear that you don't have stomach for Greek grammar, even though it was the language that gave us the NT. Your bad.

You are free to ignore Greek grammar all you want, but the truth remains. The gift in Eph 2:8 is our salvation. The genders match.
Peace be unto you
And to you.

even the devils can believe but they can never have saving faith
What is it exactly that the devils "believe" in the Bible? Is it the gospel? Do they trust Jesus for their salvation?

No, of course not. James 2:19 isn't about believing, but rather KNOWING from experience that "God is One". iow, they believe that God is Triune; Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

How do they know that? Did someone simply tell them and they "have faith" that God is Triune?

Of course not. They KNOW that God is Triune because they ALL were once in heaven with Triune God.

They EXPERIENCED the Triune God.

It is amazing how many believers misunderstand James 2:19 and come up with some kind of silly "demons believe but not saving faith", when that isn't even the point.

There are 2 ways to believe something. An example to demonstrate.

Young boy was told by Mother that the top of the stove is very hot and not to touch. He doesn't believe her and touches the stove and burns his fingers. NOW, he DOES believe the stove top is very hot. He experienced it.

Another young boy was told my Mother that the top of the stove is very hot and not to touch. He BELIEVES her and never touches the stove and therefore never burns his fingers.

Do you see the difference here?

Salvation is a trust issue. The first boy didn't trust his mother and got burned. The second boy trusted his mother and avoided getting burned.

I believe election is unto the body of Christ, the church, it does not exclude any from being saved
Without a doubt NT election is about believers. The question that needs answering is this: for what PURPOSE are believers chosen?

Christ died for sinners, He imparts life to whom He will
He died for all sinners.

People can fall from grace, falling from grace is not tantamount to losing salvation for the saved one
Amen!

God is irresistible in the day of His power
However, the Bible is clear that His will isn't irresistible. 1 Tim 2:3,4

eternal means eternal, eternal life means eternal life.
Amen.
 

AndrewMorgan

Active member
Jul 10, 2022
375
81
28
I do not know who James white is.
I recommend reading Luther.

If, by chance, you were interested in finding James White's views, he's easily accessible via Youtube, at - eg - Dr. James White - Calvinism.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
However, the Bible is clear that His will isn't irresistible. 1 Tim 2:3,4

There is a deliverance (salvation) here in this world when a born again child of God comes unto a knowledge of the truth. I have shown you an example of this in Romans 10:1-3.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,396
1,204
113
Salvation is a trust issue. The first boy didn't trust his mother and got burned. The second boy trusted his mother and avoided getting burned.
The first boy did not trust his mother because he was unregenerate. The second boy trusted his mother because he was born again by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. It is a spiritual faith issue.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
However, the Bible is clear that His will isn't irresistible. 1 Tim 2:3,4
There is a deliverance (salvation) here in this world when a born again child of God comes unto a knowledge of the truth.
I don't buy any of this stuff. You don't even explain what you mean by what you mean by "deliverance" anyway. And you quote verses that link BELIEVE in Christ for your "whatever" deliverance, when they are clearly about eternal soul salvation.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Salvation is a trust issue. The first boy didn't trust his mother and got burned. The second boy trusted his mother and avoided getting burned.
The first boy did not trust his mother because he was unregenerate.
Nonsense. I didn't give you a spiritualized parable. I gave you a real life example of 2 different boys, to illustrate how people come to believe things. Some believe things because they EXPERIENCED them, and others simply trust what they are told.

The second boy trusted his mother because he was born again by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. It is a spiritual faith issue.
Show me any verse that speaks of "a spiritual faith". There aren't any.

I'll bet you spiritualize everything in the Bible.
 
P

Polar

Guest
One thing I want to point our is that what I mean by "Calvinism" is not necessarily exactly what Calvin meant, but what the likes of James White say.
James White is a five point Calvinist even though he denies it.
 
P

Polar

Guest
First, to clarify - When I say "Calvinism", I mean the likes of modern-day Calvinism, such as James White and the like, not Calvin himself. I'm not sure what HIS position was, but I think modern proponents of Calvinism have "gone further" than what he originally proposed. After listening to many debates with James White and the like, I can't believe these people don't believe that everything is God's will, even the thoughts, desires and actions of man.
I don't know if you've got evidence that I'm wrong - and I'm happy to read any such material if you'd care to send me or direct me to any.
and again

White is a 5 point Calvinist...T.U.L.I.P.

White believes that a person is regenerated by God's will alone and there is no choice

You can call it modern or old. It's all the same brain washed unbiblical goulash. Still, people will be persuaded as they will and personalities play a part, along with life experiences and other considerations. Following Calvinism or Whiteism or whatever, if it's in the reformed category and of the tulip persuasion, it is not biblical. God does not put His Spirit into people PRIOR to salvation as these folks will tell you He does.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
He died for all sinners.
Not according to John 6:39.
John 6:39 - And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.

Your statement isn't even related to this verse. It doesn't even mention Christ's death. It is about eternal security, not His work on the cross.

However, here are the verses that very plainly and specifically teach who Christ did die for.

John 1:29 - The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

John 3:16 - For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

John 4:42 - They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.”

John 6:40 - For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”

1 Tim 2:3-6
3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior,
4 who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.
5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus,
6 who gave himself as a ransom for all people. This has now been witnessed to at the proper time.

1 Tim 4:10 - That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe.

Heb 2:9 - But we do see Jesus, who was made lower than the angels for a little while, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

1 John 2:2 - He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.

I have seen EVERY Calvinist argument that tries to twist these verses into meaning Christ didn't die for literally everyone.

So please don't bother me with any such arguments. When "all" doesn't literally mean "everyone in the human race", then there is no qualifying descriptors to that effect. So in referring to humans, the word "all" does mean everyone. It is an inclusive word.

And "world" means all of humanity, unless there are descriptors that LIMIT the meaning to some certain group or area of the world.

So, Jesus Christ did die for everyone. The world. All of humanity. Every last one of them.

The Bible says so.
 
P

Polar

Guest
So are you saying God is not sovereign 🤔
oh so tricky :LOL: here is a pre-programmed question Calvinists are taught to ask even though no one has ever said God is not Sovereign.

He is. That does not mean he is also a puppet master. YOU are saying God causes disaster, sin, evil and every other thing that believers KNOW are not from God.

Yes you are.
 
P

Polar

Guest
What is this reformed is not Calvinism business? Do y'all know what the reformation is? I think not.

Calvinism is actually called the 'reformed tradition' and stems from the 16th C. it is notable to mention that Calvin himself, baptized in the Catholic church as an infant, never spoke of his salvation through Christ, but referred to and believed in infant baptism and considered himself saved from that moment on, when as an infant with no choice in the matter, he was baptized...actually has his head only sprinkled. No wonder then he taught that we have no choice in our salvation.

Does scripture teach infant baptism? Does scripture state we do not need to confess Christ as our Savior?

No doubt, there are different flavors of the reformed now just as there are different flavors of any group. Some take the 5 points and water them down, some only believe 3 or 4 out of the 5 and then we have the 5 pointers who may even question a person's salvation if they are not Calvinist in their persuasion.

You can't get away from the fact that the word 'reformed' has attachments to Calvinism that may not be obvious, but are nonetheless present.