E
Because your 'simple' questions contradict themselves.
Also you say - 'there are times when a person can break God's law's and still be blameless.'
Your claim is utter nonsense.
Also you say - 'there are times when a person can break God's law's and still be blameless.'
Your claim is utter nonsense.
Still waiting on a reply.
Did not you know that a person, in some cases, could break God's law and still be blameless?
Did not Jesus tell us it is ok to do GOOD on His sabbath? Getting a sheep out of a ditch is work. Work is not permitted on the Sabbath. But work that is GOOD is ok. The person is blameless for doing such.
Let's now read of the example God gave us....
Matt.12
[3] But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;
[4] How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?
Was David to let him and his men starve? This was something that was out of their control....being chased by Saul throughout the kingdom. David and his men did not have time to prepare a sabbath mean the day before having to flee Saul. Let's read another...
[5] Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
Did you not know there are times when one can break God's laws and yet be blameless?
Did you miss reading this?
And what about my other example? Let's read it again....
Which do you think God will have more compassion for.....
A thief that steals to feed his family.....
OR.....
A thief that steals just because he can get away with it?
OR........
Will God see both sins as the same?
Common sense!
.