Is polygamy ok to God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

Dagallen

Guest
To assume Cain married his sister, is interesting at best and can be fun at times but to believe it to be true is foolish, as it lacks evidenced, it reminds me of the Serpent story, the Serpent was a talking snake, is foolish but interesting because it lacks evidenced.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,048
29,410
113
After Seth was born, then it records other sons and daughters, why not before ? If we put daughters before Seth, then we change the story, by assuming there were daughters before Seth, therefore one can only assume, there is no evidents to back that Cain married a sister.
There is no evidence to back that Cain did not marry someone to whom he was related. Since Adam named Eve the mother of all living, it would seem he would have had to marry kin. We do not know how old Cain was when he wed. It could have been a great grand niece he married for all we know.
 

G00WZ

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
1,318
453
83
38
I think it depends on circumstance/culture and time period where people needed to reproduce to build rank/ numbers to their tribes/family for protection.
God's original plan was to have marriage between 1 man and 1 woman...but that was then and this is now so 1 man 1 woman is righteous, anything else is sin.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
After Seth was born, then it records other sons and daughters, why not before ? If we put daughters before Seth, then we change the story, by assuming there were daughters before Seth, therefore one can only assume, there is no evidents to back that Cain married a sister.
You still have not suggested another plausible scenario. We know for a certainty that Abram (Abraham) married his half sister; and there is no record of God having criticized him for doing so. In Seth's case the need to marry a sister would have been much more pressing as there is no record of any alternative.
 
H

Huckleberry

Guest
After Seth was born, then it records other sons and daughters, why not before ? If we put daughters before Seth, then we change the story, by assuming there were daughters before Seth, therefore one can only assume, there is no evidents to back that Cain married a sister.
Why all the tortured explanations?
Why you got such a problem with this?
Adam and Eve not only had children before Seth,
but before Cain and Abel, and they were all daughters.
See Genesis 1:28 and 4:1.
After the curse, Eve was "able" to conceive sons.
The sons had no choice but to marry their sisters
since they were the only mates available for them.
There were no genetic mutations then, so birth defects weren't an issue.
Also, there would no laws against it until the days of Moses over 2,000 years later.
This stuff's not that hard to figure out.

To assume Cain married his sister, is interesting at best and can be fun at times but to believe it to be true is foolish, as it lacks evidenced, it reminds me of the Serpent story, the Serpent was a talking snake, is foolish but interesting because it lacks evidenced.
Here you go again.
The serpent was not a snake, it was a dragon.
You gotta read the whole Bible, man.
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
Why all the tortured explanations?
Why you got such a problem with this?
Adam and Eve not only had children before Seth,
but before Cain and Abel, and they were all daughters.
See Genesis 1:28 and 4:1.
After the curse, Eve was "able" to conceive sons.
The sons had no choice but to marry their sisters
since they were the only mates available for them.
There were no genetic mutations then, so birth defects weren't an issue.
Also, there would no laws against it until the days of Moses over 2,000 years later.
This stuff's not that hard to figure out.


Here you go again.
The serpent was not a snake, it was a dragon.
You gotta read the whole Bible, man.
The Serpent wasn't a snake, the serpent was not a dragon.
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
Why all the tortured explanations?
Why you got such a problem with this?
Adam and Eve not only had children before Seth,
but before Cain and Abel, and they were all daughters.
See Genesis 1:28 and 4:1.
After the curse, Eve was "able" to conceive sons.
The sons had no choice but to marry their sisters
since they were the only mates available for them.
There were no genetic mutations then, so birth defects weren't an issue.
Also, there would no laws against it until the days of Moses over 2,000 years later.
This stuff's not that hard to figure out.


Here you go again.
The serpent was not a snake, it was a dragon.
You gotta read the whole Bible, man.
Adam and Eve had children before Cain, really ? This I got to hear, as the story just keeps getting bigger, so let's hear about these so called children ?
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
You still have not suggested another plausible scenario. We know for a certainty that Abram (Abraham) married his half sister; and there is no record of God having criticized him for doing so. In Seth's case the need to marry a sister would have been much more pressing as there is no record of any alternative.
There are other plausible.
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
There is no evidence to back that Cain did not marry someone to whom he was related. Since Adam named Eve the mother of all living, it would seem he would have had to marry kin. We do not know how old Cain was when he wed. It could have been a great grand niece he married for all we know.
I agree that there is no evidence that Cain did not married someone related to him, just as there is no evidence that he did marry someone who was related.
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
I really miss SerpentDove's hilarious posts
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
I guess back in those days things were very different. Men probably had much higher libidos. These days our poor food and all the plastics and pollutants have feminized men. Solomon must have been quite energetic.

Also women weren't radicalized feminists armed with the pill. After a few children they quite often died, like Rachel, in childbirth, so they were probably delighted to have some co-wives to lessen the child-bearing burden.
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
I guess back in those days things were very different. Men probably had much higher libidos. These days our poor food and all the plastics and pollutants have feminized men. Solomon must have been quite energetic.

Also women weren't radicalized feminists armed with the pill. After a few children they quite often died, like Rachel, in childbirth, so they were probably delighted to have some co-wives to lessen the child-bearing burden.
Interesting points !
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,048
29,410
113
I agree that there is no evidence that Cain did not married someone related to him, just as there is no evidence that he did marry someone who was related.
I gave the Biblical evidence that Cain married someone to whom he was related, but you seem to have overlooked it. Eve was the mother of all living. And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” Genesis 3:21
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
If Eve is the mother of all living,Cain would of had to marry a relative,but since the law was not given yet,it was alright,and it had to be for the earth to start being repopulated.
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
I gave the Biblical evidence that Cain married someone to whom he was related, but you seem to have overlooked it. Eve was the mother of all living. And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” Genesis 3:21
The word Eve represent the female race, therefore all women are the mother's of the living not just one woman, is Eve the mother of my children ? Of course not !.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,048
29,410
113
The word Eve represent the female race, therefore all women are the mother's of the living not just one woman, is Eve the mother of my children ? Of course not !.
That is not what Scripture says. The fact remains that Eve was the matriarch of ALL living in her time, meaning she is the source from whom all others originally sprang. Your grandmother is your matriarch despite the fact that she is not your mother, and her mother the matriarch before her. This is a fairly simple concept. Cain would have had to marry someone to whom he was related, but this need not have been a sister as already pointed out.

Adam and Eve had other children besides Cain, Abel, and Seth. Genesis 5:4 says that "after Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years," and that "he had other sons and daughters." In fact, the genealogy of Genesis 5 records that every descendant of Adam down to Lamech had "other sons and daughters." These other sons and daughters were born to men even older than 187 years. Considering the long life spans recorded in Genesis 5, and assuming that couples remained reproductive for about half their lifetime, the possibility existed for a veritable population explosion. In fact, the world's population could have approached a few billion by the time of Adam's death at the age of 930.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]Expected Population Growth in Adam's Lifetime[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]According to Genesis 5, life spans from Adam to Noah averaged 912 years. Each of the patriarchs mentioned had "other sons and daughters" in addition to the sons recorded by name. The table calculations are based on:[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
  • life span = 900 years,
  • first child comes at age 50,
  • child bearing years =500, and
  • one child every 5 years during child bearing years.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 600"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]year[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]reproducing couples[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]children born[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]total population[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]0[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]0[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]50[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]0[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]100[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]10[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]150[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]6[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]30[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]42[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]200[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]21[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]100[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]142[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]250[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]71[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]352[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]494[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]300[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]247[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1210[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1704[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]350[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]852[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]4180[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]5884[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]400[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]2942[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]14,450[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]20,334[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]450[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]10,167[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]49,892[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]70,226[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]500[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]35,113[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]172,358[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]242,584[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]550[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]121,292[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]595,378[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]837,962[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]600[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]418,980[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]2,056,530[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]2,894,492[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]650[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1,447,245[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]7,103,862[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]9,998,364[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]700[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]4,999,176[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]24,538,536[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]34,536,930[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]750[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]17,268,444[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]84,762,338[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]119,299,368[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]800[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]59,649,613[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]292,790,780[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]412,090,500[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]850[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]206,045,003[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1,011,374,120[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]1,423,465,830[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150"]900[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]711,732,063[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]3,493,544,650[/TD]
[TD="width: 150"]4,917,014,660[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
According to the simple mathematics, if Cain waited to marry until he was about 200 years old, he probably had several women to choose from. If he waited another 200 years to build a city, he could have had at least a few thousand people to help him, again assuming some migration occurred. It is not entirely impossible that Cain had sisters from whom to take a wife even before his banishment and the birth of Seth. The text does not tell us, *and the fact remains, he could have married a niece or grand niece or great grand niece etc. Some of this (including population growth table) was sourced from http://www.reasons.org/articles/finding-a-wife-for-cain
 
H

Huckleberry

Guest
Adam and Eve had children before Cain, really ? This I got to hear, as the story just keeps getting bigger, so let's hear about these so called children ?
All your posts are basically "I don't believe.......", and "There's no evidence.......".
You say there are "other plausible" scenarios, but you've not enlightened us with any.
Why won't you outline what you do believe there's evidence for?
Can you back up anything you've said to this point?
 
D

Dagallen

Guest
All your posts are basically "I don't believe.......", and "There's no evidence.......".
You say there are "other plausible" scenarios, but you've not enlightened us with any.
Why won't you outline what you do believe there's evidence for?
Can you back up anything you've said to this point?
Could Cain have married someone he was related ? Yes that is possible but does the scriptures say that Cain married someone related to him ? The scriptures does not say either way, so one therefore can only assume, as one can not prove anything one way or another. Adam had sons and daughters after Seth, not before Seth, Seth was a replacement for the loss of Abel, therefore Cain already killed Abel before Seth was born, Cain went east and took a wife, Seth was born and after Seth, Adam had many sons and daughters. The odds of Cain taking a sister as a wife, would be zero to none.