-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
2
The leaders of the nation in Jesus time were all remarried divorced and committing adultery
When they drageged the lady they set up to be stoned
they knew they had Jesus
when you tell people they are in adualtery
they must be stones
so they set him up to be stoned himself
they said
JESUS is so prolaw lets see what he says about our whole nation needing to be stoned!
the people would kill him
but if he said its ok
they could accuse him!
but he turned the tables
this divorce thing is GOOD
Jesus FORGIVES
he just says dont do it anymore!
I forgive you
dont remain with your second marriages I forgive you
stop having beta marriages I forgive you repent
so Jesus wrote in the sand
and what he wrote was
EACH LEADER was in adultery!
they were all remarried or divorced or fornicating with someone
same like today
Jesus is here today
to tell you to STOP IT
preach the truth
tell the people their sins
purify self
and he forgives
correct the wrong
if you are divorced and in second marriage dont pollute the church unless you fix the problem
and the whole church will be clean again.
is this going to happen?
bible says no
Revelation says they REFUSED to repent
they continuned remarrying and divorcing
what they did instead was declare war on the remnant.
who keep the commandments
its all going according to revelation
trust in God
see you in the concentration camps soon!
dont take the RFID
When they drageged the lady they set up to be stoned
they knew they had Jesus
when you tell people they are in adualtery
they must be stones
so they set him up to be stoned himself
they said
JESUS is so prolaw lets see what he says about our whole nation needing to be stoned!
the people would kill him
but if he said its ok
they could accuse him!
but he turned the tables
this divorce thing is GOOD
Jesus FORGIVES
he just says dont do it anymore!
I forgive you
dont remain with your second marriages I forgive you
stop having beta marriages I forgive you repent
so Jesus wrote in the sand
and what he wrote was
EACH LEADER was in adultery!
they were all remarried or divorced or fornicating with someone
same like today
Jesus is here today
to tell you to STOP IT
preach the truth
tell the people their sins
purify self
and he forgives
correct the wrong
if you are divorced and in second marriage dont pollute the church unless you fix the problem
and the whole church will be clean again.
is this going to happen?
bible says no
Revelation says they REFUSED to repent
they continuned remarrying and divorcing
what they did instead was declare war on the remnant.
who keep the commandments
its all going according to revelation
trust in God
see you in the concentration camps soon!
dont take the RFID
The leaders of the nation in Jesus time were all remarried divorced and committing adultery
When they drageged the lady they set up to be stoned
they knew they had Jesus
when you tell people they are in adualtery
they must be stones
so they set him up to be stoned himself
When they drageged the lady they set up to be stoned
they knew they had Jesus
when you tell people they are in adualtery
they must be stones
so they set him up to be stoned himself
Personally, I'm not satisfied with the responses you have given to errors that have been brought to your attention already.
Once again:
The KJV contained the Apocrypha for well over 200 years. Was it an "error" for the KJV to have contained the Apocrypha? Yes or no. You might want to use the word "mistake" or "blunder" instead of "error" so you can keep saying there have never been any "errors."
Is John 5:7 in the KJV an error? This verse has been brought up several times in this thread, and I have yet to see anybody come close to justifying that this verse belongs in any Bible as it reads in the KJV.
If you can't resolve these two issues, why go on with this KJV ONLY nonsense?
Once again:
The KJV contained the Apocrypha for well over 200 years. Was it an "error" for the KJV to have contained the Apocrypha? Yes or no. You might want to use the word "mistake" or "blunder" instead of "error" so you can keep saying there have never been any "errors."
Is John 5:7 in the KJV an error? This verse has been brought up several times in this thread, and I have yet to see anybody come close to justifying that this verse belongs in any Bible as it reads in the KJV.
If you can't resolve these two issues, why go on with this KJV ONLY nonsense?
Last edited:
2
The KJV is the word of God
if a preacher gets up and misqotes it the Bible is still good
the PREACHER will meet his maker later
and I wouldnt want to be him
if King james wants to hide divorce that is his problem
He will meet his maker later
and I certainly will not ever wish to have been king james
kjv has correct but confusable words due to KJV comittee ON PURPOSE
Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
the word is PSCHA
PAssover
not easter
Plain error
PASCHA has always translated passover until KJV guys put it in on purpose to support the church of england following of the blasphemous easter celebration of secual pagan perversions...
same word
Mat 26:2 Ye know that after two days is the feast of the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.
here they translated it passover SAME WORD
easter and PASSOVER are NEVER on the same day
plain proof they STUCK IT IN THERE at KJV 1611 translation time
want more?
kjv guys were NOT NICE GUYS
they were commanded by king james to MAKE THE BIBLE MATCH THEIR DOCTRINES and the used questionable english words whenever they could whcih are not wrong byut allow argument
so Bible is the word of God
the translators will met their God about this, I wont awant to be there.
if a preacher gets up and misqotes it the Bible is still good
the PREACHER will meet his maker later
and I wouldnt want to be him
if King james wants to hide divorce that is his problem
He will meet his maker later
and I certainly will not ever wish to have been king james
kjv has correct but confusable words due to KJV comittee ON PURPOSE
Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
the word is PSCHA
PAssover
not easter
Plain error
PASCHA has always translated passover until KJV guys put it in on purpose to support the church of england following of the blasphemous easter celebration of secual pagan perversions...
same word
Mat 26:2 Ye know that after two days is the feast of the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.
here they translated it passover SAME WORD
easter and PASSOVER are NEVER on the same day
plain proof they STUCK IT IN THERE at KJV 1611 translation time
want more?
kjv guys were NOT NICE GUYS
they were commanded by king james to MAKE THE BIBLE MATCH THEIR DOCTRINES and the used questionable english words whenever they could whcih are not wrong byut allow argument
so Bible is the word of God
the translators will met their God about this, I wont awant to be there.
Last edited by a moderator:
2
Now get THIS and please pay attention
if indeed
the word actually IS EASTER
then that proves the ROMANS kept a pagan holidy called easter and the christians did not
you cannot win on this one
those who believe easter is a christian holiday and want easter to be in there
have no idea of the ramifications of messing with the word of God
JEWS DID NOT KEEP EASTER
if it WAS esaster that proves easter to be a non christian Jewish holiday!
Because the ROMAN GUARDS WERE KEEPING IT! ever thin of that?
no?
yes!
but since it was a mistranslation and should have been passover it proves the KJV shills were overactive thyroid glands in their translations
on that vers
KJV only guys loose either way
give it up
the translators were not holy
the Bible is holy
translators goof up
so ntaht is why yo have to STUDY THE WORD and see if it is translated correctly
which
on hell, eternal security and predestination and sabbath and kneeling in prayer they are all messing up a LOT
and I can show you whre they TOK OUT SABBATH and out in something else
wanna see?
If they were my translators I would fire them now... they worked for the king
obviously
if indeed
the word actually IS EASTER
then that proves the ROMANS kept a pagan holidy called easter and the christians did not
you cannot win on this one
those who believe easter is a christian holiday and want easter to be in there
have no idea of the ramifications of messing with the word of God
JEWS DID NOT KEEP EASTER
if it WAS esaster that proves easter to be a non christian Jewish holiday!
Because the ROMAN GUARDS WERE KEEPING IT! ever thin of that?
no?
yes!
but since it was a mistranslation and should have been passover it proves the KJV shills were overactive thyroid glands in their translations
on that vers
KJV only guys loose either way
give it up
the translators were not holy
the Bible is holy
translators goof up
so ntaht is why yo have to STUDY THE WORD and see if it is translated correctly
which
on hell, eternal security and predestination and sabbath and kneeling in prayer they are all messing up a LOT
and I can show you whre they TOK OUT SABBATH and out in something else
wanna see?
If they were my translators I would fire them now... they worked for the king
obviously
There are thousands of words added to the KJV that are not in the original texts that it is translated from. Word count can not be used as the basis of accuracy.
I have a small request of you, well it might not be all that small. Would you take a little time and unravel that pile of twine that you have been through in this thread, then come back and explain to those of us following this tread exactly what you are really arguing? The only thing that I get from your comments is that you are trying to prove something that you can't prove.
I have a small request of you, well it might not be all that small. Would you take a little time and unravel that pile of twine that you have been through in this thread, then come back and explain to those of us following this tread exactly what you are really arguing? The only thing that I get from your comments is that you are trying to prove something that you can't prove.
Strong's Concordance is based off of the Textus Receptus.
Most Modern Translations are based off of the Westcott and Hort Greek texts.
These are completely two different sets of Greek manuscripts that are different by thousands of words.
Westcott and Hort were not even true believers. They were involved in occult practices. It's not surprising. I believe many who don't believe they have to be held accountable to a perfect Word of God that they can understand in our world language today are not true believers either. They are Bible Agnostics. They think maybe a pure Word exists but they really have no way of showing it or proving it. For faith comes by hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17). But if you don't believe in a perfect Word and can demonstrate it's perfection easily, then you don't have a perfect Word and or you really don't believe one exists. So having a final Word of authority for doctrine, correction, and training in righteousness does not really exist. One has to use what they believe to be the originals in a language they do not speak or write. But God is not the author of confusion, though. God doesn't require you to speak and write to people today in a language that others would not understand and or easily confirm quickly for themselves. For it is a lot easier to trick people into buying into a false interpretation of God's Word by telling them the Greek actually says this, etc., etc. ~ Versus ~ Just telling them what God's Word says in their own language that they would understand. In fact, this is what the Catholics did. They spoke the Bible in Latin to their church and they did not even give them any kind of way to check it themselves. It was like a blah, blah (What in the world are you saying?) See, they spoke confusion to them. For Paul says he would rather speak five words with the understanding than five thousand words with no understanding.
Most Modern Translations are based off of the Westcott and Hort Greek texts.
These are completely two different sets of Greek manuscripts that are different by thousands of words.
Westcott and Hort were not even true believers. They were involved in occult practices. It's not surprising. I believe many who don't believe they have to be held accountable to a perfect Word of God that they can understand in our world language today are not true believers either. They are Bible Agnostics. They think maybe a pure Word exists but they really have no way of showing it or proving it. For faith comes by hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17). But if you don't believe in a perfect Word and can demonstrate it's perfection easily, then you don't have a perfect Word and or you really don't believe one exists. So having a final Word of authority for doctrine, correction, and training in righteousness does not really exist. One has to use what they believe to be the originals in a language they do not speak or write. But God is not the author of confusion, though. God doesn't require you to speak and write to people today in a language that others would not understand and or easily confirm quickly for themselves. For it is a lot easier to trick people into buying into a false interpretation of God's Word by telling them the Greek actually says this, etc., etc. ~ Versus ~ Just telling them what God's Word says in their own language that they would understand. In fact, this is what the Catholics did. They spoke the Bible in Latin to their church and they did not even give them any kind of way to check it themselves. It was like a blah, blah (What in the world are you saying?) See, they spoke confusion to them. For Paul says he would rather speak five words with the understanding than five thousand words with no understanding.
Last edited:
You have things backwards. Think for a moment. If the devil hates the Word of God and seeks to corrupt it, would He reinforce the good things of God (with supposedly added verses that are good), or would the devil take away words from God's Word that are good and or subtly twist them in an attempt to effect the Christian life.
For fasting is taking out in certain translations when it comes to casting out certain demons. Hmmm.... I wonder why? Romans 8:1 in the KJV says "Walk after the Spirit." Other translations remove this which destroys the whole argument that Paul was making in Romans 7-8. 1 John 5:7 is the only verse that actually teaches us about the Trinity clearly. So you have no real authority in telling Anti-Trinitarians that God is triune because you really don't have one clear verse like 1 John 5:7 to defend the Trinity. See, satan wants to remove God's Word as an authority in your life. That's his goal.
For fasting is taking out in certain translations when it comes to casting out certain demons. Hmmm.... I wonder why? Romans 8:1 in the KJV says "Walk after the Spirit." Other translations remove this which destroys the whole argument that Paul was making in Romans 7-8. 1 John 5:7 is the only verse that actually teaches us about the Trinity clearly. So you have no real authority in telling Anti-Trinitarians that God is triune because you really don't have one clear verse like 1 John 5:7 to defend the Trinity. See, satan wants to remove God's Word as an authority in your life. That's his goal.
Last edited:
Contradiction - Jesus is the morning star, Satan is the morning star.
[h=1]Revelation 22:16New American Standard Bible (NASB)[/h]16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things [a]for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.”
[h=1]Isaiah 14:12New American Standard Bible (NASB)[/h]12 “How you have fallen from heaven,
O [a]star of the morning, son of the dawn!
You have been cut down to the earth,
You who have weakened the nations!
[h=1]Revelation 22:16New American Standard Bible (NASB)[/h]16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things [a]for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.”
[h=1]Isaiah 14:12New American Standard Bible (NASB)[/h]12 “How you have fallen from heaven,
O [a]star of the morning, son of the dawn!
You have been cut down to the earth,
You who have weakened the nations!