-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L
Other translations do not remove anything. You cannot remove what is not there. Other translations do not have certain phrases because they were not in the earlier manuscripts - they were added by copyists later on! Also, you don't need that particular passage to prove the Trinity. The Trinity was added to that passage because it was already believed!
L
So the bible is completely different because Erasmus chose to pick the version that said John was standing on the shore?
The bibles all agree with each other. Pointing out minute unimportant differences does not change that. There are far larger issues between say, the different Gospel accounts. Even still, does not matter because it does not change what is believed.
The bibles all agree with each other. Pointing out minute unimportant differences does not change that. There are far larger issues between say, the different Gospel accounts. Even still, does not matter because it does not change what is believed.
L
It does not matter which one you go with, they all say the same thing.
Actually, you are totally wrong on that one.
The question is what bible does the new believer pick?
that is exactly what you are doing! Except your choice isn't even informed. You just randomly decide there can only be one right bible and you randomly decided it was the KJV and want others to think if they don't use that one they have a bad bible.
Actually, you are totally wrong on that one.
The question is what bible does the new believer pick?
that is exactly what you are doing! Except your choice isn't even informed. You just randomly decide there can only be one right bible and you randomly decided it was the KJV and want others to think if they don't use that one they have a bad bible.
Oh, Chick Publications. Now there is some squirrel bait.
They feature some stuff by the dinosaur man, Kent Hovind.
Hovind is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Atlanta. I'm not sure what for. He probably parked the dinosaur he was riding in a handicapped spot.
Let me guess. You believe that the earth is around 6,000 years old and dinosaurs coexisted with humans. Did I guess right?
They feature some stuff by the dinosaur man, Kent Hovind.
Hovind is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Atlanta. I'm not sure what for. He probably parked the dinosaur he was riding in a handicapped spot.
Let me guess. You believe that the earth is around 6,000 years old and dinosaurs coexisted with humans. Did I guess right?
Yeah, the word "name" being singular is not saying specifically that God is three in one here like 1 John 5:7. It doesn't actually say what 1 John 5:7 says.
Relate but not specifically describe the Trinity like 1 John 5:7. No other verse really does that.
Never said it was heresy to use another translation. In fact, I have used Modern Translations many times in helping to update the language. However, Modern Translations are also corrupted, so I don't make them my final Word of authority like the KJV.
Speaking of Ecclesiastes:
Well, the Bible says the number 6 is the number of a man in Revelation 13 and that threescore of that is the mark of the Beast (666). It also tells us within this chapter to count this number as a part of wisdom. Why? So that we may understand what this number means. In fact, did you know that the 666th chapter in the Bible (Ecclesiastes 7) talks about the same thing in Revelation 13?
Ecclesiastes 7:23-29
"All this have I proved by wisdom: I said, I will be wise; but it was far from me. That which is far off, and exceeding deep, who can find it out? I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things, and to know the wickedness of folly, even of foolishness and madness: And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart is snares and nets, and her hands as bands: whoso pleaseth God shall escape from her; but the sinner shall be taken by her. Behold, this have I found, saith the preacher, counting one by one, to find out the account: Which yet my soul seeketh, but I find not: one man among a thousand have I found; but a woman among all those have I not found. Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions."
Revelation 13:16-18
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."
In other words, what are the odds of the above parallel happening by random chance?
Do you think Stephen Langton, and Robert Stephanus worked together?
Relate but not specifically describe the Trinity like 1 John 5:7. No other verse really does that.
Never said it was heresy to use another translation. In fact, I have used Modern Translations many times in helping to update the language. However, Modern Translations are also corrupted, so I don't make them my final Word of authority like the KJV.
Speaking of Ecclesiastes:
Well, the Bible says the number 6 is the number of a man in Revelation 13 and that threescore of that is the mark of the Beast (666). It also tells us within this chapter to count this number as a part of wisdom. Why? So that we may understand what this number means. In fact, did you know that the 666th chapter in the Bible (Ecclesiastes 7) talks about the same thing in Revelation 13?
Ecclesiastes 7:23-29
"All this have I proved by wisdom: I said, I will be wise; but it was far from me. That which is far off, and exceeding deep, who can find it out? I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things, and to know the wickedness of folly, even of foolishness and madness: And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart is snares and nets, and her hands as bands: whoso pleaseth God shall escape from her; but the sinner shall be taken by her. Behold, this have I found, saith the preacher, counting one by one, to find out the account: Which yet my soul seeketh, but I find not: one man among a thousand have I found; but a woman among all those have I not found. Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions."
Revelation 13:16-18
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."
In other words, what are the odds of the above parallel happening by random chance?
Do you think Stephen Langton, and Robert Stephanus worked together?
