KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES
- Thread starter KingJamesVersionBibleOnly
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I am 100% certain that was your reasoning the last time this issue came up. I don't accept it as true because it's not supported by the text.
2 Kings 8: [SUP]25 [/SUP]In the twelfth year of Joram the son of Ahab king of Israel did Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah begin to reign.
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
2 Chronicles 22: 1 And the inhabitants of Jerusalem made Ahaziah his youngest son king in his stead: for the band of men that came with the Arabians to the camp had slain all the eldest. So Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah reigned.
[SUP]2 [/SUP]Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
It's the same person. The details make it irrefutable. Kings says he was 22, Chronicles says 42.
It's a contradiction, clear and plain, with no room for weaseling, wiggling, or convolutions.
2 Kings 8: [SUP]25 [/SUP]In the twelfth year of Joram the son of Ahab king of Israel did Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah begin to reign.
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
2 Chronicles 22: 1 And the inhabitants of Jerusalem made Ahaziah his youngest son king in his stead: for the band of men that came with the Arabians to the camp had slain all the eldest. So Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah reigned.
[SUP]2 [/SUP]Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
It's the same person. The details make it irrefutable. Kings says he was 22, Chronicles says 42.
It's a contradiction, clear and plain, with no room for weaseling, wiggling, or convolutions.
The context wasn’t Passover. The feast was stated in the scripture
“Acts 12:3 ...(Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
The parenthetical stresses a necessary factual understanding that Passover was over and the time was the feast of unleavened bread.
The context is specified as during...the Days of Unleavened Bread...after the Passover.
On Easter the celebration of the resurrection of our passover lamb, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
The context provided by scripture is precise, and precisely what is needful to determine that it was not Passover, nor the feast of Unleavened Bread that Herod referred to, for Passover was over, it was Easter that Herod wanted to use against the followers of the risen Christ Jesus.
And Herod was judged for his evil intention. Herod was an antichrist. He wanted to rule over Israel. But he was eaten of worms as he sat lusting to be called God.
Herod should’ve taken heed of Psalms 2...
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
“Acts 12:3 ...(Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
The parenthetical stresses a necessary factual understanding that Passover was over and the time was the feast of unleavened bread.
The context is specified as during...the Days of Unleavened Bread...after the Passover.
On Easter the celebration of the resurrection of our passover lamb, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
The context provided by scripture is precise, and precisely what is needful to determine that it was not Passover, nor the feast of Unleavened Bread that Herod referred to, for Passover was over, it was Easter that Herod wanted to use against the followers of the risen Christ Jesus.
And Herod was judged for his evil intention. Herod was an antichrist. He wanted to rule over Israel. But he was eaten of worms as he sat lusting to be called God.
Herod should’ve taken heed of Psalms 2...
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
Last edited:
What was referred to by Herod was the timing of when best to bring forth Peter before the people.
It was the people, whom Herod sought to turn away from believing in the risen Jesus of Nazareth.
Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easterto bring him forth to the people.
So it wasn’t pascha, the passover lamb eaten back on Passover that set the time Herod chose. For it was already the Days of Unleavened Bread. It was Jesus, the pascha, the passover lamb, whose resurrection was celebrated by the followers of Jesus.
It was the people, whom Herod sought to turn away from believing in the risen Jesus of Nazareth.
Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easterto bring him forth to the people.
So it wasn’t pascha, the passover lamb eaten back on Passover that set the time Herod chose. For it was already the Days of Unleavened Bread. It was Jesus, the pascha, the passover lamb, whose resurrection was celebrated by the followers of Jesus.
