U
Thank you Ben, I absolutely agree! You said it so well. I also look at it the whole "license to sin" or 'greasy grace" slander like this.....
License to sin is distorted reasoning, it is basically saying let us do evil that good may come.
Paul had lot to say about people who defamed that message of grace.
Roman 8:3 Why not say, as some slanderously claim that we say,“ - Let us do evil that good may result?” Their condemnation is deserved!
To avoid the truth of grace or defame the message by saying that it may give a person the right to sin is to support the truth of that which is opposite of grace – teaching that the law justifies.
This is unbelief in the finished work of Jesus.
Read what Paul says about those who do such.
So it is either grace or law it cannot be both.
My testimony.... thank God I have changed my mind (repented) and accepted what God says about His abounding grace, and escaped my own human reasoning which falters and fails even at the best of times.
One debt......paid in full.
When I did not agree with God on grace (kept bringing the law into play) I lived on the debt side, then I changed my mind, I came over to the paid in full side. Finally understand the freedom that Jesus gives.
In other words, license to sin. That is the accusation and summary of your perceived interpretation of what is being said by the hyper-grace proponents. I think the issue is that you don't understand how their solution to sin actually works, so you're fighting it because you don't understand it.
To you they are excusing their sin, instead of addressing it and having victory over it. Yet, there are testimonies of Christians who are victorious over sin through an understanding of God's grace, and their identity in Christ. Their repentance may not look like your repentance but its getting results in the lives of many believers. Setting them free from sins that held them. You cannot argue with the results.
It was a tad presumptuous to say they are being disobedient to the Holy Spirit, and not listening to Him. You don't know that, it is personal between them and the Lord. He lets us know when we are grieving Him.
How you define "true and godly repentance" and how they define repentance may differ, but again, I think you're fighting something you don't, at the moment, understand. Their solution albeit different from traditional concepts of repentance is getting results in the lives of people getting a hold of this revelation of God's grace and who they are in Christ, being new creations dead to sin and alive unto God.
No one is presenting a doctrine that says we have a license to sin. No one is saying to live the way you want. As a matter of fact they agree with the apostle Paul in asking, "How can we who are dead to sin, live in it?" The accusation, the allegation, or even the defamatory summation of hyper-grace theology is preaching licentiousness is unfounded and incorrect.
To you they are excusing their sin, instead of addressing it and having victory over it. Yet, there are testimonies of Christians who are victorious over sin through an understanding of God's grace, and their identity in Christ. Their repentance may not look like your repentance but its getting results in the lives of many believers. Setting them free from sins that held them. You cannot argue with the results.
It was a tad presumptuous to say they are being disobedient to the Holy Spirit, and not listening to Him. You don't know that, it is personal between them and the Lord. He lets us know when we are grieving Him.
How you define "true and godly repentance" and how they define repentance may differ, but again, I think you're fighting something you don't, at the moment, understand. Their solution albeit different from traditional concepts of repentance is getting results in the lives of people getting a hold of this revelation of God's grace and who they are in Christ, being new creations dead to sin and alive unto God.
No one is presenting a doctrine that says we have a license to sin. No one is saying to live the way you want. As a matter of fact they agree with the apostle Paul in asking, "How can we who are dead to sin, live in it?" The accusation, the allegation, or even the defamatory summation of hyper-grace theology is preaching licentiousness is unfounded and incorrect.
Last edited by a moderator: