Modern State of Israel: Is it biblical?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
Okay let me try this approach:

IF prophecy is allegories and spiritual, HOW can anyone ever know when something has been fulfilled?

For example: If ALL EYES seeing Jesus return on the clouds with power and glory doesnt mean that all eyes are seeing Jesus returning on the clouds with power and glory, but instead means that a PAGAN ARMY (the romans) destroy Jerusalem, HOW can we ever know what any prophecy is saying?

You could make it say anything if it doesnt mean what it says. You guys understand that, right?

And one more point: Lets look at the FIRST COMING of Christ, the prophecies were fulfilled LITERALLY; Jesus actually rode a donkey, for example, it wasnt a spiritual donkey or fulfilled in any kind of way like that.
 

JimmieD

Senior Member
Apr 11, 2014
895
18
18
There are no lost tribes.

God knows where they are
Most of them probably never went anywhere. Some of them may have fled to Judah and the Assyrians probably just deported mostly the leadership. And there is evidence that Assyria didn't deport the entire population.

(1) In 2 Chron 30, Hezekiah invites people of Ephraim, Manasseh, Asher, Zebulun, Issachar to join him in the feast.
(2) In 2 Chron 31, it appears that some of the Israelites (the Northern Kingdom) went back to their cities.
(3) In 1 Kings 17, Assyria had to send back some priests as it appears the population was restless due to requirements to worship Yahweh.
(4) Sargon II puts a number on the exiled people at about 27,000, which was probably something of an exaggeration for propaganda purposes, and says he installed Tartan as governor.

Thus the "lost" tribes of the North probably never really went anywhere. Their leadership was undoubtedly removed and replaced with Assyrian loyalists, but much of the general populace remained or went a little south to Judah. In fact, when Babylonian exiles return and start to rebuild the temple (Ezra 4), there are people there who still worship Yahweh. Sanballat and Tobiah were probably Yahweh-worshiping Samaritans (Horon was probably a village at the foot of Mt. Gerizim) who were descendants of the Northern tribes, and Sanballat is traditionally associated with a Samaritan Temple on Mt. Gerizim. One of Tobiah's relatives was a priest in Jerusalem (Neh 13) and his son in law seems to have been either working for Nehemiah and/or working in the temple.

In any case, I think there is good reason to believe that much of the Northern Kingdom remained in place and many were still living there when people immigrated from Babylon.

Also an interesting footnote, Samaritans are to this day STILL on Mt. Gerizim and though they don't have a temple structure, you can Youtube their feasts. They still do traditional lamb sacrifices, so it's pretty interesting.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Okay let me try this approach:

IF prophecy is allegories and spiritual, HOW can anyone ever know when something has been fulfilled?

For example: If ALL EYES seeing Jesus return on the clouds with power and glory doesnt mean that all eyes are seeing Jesus returning on the clouds with power and glory, but instead means that a PAGAN ARMY (the romans) destroy Jerusalem, HOW can we ever know what any prophecy is saying?

You could make it say anything if it doesnt mean what it says. You guys understand that, right?

And one more point: Lets look at the FIRST COMING of Christ, the prophecies were fulfilled LITERALLY; Jesus actually rode a donkey, for example, it wasnt a spiritual donkey or fulfilled in any kind of way like that.
Jesus made it clear. If A prophet makes a prophesy, and that things does not happen. The prophet is a false prophet.

The purpose of prophesy is to PROVE God is the God of the universe, Who else can prophesy 100s even 1000s of years in advance, and that prophesy come true 100%

If we make prophesies allegories (because they can not fit out belief otherwise) anyone can prophesy and make the claim that prophesy came true.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,590
9,107
113
I would not expect you to understand. You THINK you have proven Penn Ed wrong, but you have not. And I would expect Penn ed to respond. Just because he has not yet does not mean he will not. But as usal Certain types think they are gods gift thus they know it all.

1. Egypt was not a regathering. So wrong answer
2. Babylon was the FIRST time ALL israel had been punished for their sins (it started with Assyria removign the northern kingdom) so in no way could it be the REGATHERING, because JUDA had not even been removed yet.
3. Is 11 is speaking of the restoration of Isreal at the end. And it must be taken in context. Here are the characteristics of that period. When they will be restored.


Isaiah 11: 11 Then a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse,
And a branch from his roots will bear fruit.

(This is Jesus, so he must ocome BEFORE this gathering)

Concerning this shoot (jesus) . God says the following.

2 The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him,
The spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The spirit of counsel and strength,
The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.

3 And He will delight in the fear of the Lord,
And He will not judge by what His eyes see,
Nor make a decision by what His ears hear;

4 But with righteousness He will judge the poor,
And decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth;
And He will strike the earth with the rod of His mouth,
And with the breath of His lips He will slay the wicked.
5 Also righteousness will be the belt about His loins,
And faithfulness the belt about His waist.


God will have judged the earth, With as this says, the rod (sound familiar, the king who will RULE with a rod of Iron)

Concerning the earth in this day

6 And the wolf will dwell with the lamb,
And the leopard will lie down with the young goat,
And the calf and the young lion [a]and the fatling together;
And a little boy will lead them.

7 Also the cow and the bear will graze,
Their young will lie down together,
And the lion will eat straw like the ox.

8 The nursing child will play by the hole of the cobra,
And the weaned child will put his hand on the viper’s den.

9 They will not hurt or destroy in all My holy mountain,
For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord
As the waters cover the sea.

10 Then in that day
The nations will resort to the root of Jesse,
Who will stand as a [b]signal for the peoples;
And His resting place will be [c]glorious.


Concerning Israel, The Restored Remnant


11 Then it will happen on that day that the Lord
Will again recover the second time with His hand
The remnant of His people, who will remain,
From Assyria, Egypt, Pathros, Cush, Elam, Shinar, Hamath,
And from the [d]islands of the sea.

12 And He will lift up a standard for the nations
And assemble the banished ones of Israel,
And will gather the dispersed of Judah
From the four corners of the earth.


As for the rest of the world



13 Then the jealousy of Ephraim will depart,
And those who harass Judah will be cut off;
Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah,
And Judah will not harass Ephraim.


Again back to Israel

14 They will swoop down on the slopes of the Philistines on the west;
Together they will plunder the sons of the east;
[e]They will possess Edom and Moab,

And the sons of Ammon will be [f]subject to them.

Gods judgment on the gentiles

15 And the Lord will [g]utterly destroy
The tongue of the [h]Sea of Egypt;
And He will wave His hand over the [i]River
With His scorching wind;

And He will strike it into seven streams
And make men walk over [j]dry-shod.


As for the rest of the lost, The people who were taken by Assyria, Even they will return

16 And there will be a highway from Assyria
For the remnant of His people who will be left,
Just as there was for Israel

In the day that they came up out of the land of Egypt.


So in laughing and mocking a brother in Christ. You have made yourself look bad. Not only could you not get who the prophet Isaiah was talking ab out in Verse 11. You completely missed context of the time period. The people. And what is going on in this prophesy.

Shame Shame, Instead of trying to rip your brothers apart. You should try to listen every now and then, Because you may be wrong (and you are)
Thank you brother. But I fear antisemitism is strong here.

First they say the second regathering was when Jesus led captivity captive, now that switched to the 1st being led out of Egypt, even though they were NEVER a nation before.

THEY ARE IN THE LAND NOW!!! You can get on a plane and go to ISRAEL. TODAY!

They HATE that FACT. So much so that most of them actually side with the muslims who are constantly trying to kill them.

The country Israel today is mostly comprised of atheists and extreme legalists. But they are Jews in the land. And they will look on Him whom they pierced. They will call out to Him in their affliction, and some will believe. But make no mistake. Isaiah 11:11 is about 1948.

WE are called to bless and love them. Let others be the instruments of God's wrath against them. It never works out well for those instruments in the end. Just ask the Nazis.
 

bygrace

Active member
Dec 3, 2018
150
55
28
Hey guys!

It has been a while, but I am back on. I don’t really expect that I would be remember by any senior members here, since people come and go all of the time on this site. I haven’t been on here for several years now, but I went under the username Spokenpassage. Apparently my account was deleted due to inactivity, but I was able to set up my account again with the same email. Finding a username is not easy, I did like the other one, but I decided to be different. The first time I joined I was still near my mid-teens (2011), but now I am near my mid-twenties. The Lord has done a lot in my life throughout these years, I could not explain it in one post if I wanted to. Anyways, after praying a while about rejoining, I wanted to see what is up nowadays here. There have been a lot of people I personally met on here that seem completely gone, while I am still seeing others thriving in these discussions group (you know who you are). It is normal to see members and thread posts constantly debate about the law, end times, and the Trinity. It is like here things go on repeat, and I just don’t know how some of you who are still on here still do it. So this is a sort of introduction I suppose.

*to the point*

I want to have an honest, serious, discussion with knowledgeable brothers here about some subjects. If you deny that God is revealed in three distinct co-eternal, consubstantial, persons; or that we are not under the jurisdiction of the law, but have been washed and justified in the saving blood of Jesus Christ through faith by grace alone; that we all are condemned in connection to, and corrupt by transmission from, Adam’s first transgression in the garden; that God predestined some persons in Christ, for his glory and praise, before the foundation of the world was laid, and predestined the rest to be lost in their sin to eternal punishment; then I prefer that you don’t respond. A lack of acknowledging and trusting in these truths keep discussions from progressing anywhere in any place of theology. There are too many people out there who want to be teachers and tell people about what they think they know. Some here are continually promoting Mosaic Law keeping, which is insane still (with the exception of one particular brother here who does it because he simply wants to). Don’t you understand that the Mosaic Law was written to the nation of Israel for tenure in the land of their possession? It was never intended for the world to obey, it pertained to the conditional nature of Abraham’s promises and the arrival of the coming Messiah. The New Covenant, as the writer of Hebrews plainly states, is a newer and better covenant that promised better things and eternal realities, whereas the Old Covenant promised temporal promises and realities to a temporal nation for a temporal period until the Offspring would be born and redeem the elect of God from the creation to the last one who will be converted prior to the resurrection of the dead and the consummation of the kingdom on the new earth. Anyways…

I want an honest, serious, prayerful conversation on the issue of the modern state of Israel. What is your take on its existence? Is it biblical, is it not? Explain your reason, back it up with Scripture. This is not necessarily political question, and it is not so much of whether it is a settlement of land thief or that the government is maybe questionable in their control of the land. You can mention that if you want, but I am looking for a discussion on the statehood itself. Many say that this is the fulfillment of some prophecy, that God would bring the Jews back to the land of Canaan as their possession. Others see this as a fraud and a fake, that God had already finished his purpose with Israel a long time ago and that they no longer exist as a nation.

Now,

* Replacement Theology teaches that the Church replaced the nation of Israel (New Covenant replaces and abolishes the Old).

* Reformed Theology teaches that the Church is the eschatological and fulfillment of Israel (New Covenant is what the Old pointed to and foreshadowed).

Pointing that out there lest someone confuses two.

I am of the conviction that this is not biblical, this is not right, and that the fact that many Christians are supporting it is frightening. I can explain afterward.
for Israels pupose is not needed in context to modern day location or geographical land. Why Did Jesus say He would come back there ? Why is the place Isreal shown in the Book of Rev? Why would the Temple reconstruction be in the works? it is because Israel and the people are still the apple of His Eye.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Thank you brother. But I fear antisemitism is strong here.

First they say the second regathering was when Jesus led captivity captive, now that switched to the 1st being led out of Egypt, even though they were NEVER a nation before.

THEY ARE IN THE LAND NOW!!! You can get on a plane and go to ISRAEL. TODAY!

They HATE that FACT. So much so that most of them actually side with the muslims who are constantly trying to kill them.

The country Israel today is mostly comprised of atheists and extreme legalists. But they are Jews in the land. And they will look on Him whom they pierced. They will call out to Him in their affliction, and some will believe. But make no mistake. Isaiah 11:11 is about 1948.

WE are called to bless and love them. Let others be the instruments of God's wrath against them. It never works out well for those instruments in the end. Just ask the Nazis.
Is 11 is still ongoing! It will be completely fulfilled when everything the prophet says happens. Amen.

And your right, they will not recieve this. In fact HATE it, thats why they act the way they do (so many have said I can not be saved based on my belief)
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
people want to say Simon said this prophesy was fulfilled. Simon said no thing, Simon spoke of prophesies concerning the gentiles and how God would go to them in the future. (Paul even mentioned some of these prophesies in Rom 9 - 10)

Either way.. the followng is true
1. Isaiah is not talking about gentiles (except for their punishment) So simon could not be talking in said passage about gentiles
2. One must Just ignore the rest of the passage of what the prophet said ( The things I highlighted which in any case NON HAVE AS OF YET OCCURED) till this day


But hey, if these people want to continue to laugh and attack others.. Thats on them, People can see right through it.
Act 15:14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
Simeon declared that God visited the Gentiles to take out a people for his name. Jesus called the gentiles to salvation when he came the first time. This IS NOT a future prophesy... It's done.

Act 15:15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
The words of Simeon AGREE with the words of the prophets.

Act 15:16 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
After this... After what? After the destruction of Israel in Amos 9 God will return and build again the tabernacle of David which was utterly destroyed in AD 70.

Act 15:17 That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
He will build up the tabernacle of David SO THAT the RESIDUE (remnant) and all the GENTILES upon whom his name is called might seek after the Lord.

If anybody thinks all of that's future then your'e deceiving your own selves as well as the others you push this nonsense on.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
Jesus made it clear. If A prophet makes a prophesy, and that things does not happen. The prophet is a false prophet.

The purpose of prophesy is to PROVE God is the God of the universe, Who else can prophesy 100s even 1000s of years in advance, and that prophesy come true 100%

If we make prophesies allegories (because they can not fit out belief otherwise) anyone can prophesy and make the claim that prophesy came true.
Thats my concern exactly.

I could say that the book of revelation is about me going on a fishing trip and getting hit with bad weather. (In allegory, obviously, spiritually speaking)

I believe because of the reason you said above is why we need to take prophecies as they are. The prophecy about for example third of the fish dying, now if it doesnt mean that, how can we ever know its fulfilled?
But since it means what it says, when the 3rd of fish have perished, people can see it and go "Hey, thats bible prophecy fulfilled, I guess its true after all!"

If its allegorical, it can never be proven to be true.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Thats my concern exactly.

I could say that the book of revelation is about me going on a fishing trip and getting hit with bad weather. (In allegory, obviously, spiritually speaking)

I believe because of the reason you said above is why we need to take prophecies as they are. The prophecy about for example third of the fish dying, now if it doesnt mean that, how can we ever know its fulfilled?
But since it means what it says, when the 3rd of fish have perished, people can see it and go "Hey, thats bible prophecy fulfilled, I guess its true after all!"

If its allegorical, it can never be proven to be true.
One must remember God does use symbols (babylon was the head) But those symbols represent literal things (Daniel said Nebbachadnezzar was that head)
 

Deade

Called of God
Dec 17, 2017
16,724
10,531
113
78
Vinita, Oklahoma, USA
yeshuaofisrael.org
Most of them probably never went anywhere. Some of them may have fled to Judah and the Assyrians probably just deported mostly the leadership. And there is evidence that Assyria didn't deport the entire population.

(1) In 2 Chron 30, Hezekiah invites people of Ephraim, Manasseh, Asher, Zebulun, Issachar to join him in the feast.
(2) In 2 Chron 31, it appears that some of the Israelites (the Northern Kingdom) went back to their cities.
(3) In 1 Kings 17, Assyria had to send back some priests as it appears the population was restless due to requirements to worship Yahweh.
(4) Sargon II puts a number on the exiled people at about 27,000, which was probably something of an exaggeration for propaganda purposes, and says he installed Tartan as governor.

Thus the "lost" tribes of the North probably never really went anywhere. Their leadership was undoubtedly removed and replaced with Assyrian loyalists, but much of the general populace remained or went a little south to Judah. In fact, when Babylonian exiles return and start to rebuild the temple (Ezra 4), there are people there who still worship Yahweh. Sanballat and Tobiah were probably Yahweh-worshiping Samaritans (Horon was probably a village at the foot of Mt. Gerizim) who were descendants of the Northern tribes, and Sanballat is traditionally associated with a Samaritan Temple on Mt. Gerizim. One of Tobiah's relatives was a priest in Jerusalem (Neh 13) and his son in law seems to have been either working for Nehemiah and/or working in the temple.

In any case, I think there is good reason to believe that much of the Northern Kingdom remained in place and many were still living there when people immigrated from Babylon.

Also an interesting footnote, Samaritans are to this day STILL on Mt. Gerizim and though they don't have a temple structure, you can Youtube their feasts. They still do traditional lamb sacrifices, so it's pretty interesting.
Yes the Samaritans were placed there from pagan origins and tried to become spiritual Jews. That is why the real Jews despised them so much. They were counterfeit Israelis. Your Sargon II is a non reference. Here is a reference under Sargon II in Wikipedia:

Conquest of Israel[edit]
Under his rule, the Assyrians completed the defeat of the Kingdom of Israel, capturing Samaria after a siege of three years and exiling the inhabitants. This became the basis of the legends of the Ten Lost Tribes. According to the Bible, other people were brought to Samaria, the Samaritans, under his predecessor Shalmaneser V (2 Kings 18). Sargon's name actually appears in the Bible only once, in the Book of Isaiah,[8]which records the Assyrian capture of Ashdod in 711 BC.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
God allows the unrepentant Christ denying Jews back into the land in 1947.

Next he is then going to utterly destroy Jerusalem according to Amos 9 which the book of Acts was quoting.

Then he's he's going to rebuild the physical house of David SO THAT the RESIDUE (remnant) and all the GENTILES upon whom his name is called might seek after the Lord. And he's going to call the Gentiles AFTER the times of the Gentiles are over.

Is this dispensational thinking in a nutshell or have I gotten something wrong?
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Mat 24:32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:

Also for you people who think Matthew 24:32 is talking about Israel becoming a nation again because the branch is tender and starting to put forth leaves.... That's not a new tree, it's a tree in the SPRING TIME, warning the Jews of God that SUMMER IS NEAR.

Here's what was to happen when summer came. The summer fruit was to be gathered and once the summer fruit was gathered THE END came upon Israel and God said he would NEVER pass by them anymore.

Amo 8:2 And he said, Amos, what seest thou? And I said, A basket of summer fruit. Then said the LORD unto me, The end is come upon my people of Israel; I will not again pass by them any more.
 

JimmieD

Senior Member
Apr 11, 2014
895
18
18
Yes the Samaritans were placed there from pagan origins and tried to become spiritual Jews.
Doubtful that's the full story. I've posted my reasons already.

That is why the real Jews despised them so much. They were counterfeit Israelis.
Looks too simplistic to me and doesn't account for all the available data.

Your Sargon II is a non reference. Here is a reference under Sargon II in Wikipedia:
Not sure what you mean by non-reference. I can give sources if you need.

https://scholarship.claremont.edu/c...httpsredir=1&article=1052&context=cgu_fac_pub (pp12-13)

https://oi.uchicago.edu/sites/oi.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/shared/docs/ancient_records_assyria2.pdf (pp 2)
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
God allows the unrepentant Christ denying Jews back into the land in 1947.

Next he is then going to utterly destroy Jerusalem according to Amos 9 which the book of Acts was quoting.

Then he's he's going to rebuild the physical house of David SO THAT the RESIDUE (remnant) and all the GENTILES upon whom his name is called might seek after the Lord. And he's going to call the Gentiles AFTER the times of the Gentiles are over.

Is this dispensational thinking in a nutshell or have I gotten something wrong?
Allowing the Jews back in in unbelief and unrepentance is against the very nature of God as spelled out in the bible.

Neh 1:9 But if ye turn unto me, and keep my commandments, and do them; though there were of you cast out unto the uttermost part of the heaven, yet will I gather them from thence, and will bring them unto the place that I have chosen to set my name there.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Okay let me try this approach:

IF prophecy is allegories and spiritual, HOW can anyone ever know when something has been fulfilled?

For example: If ALL EYES seeing Jesus return on the clouds with power and glory doesnt mean that all eyes are seeing Jesus returning on the clouds with power and glory, but instead means that a PAGAN ARMY (the romans) destroy Jerusalem, HOW can we ever know what any prophecy is saying?

You could make it say anything if it doesnt mean what it says. You guys understand that, right?

And one more point: Lets look at the FIRST COMING of Christ, the prophecies were fulfilled LITERALLY; Jesus actually rode a donkey, for example, it wasnt a spiritual donkey or fulfilled in any kind of way like that.
All eyes seeing Jesus return with clouds has nothing to do with AD 70, that happened when Christ resurrected with old testament saints. After all, he did say he would return BEFORE the disciples finished going over the cities of Israel.

He also said THIS GENERATION will not pass before he returned. The only figurative part of the verses you referenced are the clouds. Clouds in that particular case are the clouds of witnesses... the Old Testament saints.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
It most certainly was
We disagree again
Disagreeing is fine

But show me how it was a recovering. Since God left them in egypt. And had not yet even been to their land?


That should be easy if it is true

And then show me when all of the things spoken of in Is 11 occured/ Again should be easy if it hapened.
 

Ignorun

Active member
Dec 18, 2018
180
69
28
Hey guys!

It has been a while, but I am back on. I don’t really expect that I would be remember by any senior members here, since people come and go all of the time on this site. I haven’t been on here for several years now, but I went under the username Spokenpassage. Apparently my account was deleted due to inactivity, but I was able to set up my account again with the same email. Finding a username is not easy, I did like the other one, but I decided to be different. The first time I joined I was still near my mid-teens (2011), but now I am near my mid-twenties. The Lord has done a lot in my life throughout these years, I could not explain it in one post if I wanted to. Anyways, after praying a while about rejoining, I wanted to see what is up nowadays here. There have been a lot of people I personally met on here that seem completely gone, while I am still seeing others thriving in these discussions group (you know who you are). It is normal to see members and thread posts constantly debate about the law, end times, and the Trinity. It is like here things go on repeat, and I just don’t know how some of you who are still on here still do it. So this is a sort of introduction I suppose.

*to the point*

I want to have an honest, serious, discussion with knowledgeable brothers here about some subjects. If you deny that God is revealed in three distinct co-eternal, consubstantial, persons; or that we are not under the jurisdiction of the law, but have been washed and justified in the saving blood of Jesus Christ through faith by grace alone; that we all are condemned in connection to, and corrupt by transmission from, Adam’s first transgression in the garden; that God predestined some persons in Christ, for his glory and praise, before the foundation of the world was laid, and predestined the rest to be lost in their sin to eternal punishment; then I prefer that you don’t respond. A lack of acknowledging and trusting in these truths keep discussions from progressing anywhere in any place of theology. There are too many people out there who want to be teachers and tell people about what they think they know. Some here are continually promoting Mosaic Law keeping, which is insane still (with the exception of one particular brother here who does it because he simply wants to). Don’t you understand that the Mosaic Law was written to the nation of Israel for tenure in the land of their possession? It was never intended for the world to obey, it pertained to the conditional nature of Abraham’s promises and the arrival of the coming Messiah. The New Covenant, as the writer of Hebrews plainly states, is a newer and better covenant that promised better things and eternal realities, whereas the Old Covenant promised temporal promises and realities to a temporal nation for a temporal period until the Offspring would be born and redeem the elect of God from the creation to the last one who will be converted prior to the resurrection of the dead and the consummation of the kingdom on the new earth. Anyways…

I want an honest, serious, prayerful conversation on the issue of the modern state of Israel. What is your take on its existence? Is it biblical, is it not? Explain your reason, back it up with Scripture. This is not necessarily political question, and it is not so much of whether it is a settlement of land thief or that the government is maybe questionable in their control of the land. You can mention that if you want, but I am looking for a discussion on the statehood itself. Many say that this is the fulfillment of some prophecy, that God would bring the Jews back to the land of Canaan as their possession. Others see this as a fraud and a fake, that God had already finished his purpose with Israel a long time ago and that they no longer exist as a nation.

Now,

* Replacement Theology teaches that the Church replaced the nation of Israel (New Covenant replaces and abolishes the Old).

* Reformed Theology teaches that the Church is the eschatological and fulfillment of Israel (New Covenant is what the Old pointed to and foreshadowed).

Pointing that out there lest someone confuses two.

I am of the conviction that this is not biblical, this is not right, and that the fact that many Christians are supporting it is frightening. I can explain afterward.
The powers that be...Romans 13.
The state of Israel...physical.
The state of the soul...spiritual. That's of utmost importance.
 

GraceAndTruth

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2015
2,031
637
113
Disagreeing is fine

But show me how it was a recovering. Since God left them in egypt. And had not yet even been to their land?

That should be easy if it is true

And then show me when all of the things spoken of in Is 11 occured/ Again should be easy if it hapened.
sigh.....
Brought out of Egypt to Caanan, what is hard about that?
And God brought Israel out of Babylon after the 70yr captivity.

I looked at a footnote on this and it says the 1sr was the regathering of the Jews under Zerubbabel.
Do you prefer that? I don't, but immaterial.

Are you about the wording? Does "recover" have another meaning for you?

Why not just say what you think the 1st one was.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
Allowing the Jews back in in unbelief and unrepentance is against the very nature of God as spelled out in the bible.

Neh 1:9 But if ye turn unto me, and keep my commandments, and do them; though there were of you cast out unto the uttermost part of the heaven, yet will I gather them from thence, and will bring them unto the place that I have chosen to set my name there.
Don't they have to exist before they can "turn back" [Hebrew: shuv]... That's what it seems to me that Hosea 5:15-6:3 is saying; as well as its parallels Ezekiel 37:12-14,20-23 [dry bones prophecy; stand before "breath" etc]... and Daniel 12:1-4,10 [distinct from verse 13]... and Isaiah 26:16-21 [note "birth pangs"]... and Romans 11:15[25]… John 6:39 [distinct from v.40]… and others.