Music in Church?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JesusLives

Senior Member
Oct 11, 2013
14,551
2,173
113
At over 900 posts and no one has changed their mind - I guess I couldn't resist a little comic relief.....well mine anyway......It makes me want to post all I have learned on CC in the year plus I have been here......maybe I should start a new thread.....
 
S

Sirk

Guest
At over 900 posts and no one has changed their mind - I guess I couldn't resist a little comic relief.....well mine anyway......It makes me want to post all I have learned on CC in the year plus I have been here......maybe I should start a new thread.....
Many of the topics are pretty humorous. Kinda like how modern country music has become a silly characature of itself....so has the hair splitting in Christendom.
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
At over 900 posts and no one has changed their mind - I guess I couldn't resist a little comic relief.....well mine anyway......It makes me want to post all I have learned on CC in the year plus I have been here......maybe I should start a new thread.....
Goes to show me that online might not be worth engaging in to be quite truthful, nothing but arguments and divisions, I rarely change my mind anymore, and no one else changes theirs, why bother?

I'll be spending more of my time at recipe forums, and my husband so approved! lol

Ah... they do have that same onesupmanship there too (as to whom can cook better then whom) but its less nasty

I dont know what reason there is to partake of forums any longer, this is becoming a much larger question in my mind
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
As Seabass said in post 968, this thread should be more about the question, is IM a form of worship pleasing to God or man.

Because someone thinks their own doctrine is correct therefore the thread can die now, should rather spend their time in another thread.
Pleasing to God according to whom? Who defines obedience?

Does God bless and save souls in churches with musical instruments? Are souls blessed and drawn closer to Christ by musical instruments?

You guys are not going to convince anyone that you are right. Your credibility was destroyed long ago when you waffled on the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit and making salvation absolutely dependent on water baptism. Not to mention the eternal security of the believer in Christ. You guys talk about grace but it is hard to find any evidence that you know and have received biblically defined grace that only God can provide.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
yup.....and I am not getting sucked back in to this conversation..... as I imagine it as a conversation among mental hospital patients at a table in the cafeteria as Jeopardy plays on the tv in the background.
HAHHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHA cough cough cough HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHH now that was HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Alas it cannot be...The Holy Seventh Church of the Sacred Kazoo has been here since the oceans were made salty. Her sister church of the Holy Washboard is a little more progressive teaching a doctrine of weekly laundering of the soul.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Alas it cannot be...The Holy Seventh Church of the Sacred Kazoo has been here since the oceans were made salty. Her sister church of the Holy Washboard is a little more progressive teaching a doctrine of weekly laundering of the soul.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
LOL! Now that is FUNNY!!!
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
LOL! Now that is FUNNY!!!
I've heard rumors of a sect of whistlers infiltrating the church. They are neither voice nor instrument. What shall we do?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
S

Sirk

Guest
I've heard rumors of a sect of whistlers infiltrating the church. They are neither voice nor instrument. What shall we do?

For the cause of Christ
Roger

We must stone them!
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,093
1,756
113
SeaBass;1886609 The condition Eph 5 is that [B said:
everyone[/B] must sing to obey the command to be filled with the spirit. If one person (or group) sings and I do nothing, then not only am I not obeying the command to be filled with the spirit, I am not reciprocating the action. It's impossible to have just one person singing while everyone else does not and fulfill Eph 5:18,19.
The participle 'singing' is plural meaning all are to sing.
Again, that's just an assertion on your part. The sources you cited don't support your view. It would be hard to find a source that directly addresses that. I did ask a retired Greek professor who'd been reading Greek for decades about it. His understanding of the language is that individuals taking turns singing solos could also be described with the language in the passage.

If there are 20 people, and each sings a psalm, in turn, then they fulfill the requirement.

You are treating the passage as if it is something that each individual must obey every time there is a church gathering. The passage doesn't even specify a church meeting or say that every believer has to do this every time.

"speaking to yourselves" is reflexive where the subject does the action to himself, he sings to himself.
Sorry, bro. The word translated 'yourselves' is plural. I've got an interlinear open in another tab.

It is reciprocal meaning the action of singing is exchanged among people. So one not only sings to himself but also to others within the time frame of the song being sung. The language makes ALL participants, NONE are observers. Again, the command is to sing NOT to sit and listen.
Taking turns singing solos fits the bill.

But notice if you apply this legalistic reasoning that if it says sing, it can't mean something else, to listening, then you get a problem. Because we are to go to church and 'exhort one another.' So if we use your 'logic' then we are only allowed to exhort at church, but no one is allowed to listen to what other people are saying. Of course, there are scriptures that would imply that this interpretation is wrong. But the ones I'm thinking of have to do with prophecy, and they go against your church tradtion.

"Yourselves" is heautou not allelon.

Lk 2:15 " as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another (allelon)."

Allelon can give the idea one was speaking then another responded, each person speaking is a separate event.
Now prove that Heautou cannot. The Greek expert I conferred with disagreed.

Lk 23:28 "...but weep for yourselves (heautou)..."
Mt 3:9 "...And think not to say within yourselves (heautou).."


So you think if they aren't weeping at the same time, they aren't weeping? Or if they aren't saying within themselves at exactly the same time, they aren't saying wthin themselves?

It sounds like you are deadest on arriving at a certain conclusion when you read the Bible rather than approaching the Bible with an intention to study and learn what it says, at least on this issue.

{quote]
Heautou carries the idea of a collective action...not one weeps now and another weeps later and another weeps at some other time. Heautou in Eph 5:19 is collective in action...all sing collectively together, not one singing now, one singing later and another singing at some other time.
(Gene Frost)[/quote]

Are you quoting? You aren't using quotation marks, so I can't tell if you are citing or quoting or what.

1 Cor 14:26 you did not prove that this requires singing, it can be reading. You're making an assumption here so that argument fails for it is based upon an assumption.
Ephesians and Colossians speak of 'speaking to yourselves' in psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. So those verses don't mention singing either. Why do you allow singing in church at all? If something has to be specifically authorized in New Testament scripture (post Pentecost? Pre-book-of Revelation?) why allow any singing?

Your whole argument is based on the idea that something isn't allowed if it is not specifically authorized. (of course, suff your church does gets a free pass.) Where does New Testament scripture specifically authorize that doctrine? Or are you relying on Nadab and Abihu in the Old Testament, while forbidding going to the OT to legitimize instrumental music?

It is also assumed that the psalms were being sung/read solo.
That's because every 'one' of you hath a psalm. The passage is about individual activities. Do you think Paul is saying they should all speak in tongues at the same time? Btw, do you think the church should allow either scenario or just have the preacher preach?

As stated before 1 Cor 14:26 would not contradict Eph 5:18,19 that requires each person to sing in order to obey the command to be filled with the spirit.
You are the one creating the contradiction where it doesn't exist by assuming.
1. Ephesians 5 is exclusively about congregational singing.
2. That if Ephesians 5 is about or allows for congregational singing, that another verse can't allow for solos.

I get it. You probably go to a church that doesn't have solos and may teach against them. And you probably think your church has a good handle on the truth unlike other churches, and it's hard for you to think your church or church experience can be wrong or not portray the whole reality of New Testament church experience. That approach keeps a lot of people from believing and accepting what the Bible teaches on a number of issues.

Silence does forbid. In instituting the Lord's Supper, Christ was silent about milk and peanuts, so does His silence in forbidding such actually include them? Hardly.
Why would milk and peanuts be forbidden? You do know that Jews ate lamb or goat for the Passover don't you, along with other food. We don't take peanuts to remember the Lord's body, but why would it be a sin to eat them together during the love feast?

The law of inclusion and exclusion is used throughout the bible. The logic behind this means God did not have to make long list of things HE did not want, that is, God did not have to specifically forbid everything He did not want, He could just include what He did want and that excludes everything else. Example God told Noah to use gopher wood. The inclusion of that specific wood also excluded all other types woods that was not gopher. God did not have to make a long lists of all the wood He did not want, but just name the one He did want and that automatically excludes all other types of wood. The idea that if God did not specifically forbid it means it is allowable is a horribly bad argument.
We could ask the team who found that wood structure up on Ararat if there was any other wood. If Noah hammered on a cedar peg for a coat hanger, I wouldn't consider that a violation if he'd built the ark according to God's specs. Since God doesn't rebuke or punish Noah for violating his instructions, this isn't really a good example.

But I notice you feel free to go to the OT for this sort of thing and not for musical instruments. Why is that? You use the OT if it supports your church tradition, but not if it contradicts it.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
25,332
8,368
113
Goes to show me that online might not be worth engaging in to be quite truthful, nothing but arguments and divisions, I rarely change my mind anymore, and no one else changes theirs, why bother?

I'll be spending more of my time at recipe forums, and my husband so approved! lol

Ah... they do have that same onesupmanship there too (as to whom can cook better then whom) but its less nasty

I dont know what reason there is to partake of forums any longer, this is becoming a much larger question in my mind
Oh but the end result of that kind of oneupsmanship is better recipes and cooking all around! I am AAAAAAAALL for that! :D :D :D

So... when is dinner?
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
Oh but the end result of that kind of oneupsmanship is better recipes and cooking all around! I am AAAAAAAALL for that! :D :D :D

So... when is dinner?

Ha! Ya missed a good one (though I didnt cook it Texas road house did) hubby brought it home lol

I hear ya, that kind of competition will only make our meals better and my husband both fat and happier.

He would love it if I dropped the christian forums and go to the cooking forums, he believes he benefits from the other because Im always saying "hold on hon, let me just post this one post real quick" (he is always hearing that) so he playfully threatens to get a screen name and tell everyone at the board that Im not being subject to him lol By that he means when he snaps his fingers and jokes around for me to get with his program (second or third helpings LOL)

I can make you cookies Lynx, you just say the word and I'll make you a batch and send them out special for you, you like?

LOL
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Ha! Ya missed a good one (though I didnt cook it Texas road house did) hubby brought it home lol

I hear ya, that kind of competition will only make our meals better and my husband both fat and happier.

He would love it if I dropped the christian forums and go to the cooking forums, he believes he benefits from the other because Im always saying "hold on hon, let me just post this one post real quick" (he is always hearing that) so he playfully threatens to get a screen name and tell everyone at the board that Im not being subject to him lol By that he means when he snaps his fingers and jokes around for me to get with his program (second or third helpings LOL)

I can make you cookies Lynx, you just say the word and I'll make you a batch and send them out special for you, you like?

LOL
cookies!!!!
 
S

Sirk

Guest
K.....m&m cookies!
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
K.....m&m cookies!

LOL!! Settle it with Lynx and send me your addresses!

Just m&m cookies, thats so easy, how about whoopie pies or something like that lol

I can roll them in M&M's for ya
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
25,332
8,368
113
This is getting interesting. Can I trade you a loaf of whole wheat sourdough bread for a batch of whoopie pies? You do use cream cheese, right? Or maybe two or three loaves of bread, depending on the size of the pie batch...
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
This is getting interesting. Can I trade you a loaf of whole wheat sourdough bread for a batch of whoopie pies? You do use cream cheese, right? Or maybe two or three loaves of bread, depending on the size of the pie batch...
I wouldnt use cream cheese I dont think it would survive the trip, although I dont believe that is in my husbands recipe but they are still pretty good (says him).

I was never a whoopie pie person

Now, I would send them without any trades at all, and because you know fresh bread doesnt last that long

Lynx you make bread?! You bake?

Because I can send you a portion of my sanfrancisco sour dough starter, I have been feeding it for well over 6 months and its doing great.

I even have various vinegar mothers if you are interested if you like to make your own vinegars. I love doing that sort of stuff and I have way too many of them.

I'll send ya a care package lol Lots of weird stuff in a box hows that? lol
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
25,332
8,368
113
No thanks. I have my own starter in the fridge and I have no interest in making vinegar. But yes, I make sourdough bread. Usually in large (14-ish loaf) batches, then I freeze most of it. I live on the stuff. I haven't bought store "bread" in years. The "bread" in the store is spongy, floppy, gummy junk. Even the whole wheat "bread" has no crumb at all, much less a good crumb. I also make bread for various church bake sales and every Christmas I bake up a big lot to give to certain people at church who have said they like my bread.

The only way we could get this thread back on topic would be to bring up baking beans and tie in flatulence as "tooting" in church...
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
25,332
8,368
113
I did figure out how to ship sourdough starter though. Add flour to a bit of starter until it's about as thick as noodle dough. It'll survive until it reaches its destination. Have the recipient reconstitute it in a batch of sourdough starter food.